
BYD unleashes an EV industry reckoning that alarms Beijing
HighlightsThe ongoing price war in China's electric vehicle industry, led by market leader BYD Company Limited, is causing significant declines in share prices and prompting governmental intervention to curb aggressive discounting and prevent further market instability. Despite attempts by Chinese authorities to manage the situation, analysts predict that overcapacity and weak demand will force many automakers, especially smaller ones, to consolidate or exit the market, as evidenced by the exit of 16 new energy vehicle brands in 2024. Concerns have emerged regarding the long-term sustainability of Chinese automakers, as relentless discounting erodes profit margins and brand value, while also risking the quality and safety of vehicles produced amid financial pressures.
The price war engulfing China's
electric vehicle industry
has already sent share prices tumbling and prompted an unusual level of intervention from Beijing. The shakeout may just be getting started.
For all the Chinese government's efforts to prevent price cuts by market leader
BYD
Co. from turning into a vicious spiral, analysts say a combination of weaker demand and extreme overcapacity will slice into profits at the strongest brands and force feebler competitors to fold. Even after the number of EV makers started shrinking for the first time last year, the industry is still using less than half its production capacity.
Chinese authorities are trying to minimize the fallout, chiding the sector for 'rat race competition' and summoning heads of major brands to Beijing last week. Yet previous attempts to intervene have had little success. For the short term at least, investors are betting few automakers will escape unscathed: BYD, arguably the biggest winner from industry consolidation, has lost $21.5 billion in market value since its shares peaked in late May.
'What you're seeing in China is disturbing, because there's a lack of demand and extreme price cutting,' said John Murphy, a senior automotive analyst at Bank of America Corp. Eventually there will be 'massive consolidation' to soak up the excess capacity, Murphy said.
For automakers, relentless discounting erodes profit margins, undermines brand value and forces even well-capitalized companies into unsustainable financial positions. Low-priced and low-quality products can seriously damage the international reputation of 'Made-in-China' cars, noted the People's Daily, an outlet controlled by the Communist Party. And that knock would come just as models from BYD to Geely, Zeekr and Xpeng start to collect accolades on the world stage.
For consumers, price drops may seem beneficial but they mask deeper risks. Unpredictable pricing discourages long-term trust — already people are complaining on China's social media, wondering why they should buy a car now when it may be cheaper next week — while there's a chance automakers, as they cut costs to stay afloat, may reduce investment in quality, safety and after-sales service.
Auto CEOs were told last week they must 'self-regulate' and shouldn't sell cars below cost or offer unreasonable price cuts, according to people familiar with the matter. The issue of zero-mileage cars also came up — where vehicles with no distance on their odometers are sold by dealers into the second-hand market, seen widely as a way for automakers to artificially inflate sales and clear inventory.
Chinese automakers have been discounting a lot more aggressively than their foreign counterparts.
BofA's Murphy said US automakers should just get out. 'Tesla probably needs to be there to compete with those companies and understand what's going on, but there's a lot of risk there for them.'
Others leave no room for doubt that BYD, China's No. 1 selling car brand, is leading the way on price cuts.
'It's obvious to everyone that the biggest player is doing this,' Jochen
Siebert
, managing director at auto consultancy JSC Automotive, said. 'They want a monopoly where everybody else gives up.' BYD's aggressive tactics are raising concerns over the potential dumping of cars, dealership management issues and 'squeezing out suppliers,' he said.
The pricing turmoil is also unfolding against a backdrop of significant overcapacity. The average production utilization rate in China's automotive industry was mere 49.5% in 2024, data compiled by Shanghai-based Gasgoo Automotive Research Institute show.
An April report by AlixPartners meanwhile highlights the intense competition that's starting to emerge among new energy vehicle makers, or companies that produce pure battery cars and plug-in hybrids. In 2024, the market saw its first ever consolidation among NEV-dedicated brands, with 16 exiting and 13 launching.
'The Chinese automotive market, despite its substantial scale, is growing at a slower speed. Automakers have to put top priority now on grabbing more market share,' said Ron Zheng, a partner at global consultancy Roland Berger GmbH.
Jiyue Auto shows how quickly things can change. A little over a year after launching its first car, the automaker jointly backed by big names Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co. and technology giant Baidu Inc., began to scale down production and seek fresh funds.
It's a dilemma for all carmakers, but especially smaller ones. 'If you don't follow suit once a leading company makes a price move, you might lose the chance to stay at the table,' AlixPartners consultant Zhang Yichao said. He added that China's low capacity utilization rate, which is 'fundamentally fueling' the competition, is now even under more pressure from export uncertainties.
While the push to find an outlet for excess production is thrusting more Chinese brands to export, international markets can only offer some relief.
'The US market is completely closed and Japan and Korea may close very soon if they see an invasion of Chinese carmakers,' Siebert said. 'Russia, which was the biggest export market last year, is now becoming very difficult. I also don't see Southeast Asia as an opportunity anymore.'
The pressure of cost cutting has also led analysts to express concern over supply chain finance risks.
A price cut demand by BYD to one of its suppliers late last year attracted scrutiny around how the car giant may be using supply chain financing to mask its ballooning debt. A report by accounting consultancy GMT Research put BYD's true net debt at closer to 323 billion yuan ($45 billion), compared with the 27.7 billion yuan officially on its books as of the end of June 2024.
The pain is also bleeding into China's dealdership network. Dealership groups in two provinces have gone out of business since April, both of them ones that were selling BYD cars.
Beijing's meeting with automakers last week wasn't the first attempt at a ceasefire. Two years ago, in mid 2023, 16 major automakers, including Tesla Inc., BYD and Geely signed a pact, witnessed by the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, to avoid 'abnormal pricing.'
Within days though, CAAM deleted one of the four commitments, saying that a reference to pricing in the pledge was inappropriate and in breach of a principle enshrined in the nation's antitrust laws.
The discounting continued unabated.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
R&D? Rarely
Dependence in critical areas makes the nation vulnerable. Strategic interest must prevail over economic sense Germany's crude reserves are so small, they won't last three months in an emergency. So how did Hitler wage war for five years? By turning coal into petrol. Over 92% of the Luftwaffe's aviation fuel was synthetic. As the world grapples with China's rare earth curbs, there's a useful lesson here. While the rare earths crisis that started with China's export curbs on April 4 may be blowing over – Trump announced on Truth Social yesterday, 'Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China' – it will have a once-bitten-twice-shy effect. Over the past few weeks, Western carmakers have considered producing cars minus some components that use rare earths. At home, Maruti's had to scale back production plans for its first EV due to a global shortage of rare earth magnets. As our second Op-Ed explains, these magnets contain about 25% of a rare earth element called neodymium. It's one of the so-called 'light' rare earths that are available in India, but we don't produce enough of it because cheap Chinese supplies made investment in this area unattractive. While you can make motors without rare earths, other devices like TV screens, computers and MRI machines can't do without them. That's why India needs to build a large rare earths industry. And with the world's fifth largest rare earth reserves, it's well-placed to do so. Likewise, it needs to end its dependence on China for 70% of active pharmaceutical ingredients or APIs, because while buying from the cheapest supplier makes economic sense, it's a strategic risk. The aim must be to reduce dependence because dependence, especially in critical products, is vulnerability. About 90% of our crude is imported. An electric future will take care of that, but not if it means 100% dependence on China for lithium batteries. To find alternatives – like Germany's WW-II 'synfuels' – we need big investments in R&D, which is not our strong suit. As a nation, we invest only 0.6% of our $4tn GDP in research. China invests 2.4% of $18tn, US 3.5% of $29tn. And our private sector is even stingier, accounting for only a third of the national R&D spend, as against 70% in US and S Korea. The rare earth crisis is a brief distraction, the real issue is India's rare investment problem, and it needs national attention now. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.

Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Indian govt report in 2022 foresaw China rare earth export crisis
As Indian manufacturers are scrambling to deal with supply-chain disruptions caused by China's restrictive policies on the export of rare earth metals, in many of which it has a near monopoly, experts are pointing to an early warning of this — in a 2012 strategy paper prepared by a steering committee headed by the then mines secretary Vishwapati Trivedi after a similar crisis caused after Beijing restricted supplies of the critical materials that are needed in the auto, space and clean energy industries. Also Read: 'China deal done': US to lower tariffs to 55%, allow Chinese students for higher ed Back then, they added, India felt the heat of Chinese squeeze and on August 9, 2011, the government set up an 11-member steering committee to develop a strategy paper on status and availability of rare earth elements (REE) and energy critical elements (ECE). The committee was chaired by the mines secretary and co-chaired by chairman of the Centre for Study of Science Technology (C-STEP). Members included senior officials and experts from the Department of Science & Technology (DST), the Geological Survey of India, the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), the Department of Atomic Energy, the Defence Research & Development Organization (DRDO) and the chairman of India Rare Earth Ltd. Also Read: China can't afford double standards in fight against terror: S Jaishankar The forward of the committee's report titled ''Rare Earths and Energy Critical Elements: a Roadmap and Strategy for India', published in July 2012, said: 'In view of the increased demand of REE and near monopoly of supply from China, there is a need to develop national policies and implementation strategies for ensuring indigenous supply of REE… A Steering Committee was constituted by the ministry of mines with the ultimate intention of preparing a strategy paper for the government, providing short, medium and long term options along with proposals for specific policy & legislative interventions.' Also Read: 'Gratitude to Indian Navy': China on rescue of crew aboard cargo ship which caught fire off Kerala coast The report was blunt about Beijing's approach. 'China has been the major supplier of rare earths all over the world. Even though it has only 37% of global RE resources, it has captured the worldwide market to the extent of 97%. The low cost and efficient production process enabled China to monopolize the rare-earth market, forcing rare earth operations around the world to close down. Indian Rare Earths Ltd (IREL), which was once a leader in export of rare earth compounds had to shut down its operation in 2008,' the report added. 'Over the last couple of years China has imposed restrictions and curtailed its export by over 30% citing domestic demands as the reason. This unexpected decline has restarted rare earth operations once again throughout the world,' the report said. The same thing is happening again. Indian industries are suffering due to shortage of the critical minerals. According to a Reuters report published in Hindustan Times on Wednesday, automobile majors such as Maruti Suzuki have cut near-term production targets because of rare earth shortages. 'Government departments, particularly the ministry of commerce and industry, are holding hectic meetings with industry and other stakeholders to resolve the supply crisis. Government is using diplomatic channels asking Beijing to relax supply curbs for the Indian industries,' one of the people mentioned in the first instance said. The ministries of mines, commerce and external affairs did not respond to an email query on this matter. China's curbs on exports of rare earth materials have been officially raised through diplomatic channels by India, especially in view of the impact on manufacturers of electric vehicles, people familiar with the matter said. The issue reportedly figured in a meeting between Indian ambassador Pradeep Rawat and China's vice foreign minister Sun Weidong in Beijing on June 5. 'China's move was primarily aimed at the US and the impact on India was collateral damage. We are hopeful that the matter will be resolved soon,' one of the people said. It is not clear how China's deal with the US —the two countries reached a framework agreement that will now have to be approved by their respective Presidents —will affect this. The matter is expected to figure in discussions during a visit to India by Sun Weidong, a former Chinese ambassador to New Delhi, beginning on Thursday, the people said. Sun is visiting India to continue discussions with foreign secretary Vikram Misri aimed at normalising bilateral ties following the end of the military face-off in the Ladakh sector of the Line of Actual Control (LAC) last October. Auto manufacturers affected by the curbs on rare earth exports too have sought to reach out to Chinese authorities but without much success so far, the people said. Two days after India and China reached an understanding on withdrawing forces from the two remaining 'friction points' on the LAC last October, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Xi Jinping met in the Russian city of Kazan and agreed to revive several mechanisms to restore normalcy in ties and to address the long-standing border dispute.


Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Alarm bells in textile recycling hub Panipat over suspension of Bangladesh rags supply
Traders and manufacturers in Panipat, India's largest textile recycling hub that receives discarded clothing from multiple countries for recycling and resale, have raised concerns over the suspension of shipments from Bangladesh, the top source of rags for recycling in India, The Indian Express has learnt. 'Rags and recycled items were not part of the restriction on garments through the land border route that the government announced in May. Traders in Panipat are complaining that the shipments from Bangladesh have been halted but it is unclear why this step has been taken,' a person aware of the development said. While traders plan to raise the issue with the government, they remain unsure about the reason for the halt in exports. But the development comes amid heightened trade tensions between India and Bangladesh after Dhaka's Chief Adviser Muhammad Yunus called for the extension of the Chinese economy around the strategically important North-East India region. This assumes significance as over 200 tonnes of rags are recycled in Panipat every day, with 150-200 mills operating in the sector. Their key sources of rags include discarded clothing from Western countries, but Bangla-desh alone generates over 0.5 million metric tonnes of textile waste from its factories each year. The suspension of exports of rags and textile waste coincides with Bangladesh attempts at seeking Generalised Scheme of Preferences Plus (GSP+) status in the European Union, which would result in the removal of tariffs on over 66 per cent of EU tariff lines. The EU is one of Bangladesh's biggest export markets, but the country is set to lose concessions in 2026 after graduating from the Least Developed Country (LDC) status. To qualify for the GSP+ scheme, Bangladesh must enhance its domestic recycling capabilities and meet specific conditions related to labour rights and governance. According to news agency Reuters, increased local recycling could save Bangladesh around $700 million annually in import costs, as several countries, including India, ramp up their textile recycling capacities. India recycles or reuses approximately 4.7 million tonnes, or about 60 per cent, of its textile waste. Political and economic tensions between India and its largest trade partner in South Asia have been growing, especially as the Union government in May imposed a series of import restrictions on goods from Bangladesh, particularly on ready-made garments, the country's largest export item and a key source of foreign exchange. This followed earlier signs of deteriorating ties, including New Delhi's decision in April to terminate the five-year-old transhipment facility for Bangladesh's export cargo – a mechanism that enabled Dhaka to ship goods to several Western countries using Indian land routes and airports. Notably, Bangladesh also imposed port restrictions on Indian yarn exports via land ports, allowing such exports only through seaports. This move, an official said, was ostensibly in response to demands from Bangladeshi textile mills – despite the fact that the land route offers the quickest and most cost-effective yarn supply to the ready-made garments industry in Bangladesh. Yarn exports to Bangladesh account for 20 per cent of India's total exports to the country, which were valued at $11.38 billion in FY25. Official data showed that cotton yarn and handloom product exports to Dhaka stood at $2.39 billion during the last financial year. Meanwhile, India imports ready-made garments from Bangladesh valued at over $700 million annually. Ravi Dutta Mishra is a Principal Correspondent with The Indian Express, covering policy issues related to trade, commerce, and banking. He has over five years of experience and has previously worked with Mint, CNBC-TV18, and other news outlets. ... Read More