logo
Buy Volvo EC40 Price, PPC or HP

Buy Volvo EC40 Price, PPC or HP

Top Gear10-07-2025
Buying
What should I be paying?
The EC40 starts at £50,410 for the Single Motor in Plus spec, with the other two trim levels being Plus Pro and Ultra.The latter loses the option for the Single Motor powertrain; it's just the Extended Range and Twin Motor here.
In base form the Extended Range starts from £52,160 and the Twin Motor is five grand more at £55,660. The Black Edition can be paired with everything, meaning the most you can spend before options is £60,660. Strewth.
Advertisement - Page continues below
What are the trims like?
Plus comes very well equipped, with heated front and rear seats and steering wheel, a panoramic glass sunroof, wireless phone charging, heat pump, adaptive cruise control, LED headlights, park assist, powered tailgate and 19in alloys.
Plus Pro adds a 360-degree parking camera and pixel LED headlights, as well as keyless entry. Yours for £52,410 and up.
Ultra costs from £55,910 and adds matrix LEDs, an upgraded Harman Kardon sound system, dual zone climate, more sophisticated cruise control, 20in alloys and a fancier interior trim.
Then there's the Black Edition, which you can think of as a pack in its own right. It adds an Onyx Black finish to the body and badging, plus a glossy black hue to the grille and alloys. Worth the money if you're after that unmistakable 'stay out of my way' look.
Advertisement - Page continues below
It can't be twinned with the Single Motor, and embellishes the Twin Motor with the Performance upgrade if you do end up going there. Saves doing it on the app, we guess.
Which one should I go for?
The 'entry' trim is so generous we'd be likely to go for the Single Motor Extended Range car in Plus guise. That model leans into the EC40's strengths a bit better than the others, while its 346 miles of official range make it very usable for longer journeys.
There are a variety of ways to get into a Volvo, many of which can be arranged entirely online. If we were to order this car we could get it on Volvo's PCP package over three years and £843 a month with a £5k deposit.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cornwall mum 'could be alive' if older driver rules changed
Cornwall mum 'could be alive' if older driver rules changed

BBC News

time11 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Cornwall mum 'could be alive' if older driver rules changed

Claire Eady believes that if the rules for older drivers were different her mum would still be here summer 79-year-old Geraldine Gibson died after pulling out into oncoming traffic near her home in Cornwall."I never thought I would have to say the words 'my mum's been killed in a car crash'," said Mrs Eady, who said regulations for drivers over the age of 70 were "unsafe and inadequate" and needed an the moment there is no upper age limit for driving in the UK, with around 500 licence holders aged between 100 and government said it was committed to improving road safety. Mrs Gibson was trying to cross the A30 at Plusha near Launceston to meet a friend when she pulled into the path of another inquest heard there was nothing the other driver, who suffered minor injuries, could have done to avoid Highways told the hearing the junction had since been altered after other accidents but Mrs Eady, from West Sussex, said older age was "absolutely a factor" in her mother's learned her mother was struggling to manoeuvre beforehand and had a separate Eady said she believed arthritis and an earlier stroke may also have affected her mum's driving."I don't think my mum ever would have thought she needed to stop driving because there were too many things that depended on her being out in a car," she have a legal responsibility to notify the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Authority (DVLA) of conditions affecting their fitness to drive, but Mrs Eady said this felt insufficient."You can't really rely on the individual to do that... especially if it's their only way of getting out," she said she would like medical professionals to be legally required to notify authorities and for there to be mandatory testing for those over 70. What are the current rules regarding older drivers?Drivers must renew their licence aged 70 and every three years thereafterThere is no upper age limit for driving in the UK, with about 500 licence holders aged between 100 and 108Drivers have a legal responsibility to self-declare medical conditions that could affect driving to the DVLAGuidance by the DVLA states health professionals should inform the agency if a patient cannot or will not, but it is not a legal requirement As the UK population ages, the number of older drivers is also increasing, with licence holders aged 70 and over going up by about 200,000 a year, according to the of Transport statistics show older drivers make up about 14% of all licence holders but account for a quarter of those killed on the roads, and that people aged over 75 and under 25 are at highest risk of being killed or seriously hurt in a Heard from the Older Drivers Forum, which supports motorists to continue driving safely for longer, said the "vast majority of older drivers have a wealth of experience, confidence and tolerance".But he added: "As we age, our relative frailty means that older drivers are often over represented in serious injury collisions, particularly for the age group of 80 and above." Mr Heard said elderly drivers were more likely to crash due to illness or errors in judgement, while accidents involving younger drivers were more likely through speed or taking said he supported mandatory referrals of medical conditions by health professionals and advised concerned family members to encourage mature driver BBC has had exclusive access to a report, which said many people were "unaware" of their legal obligation to inform the DVLA of certain medical conditions and health professionals were "reluctant to" do research, prepared for a coroner in April, showed less than 10% of DVLA notifications were made by medical professionals and other third parties. The report's author, Dr Carol Hawley, research fellow at the University of Warwick, said the system "does need to change".She said her research suggested there was underreporting of visual and medical conditions "because there are not that many notifications compared to the number of driving licence holders and the number of people that have those conditions".Professor Kamila Hawthorne, chair of the Royal College of GPs, said the college would welcome a more formalised approach "to ensure that any necessary breaches of doctor-patient confidentiality are protected in law and avoid undermining patient trust".The Association of Optometrists and The College of Optometrists said they "strongly support" the introduction of regular mandatory vision checks for all drivers and said the current system was "not fit for purpose". Elsewhere in Cornwall, Hilary Nias said she "feels very strongly" that change is needed, following her sister-in-law's fatal accident."It was a tragic end to a really interesting life," she said, adding family had repeatedly warned her that her driving was Nias, 90, pulled out onto the A39 at Devoran and crashed onto a roundabout when she mistook the accelerator pedal for the died from her injuries five months later. Mrs Nias said her sister-in-law could "only just" see over the dashboard and was having problems with spatial awareness. "That needed testing and assessing... it could possibly have avoided my sister-in-law's ghastly accident - and many others," she Nias applied for her driving licence to be renewed within the three years before her accident and no medical conditions were her inquest Emma Hillson, assistant coroner for Cornwall, wrote to the Department of Transport and the DVLA, highlighting the lack of any "requirement for there to be any form of medical check or assessment to confirm fitness to drive".Mrs Nias said she was "frankly depressed" by the response, which did not suggest any changes to the current system. There is a higher proportion of elderly people in the South West of England than the national average, and some here see driving as a Bodmin, 130 older people meet weekly at the town hall at an Age Concern social group. Some drive to get Reg Harris, 85, said giving up driving would "absolutely crucify" his Trevenna, 88, added: "I wouldn't be able to get anywhere, do anything... I'd just as well sit in the armchair and wait to die."Drivers can refer themselves for an older driving assessment by Driving Mobility at a cost, but referrals from the DVLA, police or NHS are free. The charity said more than 10,000 people aged over 70 in England underwent one in 2024 - 0.2% of drivers of that age. The local road safety partnership Vision Zero South West wants more public awareness as well as tighter said 176 drivers aged over 60 were killed or seriously injured on Cornwall and Devon's road network in Alison Hernandez said: "We want to protect people's lives because it is absolutely devastating when this happens to people and their families."Asked what could be done to support older drivers who felt they had no choice but to carry on because public transport often was not good enough in rural areas, Hernandez said her office was planning to run a campaign "to educate older drivers on how they can be at their best behind the wheel". The government told the BBC the DVLA was analysing findings from recent inquests, and from a 2023 call for evidence on the legislative framework governing driver licensing for people with medical said the DVLA would continue to engage with healthcare professionals and their regulatory bodies to understand if there may be circumstances where they "could be encouraged or supported in notifying DVLA of a patient's medical condition".A Department for Transport spokesperson added: "The NHS recommends adults should have their eyes tested every two years and drivers are legally required to inform the DVLA if they have a condition which affects their ability to drive. "We are committed to improving road safety and continue to explore ways to achieve this."Additional reporting by Lauren Woodhead, England Data Unit

Supreme Court to rule on motor finance compensation row
Supreme Court to rule on motor finance compensation row

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

Supreme Court to rule on motor finance compensation row

The Supreme Court is to rule on Friday on whether millions of motorists could be entitled to compensation on their hire-purchase agreements. In October last year, the Court of Appeal ruled that 'secret' commission payments to car dealers as part of finance arrangements made before 2021 without the motorist's fully informed consent were unlawful. The court found that three motorists, who all bought their cars before 2021, had not been told either clearly enough or at all that the car dealers, acting as credit brokers, would receive a commission from the lenders for introducing business to them, and should receive compensation. Two lenders, FirstRand Bank and Close Brothers, took the row to the Supreme Court, telling a three-day hearing in April that the decision was an 'egregious error'. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has also intervened in the case, telling the UK's highest court that the Court of Appeal ruling 'goes too far', while the three motorists oppose the challenge. Lords Reed, Hodge, Lloyd-Jones, Briggs and Hamblen are due to hand down their ruling at 4.35pm on Friday. The outcome of the ruling could have major consequences for the industry, with the FCA telling the Supreme Court last year that almost 99% of the roughly 32 million car finance agreements entered into since 2007 involved a commission payment to a broker. The three drivers, Marcus Johnson, Andrew Wrench and Amy Hopcraft, all used car dealers as brokers for finance arrangements for second-hand cars, all worth less than £10,000. Only one finance option was presented to the motorists in each case, with the car dealers making a profit from the sale of the car and receiving commission from the lender. The commission paid to dealers was affected by the interest rate on the loan. The schemes were banned by the FCA in 2021, with the three drivers taking legal action individually between 2022 and 2023. After the claims reached the Court of Appeal, three senior judges ruled that the lenders were liable to repay the motorists the commission, as there was 'no disclosure' of the commission payments in Ms Hopcraft's case, and 'insufficient disclosure' in the case of Mr Wrench. In Mr Johnson's case, the judges found that he had received 'insufficient disclosure' about the commission to give 'fully informed consent' to the payment. Lady Justice Andrews, Lord Justice Birss and Lord Justice Edis said that while each case was different, 'burying such a statement in the small print which the lender knows the borrower is highly unlikely to read will not suffice' as enough to properly inform a motorist about the commission. If justices dismiss the challenge, it is unclear how many people could be entitled to compensation. If they side with the lenders, then it is likely to significantly limit the scope of potential payouts to motorists. The FCA has said it will confirm within six weeks of the judgment whether it is planning to launch a redress scheme.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store