logo
Celebrities rail against Trump's policies — but hesitate to say his name

Celebrities rail against Trump's policies — but hesitate to say his name

The Hill05-02-2025

After years of launching blistering attacks on President Trump, much of Hollywood appears to be casting him in a new 'Harry Potter'-inspired role: He Who Must Not Be Named.
Rather than blast Trump by name, many of his celebrity critics are instead zipping their lips when it comes to mentioning the 47th president.
From Lady Gaga to Alicia Keys and Shakira, plenty of stars took to the stage at Sunday's Grammy Awards in Los Angeles to speak out about hot-button issues, including transgender rights, immigration and anti-diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) efforts. But none of the music artists name-checked Trump while railing against some of his administration's core focuses.
Even Grammys host Trevor Noah offered up a Trump-related punchline, minus actually speaking the president's name.
'Yesterday, Beyoncé announced her new tour,' Noah said on the CBS broadcast. 'I will say though, Beyoncé, there's tariffs. We can't afford a new tour. Maple syrup is about to be $50,' Noah said, referring to tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China that had been threatened by Trump.
'Everybody's sort of radio silent in terms of mentioning Trump's name,' noted Mark Harvey, an associate professor and the director of graduate business programs at the University of Saint Mary.
The approach from many in the entertainment world just weeks into Trump's second term is in stark contrast to Hollywood's reaction to the commander in chief following his White House win in 2016. A day after Trump's 2017 inauguration, a who's who of Hollywood — including Madonna, Scarlett Johansson and America Ferrera — joined protesters and denounced the new president at the Women's March on Washington and in other U.S. cities.
'There's a night and day difference' between then and now, said Harvey.
The first Trump era was marked by celebs making headlines as they assailed Trump on a regular basis. In 2016, singer Cher dubbed Trump a 'f‑‑‑ing idiot,' saying she wished the then-GOP presidential nominee would 'fall off the face of the Earth.' Comedian Kathy Griffin posed for a controversial photo in 2017 with a bloodied, decapitated fake head meant to resemble the president. Robert De Niro received a standing ovation from the audience at the Tony Awards in 2018 after repeatedly declaring 'f‑‑‑ Trump' onstage.
But in interviews since his November reelection, performers have kept Trump's name out of the conversation.
'The main thing is I have so much compassion and love for so many people that are afraid today,' Lady Gaga said in an interview with Elle UK conducted just days after Trump's win, which the 'Born This Way' singer said she 'prayed' wouldn't happen.
Eva Longoria similarly didn't utter Trump's name while expressing dissatisfaction with him winning the 2024 race against then-Vice President Harris in a November interview with Marie Claire, saying, 'The shocking part is not that he won.'
'It's that a convicted criminal who spews so much hate could hold the highest office,' said the former 'Desperate Housewives' star, who campaigned for Harris and spoke at the Democratic National Convention.
These days, said Harvey, Hollywood seems to be reflecting an attitude of 'we've been here before, we've seen this before.'
'What we did last time wasn't having an impact, so maybe we should do things differently now,' Harvey, the author of 'Celebrity Influence: Politics, Persuasion and Issue-Based Advocacy,' said of what Trump's bevy of star-studded critics could be thinking.
Many famous faces, Harvey said, likely find themselves in a similar predicament right now as the Democratic Party itself.
'If you compare 2016 to now — the slightest thing, every executive order, everything — had an outraged response. You could argue this was a justifiable outrage, but it also didn't matter,' Harvey said.
'[Celebrities] spoke out, and they felt probably by now that some of that was ineffective. I think they're being more choosy about their outrage or how they're going about this. This is going to have to be less about Donald Trump, and more about the issues.'
It's a reset that, knowingly or not, echoes a change in messaging that Democrats adopted as part of their 2018 agenda ahead of the midterm elections. In messaging documents released in 2017, Trump's name was not mentioned a single time.
'People need to know not only what we're fighting against,' Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) said at the time. 'They need to know what we're fighting for.'
Some big names have been open about utilizing a Lord Voldemort-like approach to Trump's name. In J.K. Rowling's famed 'Harry Potter' series, the villain is rarely referred to by his name by the other characters out of fear and worry of retribution.
'I think it might be irresponsible to give him attention,' Stephen Colbert said of Trump in 2021.
While 'there's no avoiding him as a subject,' the 'Late Show' host said of the then-ex-president, 'He shouldn't be [an] essential subject because I think that merely empowers him in some way. That's why I don't like saying his name, or showing his picture, if possible.'
Colbert made an appeal to his show's viewers to submit alternative name suggestions for Trump on social media using the hashtag #HeWhoShallBeNamed. The late-night host began saying 'Trump' again on his CBS program in 2023.
'The View' co-host Whoopi Goldberg also adopted a personal 'don't speak his name' Trump policy on the ABC daytime talk show.
'He's the president. I'm still not going to say his name. That's not going to change,' Goldberg told viewers a day after the 2024 presidential election.
Harvey noted that there are only certain circumstances in which celebrities can exert political influence. While they may fill up movie theaters and concert halls, superstars 'are not good at convincing people on issues that are highly polemic.'
'Celebrities can't get people to give up their guns. Celebrities can't get people to change their mind on abortion,' Harvey said. 'Do you think they're going to change anybody's mind on Donald Trump? Probably not.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

TACO Trump Punts Decision on Bombing Iran in Wild New Twist
TACO Trump Punts Decision on Bombing Iran in Wild New Twist

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

TACO Trump Punts Decision on Bombing Iran in Wild New Twist

President Donald Trump will decide whether to attack Iran within the next two weeks, and has issued a plea to stave off the backlash in his MAGA base: Trust in Trump. As a MAGA civil war over military intervention threatens to tear his party apart, the president has left the door open to a diplomatic off-ramp. 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' he said, in a direct message issued through his White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt. The unexpected twist is reminiscent of the two week window Trump regularly gives Russia to start negotiating a genuine ceasefire with Ukraine. It comes after the president left the nation on edge for days about the possibility that he would help Israel destroy a deeply buried nuclear enrichment facility at Fordow, in northeast Iran, using a 30,000 pound bomb known as a 'bunker buster'. Trump gave numerous mixed messages, insisting the strikes could be imminent and saying it was 'too late' to talk while also insisting that there was scope for negotiations. On Wednesday, he even boasted that 'nobody knows what I'm doing' when it comes to Iran. Tensions escalated this week when he abruptly departed the G7—despite having meetings locked with global allies including Australia and India—to rush to Washington to deal with the issue. For the next three days, he then huddled with his national security advisers to decide whether the U.S. military helps Israel's bombing campaign. But such a move would risk any remaining chance of the nuclear disarmament deal Trump has been pursuing and threatened to tear apart the very base that got him elected. The MAGA civil war over the Iran put conservatives such as pro-Israel war hawks Laura Loomer and Mark Levin on one side, and America First firebrands such as Charlie Kirk, Steve Bannon and Jack Posobiec on the other. 'We can't have another Iraq,' Bannon warned at a breakfast with reporters hosted Wednesday by The Christian Science Monitor. Earlier today, he was spotted at the White House but Leavitt declined to say what he was doing there. The issue also spilled out onto screens this week, with conservative pundit Tucker Carlson—who accused the president of being 'complicit' in the Middle East conflict—skewering Texas Senator Ted Cruz over his support for regime change. Asked what the president would say to those who voted for his 'America First' doctrine and didn't want the nation involved in another foreign war, Leavitt replied: 'Trust in President Trump.' 'President Trump kept America and the world safe in his first term as president, implementing a 'peace through strength' foreign policy agenda,' she said. 'With respect to Iran, nobody should be surprised by the President's position that Iran absolutely cannot obtain a nuclear weapon. He's been absolutely unequivocal about this.' Trump's announcement was immediately mocked online. One critic on social media described it as 'beyond parody' while another joked: 'He's going to announce it during Infrastructure Week when the healthcare plan comes out.' Leavitt was also quizzed about the issue in the briefing room, with one reporter noting that Trump had regularly given Russia two week deadlines on Ukraine, with no outcome. However, she blamed the Biden administration, saying both were complicated global conflicts that the president had inherited.

Trump Boasts ‘Nobody Knows What I'm Doing' as MAGA Civil War Rages
Trump Boasts ‘Nobody Knows What I'm Doing' as MAGA Civil War Rages

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Boasts ‘Nobody Knows What I'm Doing' as MAGA Civil War Rages

President Donald Trump has boasted that 'nobody knows what I'm doing' when it comes to Iran as a MAGA civil war rages over the prospect of a U.S. military attack. Speaking with reporters for the first time since meeting with his national security council on Tuesday, the president refused to say whether the U.S. is moving closer to helping Israel strike Iranian nuclear facilities. 'You don't seriously think I'm going to answer that question,' Trump said, mockingly. 'Will you strike the Iranian nuclear component, and what time exactly? Sir, sir, would you strike it? Will you please inform us so we can be there and watch? 'I mean, you don't know that I'm going to even do it. You don't know. I may do it; I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Trump's comments come as a MAGA civil war has been brewing for days between pro-Israel war hawks such as Laura Loomer and Mark Levin on one side, and America First firebrands such as Charlie Kirk and Jack Posobiec on the other. Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson also entered the fray last week, calling Trump complicit and suggesting that the administration 'drop Israel [and] let them fight their own wars.' Carlson also clashed with Texas Senator Ted Cruz this week, lashing out over Cruz's support for military intervention in Iran despite his apparent lack of knowledge about the country. While a U.S. attack on Iran could have serious consequences for the region, Trump's rhetoric has shifted considerably in recent days, with the president admitting that his patience is wearing thin on finding a diplomatic solution to stop Iran from building its nuclear arsenal. On Wednesday, Iran Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei hit back at the president for his 'absurd rhetoric' after Trump demanded Iran's 'complete surrender' and issued an ominous warning on X: 'The US entering this matter (war) is 100% to its own detriment. The damage will be far greater than any harm that Iran may encounter.' But Trump doubled down on his push for Iran to surrender, telling reporters that Tehran should have negotiated weeks ago. Only now were they rethinking their strategy, he said. 'They even suggested coming to the White House,' he claimed. A U.S. defense official told the Daily Beast it was moving the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group to the Middle East to protect U.S. forces in the region. Vice President JD Vance also posted on X that after showing 'remarkable restraint,' Trump 'may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment.' As the president weighed options, some Democrats on Capitol Hill called for Congress to act. Senator Tim Kaine introduced a resolution to prevent the U.S. from using military force against Iran without congressional approval while several others backed Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders' bill to prevent the use of funds for military force against Iran without congressional authorization. But Democrats were deeply divided over the response to Iran. Senator John Fetterman, who has often bucked his party to fiercely defend Israel, said he would vote against Kaine's resolution. He told reporters he was a 'hell yes' on the U.S. making preemptive strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities. Senate Majority Leader John Thune rejected that the president would need authorization from Congress to strike Iran. 'I think right now the president's within his authorities,' Thune told reporters on Capitol Hill on Tuesday. 'He obviously has a lot of authorities as Commander in Chief to respond to incidents that happen around the world.' Thune said if it goes on for a period of time, there would be discussions on what the role of Congress should be and whether it needed to take action. 'I think right now, let's hope and pray for the best outcome,' he said. Senate Foreign Committee Chair Jim Risch emphasized on Tuesday 'this is not our war' and praised the president for threading the needle when it came to Iran. While the House is not in session this week, in a rare moment of bipartisanship, Republican Rep. Thomas Massie was joined by Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna to introduce a resolution to prohibit the U.S. from getting involved in the conflict. 'This is not our war,' Massie wrote in a post. 'Even if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution.'

Leavitt Gets Skewered on Trump's Bogus ‘Two-Week Deadlines'
Leavitt Gets Skewered on Trump's Bogus ‘Two-Week Deadlines'

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Leavitt Gets Skewered on Trump's Bogus ‘Two-Week Deadlines'

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt took heat from a reporter after announcing that President Donald Trump had punted on whether to attack Iran, giving himself a two-week deadline to decide. The reporter pointed out to Leavitt that Trump has previously given himself two-week deadlines on other major decisions, particularly related to the Russia-Ukraine war, and then failed to meet them. 'He's used this phrase about two weeks several times, in terms of 'We expect a two-week deadline,' and then you give another two-week deadline,' the reporter said. 'How can we be sure that he's gonna stick to this one, making a decision on Iran?' Leavitt's first response was to blame Joe Biden, saying that 'these are two different global conflicts that the president inherited from our previous, incompetent president.' Eventually Leavitt suggested that Trump's tendency to push his own self-assigned deadlines comes from his desire to broker peace. 'The last time the president said two weeks, you saw [Russia and Ukraine] have direct negotiations for the first time in years,' Leavitt said. 'The president is always interested in a diplomatic solution to the problems and the global conflicts in this world,' she added. 'He is a peace-maker-in-chief, he is the peace-through-strength president. If there is a chance for diplomacy, the president will grab it. But he is not afraid to use strength, I will add.' Questions about how Trump will handle the conflict between Israel and Iran have swirled over the last week, and the president has yet to give a straight answer. The prospect of the U.S. joining the conflict on Israel's behalf has divided the president's MAGA supporters. The last two-week deadline Trump set came on May 28, with regard to determining whether Russian President Vladimir Putin actually wants peace against Ukraine. It came and passed last week with no acknowledgment from the president. On April 24, Trump used the two-week line to evade a reporter's question about aid to Ukraine. Three days later, asked whether he trusted Putin, the president said, 'We'll let you know in two weeks.' And on May 19, Trump was asked whether Ukraine had done enough to foster negotiations. 'I'd rather tell you in about two weeks from now because I can't say yes or no,' Trump said. Trump's penchant for backing off of big decisions during his second term has led to the rise of the acronym TACO, short for 'Trump Always Chickens Out.' It went mainstream after Trump repeatedly lowered his steep tariff on China. The president hates the acronym, as he made clear to a reporter who asked him about in May. 'Don't ever say what you said,' Trump told the reporter. 'That's a nasty question.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store