Fuel to Air India jet engines cut off moments before crash: Probe - International
The report, issued by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), did not offer any conclusions or apportion blame for the June 12 disaster, but indicated that one pilot asked the other why he cut off fuel, and the second pilot responded that he had not.
The Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner was headed from Ahmedabad in western India to London when it crashed, killing all but one of the 242 people on board as well as 19 people on the ground.
In its 15-page report, the investigation bureau said that once the aircraft achieved its top recorded speed, "the Engine 1 and Engine 2 fuel cutoff switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one after another with a time gap of 01 sec".
"In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why he cut off. The other pilot responded that he did not do so," it said.
The aircraft quickly began to lose altitude.
The switches then returned to the "RUN" position, and the engines appeared to be gathering power, but "one of the pilots transmitted 'MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY'", the report said.
Air traffic controllers asked the pilots what was wrong, but then saw the plane crashing and called emergency personnel to the scene.
Investigation ongoing
Earlier this week, specialist website The Air Current, citing multiple sources familiar with the probe, reported it had "narrowed its focus to the movement of the engine fuel switches", while noting that full analysis will "take months -- if not longer".
It added that "the focus of the investigators could change during that time".
The Indian agency's report said that the US Federal Aviation Administration had issued an information bulletin in 2018 about "the potential disengagement of the fuel control switch locking feature".
Though the concern was not considered an "unsafe condition" that would warrant a more serious directive, Air India told investigators it did not carry out suggested inspections as they were "advisory and not mandatory".
Air India was compliant with all airworthiness directives and alert service bulletins on the aircraft, the report said.
The investigations bureau said there were "no recommended actions to B787-8 and/or GE GEnx-1B engine operators and manufacturers", suggesting no technical issues with the engines (GE) or the aircraft (Boeing).
The bureau said the investigation was ongoing, and that additional evidence and information had been "sought from the stakeholders".
Boeing said in a statement it will "continue to support the investigation and our customer", adding "our thoughts remain" with those affected by the disaster.
Air India said it was "working closely with stakeholders, including regulators."
"We continue to fully cooperate with the AAIB and other authorities as their investigation progresses," it said in a statement on X.
The UN's International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) stipulates that states heading an investigation must submit a preliminary report within 30 days of an accident.
US and British air accident investigators have taken part in the probe.
The plane was carrying 230 passengers -- 169 Indians, 53 British, seven Portuguese and a Canadian -- along with 12 crew members.
Dozens of people on the ground were injured.
One passenger miraculously survived, a British citizen who was seen walking out of the wreckage of the crash, and who has since been discharged from the hospital.
Health officials in the Indian state of Gujarat initially said at least 279 people were killed, but forensic scientists reduced the figure after multiple scattered and badly burnt remains were identified.
Follow us on:
Short link:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Copts Today
14-07-2025
- Copts Today
Why Being Single in India Still Feels Like a Defect, Not a Choice
There is a quiet tension at family lunches or even in office chats that moment someone leans in and asks, Still single? Its not quite an accusation, but it isnt harmless either. In India, singlehood isnt just a phase; its a pause people expect you to fast-forward. No matter your success or contentment, theres a quiet judgment like playing a balloon game online, where pressure builds with each round until something has to pop. Why is choosing to be single still seen as unfinished living? Take It Apart One Belief at a Time The stigma around singlehood comes from quiet, inherited beliefs. They define how youre seen, how youre judged, and even how you see yourself. Loneliness is part of the human condition, not something caused by being single. Still, the idea lingers: if youre not in a relationship, you must be eating alone, watching Netflix in silence, and crying on Sundays. But many single people have rich, connected lives. They form close friendships and build strong support systems outside of romance. Marriage doesnt solve loneliness, and its no guarantee of emotional closeness. Many married people feel deeply alone. Emotional distance, mismatched values, or simply growing apart can make life lonelier than being on your own. Being single doesnt mean youre lonely and being partnered doesnt mean youre fulfilled. Something Must Be Wrong With You This one cuts deep. Youre not married? People assume youre too demanding, too ambitious, too emotional or not emotional enough. Theres a quiet accusation buried in the question. No one says it outright, but it lingers. In Indian society, marriage is treated as so basic, so expected, that being unmarried feels like a flaw. It leaves no room for timing, choice, or the decision to focus on healing, growth, or your career. A person without a car isnt automatically seen as unable to afford one. But with singlehood, the assumption flips if youre not married, people often believe you werent good enough for it. Thats not logic; its social gaslighting. Its Just a Phase The temporary glitch. The waiting period. As if being single is simply a layover before life begins. Youre told to hang in there keep swiping, keep meeting people, keep adjusting. The right one will come along. That advice might sound comforting, but it carries a quiet expectation: that everyone should want marriage. Some people are single by chance, others by choice. Either way, its not a flaw or a placeholder. Its a life fully underway not on pause. The Reality Check: What the Data Says India is changing slowly, but surely. According to Census and National Family Health Survey data, the average age of marriage has been climbing for years. More men and women are staying single into their late 20s and 30s, especially in urban areas. Marriage rates are declining in major metros, and the number of people choosing live-in relationships or delaying marriage for personal or professional reasons is growing. Even in Tier 2 cities, the landscape is shifting. Yet public attitudes remain stuck in a different decade. People assume marriage is a default setting, not a conscious decision. Data may say one thing, but dinner-table conversations often say something else entirely. Media Mirror: What You Watch vs What You Live Pop culture tells you what to desire. And in India, marriage is still sold as the final prize. Just look at the stories youre offered: Bollywood dramas still revolve around shaadis and soulmates TV serials reduce unmarried women to sad tropes or wicked villains Reality shows center on arranged love stories Matrimonial ads dress up caste and class filters as preferences Instagram weddings flood your feed like milestones youve somehow missed. There are exceptions films and series that show independence or the choice to stay single. But those stories dont reflect the norm. They stand out because they rebel against it. A Shift in the Wind More people now speak openly about therapy, mental health, and boundaries. Urban singles focus on building full lives on their own terms. Friends become chosen families. Peace matters more than ticking boxes. Still, the stigma remains. Parents worry. Society watches. Even when you are content, you are treated like you are waiting for something more. Singlehood does not need an excuse. It deserves space of its own.
Egypt Independent
13-07-2025
- Egypt Independent
Air India crash report answers one question
CNN — An official report on the world's deadliest aviation accident in a decade has answered one key question – but raised others. Air India flight AI171 had barely left the runway last month when it lost momentum and crashed in a densely populated area of India's western city of Ahmedabad, killing all but one of the 242 people on board and 19 others on the ground. Now, a preliminary report by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has revealed that fuel supply to both engines was cut in the crucial minutes as the aircraft was ascending. The plane's 'black box,' its flight data recorder, showed that the aircraft had reached an airspeed of 180 knots when both engines' fuel switches were 'transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one,' the report says. The switches were flipped within a second of each other, halting the flow of fuel. On an audio recording from the black box, mentioned in the report, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why he flipped the switches. The other pilot responds that he did not do so. The report does not specify who was the pilot and who was the co-pilot in the dialogue. Seconds later, the switches on the Boeing 787 Dreamliner were flipped the other way to turn the fuel supply back on. Both engines were able to relight, and one began to 'progress to recovery,' the report said, but it was too late to stop the plane's gut-wrenching descent. The report reveals the fundamental reason why the jet crashed, but much remains unexplained. From RUN to CUTOFF – but how? The findings do not make clear how the fuel switches were flipped to the cutoff position during the flight, whether it was deliberate, accidental or if a technical fault was responsible. On Boeing's 787 Dreamliners, the fuel switches are between the two pilots' seats, immediately behind the plane's throttle levers. They are protected on the sides by a metal bar. The switches require an operator to physically lift the switch handle up and over a detent – a catch – as they are deliberately designed so they can't be knocked accidentally. Geoffrey Dell, an air safety specialist who has conducted numerous aircraft accident investigations, finds it hard to see how both switches could have been flipped in error. 'It's at least a two-action process for each one,' he told CNN. 'You've got to pull the switch out towards you and then push it down. It's not the sort of thing you can do inadvertently.' According to Dell, it would be 'bizarre' for a pilot to deliberately cut fuel to both engines immediately after take-off. There is 'no scenario on the planet where you'd do that immediately after lift-off,' he said. Pointing to the fact that both engine switches were flipped within a second of each other, Dell noted: 'That's the sort of thing you do when you park the airplane at the end of the flight… You plug into the terminal and shut the engines down.' One possibility the report raises relates to an information bulletin issued by the US Federal Aviation Administration in 2018 about 'the potential disengagement of the fuel control switch locking feature.' But, given that this was not considered an unsafe condition, Air India did not carry out inspections. Dell said an aircraft's flight data recorder should help explain how the fuel switches were flipped in each case. However, India's AAIB has not released a full transcript of the conversation between the two pilots. Without it, Dell says it's difficult to understand what happened. Rescue workers at the site where the Air India plane crashed. Amit Dave/Reuters Former pilot Ehsan Khalid also believes that the report's findings raised questions over the position of the vital engine fuel switches, which, he said, should be clarified by the investigators. Speaking to Reuters, Khalid warned against pinning the blame on the pilots. 'The AAIB report to me is only conclusive to say that the accident happened because both engines lost power.' He added: 'The pilots were aware that the aircraft engine power has been lost, and pilots also were aware that they did not do any action to cause this.' A full report is not due for months and India's Civil Aviation Minister, Ram Mohan Naidu, said: 'Let's not jump to any conclusions at this stage.' The Air India jet took off from Ahmedabad's Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport in India's western state of Gujarat on June 12, bound for London Gatwick. Air India had said 242 passengers and crew members were on board. That included 169 Indian nationals, 53 Britons, seven Portuguese and one Canadian. Everyone on board was killed, except for one passenger. The 19 people on the ground were killed when the plane crashed into the BJ Medical College and Hospital hostel. Air India has acknowledged that it has received the report and said it will continue cooperating with authorities in the investigation.
Al-Ahram Weekly
12-07-2025
- Al-Ahram Weekly
Fuel to Air India jet engines cut off moments before crash: Probe - International
Fuel control switches to the engines of an Air India flight that crashed shortly after takeoff, killing 260 people, were moved from the "run" to the "cutoff" position moments before impact, a preliminary investigation report said early Saturday. The report, issued by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), did not offer any conclusions or apportion blame for the June 12 disaster, but indicated that one pilot asked the other why he cut off fuel, and the second pilot responded that he had not. The Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner was headed from Ahmedabad in western India to London when it crashed, killing all but one of the 242 people on board as well as 19 people on the ground. In its 15-page report, the investigation bureau said that once the aircraft achieved its top recorded speed, "the Engine 1 and Engine 2 fuel cutoff switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one after another with a time gap of 01 sec". "In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why he cut off. The other pilot responded that he did not do so," it said. The aircraft quickly began to lose altitude. The switches then returned to the "RUN" position, and the engines appeared to be gathering power, but "one of the pilots transmitted 'MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY'", the report said. Air traffic controllers asked the pilots what was wrong, but then saw the plane crashing and called emergency personnel to the scene. Investigation ongoing Earlier this week, specialist website The Air Current, citing multiple sources familiar with the probe, reported it had "narrowed its focus to the movement of the engine fuel switches", while noting that full analysis will "take months -- if not longer". It added that "the focus of the investigators could change during that time". The Indian agency's report said that the US Federal Aviation Administration had issued an information bulletin in 2018 about "the potential disengagement of the fuel control switch locking feature". Though the concern was not considered an "unsafe condition" that would warrant a more serious directive, Air India told investigators it did not carry out suggested inspections as they were "advisory and not mandatory". Air India was compliant with all airworthiness directives and alert service bulletins on the aircraft, the report said. The investigations bureau said there were "no recommended actions to B787-8 and/or GE GEnx-1B engine operators and manufacturers", suggesting no technical issues with the engines (GE) or the aircraft (Boeing). The bureau said the investigation was ongoing, and that additional evidence and information had been "sought from the stakeholders". Boeing said in a statement it will "continue to support the investigation and our customer", adding "our thoughts remain" with those affected by the disaster. Air India said it was "working closely with stakeholders, including regulators." "We continue to fully cooperate with the AAIB and other authorities as their investigation progresses," it said in a statement on X. The UN's International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) stipulates that states heading an investigation must submit a preliminary report within 30 days of an accident. US and British air accident investigators have taken part in the probe. The plane was carrying 230 passengers -- 169 Indians, 53 British, seven Portuguese and a Canadian -- along with 12 crew members. Dozens of people on the ground were injured. One passenger miraculously survived, a British citizen who was seen walking out of the wreckage of the crash, and who has since been discharged from the hospital. Health officials in the Indian state of Gujarat initially said at least 279 people were killed, but forensic scientists reduced the figure after multiple scattered and badly burnt remains were identified. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
