Australian Agricultural Co Ltd (ASAGF) (FY 2025) Earnings Call Highlights: Record Cash Flow ...
Release Date: May 21, 2025
For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.
Australian Agricultural Co Ltd (ASAGF) achieved its highest operating cash flow and second highest operating profit since 2017.
The company reported a 15% increase in total sales revenue, driven by higher meat and cattle sales volumes.
ASAGF's strategic refresh and focus on sustainability initiatives, such as the solarable program and soil carbon project, are expected to provide long-term benefits.
The company maintained a stable herd size with improved productivity, contributing to increased revenue.
ASAGF's brands, including West Home and Darling Downs, showed significant sales growth and market expansion.
The company reported a statutory net loss of $1.1 million, impacted by the unrealized mark-to-market value of the herd.
Inflationary pressures led to a 5% increase in the cost of production per kilo.
Price pressures in some regions resulted in an overall reduction in the weighted average meat sales price per kilogram.
The company faced challenges from dynamic markets, evolving trade conditions, and supply and demand constraints.
An unfortunate animal welfare incident occurred earlier in the year, highlighting the need for improved procedures to prevent future occurrences.
Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Signs with ASAGF.
Q: With gearing levels at the lower end of the company's target range and the stock trading at a 43.5% discount to NTA, has a buyback been considered? A: Dave Harris, MD and CEO: The decision regarding a share buyback is for the board to make. Currently, the focus is on reinvesting in the business to develop the three strategic business areas, which we believe will provide long-term benefits for shareholders.
Q: What is the strategy for debt reduction and future dividend payments? A: Glenn Steadman, CFO: With the strategic refresh, we have identified areas requiring future investment. Therefore, debt reduction is unlikely as we pursue these investment opportunities.
Q: Can you please advise how many franking credits AAC has? How much possible fully franked dividend per share does this represent? Why does AAC have a policy of not paying dividends, and when is it likely a dividend may be paid? A: Dave Harris, MD and CEO: Currently, there are zero franking credits. The decision on dividends is for the board. Regarding the unfortunate incident where cattle died due to a water supply failure, we have conducted an investigation and developed procedures to minimize the likelihood of such an event occurring again.
Q: What were the impacts, if any, of the heavy rain and Northern Queensland floods in March? How is the pasture since the floods? A: Dave Harris, MD and CEO: The property most affected was South Galway, experiencing significant flooding. Fortunately, there were minimal cattle losses, and the rain was beneficial overall, putting us in good shape for the season ahead.
Q: Post-liberation Day, what have you witnessed with respect to trade flows and pricing, and how is AAC positioning itself given likely ongoing volatility? A: Dave Harris, MD and CEO: We focus on controllable factors, working with distributors and customers in each region. Our broad marketing opportunities allow us to move products through different markets as conditions change, ensuring the best outcomes for both customers and the business.
For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.
This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
31 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
British Airways: Air-Travel Demand Starting to Recover From ‘Liberation Day' Hit
It looks like the drop-off in demand that airlines recorded after 'Liberation Day' might have just been a blip, according to the chief executive of British Airways' parent company. Sales, particularly for economy-class seats across the Atlantic, began stuttering after President Trump unveiled his tariff line-up in early April. But in the past three weeks, that demand has started to see "a recovery," IAG CEO Luis Gallego said at the WSJ CEO Council.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump's first term shows why markets are cautious on the China trade deal
The stock market was largely unmoved by the trade agreement the US struck with China. Market pros say investors expect the trade war to unfold much as it did during Trump's first term. The US and China made scant progress on key issues in their 2018-2019 trade dispute. The stock market has been encouraged by easing tensions between the US and China in recent weeks, but investors were largely unmoved by the announcement of a trade deal between the superpowers on Tuesday. US stock futures failed to climb on news of the deal late Tuesday evening. While markets are edging higher on Wednesday, that's largely because the consumer price index report for May showed inflation was tamer than expected at 2.4% year-over-year. Here's where major indexes stood at 10:20 a.m. ET: S&P 500: 6,055.26, up 0.28% Dow Jones Industrial Average: 42,997.65, up 0.31% (+130.78 points) Nasdaq Composite: 19,788.36, up 0.37% On the trade front, observers say it's looking more likely that the trade war will shake out like it did during President Donald Trump's first term, with talk of constructive deals even as tensions remain elevated. Simply put, investors see a long and winding path ahead, and knee-jerk reactions to trade announcements have largely subsided since the chaos of "Liberation Day" in April. The framework agreement announced on Tuesday outlines how the two nations will continue trade talks. Importantly, it involves China allowing exports of rare earth minerals, while the US eases up on restrictions for exports of advanced tech to China, like semiconductors. This embedded content is not available in your region. The reaction is far more muted than how the market reacted last month, when stocks popped after the US struck a rough framework deal with China that lowered tariffs between the nations for 90 days. Art Hogan, the chief market strategist at B. Riley Wealth, told Business Insider that markets are reacting to trade talks similarly to when the US-China trade war first kicked off in 2018. He pointed to regular pullbacks in stocks during Trump's first term as traders digested the lack of progress in US-China negotiations. "We still have that muscle memory from Trump 1.0, that dealing with China is difficult and there's a multitude of issues," Hogan said. "I don't think we're going to solve this in short order and likely never solve it in the longer term." He added that markets are likely waiting for a more positive catalyst, pointing to more than 100 nations that have yet to strike a trade deal with the US. Peter Berezin, the chief global strategist at BCA Research, said the framework made only small progress on negotiations with China. "I would say that the 'deal' in London simply restores things to how they were right after Geneva," he told BI in an email. He added that he expected tariffs on China to remain high "for the foreseeable future." Strategists at Deutsche Bank also said that tariff talks appear to mirror the 2018-2019 period, when the US and China didn't make much headway in resolving key issues. Back then, the US said that China had unfair trade practices related to industries like agriculture and manufacturing. It also said China had unfairly transferred technology and stolen intellectual property from the US. Deutsche Bank pointed out that the agreement announced Tuesday skipped over fentanyl-related tariffs that Trump implemented against China earlier this year. "So while the mood music has stayed positive, investors may be wary of the pattern that emerged during the previous US-China trade talks in 2018-19," strategists wrote. "So there's perhaps a little disappointment this morning that we haven't yet got a bigger announcement." The agreement also appeared to lack detail that markets were looking for, David Morrison, a senior market analyst at Trade Nation, wrote in a note. "The big question is what kind of trade deals can the US negotiate that will be good enough to get the indices to fresh records?" he said. US stocks have whipsawed this year amid the turmoil surrounding tariffs and incremental news of trade agreements between the US and other countries. Indexes have erased their steep losses since the April 2 tariff announcements, with major averages now positive year-to-date. Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Treasury Secretary Suddenly Backtracks on Major Tariff Deadline
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent indicated that Donald Trump is again intending to move the goalposts for his global tariff policy. The United States is fast approaching the end of the president's 90-day pause on his sweeping global tariffs on July 9, but while testifying before the House Ways and Means Committee on Wednesday, Bessent said that 'Liberation Day' Part 2 may not come to pass so soon. 'I would say, as I have repeatedly said, that there are 18 important trading partners. We are working toward deals on those. And it is highly likely that those countries that are negoti—or trading blocs, in the case of the EU—who are negotiating in good faith, we will roll the date forward to continue good-faith negotiations,' Bessent said. 'If someone is not negotiating, then we will not,' he added. The Trump administration has not even vaguely approached its initial promise to crack 90 deals in 90 days, only announcing two unfinished deals, with the U.K. and China. Crucially, Trump's paltry set of terms with China isn't even a deal. China referred to it as merely a 'framework,' while Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said it was a 'handshake for a framework' that both Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping need to approve. Trump seems intent on running the country's economic policy in 90-day increments, prolonging economic uncertainty that has roiled the markets and sent prices rising. But the president's failure should hardly come as a surprise, as the stated purpose of his tariffs—not to ensure economic prosperity but to bring U.S. trading partners to their knees—defies all logic and reason. With only two half-deals made, and a suddenly unclear horizon, it's not clear how TACO Trump will ever reach the goal of 200 trade deals he'd claimed to have made in April. Especially considering that there aren't even that many countries.
