
Meet only heroine of Rajinikanth who played 4 different roles with him, sometimes a lover, sometimes a mother, sometimes a sister, she is...
In the world of cinema, stars are often worshiped for their reel-life characters. From their iconic chemistry as co-stars to their impressive and strong roles, they often remain etched in the hearts of audiences. However, what once was seen as an iconic romantic pairing would turn around and become a relationship of mother-son. Even though the male leads are often seen romancing even in their older years, actresses would be portraying everything from different generations. Where once she would see in leading a romancing co-star, next time she might be a mother, or a sister.
One such story is of a versatile and impeccable actress, Srividya. Her on-screen roles with superstar Rajinikanth are nothing short of fascinating as she has played his lover, mother, sister, and mother-in-law.
Srividya made her debut in the film industry at just the age of 14 because she had financial constraints in her family. Soon, with her strong screen presence, expressive dance, and beauty, she made a space for herself in Tamil and Telugu cinema. Her debut was a Tamil film, Thiruvarutchelvan, where she starred opposite legendary actor Sivaji Ganesan. Later, she went on to make a mark for herself in Telugu cinema with Pettarasi Pettamma, and her career soared, especially with the support of director Dasari Narayana Rao.
She did her first film with Rajinikanth in 1975 with the film Apoorva Raagangal. This K. Balachander's film, which was Rajinikanth's debut, where he was seen romancing Srividya. But 14 years later, the same on-screen duo that played lovers at one time were seen in a totally different dynamic. This time, Srividya played Rajinikanth's mother-in-law. This shift from playing Rajnikanth's lover to his mother-in-law wasn't her choice,e but it was her sabbatical from acting that affected the quality of roles being offered to her.
Then, in 1991, for Mani Ratnam's Thalapathi, she played the role of Rajinikanth's mother, which also got her a lot of appraisal. After this in 1993, she played the role of his sister in Uzhappall again in Manithan. But besides the changing on-screen dynamic with Rajnikanth, their chemistry was hailed and celebrated.
Srividya and Rajinikanth worked in five major films, portraying a spectrum of relationships that stretched across decades and generations. Their unique on-screen journey, from lovers to family members, remains one of the most memorable in South Indian cinema, highlighting not just their versatility but also the changing face of roles for women in film.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
16 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Discretion is the best part of valour, Karnataka High Court reminds makers of Thug Life film
The High Court of Karnataka on Friday asked actor Kamal Haasan's Raajkamal Films International (RKFI), Chennai, to file its statement of objections, if any, against the applications filed by the Kannada Sahitya Parishat (KSP) and an advocate, who want to be part of proceedings in its petition seeking protection for the release of the Tamil film Thug Life in Karnataka. Justice M. Nagaprasanna passed the order while adjourning further hearing till June 20 on the petition, filed by the RKFI, which had also sought a direction to retrain the Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce (KFCC) from issuing any instruction in relation to banning release and distribution of Thug Life in Karnataka as the KFCC had demanded an apology from Mr. Haasan for his controversial statement that 'Kannada is born out of Tamil'. Mr. Haasan is one of the directors of the RKFI. 'Stupid statement' Earlier, Senior Advocate S. Basavaraj, who appeared for the KSP, termed as a 'stupid statement' the actor's remark on Kannada, while placing some books before the court on historical background of the language. Mr. Basavaraj also questioned how a person, who set his house on fire can seek the help from the court to douse the blaze, while pointing out that opposition for the release the film was a result of his statement on Kannada without any basis. 'Again, I am repeating, discretion is the best part of valour,' the court orally told the petitioner's advocate while adjourning the hearing, to which the petitioner's advocate said he would convey it to the petitioner. Earlier observations During an earlier hearing on June 3, the court had said it was 'of the prima facie opinion that, if a sentence of apology had been included while concluding the communication [from Mr. Haasan to the KFCC], it would have concluded/ended all controversy and the unrest or disharmony in the State of Karnataka' on release of the film. Also, the court on June 5 adjourned the hearing as the petitioner's advocate had said the screening of the movie would not be insisted upon till the dialogue/trialogue with the KFCC to resolve the issue after Mr. Haasan chose not to go by the suggestion made by the court to apologise to put an end to the controversy.


India Gazette
39 minutes ago
- India Gazette
SC seeks Karnataka govt's response to plea over non-release of 'Thug Life' in State theatres
New Delhi [India], June 13 (ANI): The Supreme Court on Friday sought the Karnataka government's response to a plea seeking protection from threats against the screening of Kamal Haasan's film 'Thug Life'. Considering the urgency of the matter, a bench of Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan issued notices to the Karnataka government, the State police, Raaj Kamal Films International Private Limited and the Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce (KFCC) seeking their responses to the plea. During the hearing, the counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that no action has been taken by the state authorities in Karnataka despite violent threats being issued against linguistic minorities in the State. 'No FIR has been registered. They have joined hands with extremist elements', advocate A Velan stated. After hearing the matter, the Court sought the responses of the aforesaid authorities and listed the matter to be heard next week. On Monday, the top court had refused to urgently hear Reddy's plea and had asked the petitioner to approach the concerned High Court. Subsequently, the matter was listed before the top court to be heard today (Friday). During the hearing on Monday, counsel appearing for the petitioner stated that a law-and-order situation is arising in the State, as cinema halls are receiving threats from certain fringe elements. Further, the counsel had stated that threats are being issued that the theatres will be set on fire. Hence, theatres in the State sought protection from the top court. The issue arose over an alleged statement recently made by actor Kamal Hassan, which said 'Kannada was born out of Tamil'. As per the petitioners' plea, there is an effective ban on the CBFC-certified film Thug Life in Karnataka, which is caused by violent threats from private groups, and the state authorities have failed to take action in this regard. The plea argued that such inaction violates the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. This right applies not only to filmmakers but also to the public who want to view films. The top court will hear the matter next week. (ANI)


NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Vishnu Manchu On Deepika Padukone's 8-Hour Shift Demand: "Can Be Worked Around If The Filmmaker, Actor Have Agreed Upon It"
New Delhi: The 8-hour shift debate has been making waves in the Indian film industry, ever since reports emerged that Deepika Padukone had requested an 8-hour workday for Spirit, citing her responsibilities as a new mom. The request, according to reports, led to her exit from the Sandeep Reddy Vanga-Prabhas film, with Triptii Dimri stepping in. The director's veiled jabs on social media further intensified the conversation, dividing opinions. Several stars, including Ajay Devgn and filmmaker Ram Madhvani, have since spoken up in support of actors seeking shorter, more balanced workdays — provided expectations are set in advance. Now, Telugu actor and producer Vishnu Manchu has added his voice to the discussion, drawing from his experience producing and starring in the ambitious mythological drama Kannappa. Speaking about how such arrangements can work smoothly, Vishnu cited Akshay Kumar, who plays Lord Shiva in Kannappa, as an example of professionalism. 'Akshay Kumar worked on Kannappa for 8 hours,' Vishnu said. When asked if that was okay, he added, 'Yeah, that was okay. We brought it in. We wanted him to portray a certain character, and we knew that he'll be working only for 8 hours. We designed our entire shoot in a way that we can accommodate him in those eight hours. If I come into a shoot and then put in clauses like I will shoot for 8 hours, then it's wrong. But if it's done beforehand and the filmmaker and actor has agreed on it, then it can be worked around.' Praising Akshay's dedication, Vishnu added, 'Before he starts shooting, he would be in his vanity, done with his makeup. Once Akshay Kumar comes on set, he never leaves. I have hardly seen him go into his vanity — maybe to use the restroom. He's always there, even when they're prepping the set, sitting, having lunch with everybody on set, and never going into the vanity.' Kannappa, directed by Mukesh Kumar Singh, also stars Prabhas and Mohanlal in key roles.