Study Shows 25 of 28 Major U.S. Cities Are Rapidly Sinking
It's not just sea level rise threatening America's cities—some of the ground itself is giving way. According to a new satellite-based study published May 8 in Nature Cities, every one of the 28 most populous U.S. cities is sinking to some degree, with many urban areas facing widespread land subsidence due to factors like groundwater depletion and oil and gas extraction. Cities affected include Chicago, Dallas, Columbus, Detroit, Fort Worth, Denver, New York, Indianapolis, Houston, and Charlotte...and more.
The worst offender? Houston. The Texas city is sinking faster than any other in the nation, with more than 40% of its urban area dropping over 5 millimeters per year—and 12% sinking at double that rate. In some localized spots, researchers found ground sinking by as much as two inches annually.
'This is the first high-resolution, satellite-based measurement of land subsidence across the 28 most populous U.S. cities,' lead author Leonard Ohenhen of Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory told USA Today. 'It offers critical information for urban planning, infrastructure adaptation, and hazard preparedness.'Dallas and Fort Worth aren't far behind Houston, suggesting that Texas is facing a particularly intense version of this 'invisible threat,' as the researchers call it. Much of the problem stems from massive and ongoing groundwater withdrawal. When water is pulled from underground aquifers and not replenished, the earth compacts—and the land above it sinks.Subsidence isn't just a geological curiosity. It's a direct threat to urban infrastructure. Cracks in roads, buckling pavements, doors and windows that no longer shut properly, and warped foundations are all warning signs. Over time, the cumulative damage can compromise bridges, buildings, and entire neighborhoods.
Interestingly, three cities—San Jose, Memphis, and Jacksonville—showed signs of very slight uplift, but researchers caution that the effect is minimal and that those cities are still at risk.
With urban populations growing and water demands increasing, Ohenhen says now is the time to act: 'As opposed to just saying it's a problem, we can respond, address, mitigate, adapt.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Digital Trends
3 hours ago
- Digital Trends
SpaceX just called off Wednesday's crewed launch to the ISS
SpaceX has just announced that it's standing down from tomorrow's Falcon 9 launch of Axiom Space's Ax-4 crew to the International Space Station (ISS). A new target launch date has yet to be announced. In a post on X on Tuesday evening, SpaceX said its engineers need more time to repair the liquid oxygen leak identified during earlier booster inspections, and therefore would not be launching on June 11. Another plan to launch Ax-4 was also called off 24 hours earlier due to strong winds in the ascent corridor. Standing down from tomorrow's Falcon 9 launch of Ax-4 to the @Space_Station to allow additional time for SpaceX teams to repair the LOx leak identified during post static fire booster inspections. Once complete – and pending Range availability – we will share a new launch date — SpaceX (@SpaceX) June 11, 2025 Four astronauts — three of whom are non-professional and will be heading to orbit for the first time — are currently in isolation close to the launch site at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida. Recommended Videos The Ax-4 crew comprises three individuals from India, Poland, and Hungary, with all three nations sending citizens to the ISS for the first time. American Peggy Whitson makes up the four-person team, with the retired NASA astronaut leading her second commercial human spaceflight mission. The Ax-4 crew will spend about two weeks aboard the orbital outpost, living and working alongside the seven members who are already there. The upcoming mission will be Axiom Space's fourth privately funded crewed mission to the ISS. The Texas-based company also has a contract with NASA to develop habitable modules that can be attached to the space station, with a plan for the modules to become part of a free-flying, commercially funded orbital facility. Jared Isaacman, who's been on two private space missions and until recently was set to become the chief of NASA until President Trump pulled his nomination, commented on the delay to the Ax-4 mission, saying in a post on X: 'An inconvenience for the guests and families expecting a launch, but hopefully the Axiom Space's Ax-4 crew is having a fun time in quarantine. Won't be long before the big moment. All the best on the mission.' If you'd like to watch the Ax-4 crew head to orbit from the Kennedy Space Center, then check out this article, which will be updated to show the new target launch date just as soon as it's announced.


CBS News
4 hours ago
- CBS News
"Forever chemicals" found in fish caught in San Francisco Bay, report warns
A warning to anglers who eat their catch from the San Francisco Bay, fish pulled from the waters may contain dangerous levels of so-called "forever chemicals." In a recent report by the San Francisco Estuary Institute, scientists detected 20 types of polyfluoroalkyl substances, known as PFAS in fish caught in the bay. Their research and testing of fish began in 2009, and a revised study was published in the American Chemical Society this past March. "PFAS have been known to harm us in a variety of different ways, they've been known to cause cancer," said Miguel Mendez, the lead author of the SFEI study. "It affects us in variety of different organs, including the liver, and over time can cause some severe health effects." Along the docks of San Francisco's Embarcadero, one will find a variety of fisherman who are there for sport or relaxation, but a number of people fish the docks for food. "I think for communities, especially those that are eating every day from the Bay, that is a huge concern and likely leading to a higher load of PFAS and other contaminants, for these populations," said Mendez. Along Pier One, longtime anglers Danny Tran and Nick Hayden were posted up on a sunny afternoon, and both say while they love to fish, they are careful about how much of their catch they consume. "I don't eat too much fish, so I'm okay with it," said Tran. "I probably eat once a month, twice a month and that's about it." "You have to choose what you eat, the smaller (younger) the better, because there's less chemicals in them," said Hayden. "The bigger ones have higher levels of mercury, or whatever they have inside of them." Currently there are no specific state guidelines on the consumption of fish in relation to PFAS. But since 2011 the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessments has offered recommendations on 18 fish species on which types of fish to avoid, which fish are safe to eat, and how many servings are recommended per week, along with gender and age advisories. They updated their recommendations in April of 2023, and have posted signs along local docks. Where anglers catch their fish, can also determine the level of "forever chemicals." SFEI conducted tests in 12 different locations and found higher levels of PFAS in the South Bay. "The South Bay is a hotspot for PFAS, but that doesn't mean that the North Bay is the immune or doesn't have PFAS at all, because fish can swim for location to location," said Mendez. "To those who may have a seafood heavy diet, you should really think about where is my seafood coming from."


CBS News
4 hours ago
- CBS News
Think you don't need sleep? This rare gene mutation may be why.
Imagine getting only a few hours of sleep and being raring to go the next day. A new study published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences shows the discovery of a gene mutation that lets some people get away with only 3-6 hours of sleep. "They truly find themselves going to bed at say 10 p.m. and wake up at say 3 in the morning, and they are wide awake, refreshed and ready for the day," said Dr. Temitayo O. Oyegbile-Chidi, associate professor in the department of neurology at UC Davis Health. Dr. Oyegbile-Chidi says they've known about genes associated with short sleep for a while. This is just the latest, and while it sounds great, you probably don't have it. "What's quite special about these is they are very unique and very uncommon, so what I find is whenever a new mutation comes out, people say, 'Maybe I have that mutation. Let me get tested for that,' " she said. "And that's where I often say it's very, very rare." So, how do you know if you're a short sleeper? Well, you can get tested, or you can ask yourself: Are you tired? "If you find yourself managing during the week on 2-3 or 2-4 hours of sleep, but then you end up on the weekends sleeping in for 10 hours, you probably are not a short sleeper," Dr. Oyegbile-Chidi said. So make sleep a priority. Get a routine bedtime with no screens in a cool room. "Make sure you are actually getting a good amount of sleep and getting that 7-9 hours," Dr. Oyegbile-Chidi said.