Reeves outlines plan for £25bn pension 'megafunds'
However, the government is also including a legislative back-stop, which will allow it to push through the new rules, if insufficient progress is made by the end of the decade.The government has indicated it does not expect to use the new powers. Nevertheless, that element may draw criticism, with some in the industry opposed to any government mandate over how and where investments are made.Zoe Alexander, a director at the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association, said the changes would have "significant implications" for how pension schemes operated.But she added: "Increased consolidation has the potential to improve retirement outcomes through improved governance, wider investment diversification and improved bargaining power." Miles Celic chief executive of The City UK, representing the financial services industry, backed the chancellor's assertion that the move could "help drive economic growth". A former Liberal Democrat pensions minister, Sir Steve Webb, who is now a partner at consultants LCP (Lane Clark & Peacock), described the news as "truly a red letter day for pension schemes, their members and the companies who stand behind them"."The Government has clearly been bold in this area and this opens up the potential for this surplus money to be used more productively to benefit scheme members, firms and the wider economy," he added.
One of Labour's first moves after taking office last year was the announcement of a pension review. In November the chancellor floated her "megafunds" plan, which covers retirement savings for the majority of UK workers in two ways.Firstly, there are the 86 different local authority pension schemes, which provide for more than six million people in their retirement, the majority low-paid women. The £392bn in these defined benefit schemes will be merged in just six asset pools by March next year.In a defined benefit scheme a worker pays into their pension and is paid a pre-determined amount based on their salary and length of service.Local investment targets will be agreed for local authority pension schemes for the first time, the Treasury said.Secondly, defined contribution schemes currently worth £800bn, and covering millions of other private and public sector workers across the country, will also be consolidated.In defined contribution schemes workers are not guaranteed a specific amount. Instead their pension depends on the performance of the fund in the years before retirement.By 2030 the government says there should be more than 20 pension funds worth more than £25bn, in contrast to the current ten.As part of the voluntary agreement, known as the Mansion House accord, agreed earlier in May, the 17 firms involved committed to investing 10% of their assets in things other than publicly traded shares, so that more money would flow into home-building, infrastructure projects and start-up businesses in fast-growing sectors.In addition, 5% of investments will be earmarked to go into UK assets.The reforms will form part of the Pension Schemes Bill, about to go before Parliament.
The new approach would mean over £50bn additional investment in UK infrastructure, new homes and businesses, the Treasury said.On Thursday the government is publishing the final report from its Pensions Investment Review. It said the review found the reforms would drive higher returns for pension savers through cutting waste, economies of scale and improved investment strategies.As a result workers on average earnings could see a £6,000 boost to their defined contribution pension pot, the Treasury said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Car finance mis-selling payout scheme could be worth billions, says FCA
A compensation scheme to pay out drivers who were mis-sold car loans could cost as much as £18 billion, the financial regulator has said. Millions of drivers were denied payouts on Friday after the Supreme Court ruled that lenders are not liable for hidden commission payments in car finance schemes. Two lenders, FirstRand Bank and Close Brothers, challenged a Court of Appeal ruling that the 'secret' commission payments paid to car dealers as part of finance arrangements made before 2021 - without the motorist's fully informed consent - were unlawful. After the Supreme Court's decision the bulk of the claims will therefore not go ahead, with only the most serious claims eligible for compensation. The £18bn figure is a significant drop from the £45bn if the Supreme Court upheld the ruling in full. 'It is clear that some firms have broken the law and our rules. It's fair for their customers to be compensated. We also want to ensure that the market, relied on by millions each year, can continue to work well and consumers can get a fair deal,' said Nikhil Rathi, chief executive of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The regulator said the final cost of the scheme would depend on its final design, which makes it difficult to estimate precisely. 'The FCA thinks it unlikely the cost of the scheme, including to run it, would be much lower than £9 billion,' it said in a statement. 'And it could be higher, up to £18 billion in some scenarios though the FCA doesn't believe these are the most likely. A total cost midway in the range, as forecast by some analysts, is more plausible.' Individuals are forecasted to receive less than £950 in compensation. The consultation for payouts is due to be launched by early October, with the first payments due to be made in 2026. Those who have already made complaints do not need to do anything further, the FCA added, and anyone who believes they were not told about commission and believes they may have paid too much should make a complaint now. The FCA warns that consumers do not need to use a claims management company or law firm for the claim. 'Our aim is a compensation scheme that's fair and easy to participate in, so there's no need to use a claims management company or law firm. If you do, it will cost you a significant chunk of any money you get,' Mr Rathi's statement added. 'It will take time to establish a scheme but we hope to start getting people any money they are owed next year.'
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
What is Yvette Cooper's plan to fast-track asylum claims?
As tensions flare up in the UK over migration, with protests taking place in Newcastle, Manchester and north London, the government is pursuing a new plan to reduce the asylum backlog. The home secretary has said she plans to introduce a fast-track scheme to turn around asylum decisions within weeks, via a 'major overhaul' of the appeal process. The plan is part of a wider attempt to crack down on the number of people crossing the Channel, with Ms Cooper announcing a 'one-in-one-out' returns deal with France earlier this year. But despite their efforts, last week it was revealed that the number of migrants arriving in the UK after crossing the English Channel topped 25,000 in record time, piling pressure on the government to take further action. It is hoped that the new plan will make a dent in the backlog and return people to safe countries faster, reducing the number of asylum seekers who are housed in hotels while awaiting the outcome of a claim or appeal. Here, The Independent takes a look at everything we know about the plan so far and how it will work in practice. How would the fast-track system work? Asylum seekers and their families are housed in temporary accommodation, including hotels, if they are waiting for the outcome of a claim or an appeal and have been assessed as not being able to support themselves independently. But Yvette Cooper has now promised a 'major overhaul' of the appeal process, speeding up the time it takes for decisions on claims and appeals to be made. There are currently limited details on how this system would work, but sources told the Sunday Times it would allow decisions to be taken within weeks, rather than months or even years. Once a decision has been taken, those who have been rejected will be returned to their home country – reducing the number of people housed in temporary accommodation. 'If we speed up the decision-making appeal system and also then keep increasing returns, we hope to be able to make quite a big reduction in the overall numbers in the asylum system, because that is the best way to actually restore order and control,' Ms Cooper said. When will it be implemented? The home secretary has said she will legislate for the changes in autumn, when MPs return from their summer break. But it could take months for any legislation to pass through parliament, meaning we are unlikely to see the fast-track system implemented until the new year. How big is the asylum backlog and why is tackling it a priority? As of the end of March 2025, there were 78,745 asylum applications awaiting an initial decision – an 8 per cent decrease from the end of June 2024 and a 13 per cent decrease compared to the end of December 2024, official immigration statistics show. These outstanding cases related to 109,536 people, including both main applicants and their dependents. Labour has put a pledge to fix the 'broken' asylum system and crack down on the number of people coming to the UK on small boats at the centre of its plan for government. But with boat crossings at a record high, and the asylum backlog still above 75,000, there is mounting pressure on ministers to take more drastic action, a pressure exacerbated by the success of Reform UK in the polls. The government has also promised to end the use of asylum hotels before the end of this parliament, a promise it is unlikely to meet unless the backlog is reduced. Tensions over asylum hotels have flared up in recent weeks, with a protest and counter-protest taking place on Saturday outside the Thistle City Barbican Hotel in north London, and also in Newcastle and Manchester.
Telegraph
5 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Council leader accuses police of covering up rape of girl, 12, by asylum seekers
A council leader has accused police of 'covering up' an alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl by Afghan asylum seekers. Ahmad Mulakhil, 23, was charged last week with the rape of the girl in Nuneaton, while Mohammad Kabir, 23, was charged with kidnap and strangulation. Warwickshire Police reportedly advised local councillors and officials not to reveal the asylum-seeker background of the two suspects, for fear of 'inflaming community tensions'. Reform UK's George Finch, the leader of the county council, said in a letter to the force's chief constable: 'The continued cover-up of the true nature of Ahmad Mulakhil's immigration status risks public disorder breaking out on the streets of Warwickshire. 'The same detail has been covered up today concerning Mohammed Kabir. I am disgusted that one year on from the social unrest that we saw in parts of the UK in 2024, the Home Office and police have clearly not learnt any lessons from the handling of similar incidents last year. 'I strongly believe that the only risk to public order from this case in Warwickshire comes from the cover-up itself.' Warwickshire Police has not denied reports that Mr Mulakhil and Mr Kabir are both asylum seekers. The pair have appeared at Coventry magistrates' court and were both remanded in custody until an appearance at Warwick Crown Court on Aug 26. It comes after protests outside a migrant hotel in Epping, Essex, after it emerged an asylum seeker staying there had been charged with sexual assault, harassment and inciting a girl to engage in sexual activity. One man, from Warwickshire, told the Mail on Sunday: 'They're hushing it up because they don't want an Epping situation on their hands.' In a statement, the force said that once someone is charged with an offence, they follow national guidance, which 'does not include sharing ethnicity or immigration status'. Farage: Police acting against British people Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, which runs Warwickshire county council, said: 'I am afraid police and elected officials are acting against the British people.' In his letter, which was also sent to Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, Mr Finch claimed the council's chief executive told him Mr Kabir was an asylum seeker. He said: 'Residents can see they have not been told the full story. If these accusations turn out to be true, it indicates that organised crime centring around the abuse of young girls is present in Warwickshire. This is unacceptable.' He also called for all asylum seekers living in houses of multiple occupation (HMO) in Warwickshire to be rehoused. Mr Finch said: 'Our community has had enough of the Home Office breaking planning regulations to turn sections of local communities into unrecognisable, ghetto-like areas. 'Having my ear to the ground locally, it is clear that there is much appetite for protests to take place across the county. 'Let me be clear, I do not want to see protests taking place outside migrant hotels and HMOs in Warwickshire. Nor do I want to see any form of violent disorder.' The victim is now said to be receiving specialist care after the attack. Mr Mulakhil, who reportedly crossed the Channel on a small boat, is said to have raped the victim in the Cheverel Street area of Nuneaton, between 8.30pm and 9.45pm on July 22. The Mail on Sunday published CCTV footage from a resident's house near the street, which appears to show a man walking with the girl. The pair walked past the property at 8pm, about half an hour before the alleged assault. Accused pair lived on adjoining streets Warwickshire Police said Mr Mulakhil was arrested four days after the incident, and charged the following day. He appeared before Coventry magistrates' court on Monday charged with two counts of vaginal and oral rape of the victim. Kabir was arrested on Thursday, and charged with aiding and abetting rape of the 12-year-old, as well as strangulation and kidnap. He appeared before Coventry magistrates' court on Saturday. Warwickshire Police said in a statement: 'At this stage, we do not believe there to be anyone else involved but we continue to appeal for witnesses who were in the Cheverel Street area between 8.30pm and 9.45pm on Tuesday 22 July and who saw anything of interest to please come forward.' The Mail on Sunday said Mr Mulakhil and Mr Kabir lived in two tax-payer-funded rented houses about 70 yards from each other on adjoining streets. Both properties are managed by Serco, which has accommodated about five asylum seekers in each house. Serco has a £1.9bn contract with the Home Office to house asylum seekers across the country. When the paper contacted the owner of the property in which Mr Mulakhil lived, she said she was 'sickened to the stomach' when hearing about the incident. She said: 'I don't know anything because Serco manage the house completely.' Serco said in a statement: 'We do not confirm individual addresses, nor the names of people in properties we manage.'
