logo
Attorneys: New test results over 'forever chemicals' in North Georgia water systems 'alarming'

Attorneys: New test results over 'forever chemicals' in North Georgia water systems 'alarming'

Yahoo11-06-2025
The Brief
Activist Erin Brockovich is heading to two town halls in Chatsworth and Calhoun this week to discuss the possible dangers of "forever chemicals."
Studies of lab animals have found potential links between PFAS chemicals and some cancers, including kidney and testicular, plus issues such as high blood pressure and low birth weight.
Last month, the Environmental Protection Agency said that it plans to weaken limits on some "forever chemicals" in drinking water put in place during the Biden administration.
CALHOUN, Ga. - The activist whose fight against a power company played out on the big screen is lending her star power in a battle over possible chemical contamination in Georgia.
Erin Brockovich is heading to two town halls in Chatsworth and Calhoun this week to discuss the possible dangers of "forever chemicals."
The backstory
The synthetic compounds known collectively as polyfluorinated alkyl substances, or PFAS, have contaminated drinking water to varying extents in many large cities and small towns as well as private wells and public systems.
Last year, the Environmental Protection Agency reported that more than 1 million Georgians may have been exposed to the chemicals.
The compounds are widespread, don't degrade in the environment and have been around for decades. They've been used in nonstick pans, food packaging and firefighting foam. Their use is now mostly phased out in the U.S., but some remain.
Studies of lab animals have found potential links between PFAS chemicals and some cancers, including kidney and testicular, plus issues such as high blood pressure and low birth weight.
In 2024, the Southern Environmental Law Center filed a lawsuit in federal district court against the city of Calhoun and another defendant on behalf of the Coosa River Basin Initiative (CRBI) over reported PFAS pollution. That lawsuit has since been settled, with the city agreeing to overhaul its wastewater "pretreatment program" to make sure it regulates PFAS and to investigate its residential drinking water wells.
By the numbers
According to a map from USA Today using data from the EPA and SimpleLab, a water testing company, Georgia's highest numbers were found in the Augusta area at 1175% over the EPA's minimum reporting levels, Calhoun at around 625%, and Morrow at 112.5%.
Big picture view
Last month, the Environmental Protection Agency said that it plans to weaken limits on some "forever chemicals" in drinking water put in place during the Biden administration.
Limits on three types of PFAS, including what are known as GenX substances found in North Carolina, will be scrapped and reconsidered by the agency, as will a limit on a mixture of several types of PFAS.
The Biden administration's rule also set standards for the two common types of PFAS, referred to as PFOA and PFOS, at 4 parts per trillion, effectively the lowest level at which they can be reliably detected. The EPA will keep those standards, but give utilities two extra years — until 2031 — to comply.
What they're saying
The PFAS Georgia team, Brockovitch and water expert Bob Bowcock say they will announce new findings from water, soil, and dust tests in Chatsworth and Calhoun. Georgia on Thursday and Friday.
In a press release announcing the town halls, the group described the results of their testing as "alarming."
They will also announce updates on pending lawsuits connected to PFAS contamination.
The meetings will be Thursday at 6 p.m. at The Cloer Bar on 3rd Avenue in Chatsworth and Friday at 6 p.m. at The Spot 365, on South Industrial Boulevard in Calhoun.
The Source
Information for this report came from a release by PFAS Georgia, previous FOX 5 reporting, a map from USA Today and SimpleLab, and the Associated Press.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Newsmax agrees to $67 million settlement with Dominion over 2020 voter fraud claims
Newsmax agrees to $67 million settlement with Dominion over 2020 voter fraud claims

The Hill

time14 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Newsmax agrees to $67 million settlement with Dominion over 2020 voter fraud claims

Newsmax, the conservative cable news channel loyal to President Trump, has agreed to pay Dominion Voting Systems $67 million to settle a lawsuit it brought against the network over its coverage of the 2020 election. Dominion sued Newsmax in 2021 over a series of false claims alleging the company's machines were manipulated to swing votes in former President Biden's favor and against Trump in the 2020 election. A judge in Delaware ruled in April the statements made on Newsmax's air were defamatory, but a trial in the case was delayed for months. The channel said on Monday the settlement amount will be paid out in installments over three fiscal years, which it 'expects to fund through revenues.' 'Newsmax believed it was critically important for the American people to hear both sides of the election disputes that arose in 2020,' the network said in a statement it published on its website on Monday. 'We stand by our coverage as fair, balanced, and conducted within professional standards of journalism.' Newsmax, a smaller conservative media channel featuring a bevy of pro-Trump hosts, gained notoriety after the 2020 election after it was promoted by the president for its coverage his false claims of widespread voter fraud and the coronavirus pandemic. Dominion was paid a separate settlement in 2023 by Fox News, which it also sued over that network's coverage of the 2020 election and Trump's claims of voter fraud.

Joe Biden threw open the border to rig the census — and elections for Democrats
Joe Biden threw open the border to rig the census — and elections for Democrats

New York Post

time44 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Joe Biden threw open the border to rig the census — and elections for Democrats

We know that the Biden administration deliberately broke the border and ushered in over 20 million illegal aliens, at a huge cost to the nation's social welfare system, and with a reckless disregard for potential criminality and terrorism. Exactly why they did it has always been the burning question. A new Rasmussen poll gives us a clue. It's the census. Advertisement There is mounting evidence that the Biden administration tried to cook the books to give Democrats an unfair advantage, which explains why a minority of Democrats (43% compared to 83% Republicans) approve of President Trump's decision to take a new census that excludes illegal aliens from the population count. Illegal migrants have always been included in the census, so blue states like California, Texas, New York and New Jersey, that bore the brunt of Biden's influx, get increased representation, which means more Congressional seats for Democrats, more Electoral College votes for Democrats, and more funding for Democrats. Meanwhile, Democrat proxy-NGOs, not to mention federal agencies under Biden, like FEMA, were registering them to vote, even though they are not eligible. That's why Democrats fought tooth and nail to prevent voter ID so that ineligible non-citizens could vote. Further down the track, they figured that amnesty would net them tens of millions of new Democrat voters — at least for a generation or so. Advertisement But that was just the icing on the cake. The census was the immediate payoff, and they didn't care how many illegal aliens raped, murdered, robbed, or extorted American citizens. They didn't care that the social safety net in cities like New York was collapsing under the weight of all these new supplicants. Slave labor wages that undercut American workers only make sense if the state picks up the cost of room and board and health care for the slaves. It was the Census that would give Democrats more power, and in April 2021, when Biden Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo announced the 2020 Census results, we started to see 'errors' that mostly only went one way. Red states like Florida, Texas, Mississippi, Arkansas, and Tennessee were undercounted while blue states like New York, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Minnesota, and Joe Biden's home state of Delaware had overcounts, skewing political representation and funding allocation. Advertisement 'The miscounts … particularly given that overrepresentation appears to have tended to noticeably skew in favor of one political party over another, demands additional scrutiny of potential political influence by the Biden-Harris Administration or other deficiencies that would explain these errors,' House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer wrote in a letter to the Census Bureau last year. Get Miranda's latest take Sign up for Devine Online, the newsletter from Miranda Devine Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Want even more news? Check out more newsletters Rasmussen teased out public attitudes to these 'errors' with a poll of 1,184 likely voters conducted on August 11-13. Just 37% of Democrats said illegal migrants should not be counted in the census, while 49% said they should, and 13% weren't sure. By contrast, 65% of Republicans wanted illegal immigrants excluded, while a mystifying 29% wanted them to be counted. Advertisement On the question of Trump ordering up a new census to replace the error-ridden 2020 pandemic version, 57% of voters approved while 34% disapproved. Of those, a whopping 83% of Republicans were in favor compared to 43% of Democrats. The fact is, even before Comer conducts his investigation, before all the evidence is in, Democrat voters instinctively know that the census hoax benefited their side.

Trial of Hong Kong press mogul Jimmy Lai resumes closing arguments
Trial of Hong Kong press mogul Jimmy Lai resumes closing arguments

UPI

time2 hours ago

  • UPI

Trial of Hong Kong press mogul Jimmy Lai resumes closing arguments

Sebastien Lai, son of imprisoned Hong Kong media publisher Jimmy Lai, showed a picture of his father, at the European headquarters of the United Nations in Geneva in February. Lai's trial resumed Monday after pausing Friday for Lai's heart issues. File Photo by Salvatore Di Nolfi/EPA Aug. 18 (UPI) -- A court in Hong Kong resumed closing arguments in the criminal trial of media mogul Jimmy Lai on charges of sedition and collusion with foreign powers. The trial had paused Friday because Lai, 77, was having heart issues. Lai was given medication and a Holter monitor, which tracks the heart's electrical activity. The trial had also been delayed Thursday because of torrential rain in the city. Judge Esther Toh said extra breaks could be allowed for Lai if needed. Lai, a citizen of the United Kingdom, founded Apple Daily, a Chinese-language newspaper published in Hong Kong from 1995 to 2021. The tabloid has been described as anti-government, pro-democracy and anti-China. He is accused of collusion with foreign forces and sedition. He has been in solitary confinement since December 2020. He faces life in prison. Prosecutors have accused Lai of requesting foreign countries to engage in "hostile activities," such as imposing sanctions, against authorities in Hong Kong and mainland China. He allegedly conspired with senior editorial staff of Apple Daily and was the "mastermind and financial supporter" of the Fight for Freedom; Stand with Hong Kong advocacy group, which lobbied for international sanctions against Hong Kong and China. Lai denied in court that he had ever sought to influence the Hong Kong policies of other countries via his high-level contacts overseas, including former U.S. Vice President Mike Pence and former Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen. Questioned about meetings with Pence and then-U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in 2019, Lai said the meeting with Pence was more of a briefing where he updated him and answered questions about what was going on in Hong Kong Lai, who was noticeably thinner Monday than when the trial began in late 2023, was dressed in a white jacket in the glass dock and pressed his palms together in a prayer gesture several times to his family and supporters, the Independent reported. The prosecutor discussed the security law concerning the collusion charges, arguing that the request to impose sanctions must include officials and not just states. He planned to lay out other issues in the afternoon and make his closing statement on Tuesday. Lai is among hundreds of people who have been detained and charged under the controversial National Security Law, which critics say have silenced dissent in Hong Kong. Beijing justifies that the law is needed to maintain stability in the city.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store