Australian Agricultural Co Ltd (ASAGF) (FY 2025) Earnings Call Highlights: Record Cash Flow ...
For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.
Australian Agricultural Co Ltd (ASAGF) achieved its highest operating cash flow and second highest operating profit since 2017.
The company reported a 15% increase in total sales revenue, driven by higher meat and cattle sales volumes.
ASAGF's strategic refresh and focus on sustainability initiatives, such as the solarable program and soil carbon project, are expected to provide long-term benefits.
The company maintained a stable herd size with improved productivity, contributing to increased revenue.
ASAGF's brands, including West Home and Darling Downs, showed significant sales growth and market expansion.
The company reported a statutory net loss of $1.1 million, impacted by the unrealized mark-to-market value of the herd.
Inflationary pressures led to a 5% increase in the cost of production per kilo.
Price pressures in some regions resulted in an overall reduction in the weighted average meat sales price per kilogram.
The company faced challenges from dynamic markets, evolving trade conditions, and supply and demand constraints.
An unfortunate animal welfare incident occurred earlier in the year, highlighting the need for improved procedures to prevent future occurrences.
Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Signs with ASAGF.
Q: With gearing levels at the lower end of the company's target range and the stock trading at a 43.5% discount to NTA, has a buyback been considered? A: Dave Harris, MD and CEO: The decision regarding a share buyback is for the board to make. Currently, the focus is on reinvesting in the business to develop the three strategic business areas, which we believe will provide long-term benefits for shareholders.
Q: What is the strategy for debt reduction and future dividend payments? A: Glenn Steadman, CFO: With the strategic refresh, we have identified areas requiring future investment. Therefore, debt reduction is unlikely as we pursue these investment opportunities.
Q: Can you please advise how many franking credits AAC has? How much possible fully franked dividend per share does this represent? Why does AAC have a policy of not paying dividends, and when is it likely a dividend may be paid? A: Dave Harris, MD and CEO: Currently, there are zero franking credits. The decision on dividends is for the board. Regarding the unfortunate incident where cattle died due to a water supply failure, we have conducted an investigation and developed procedures to minimize the likelihood of such an event occurring again.
Q: What were the impacts, if any, of the heavy rain and Northern Queensland floods in March? How is the pasture since the floods? A: Dave Harris, MD and CEO: The property most affected was South Galway, experiencing significant flooding. Fortunately, there were minimal cattle losses, and the rain was beneficial overall, putting us in good shape for the season ahead.
Q: Post-liberation Day, what have you witnessed with respect to trade flows and pricing, and how is AAC positioning itself given likely ongoing volatility? A: Dave Harris, MD and CEO: We focus on controllable factors, working with distributors and customers in each region. Our broad marketing opportunities allow us to move products through different markets as conditions change, ensuring the best outcomes for both customers and the business.
For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.
This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
4 hours ago
Las Vegas tourism is down. Some blame Trump's tariffs and immigration crackdown
LAS VEGAS -- Tourism in Las Vegas is slumping this summer, with resorts and convention centers reporting fewer visitors compared to last year, especially from abroad, and some officials are blaming the Trump administration's tariffs and immigration policies for the decline. The city known for lavish shows, endless buffets and around-the-clock gambling welcomed just under 3.1 million tourists in June, an 11% drop compared to the same time in 2024. There were 13% fewer international travelers, and hotel occupancy fell by about 15%, according to data from the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority. Mayor Shelley Berkley said tourism from Canada — Nevada's largest international market — has dried up from a torrent 'to a drip.' Same with Mexico. 'We have a number of very high rollers that come in from Mexico that aren't so keen on coming in right now. And that seems to be the prevailing attitude internationally,' Berkley told reporters earlier this month. Ted Pappageorge, head of the powerful Culinary Workers Union, called it the 'Trump slump.' He said visits from Southern California, home to a large Latino population, were also drying up because people are afraid of the administration's immigration crackdown. 'If you if you tell the rest of the world they're not welcome, then they won't come,' Pappageorge said. Canadian airline data shows fewer passengers from north of the border are arriving at Harry Reid International Airport in Las Vegas. Air Canada saw its passenger numbers fall by 33% in June compared to the same time a year ago, while WestJet had a 31% drop. The low-cost carrier Flair reported a whopping 62% decline. Travel agents in Canada said there's been a significant downturn in clients wanting to visit the U.S. overall, and Las Vegas in particular. Wendy Hart, who books trips from Windsor, Ontario, said the reason was 'politics, for sure.' She speculated that it was a point of 'national pride' that people were staying away from the U.S. after President Donald Trump said he wanted to make Canada the 51st state. 'The tariffs are a big thing too. They seem to be contributing to the rising cost of everything,' Hart said. At downtown's Circa Resort and Casino, international visits have dipped, especially from Canada and Japan, according to owner and CEO Derek Stevens. But the downturn comes after a post-COVID spike, Stevens said. And while hotel room bookings are slack, gaming numbers, especially for sports betting, are still strong, he said. 'It's not as if the sky is falling,' he said. Wealthier visitors are still coming, he said, and Circa has introduced cheaper package deals to lure those with less money to spend. 'There have been many stories written about how the 'end is near' in Vegas,' he said. 'But Vegas continues to reinvent itself as a destination worth visiting.' On AAA's annual top ten list of top Labor Day destinations, Las Vegas slipped this year to the last spot, from number six in 2024. Seattle and Orlando, Florida — home to Disneyworld — hold steady in the top two spots, with New York City moving up to third for 2025. Reports of declining tourism were news to Alison Ferry, who arrived from Donegal, Ireland, to find big crowds at casinos and the Vegas Strip. 'It's very busy. It has been busy everywhere that we've gone. And really, really hot,' Ferry said. She added that she doesn't pay much attention to U.S. politics. Just off the strip, there's been no slowdown at the Pinball Museum, which showcases games from the 1930s through today. Manager Jim Arnold said the two-decade-old attraction is recession-proof because it's one of the few places to offer free parking and free admission. 'We've decided that our plan is just to ignore inflation and pretend it doesn't exist," Arnold said. 'So you still take a quarter out of your pocket and put it in a game, and you don't pay a resort fee or a cancelation fee or any of that jazz.' But Arnold said he's not surprised that overall tourism might be slowing because of skyrocketing prices at high-end restaurants and resorts, which 'squeezes out the low end tourist.' The mayor said the rising cost of food, hotel rooms and attractions also keeps visitors away. 'People are feeling that they're getting nickeled and dimed, and they're not getting value for their dollar,' Berkley said. She called on business owners to 'see if we can't make it more affordable' for tourists.
Business Insider
6 hours ago
- Business Insider
M&A News: Dayforce Stock (DAY) Cheered to the Rafters as PE Group Thoma Bravo Lines up Bid
Shares in human resources management software group Dayforce (DAY) rocketed over 20% higher today on reports that it is set to be bought by private equity firm Thoma Bravo. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. According to a report in Bloomberg, Thoma Bravo wants to take Dayforce, which is valued at around $8.4 billion, private in a deal that could be announced as soon as the next few weeks. Bidding War Potential However, the Bloomberg report cautioned that while discussions are said to be advanced, they could still be delayed or falter. It is also possible that a bidding war could emerge if another bidder steps forward. Dayforce has struggled to find much light in the last few years. Its shares have fallen about 60% from their peak in 2021. This is despite its revenue racing over 70% higher between 2021 and 2024 and becoming more profitable. The main drag on its shares has been the difficulties faced by the enterprise software market. It has struggled to maintain the momentum it gained while many people were forced to work from home during the Covid-19 lockdowns. During those turbulent times, companies invested in upgrading their systems only to pull back after offices reopened. AI Offering The uncertain economy has also squeezed corporate spending, but in Dayforce's favor is that it is well-placed to take advantage of the relentless rise of AI. That's because it provides AI-powered software for managing recruitment, payrolls and employee career development. Its customers include companies in the health-care, retail and hospitality and financial services sectors. 'We would not be surprised if DAY chose to sell given the lack of appreciation for the stock in the public markets,' Jefferies Financial Group Inc. analysts including Samad Samana wrote in a note to clients after the Bloomberg report. 'It has been tough sledding for DAY the last few years post-Covid highs, not unlike the rest of the HR/payroll coverage universe. However, it has also underperformed the entire group.' This deal would also signal a more aggressive approach from Thoma Bravo in an uncertain environment for private equity firms. It agreed to buy Boeing (BA) Co.'s flight navigation unit and other digital assets for $10.6 billion in April, and in July it struck a $2 billion deal to buy restaurant software maker Olo (OLO). The firm has also reportedly been in talks about a potential takeover of Verint Systems (VRNT). Is DAY a Good Stock to Buy Now? On TipRanks, DAY has a Moderate Buy consensus based on 9 Buy, 4 Hold and 1 Sell ratings. Its highest price target is $95. DAY stock's consensus price target is $68.08, implying a 28.74% upside.
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why Trump's tariffs haven't shown up for consumers — yet
Despite a huge wall of U.S. tariffs on imported goods, Target hauls still cost roughly what they did last month. And the month before. And the month before that. No sticker shock. No sudden spike. But it's not that the tariffs aren't doing what tariffs always do. It's that companies are buying time. For months, tariffs have sounded like a distant thunderclap: constant rumbling, no downpour. Prices at the supermarket haven't jumped in a way that maps neatly onto the headlines; despite all the drama, the economy hasn't buckled. If anything, the economic story since 'Liberation Day' has felt weirdly muted. But the data — and the people who parse it for a living — are still saying that the quiet is the setup. Tariffs are taxes, and taxes don't stay hidden forever. They work through ports, contracts, and production runs before they hit a cash register. And the experts still think the lag will end. Soon. Money doesn't always speak with immediacy. The government's sweeping tariffs — 10% baseline on most imports; 25% on autos and auto parts; 50% on steel, aluminum, and copper; 30% on Chinese goods (following an earlier 145% peak); and 50% on goods from Brazil — are working their way into grocery and hardware bills. But look around: Americans are operating under a carefully constructed economic calm, something that feels fragile, maybe theatrical, but is anything but random. Start with the scoreboard. July's Consumer Price Index rose 2.7% from a year earlier, unchanged from June, but the more telling 'core' measure accelerated to 3.1%, the highest reading since February. That 3.1% isn't a panic number, but it is a direction — and it's pointing the wrong way for a central bank that still talks about 2% as a goal. The labor side isn't soothing, either. The economy added just 73,000 jobs in July , and unemployment ticked up to 4.2%, with earlier months revised down sharply — an unhelpful mix of cooler hiring and stickier prices that complicates the Federal Reserve's next (and closely watched) move. '[July's CPI] print again suggests that the impact of tariffs on prices is more gradual than feared — even if it's fairly pronounced in categories like furniture and AV equipment,' Elyse Ausenbaugh, head of investment strategy at J.P. Morgan Wealth Management, said Tuesday. Added Chris Zaccarelli, chief investment officer for Northlight Management, 'As the battle continues over whether or not tariffs will lead to persistent inflation, this month's report did nothing to convince anyone.' The calm before the storm Goldman Sachs recently did the math on how long the quiet will last. Its economists estimated that, through June, U.S. companies have absorbed a hefty 64% of tariff costs, leaving consumers with a mere 22% and foreign exporters with the remainder. But Goldman's analysts don't think the tariff cushion will last. By the end of the year, Goldman predicted, about two-thirds of the tariff cost will be passed to consumers, nudging core PCE inflation toward 3.2%. This smokescreen isn't accidental. Companies largely front-loaded inventory before tariff changes arrived, building a buffer to hide structural cost shifts. But President Donald Trump didn't like Goldman's numbers. He blasted the company and its CEO, David M. Solomon, in a Truth Social post . 'I think that David should go out and get himself a new Economist,' the president wrote, 'Or, maybe, he ought to just focus on being a DJ, and not bother running a major Financial Institution.' Still, all summer, policymakers have started talking about tariffs not as a headline, but as a pipeline. 'Overall, I expect tariffs to boost inflation by about 1 percentage point over the second half of this year and the first part of next year,' New York Fed President John Williams said in mid-July , adding that the aggregate data so far shows only the 'initial effects.' Richmond Fed President Thomas Barkin was blunter: 'I do believe we will see pressure on prices,' he said in late June , while noting that earlier readings had shown only 'modest effects' from new levies. Four days ago, St. Louis Fed President Alberto Musalem described the policy trade-off as there being 'risks now to both the inflation and jobs goals.' And earlier this month , Marina Azzimonti, a senior economist and research advisor for the Richmond Fed, pointed to lags in customs processing, legacy exemptions, and strategic delays as further reasons imported costs haven't yet rippled through to shelves and scanners. Meanwhile, some firms are quietly negotiating cost-sharing, pushing parts of the burden further upstream. What's showing up in the numbers is the classic tariff pattern: a slow burn that intensifies as inventories roll, exceptions narrow, and companies stop cushioning the blow. That's why a steady headline CPI and a firmer core can coexist; tariff pressure tends to creep in through goods categories and spill outward. The Fed's Williams laid out the mechanics : Price increases are already running 'well above' trend in tariff-exposed items such as household appliances, luggage, and tableware, and tariff receipts jumped to about 8% of import value by May as earlier stockpiles cleared. He also pointed to a New York Fed survey that found that nearly a third of manufacturers and roughly 45% of service firms fully passed on tariff-related cost increases. The effects, he said, are still early — 'but I expect those effects to increase in coming months.' And that's, well, just about now. The macroeconomic cushion that has kept tariffs from being instantly visible is thinner than it was in the spring. Markets have treated the latest inflation release as survivable. And it is — for now. But survivable is different from sustainable. The Fed can talk about cutting rates in September only if the price impulse doesn't broaden. Tariffs put a thumb on that scale. The first-term test case If this all sounds theoretical, it shouldn't. There's a nearly perfect control experiment from 2018–19. In an analysis of Trump's first-term tariff wave , economists Mary Amiti, Stephen Redding, and David Weinstein found 'complete pass-through' of the import taxes into U.S. import prices and concluded that 'the full incidence of the tariffs has fallen on domestic consumers and importers,' shaving about $1.4 billion a month off real income by the end of 2018. That's prices doing what basic trade math says they'll do when a tax shows up at the border. Even in 2018–19, the pass-through into retail categories was staggered. Import prices adjusted fastest; shelf prices crept as contracts rolled and buyers traded down. But the aggregate lesson isn't an ambiguous one. Amiti, Redding, and Weinstein summed it up in their paper: The U.S. 'experienced substantial increases in the prices of intermediates and final goods,' with welfare losses on top of the tax burden. Put differently: The pain shows up, even if it takes a circuitous route. Which brings us to the part of the story that matters for the rest of 2025: who pays next. If core goods categories start to widen beyond the early hot spots that economists have flagged, the consumer take-rate of the tariff bill will rise right alongside them. At some point, price wins the argument. Even Wall Street's street-side specialists are signaling shifts. Goldman's David Kostin said in early July that the real question isn't if tariffs matter, but rather whose margins or prices adjust first. Early second-quarter earnings show companies tentatively absorbing costs. But once inventory falls, expect a shift in tone — and prices — with little fanfare. At the end of July, the Yale Budget Lab calculated that effective tariffs could peak at 20.2%, the highest since 1911, translating to a painful $2,700 annual hit per household in 2025. Even with consumers adjusting, that's an undeniable blow to buying power. When firms finally relent, it will be at margins, not just in dollar signs. The S&P 500 could shrink 1-2% in earnings per share for every five-point tariff hike. That's not a theoretical shock. GM and other automakers are already flagging billion-dollar hits. Even companies such as Apple have taken extraordinary plucks at profitability amid rising commodity costs. That means corporate guidance downshifts, investment chills, and strategic caution spread throughout boardrooms. The president, unsurprisingly, isn't buying any critiques. In that same Truth Social post aimed at Goldman, Trump cast the tariffs as an unqualified win, claiming they've been 'incredible for our Country, its Stock Market, its General Wealth, and just about everything else.' He insisted they've brought 'massive amounts of CASH' into the Treasury without fueling inflation, and argued that 'for the most part, Consumers aren't even paying these Tariffs,' pinning the cost instead on companies and foreign governments. 'It has been proven, that even at this late stage, Tariffs have not caused Inflation, or any other problems for America,' he wrote. From rhetoric to reality But tariffs don't live on campaign slogans or Truth Social posts. They live on pallets, in shipping containers, on inventory sheets, and eventually, on receipts. So while the president insists consumers aren't paying, the reality is unfolding more slowly — and more structurally. The sticker shock may be staggered, but the math is still the math. What does that that slow-motion reality look like in practice? First, more visible increases in tariff-exposed goods that had been cushioned by earlier shipments — appliances and household furnishings are the textbook categories, but think broader: travel gear, tableware, certain electronics, select auto parts. The more a category is exposed to higher tariffs, the higher its prices have risen relative to the trend this year. Second, fewer workarounds. Some companies have successfully rerouted supply chains or leaned on alternative suppliers to mute the impact. As those channels crowd and exemptions fade, the price umbrella lifts. Third, psychology. Retailers can only stagger increases for so long before they reset list prices (rather than relying on half-measures such as shrinkflation). All of that feeds the Fed's fall dilemma. A September rate cut is still plausible if headline inflation behaves and if the labor market softens without breaking. But the central bank can't wish away a tax on imports. One tell over the next few months will be the composition of inflation. The July report's stability at the headline level gave everyone relief; the uptick in core CPI was the rain cloud. Tariffs may not be showing up in a single headline number, but they're already rewriting the script. As tariff-sensitive goods broaden, the core's center of gravity can shift in a way that is hard for the Fed to dismiss, especially if a slower job market starts to amplify consumer sensitivity. The historical record says households will pay eventually; Goldman is waving a flag that 'eventually' is on the calendar, not the horizon. If core prices start climbing the way history and data suggest, the Fed may have to choose between two losing plays: fighting inflation with politically unpalatable hikes or pretending this is just another blip. The absence of sticker shock this summer isn't proof that tariffs have no bite — it's just proof that the bite hasn't reached the customer. The tariffs are still moving through the system. The macro context — steady-ish inflation, wobbly hiring — has made the pass-through look more polite than it is. U.S. consumers haven't seen the full impact yet because the system hasn't stopped absorbing it. Experts expect the impact to land hard. And when it does, it won't resemble a tax on China. It'll feel like life just got a whole lot more expensive.
