
Uri Geller's Thames-side mansion where he hosted Michael Jackson as his best man has price slashed by £10.5MILLION after a decade on the market
Sonning Court, near plush Henley-on-Thames, has had its asking price slashed by £10.5million since it first went on the market in 2015.
The home, where Geller renewed his vows in 2001 with pop icon Michael Jackson as his best man, is now expected to fetch £4.5million.
The TV mystic first put the mansion on the market for £15m in 2015 when he decided to move back to his native Israel - but failed to attract any buyers.
Instead the 77-year-old spoon-bender rented out the property until the end of 2022.
In March 2023 another attempt was made to try and secure a permanent sale with the house listed at £7.95million, dropped to £7.5million a year later.
Sonning Court is now set to be auctioned by Savills on July 22, with the self-proclaimed psychic hoping to finally wash his hands of the home.
Inspired by the White House, the stunning riverside home has an entertainment hall and bar, state-of-the-art cinema and a professional gym.
The stunning Thames-side 10,500 sq ft mansion has nine-bedrooms, eight bathrooms and generous guest and staff accommodation.
At Sonning Court Geller has hosted royalty, world-famous musicians and sport stars, as well as presidents. The Queen's cousin, Prince Michael of Kent, was a regular visitor.
When Geller and his wife Hanna renewed their wedding vows in 2001, they held a big party at the house with Michael Jackson as Uri's best man.
Guests included illusionist David Blaine, TV presenter Sir David Frost and musician Dave Stewart from the Eurythmics.
The house was built in 1970, but has been renovated and expanded since Geller and his family bought it in 1986.
The property is in the village of Sonning, Berks, which is popular with celebrities - the Clooneys, former prime minister Theresa May and Led Zeppelin's Jimmy Page all owning homes there.
There is a wide variety of schools in the area including Reading Blue Coat School in Sonning and Shiplake College in Henley.
Extensive sporting facilities include boating on the Thames and golf at a number of local courses.
Standout features include a panorama room with unmatched views of the Thames and a glass meditation pyramid in the garden, but it also has the usual trappings of a luxury mansion included a heated pool, jacuzzi and a helicopter pad.
Sonning Court also has 111-metre moorings on the Thames, which is practically unheard of in this prime location.
The main house has over 10,000 sq ft of accommodation with a reception hall, two drawing rooms, a grand glass atrium, panorama room, dining room, study, conservatory, kitchen and separate maid's quarter on the ground floor.
In the basement there is an entertainment hall, cinema and gym and on the first floor are eight bedrooms and bathrooms.
There is also a separate cellar with wine vault, panic room and safe.
Outside there are Japanese water gardens with koi pond and a traditional Japanese bridge and three interlinked ponds and a 6ft natural waterfall.
There is a four-car garage with a flat above, a professional floodlit tennis court and a large heated, covered swimming pool.
Sonning Court owns about 250m of the towpath of the River Thames, with the mooring accommodating up to 18 boats.
Outside there are Japanese water gardens with koi pond and a traditional Japanese bridge and three interlinked ponds and a 6ft natural waterfall
Uri Geller said: 'One of the things I have loved most about living at Sonning Court for over three decades has to be its location on the river.
'Throughout history, this stretch of the Thames has always been considered as one of the most magical. In fact, Jerome K. Jerome in his book 'Three Men in a Boat' described Sonning as 'the most fairy-like little nook on the whole river' and who can blame him.
'With the home's elevated position on the river-bend, which is safe from the risk of flooding, you are constantly treated to far-reaching views down the water from all parts of the house - it really is a piece of living art that changes throughout the year.
'While the house itself is beautifully Palladian in style and visitors frequently tell me how much it looks like the White House in Washington, whether that's stars of entertainment, royalty or presidents.
'Externally when I bought the house I extended it to make it more balanced and symmetrical, while internally my passion for design continues as I am a great believer in the ancient art of Feng Shui.
'Subsequently Sonning Court has been designed so positive energy can flow throughout the house at ease and impact those who are living there.
'Another of the really special things about Sonning Court is its seclusion and privacy, most people who drive through the village would have no idea that this house was here.
'The fact that you have to drive through two gates to enter and being really set back, makes you feel like you are entering into your own world when you arrive home.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Suspended EastEnders actor Jamie Borthwick attends Oasis concert at Wembley with co-stars as offensive slur scandal rumbles on
EastEnders actor Jamie Borthwick brushed off the scandal surrounding his suspension from the sap, as he joined his co-stars for a night out at Oasis' reunion show at Wembley on Wednesday. The soapstar, 31, who has played Jay Brown for 19 years, was suspended by the BBC in June after he used a slur aimed at disabled people on the set of Strictly. In his first Instagram post since the scandal broke, Jamie joined Tony Clay and Natalie Cassidy as well as her partner Marc Humphreys. Sharing some photos to his Story the group got into the Britpop spirit, wearing bucket hats and Oasis merchandise. Jamie could been seen singing-a-long to the band's hit songs in the crowd while Natalie cheered. BBC bosses are reportedly facing questions over the difference in treatment John Torode and Jamie after both used 'offensive language'. The MasterChef star, 59, has been sacked after allegedly 'used the N-word twice while singing along to a Kanye West song'. According to The Sun, bosses at the BBC are being questioned over a disparity in how both situations have been handled - with one star sacked and the other suspended. A source said: 'The difference in treatment between John and Jamie - for very similar incidents - has left questions to be answered. 'The BBC have tied themselves into knots with this - for them both stars appear to have used unacceptable and offensive language but only one has been sacked while another has kept his lucrative salary and got away with just a suspension.' 'Disabled colleagues have been left wondering why incidents of ableist slurs seemingly aren't being taken as seriously as racist language and there are no clear answers coming from bosses,' the source added. A spokesperson for the BBC told MailOnline: 'Whilst we do not comment on any individual matter, each case is always considered on its own facts. 'We are very clear on our expectations that inappropriate behaviour and language will not be tolerated.' A video obtained by The Sun in June, showed soap actor Jamie using the term 'm********s' to describe residents of Blackpool where the show was being filmed at the time. He was reportedly backstage during rehearsals with Wynne Evans who could be heard saying 'Oh my God' when he made the remark. He has since issued an apology, sharing that he did not fully understand the derogatory nature of the term he used but now that he is aware, he is 'deeply embarrassed'. The Sun reported at the time that Jamie told a former partner how it was 'not clear' if he would return to EastEnders and quoted him as saying: 'I accept the karma that has come my way due to some bad choices.' It continued that Jamie told how he was now 'attempting to write the wrongs in my life'. He added he wanted to 'sincerely apologise for the mistakes I made and for hurting you and how I handled the whole situation'.


The Guardian
12 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Gambhir's India can't escape the Fortis-verse on rain-hit day
Nothing does irony quite like Test cricket. Say what you like about the world's most desiccated, Miss Havisham-ish team sport, out there trailing around the post-colonial world still dressed in its yellowing wedding dress. It's definitely got a sense of humour. On day one of the fifth England-India Test this was expressed in cosmic terms, and a single bold and improbable dramatic arc. Talk about groundsmen a lot. Tell groundsmen they're nothing. One thing is for sure. You're going to find yourself spending quite a lot of time watching groundsmen. Or in this case watching the personage we must now refer to as controversial groundsman Lee Fortis, celebrity Oval pitch curator Lee Fortis, an otherwise peripheral figure with a name that sounds like an Anglo-Saxon burial site in Norfolk, but who was promoted in the buildup to this Test into an instrument of the sporting-political power struggle. And so it came to pass in the first two sessions at the Oval, as India and England traipsed on and off between the showers, and Fortis loomed, somehow inevitably, centre stage. Here is Lee Fortis striding about his domain in classic shorts and boots combos, like a proud, captive bear. Here is Lee Fortis tugging at a tarpaulin. Here is Lee Fortis all alone in his lime green field as the drizzle fell and the walkways around the ground took on the feel of a slowly sinking ship peopled only by pint-sozzled mariners in chino shorts, and watched from behind the plateglass by his chief adversary, India's head coach, Gautam Gambhir. In a Test series shot through with politics, rumblings and noises off, they've finally dragged in the bloke with the rake. Welcome to the Fortis-verse. It is the most unlikely turn of events. Fortis is familiar figure around here, a huge ambling man with the classic groundsman's shape, as though he's been hinged together out of sacks of cement and packed into a pair of shorts. Who thinks of the groundsman? What are they? They sit on mowers. They walk with sawdust buckets. They follow the seasons, disturbed only by their personal kryptonite, people walking near a rope, signal for instant and uncontainable explosions of boggle-eyed fury. And yet, look a little closer, squint at the magic eye picture, and something else has begun to emerge here, the groundsman as instrument of power and conspiracy. By 2pm on Thursday afternoon, 48 hours on from that unnecessary spat with Gambhir, Fortis had been memed and replicated and spun out across the global hive mind. Oval curator breaks silence. Fortis v Gambhir: the full story. Who is Lee Fortis and what does he mean? There are Fortis YouTube clips (jerky spat footage; weird ad hoc media huddle) that have been viewed two million times. Lee Fortis stuns fans with body transformation. This simple Lee Fortis trick will change your life for ever. Seventeen times Lee Fortis broke the internet (No 12 will shock you!) More fuel was added overnight as R Ashwin labelled Fortis a habitual offender. Really? It's not the first time he's yelled at people to get off his square? You shock me. Meanwhile, the groundsman community has sprung to his defence, a Facebook page speaking for this maligned minority demanding respect, understanding, a safe space for its members. What next? A Fortis spin-off vehicle. The Fortis origins story. A Fortis male grooming range. Jake Paul calls out Lee Fortis in sensational Vegas standoff. Or perhaps it won't come to that. Because this is at the same time absolutely nothing, chaff, gossip, and also a grim little episode that reflects poorly on Gambhir in particular; and perhaps also on the general power dynamics of elite cricket in its current form. The initial incident was a standard stramash over practising too close, or so Fortis said, to the square. Gambhir's response was furious. Any situation where you end up wagging a finger and shouting, 'You're nothing, you're just a groundsman, nothing beyond that,' is one that has lost any sense of scale. Later Fortis was swarmed by Indian journalists and gave the greatest no comment interview of all time, unveiling a technique that should be urgently coached to all celebrities and politicians, which basically involves just saying 'I'm not ... You're not ... I'm not really,' to every question. Sign up to The Spin Subscribe to our cricket newsletter for our writers' thoughts on the biggest stories and a review of the week's action after newsletter promotion It is a fairly simple divvying up at this point. Gambhir was always in the wrong here. First because all groundsmen are grumpy. They have to venerate, love and fetishise this patch of green. They have the artist's temperament. They feel the hand of history. They basically just want you to stay off their square and stop playing cricket. But mainly Gambhir was wrong because of the ugliness of his choice of words, and the sense of punching down. England got to show their boorishness in Manchester. This was India's turn. India's coach is a born-to-rule type, high caste Hindu, private schoolboy, son of a wealthy industrialist, BJP politician, a Jay Shah man, a Modi guy. It sits a little uncomfortably to hear anyone with such privilege dismissing a bloke with a bucket as 'nothing', unqualified to make demands of his betters. In this context Gambhir v Fortis speaks, if you choose to see it, to the way India wields its commercial and political power in this sport; to the sense that here is an overlord nation that can basically do what it wants, that is in effect untouchable. This is the most unfavourable version of events. More prosaically Gambhir does just love a fight, is essentially a grudge in a cap, outspoken and commendably feisty. In a happier turn there was at least a kind of rapprochement at the start of play between Fortis and India's players, a little wary banter and some smiles. After which, once the showers had cleared, it was a case of the groundsman's revenge, as Gambhir got to watch India's batters sparring and hopping and nicking as the ball leapt and jagged about on Fortis' chosen strip. England's pace attack had looked rusty at the start, both Jamie Overton and Josh Tongue perhaps paying tribute the 2.5m distance rule by almost missing the cut part of the pitch. But they chipped away and found movement. Shubman Gill had batted with sculpted elegance, all perfect arms, shoulders, lines, balletic in the way he shifts his weight, then ran himself out trying to take a single to Gus Atkinson's right hand in his follow through. With India on 204 for six at the end of play the series already felt a little safer. Hopefully the age of Lee is also done. Andy Warhol would later revise his most famous line to the more depressingly accurate 'in 15 minutes everyone will be famous'. Fortis had his day in the gloom. With any luck hands will now be shaken, an unpleasant tone revised, and the whole thing can be safely packed away in the shed behind the pigeon nets.


Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Watch: Martha Stewart reveals what she thinks of Meghan's lifestyle brand
Martha Stewart has revealed what she thinks of the Duchess of Sussex's lifestyle brand, saying: 'I hope she knows what she's talking about'. Stewart, the lifestyle guru and self-made billionaire, said it was important to be 'knowledgeable about your subject matter' in what appeared to be a veiled swipe the Duchess. The Duchess has recently launched a range of lifestyle products including fruit spreads, edible flowers, honey, crepe mix and wine under her As Ever wellness brand. She has also released a lifestyle programme on Netflix titled With Love, Meghan, which will air its second series in the autumn. In an interview on Thursday, the 83-year-old was asked for her thoughts on Gwyneth Paltrow, the Duchess, and their respective wellness brands. Stewart was full of praise for Paltrow, calling her 'fantastic' and 'very successful' also noting her accolades in the acting world. But, she was less enthusiastic when it came to the Duchess. 'What's it like to watch other celebrities – Gwyneth Paltrow, Meghan Markle – going in your footsteps and following something you really started?' she was asked by Yahoo Lifestyle. Stewart answered: 'I don't mind... good luck. Gwyneth's been very successful, by the way.' She continued: 'I think she's created quite an interesting body of businesses, she's admired, she's fantastic – she won an Oscar, for heaven's sake, as an actress. She's pretty powerful.' Paltrow's Goop brand, which sells an assortment of wellness, beauty, and fashion items including a vagina scented candle and jade kegel eggs, was valued at $250m (£189m) in 2018. 'Meghan I don't really know very well,' Stewart continued. 'I hope she knows what she's talking about. Authenticity to me is everything, and to be authentic and knowledgeable about your subject matter is extremely important.' In April, Stewart admitted she had not watched the Duchess's lifestyle series, which was widely criticised by reviewers and failed to crack Netflix's top 300 most-watched titles in the first six months of the year, according to reports. 'I haven't seen it yet, but I'll watch an episode and see how she does. I'm curious,' she said. Ted Sarandos, the co-chief executive officer of Netflix, has insisted the Duchess had been 'overly dismissed' and 'underestimated in terms of her influence on culture'. Stewart said last year she was 'flattered' when told by an interviewer that the Duchess 'wants to become a brand like Martha Stewart'. The 83-year-old became a household name after her personal lifestyle brand made her the world's first female self-made billionaire. Despite her controversial past, Stewart's staying power remains today with her range of cookbooks, magazine, and television appearances, including an unlikely friendship with the rapper Snoop Dogg. 'Produce good products that work and will help the homemaker have a nicer life,' Stewart advised. 'That's what it's all about.' Products from Meghan's As Ever range, including a $28 (£21) jar of wildflower honey and $15 (£11) flower sprinkles, sold out within 30 minutes of being released in April. A source told The Telegraph at the time that the items would be available only in small quantities and quickly marked as sold out to generate interest. The products were described as 'a glimpse' into Meghan's approach to 'elevated, everyday living and is inspired by her long-lasting love of cooking, entertaining and hostessing with ease'. More products are expected to be released seasonally.