
CM Fadnavis brands agri minister Kokate's ‘govt is beggar' comment inappropriate
2
3
4
Nashik: On Tuesday, state agriculture minister Manikrao Kokate referred to govt as a "beggar" while addressing the media in Nashik, igniting a fresh controversy.
Kokate, who represents Nashik's Sinnar assembly constituency, was questioned about his previous remarks suggesting that even beggars do not accept Re 1 in alms and that govt provides crop insurance for that amount.
He clarified, "Govt doesn't give Re 1 to the farmers, it takes Re 1 from them for crop insurance. So who is the beggar here? Govt is a beggar, and not the farmer. My statement was misconstrued then by the people."
Kokate said he played a key role in rejecting more than 5.3 lakh bogus applications under the Re 1 crop insurance scheme, which govt has now abolished and replaced with the Prime Minister Crop Insurance Scheme.
Chief minister Devendra Fadnavis called Kokate's comments "inappropriate."
Speaking in Gadchiroli, Fadnavis said, "If he has made such a comment, it is inappropriate for ministers to speak in this manner. We have taken corrective measures in the crop insurance scheme as we saw insurance companies benefitting and not farmers." Fadnavis added, "We have taken steps to invest Rs 5,000 crore every year in the agriculture sector.
"
NCP (SP) MP and party's working president Supriya Sule, in a post on X, condemned Kokate's remarks, saying that calling the state govt a "beggar" was an act of insensitivity.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
15 most beautiful women in the world
Topgentlemen.com
Undo
"It took the supreme sacrifice by 105 martyrs in the struggle for United Maharashtra and immense contribution by previous chief ministers and the people of the state to make Maharashtra the most prosperous state in the country. Calling the state a 'beggar' is a disaster and an insult to them," she wrote.
Sule further added, "There has never been an agriculture minister who behaved so insensitively towards farmers when there are so many burning issues.
The portfolio should be handled by someone sensitive towards agriculture and farmers."
Congress, meanwhile, questioned whether chief minister Fadnavis lacked the courage to dismiss a cabinet minister who jeopardised the rich political tradition and culture of the state. Maharashtra Pradesh Congress Committee president Harshvardhan Sapkal asked, "The ministers in Fadnavis's cabinet seem like a collection of rare specimens — each one a 'gem' in his own way. A minister like Kokate should not be retained in the office even for a moment.
Does Fadnavis lack courage to sack Kokate?"
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Amit Shah to move resolution in Lok Sabha for 6-month extension of President's rule in Manipur
Union Home Minister Amit Shah will move a resolution to extend President's rule in the ethnic violence-hit state of Manipur for six months. The President's rule was imposed in Manipur on February 13, days after N Biren Singh resigned from the Chief Minister 's position. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category others Management healthcare Digital Marketing Degree Others Cybersecurity Healthcare Data Science Technology CXO Public Policy Data Science Product Management MCA Leadership PGDM MBA Data Analytics Design Thinking Operations Management Finance Project Management Artificial Intelligence Skills you'll gain: Duration: 16 Weeks Indian School of Business CERT - ISB Cybersecurity for Leaders Program India Starts on undefined Get Details Under the motion, the President's rule will be extended till February 13, 2026, after the Parliament 's concession. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Outdoor Clothing | Designed to Perform. Built to Endure. Trek Kit India Shop Now Undo "SHRI AMIT SHAH to move the following resolution:- "That this House approves the continuance in force of the Proclamation, dated the 13th February, 2025 in respect of Manipur, issued under article 356 of the Constitution by the President, for a further period of six months with effect from 13th August, 2025," the statement on list of business in Lok Sabha reads. Earlier, on July 25, Amit Shah gave a statutory resolution to extend the already imposed President's rule in Manipur till February 13, 2026, which was admitted by the Rajya Sabha . Live Events "That this House approves the continuance in force of the Proclamation dated February 13, 2025, in respect of Manipur, issued under article 356 of the Constitution by the President, for a further period of six months with effect from August 13, 2025," the Rajya Sabha Parliamentary Bulletin stated. In February, President Droupadi Murmu imposed President's rule in Manipur after receiving a report from the state governor. Singh resigned amid violence and political instability that had plagued the state for nearly two years. Along with Amit Shah's motion to extend the President's rule, Union Minister of Ports, Shipping and Waterways, Sarbananda Sonowal will move the 'Merchant Shipping Bill, 2024'. The bill aim to amend the law relating to merchant shipping to ensure compliance with India"s obligation under the maritime treaties and international instruments to which India is a party and also to ensure the development of Indian shipping and efficient maintenance of Indian mercantile marine in a manner best suited to serve the national interest and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto, be taken into consideration, according to the list of business statement. Moreover, Lok Sabha MP PP Chaudhary and Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra will move a motion to recommend that Rajya Sabha appoint one member for the joint parliamentary committee on One Nation One Election, after the retirement of P. Wilson. "SHRI P. P. CHAUDHARY SMT. PRIYANKA GANDHI VADRA to move the following:- "That this House do recommend to Rajya Sabha that Rajya Sabha do appoint one Member of Rajya Sabha to the Joint Committee on the Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-ninth Amendment) Bill, 2024 and the Union Territories Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2024 in the vacancy caused by the retirement of Shri P. Wilson from Rajya Sabha and communicate to this House the name of the Member so appointed by Rajya Sabha to the Joint Committee," the statement reads.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Operation Sindoor discussion: Rahul Gandhi's "blood of Pahalgam victims" remarks expunged
Parts of Rahul Gandhi 's speech during the Operation Sindoor discussion in the Lok Sabha were expunged from the record after he criticised the government for trying to protect Prime Minister Narendra Modi's image. Gandhi held PM Modi responsible for the Pahalgam attack , saying he had "blood of Pahalgam victims" on his hands. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Product Management Technology Management Cybersecurity PGDM Leadership Project Management Finance Degree Digital Marketing MCA Design Thinking Data Science Data Science healthcare others MBA Artificial Intelligence Operations Management Data Analytics CXO Others Public Policy Healthcare Skills you'll gain: Product Strategy & Competitive Advantage Tactics Product Development Processes & Market Orientations Product Analytics & Data-Driven Decision Making Agile Development, Design Thinking, & Product Leadership Duration: 40 Weeks IIM Kozhikode Professional Certificate in Product Management Starts on Jun 26, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Product Strategy & Roadmapping User-Centric Product Design Agile Product Development Market Analysis & Product Launch Duration: 24 Weeks Indian School of Business Professional Certificate in Product Management Starts on Jun 26, 2024 Get Details He also questioned why Operation Sindoor lasted only 22 minutes and challenged Modi to publicly call US President Donald Trump a liar over his repeated claims of mediating an India-Pakistan ceasefire. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Amalfi Coast 2025. Velasca Undo Addressing the Lok Sabha, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi said that the purpose of Operation Sindoor was to protect the image of the Prime Minister. "His (PM's hands are stained with the blood of those killed in Pahalgam. He used the Air Force to safeguard his public image," Gandhi claimed. Rule 380 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha allows, at the Speaker's discretion, for expunging any words or statements considered to be unparliamentary or unprofessional during a debate or discussion. Live Events Gandhi launched a sharp attack on former US President Donald Trump, accusing him of violating diplomatic norms by inviting Pakistan Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir for lunch. Gandhi alleged that Munir, who he claimed is the mastermind behind the Pahalgam terror attack, was being entertained by Trump while India's Prime Minister chose to remain absent. "The man behind Pahalgam is having lunch with Trump and our Prime Minister is nowhere to be seen," he remarked. The LS Leader of Opposition had participated in the discussion which, went on for two days, on July 29 (Tuesday), where he criticised the handling of Operation Sindoor, claiming that National Democratic Alliance (NDA)-led Centre did not have the "political will" to fight and only wanted to protect the image of PM Modi. "You told the Pakistanis exactly what you would do. You told them we would not hit military targets, you told them we do not want escalation... It means you have directly told Pakistan that you do not have the political will to fight. This is said by the Defence Minister. It means the government of India informed the Pakistgovernment that we have no political will, we don't want to fight. Surrender, immediate surrender in 30 minutes," the Congress MP said. He also attacked PM Modi for his 'silence' on US President Donald Trump's claims of having brokered a ceasefire between India and Pakistan, challenging him to publicly denounce the US president's claim in Parliament. "Donald Trump has said 29 times that he brokered a ceasefire. If he is lying, then the PM should say this in the House that Trump is lying. If he has the courage of Indira Gandhi, let him say here that Donald Trump is a liar. And we didn't lose any planes. If he has even 50 per cent courage of Indira Gandhi." Apart from the LS LoP, certain words and remarks of other MPs, including Baramulla MP Abdul Rashid (also known as Engineer Rashid), Jadavpur MP Saayoni Ghosh, Nilgiris MP A Raja, were expunged after their speeches. Ghosh's words 'monkey' and 'joker,' made about Indira Gandhi and PM Modi, respectively, were expunged. Nilgiris MP and DMK leader A Raja's speech had multiple words expunged like 'shame,' 'incompetence,' 'tyranny,' 'dictatorship,' 'ashamed', and 'nonsense.' From Engineer Rashid's speech, made in Hindi, the word 'died' was removed. The Baramulla MP was requesting his time to speak, saying, "I have come here (in the house) by giving 15 lakh, has your conscience died?' Meanwhile, on Congress MP Praniti Shinde's now-expunged remark in Lok Sabha, PM Modi said, "She was made to say that Operation Sindoor was a 'tamasha'. This is like putting acid (on the wounds) of the 26 people killed by terrorists." The Rajya Sabha is set to continue the discussion on Operation Sindoor today, after a marathon of discussion in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha earlier on Tuesday. (ANI)


Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
Delhi HC upholds conviction of activist Medha Patkar in defamation case filed by Delhi LG VK Saxena
The Delhi High Court on Tuesday upheld the conviction of activist Medha Patkar in a 24-year-old defamation case filed by Delhi Lieutenant Governor VK Saxena, Live Law reported. Justice Shalinder Kaur said that there was no illegality in the decisions taken by the trial court and the appellate court to convict the Narmada Bachao Andolan leader in the case, adding that the orders were passed after consideration of evidence and law. The High Court was hearing a petition filed by Patkar against the trial court's April verdict dismissing her appeal against her conviction in the case. She had also challenged the order directing her to appear in person before the trial court to make submissions on the sentencing. Patkar failed to demonstrate any defects in the procedure that was followed or any error in the law that resulted in the alleged miscarriage of justice, Kaur said on Tuesday. The bench further upheld the decision taken by the appellate court to release Patkar on probation, Bar and Bench reported. However, the High Court modified the probation condition requiring her to appear before the trial court every three months. The activist can now appear online or be represented by an advocate. 'All the other conditions do not require any interference by this court,' Kaur said. The bench also dismissed another petition filed by the activist against the dismissal of her application to introduce and examine an additional witness in the defamation case, Live Law reported. The case was filed in 2001, when Saxena was heading the Ahmedabad-based non-governmental organisation National Council for Civil Liberties. Saxena alleged that Patkar had defamed him in a press note titled 'True face of patriot', which the activist had issued on November 25, 2000. The case, filed in an Ahmedabad court, was transferred to the chief metropolitan magistrate's court in Delhi in 2003. Patkar pleaded not guilty to the charges in 2013. In May 2024, Metropolitan Magistrate Raghav Sharma convicted Patkar in the case. She was found guilty of criminal defamation and held liable to serve two years' jail time, pay a fine, or both. On April 2, Additional Sessions Judge Vishal Singh upheld the verdict convicting Patkar. On April 8, Singh granted Patkar one year's probation in the case, noting that the offence she had committed was not grave enough to warrant imprisonment. However, Patkar had been expected to appear before the court on April 23, furnish probation bonds and deposit a fine of Rs 1 lakh. As the activist did not appear in court or comply with other orders, Singh said that Patkar was deliberately violating the directions and issued a non-bailable warrant. On April 25, Patkar was arrested but released hours later from custody. Her release came after her counsel told the court that the probation order was still valid and that the activist would furnish the probation bonds. The activist had moved the High Court against her conviction. The May 2024 judgement had said that Patkar's press note was a direct attack on Saxena's personal character and loyalty to the nation. The court also observed that Patkar had accused Saxena of 'mortgaging the people of Gujarat and their resources to foreign interests' and held the allegation to be a 'direct attack' on his integrity and public service. 'Such allegations are particularly grave in the public sphere, where patriotism is highly valued, and questioning someone's courage and national loyalty can cause irreversible damage to their public image and social standing,' the court had said.