State regulators should push Georgia Power to mothball coal, methane energy sources
Georgia Power uses methane gas to generate electricity at Plant Yates in Newnan. Grant Blankenship/GPB
The Public Service Commission's mission statement says that it is supposed to ensure that Georgians have safe, reliable, and reasonably priced electricity. To be honest, natural (methane) gas and coal and any combustion fuel are neither safe nor reasonable cost. Methane gas is not actually natural, it is a fossil fuel just as coal and oil are fossil fuels. There is an entire scientific article in the prestigious medical journal, the New England Journal of Medicine, titled 'The False Promise of Natural Gas.' This scientific article describes many of the health harms caused by natural methane gas, from production to pipelines to end use in power plants or homes. These health harms include exposure to carcinogens, air and water pollution, earthquakes, pipeline and other facility explosions, and climate change.
We know that both coal and methane gas power plants produce many kinds of air pollution, including fine particles (PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and volatile organic compounds or VOCs. Some of these pollutants are precursors for ozone, which is created every day from a chemical reaction in the air between air pollution and sunlight. In addition, there are contaminants in both coal and natural gas that affect our health. Coal contaminants include many heavy metals, including lead, mercury, and arsenic, among others. Natural (methane) gas has benzene and other cyclic aromatics. All of these kinds of pollution and contaminants harm our health and damage our economy.
In the U.S., PM2.5 from fossil fuels causes 13% of all deaths, and NO2 from burning fossil fuels causes 1.6% of all deaths. Ozone causes even more deaths, and is known to cause as much progression of emphysema as smoking a pack of cigarettes every day. Ozone also triggers asthma and COPD exacerbations. In the Southeast, all of the kinds of air pollution made by coal and gas power plants put people in the hospital.
Recently, we have learned that PM2.5 damages children's IQ, from exposure during the prenatal period through the childhood years. We know that children exposed to air pollution are more likely to have mental health problems too, either within a few days of a PM2.5 spike or even eight years after exposure to NO2 or PM2.5. We know that the kinds of air pollution that coal and methane gas power plants produce will trigger asthma attacks and can cause children to develop asthma. And we have learned that giving air filters to pregnant women who live in polluted cities improves their children's IQ 4 years AFTER the children are born.
In California, when coal plants closed, the rate of preterm births for those who lived near the coal plants went down by over 25%.
Here in Georgia, more than two-thirds of our rivers and large lakes are contaminated with mercury to the point that the Department of Natural Resources has to publish guidelines every year about which fish need to have limited consumption, because the fish are contaminated with mercury. The vast majority of that mercury came from coal-fired power plants.
These are some of the reasons that it is clear that both coal and natural gas are not safe sources of fuel. The PSC needs to be true to its mission, and encourage safer sources of electricity production.
In addition, even though Lazard's Levelized Cost of Energy (an energy cost analysis) shows that methane combined cycle and utility scale solar with storage appear to be in the same price range, this ignores the economic harms of reduced crop yields, work absences, and lower work productivity caused by fossil fuels, and also the enormous health costs of all the health damage from both coal and methane. Therefore it is also clear that both methane and coal are not reasonably priced, the stated costs are artificially low because they don't include the enormous economic and health damages. It is massive cost-shifting, and Georgia residents are paying with increased taxes, increased health insurance premiums, and with our own lives.
However, it's not all doom and gloom. There is a good solution: we can have abundant affordable electricity without all the health and economic damages. It sounds like pie-in-the-sky, but it's true. Solar with storage is in the same price range as methane gas combined cycle, and wind with storage is less expensive. And both are quicker to build than a new gas turbine power plant. The PSC should require Georgia Power to have much more solar with storage and much less health-damaging methane and coal.
And just this week, news came out that Georgia Power will be asking to recover costs from Hurricane Helene next year. Many scientists have shown that Hurricane Helene was more damaging and carried more moisture because of climate change. Yet, while Georgia Power is asking to recover costs of damages from a climate change enhanced hurricane, they are at the same time asking to build new natural gas power plants that will make climate change worse. It doesn't make sense, especially when we know that for about the same cost they could build solar with storage and stop making climate change worse.
Georgia has abundant sunshine that is more direct than in much of the United States. It is an abundant natural resource we can easily use without hurting people's health or hurting our crop yields. Georgia power has abundant opportunity for utility scale solar with storage, which is the safest and most reasonable cost form of electricity that there is.
The bottom line is this: air pollution is so bad for our health and economy, that you don't have to care about climate to want clean energy. Solar is one of Georgia's most abundant natural resources. The PSC should be true to its mission and require Georgia Power to use more solar and wind energy with storage so that we have safe, affordable, and reliable energy.
If you want to comment on Georgia Power's energy plan, you can use this link, or go to the PSC comment form and use Docket Number 56002, Agenda Item 'Georgia Power Company's 2025 Integrated Resource Plan', and the hearing date May 27, 2025. Please make your comment before the hearing.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Bookman: There's no way to cut $800 billion from Medicaid without hitting bone
Opinion writer Jay Bookman argues that Trump administration officials are being dishonest when they say cuts to Medicaid won't lead to people losing benefits. the_burtons/Getty Images After repeatedly promising on the campaign trail that he would never cut Medicaid benefits, Donald Trump is pushing a 'big, beautiful' spending bill that would slash Medicaid and other health care spending by $800 billion over the next decade. And if you still believe the administration, they're going to make those cuts without anyone losing benefits. As White House official Russell Vought put in last week, 'This bill will preserve and protect the programs, the social safety net, but it will make it much more common sense. No one will lose coverage as a result.' If your BS detector isn't ringing by now, you need to take it in for repair. Confronted with the absurdity of claiming that you can cut $800 billion without canceling health care coverage, Trump officials retreat to their fallback position. Yes, they admit, they'll be cutting benefits, but only for those who don't deserve it. 'Medicaid does not belong to people who are here illegally, and it does not belong to capable and able-bodied men who refuse to work,' another White House official told Politico. 'So no one is getting cut.' Once again, though, your BS detector ought to be blaring. Under existing federal law, undocumented immigrants are already barred from getting Medicaid. They're promising to cut benefits to people who are already not getting those benefits. So no savings there. And the truth is, most of the able-bodied men who are too lazy to work are also too lazy to worry about jumping through the hoops needed to get Medicaid health-care coverage. Such men do exist, no doubt, but in numbers far too small to generate $800 billion in savings. To get savings on that scale, you have to look elsewhere. And the truth is that millions of lower-income Americans, many of them working people, would be stripped of their health insurance if the bill becomes law. In Georgia alone, the projections are that as many as 200,000 people would lose coverage. And because Medicaid plays a larger health care role in rural communities, where the population is older and private sector jobs less likely to offer health insurance, the impact would be greater in those areas, putting additional financial strain on rural hospitals and health-care providers already struggling to stay open. (If Congress also refuses to extend subsidies for the Affordable Care Act later this year, as seems likely, the total number of Georgians who lose health insurance could top 700,000.) And no, the money saved by such measures would not be used to reduce the nation's deficit. It would instead be used to finance tax cuts, the overwhelming majority of which would benefit the wealthy. A big chunk of the projected savings, an estimated $280 billion, would come from instituting work requirements for Medicaid recipients. The model for that nationwide requirement is supposedly the Pathways program instituted here in Georgia in 2020 by Gov. Brian Kemp. By most measures, however, that program has proved a massive disappointment. According to the original projections by the Kemp administration, some 25,000 low-wage Georgians should have been enrolled in Medicaid through the program in its first year of operation. The actual number was 4,300. By the end of its second year of operation, which comes next month, total enrollment was projected to be almost 50,000. As of April 25, it was 7,400, according to reporting by ProPublica and The Current. The monthly reporting requirements, record-keeping and bureaucratic red tape proved so discouraging that many Georgia applicants gave up in frustration, choosing instead to take the risk that they would not need coverage. If it seems odd that such a program would be embraced as a model by the GOP, it might be a matter of perspective. It might be that your idea of a failure is somebody else's idea of a success, because the two of you have different goals in mind. In this case, if your goal is to provide at least a bare-bones health insurance plan to lower-income Americans, then Georgia's Pathways program has failed. However, if your goal is to discourage and obstruct as many Americans as possible from participating in that coverage, because you want to generate $800 billion in savings so the rich can get more tax cuts, then it starts to look a whole lot better. Those yachts aren't going to buy themselves. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
State Rep. Derrick Jackson launching bid to be Georgia's next governor
The Brief State Rep. Derrick Jackson plans to launch his campaign to become the Democratic gubernatorial nominee in 2026. The metro Atlanta lawmaker and Navy veteran joins former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms, Atlanta state Sen. Jason Esteves and Atlanta pastor Olu Brown in the Democratic primary. Jackson says that he wants to expanded access to medical care and repeal the state's abortion law. ATLANTA - State Rep. Derrick Jackson is the latest Democrat to join the race to succeed Brian Kemp as Georgia's next governor. The metro Atlanta lawmaker plans to launch his campaign on Friday, joining three other Democrats in a race without a clear frontrunner after two high-profile candidates decided not to run. What they're saying Jackson, a former marketing executive with General Electric, was elected to the state House in 2016. Speaking to the Associated Press, the U.S. Navy veteran said he would "put Georgia families first," in part by expanding access to medical care and economic opportunities in rural areas. "My Republican friends love to tout Georgia as the number one state to do business, but I'm going to campaign on making Georgia the number one place to work, to play, to have a family and for young professionals to realize that regardless of which of the 159 counties they live in, there's going to be opportunity there," Jackson said. Inspired by civil rights icon John Lewis, Jackson said he has a "moral obligation" to run because he saw state and federal policies that were "not right, not fair, not just." He wants to help Georgians who could be impacted by President Donald Trump's sweeping bill that Jackson said "will devastate a lot of families" with provisions such as cuts to Medicaid funds. He said he plans to push for stricter gun regulations and to repeal Georgia's abortion law, which took effect in 2022 and effectively prohibited abortions beyond about six weeks of pregnancy. Dig deeper Jackson will join former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms, Atlanta state Sen. Jason Esteves and Atlanta pastor Olu Brown in the Democratic primary. They will compete for the Democratic nomination in the race to replace Republican Gov. Brian Kemp, who was limited to two terms in office. Democrat Stacey Abrams, who ran and lost to Kemp in 2018 and 2022, has not closed the door on a third run. Jackson finished sixth in the Democratic primary for lieutenant governor in 2022. After losing, he was reelected to the House in 2023 following the death of state Rep. Tish Naghise. He was defeated last year by Rep. Carolyn Hugley after running for House minority leader. Despite past losses, Jackson said his experience campaigning for statewide office will help him pull ahead of his competitors. U.S. Rep. Lucy McBath, once the expected frontrunner known for her gun control advocacy, announced in March she wasn't running because she needed to focus on her husband's health after complications from cancer surgery. Former state Sen. Jason Carter, former President Jimmy Carter's moderate grandson and the Democrats' 2014 nominee for governor, said he would not run because his wife was diagnosed with cancer. On the Republican side, Attorney General Chris Carr is the only candidate who has declared so far. Other high-profile Republicans, including Lt. Gov. Burt Jones and Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, could eventually announce plans to run. The Source Information for this story came from an interview with state Rep. Derrick Jackson by the Associated Press and previous FOX 5 reporting.
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Is Georgia losing OB-GYNs because of the state's abortion law? Here's what we found
It's a decision some Georgia OB-GYNs are making since the passing of Georgia's six-week abortion ban. Dr. Ash Panakam, a Georgia native, told Channel 2 investigative reporter Ashli Lincoln that she decided to do her residency to become an OB-GYN in Pittsburgh instead of Atlanta. 'And I felt like I was letting a lot of people making that choice not to come back,' she told Lincoln. Panakam said her decision to not practice medicine in Georgia wasn't political, but rather where she would get the most comprehensive training. 'These restrictions are affecting our ability to get necessary training,' Panakam said. Doctors with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists were surveyed across the state. TRENDING STORIES: Chase in DeKalb ends in serious crash, blocks traffic on Peachtree Ind Blvd by I-285 ramp Man sentenced for kidnapping, raping woman in DeKalb nearly 40 years ago Atlanta Public Schools approves new $1.3 billion budget, will cut 135 positions Some key findings include doctors fearing prosecution for treating pregnancy-related emergencies, doctors leaving Georgia, and some said they've stopped practicing altogether. 'Now we're hearing from these doctors that they're thinking about stopping the practice of medicine in Georgia,' U.S. Senator Jon Ossoff said. Ossoff launched a federal inquiry into the impacts the abortion ban is having on medical care earlier this year. 'I continue to call on the state legislature to repeal this extreme abortion ban,' Ossoff told Lincoln. State Sen. Ed Setzler, who sponsored Georgia's Heartbeat Abortion Bill, sent Channel 2 Action News a statement, saying: 'The twin sisters ACOG and Planned Parenthood are the two most activist, proabortion lobbyist groups in the entire nation. ACOG members killed more than 60 million helpless human children through legalized abortion between 1973 and 2022 and are as mad as a hornet that their killing spree, focused on low-income minority children, has been slowed down by Georgia's thoughtful, balanced heartbeat law. Jon Ossoff, who sadly believes in very little, is using OCOG abortion doctors to wage a doubt campaign that is carefully calculated to confuse Georgians into doubting our heartbeat law, when what they really want is to make killing healthy children through all 40 weeks of pregnancy legal once again.' The Association of American Medical Colleges reported in 2024 that applicants to OB-GYN residency programs in abortion banned states dropped by 6.7%, compared to 0.4% increase in states where abortion is legal.