Ambassadors in South Africa celebrate Women's Month
Monageng's path to diplomacy is rooted in justice.
This Women's Month, six women ambassadors representing their countries in South Africa speak about their leadership. In a world still navigating inequality, it stands as a reminder of what diplomacy can look like.
Strength: Ukraine's ambassador, Liubov Abravitova, knows
the strength of women, especially during a war.
Ukraine
: For Liubov Abravitova, Ukraine's ambassador to South Africa, diplomacy represents building bridges across cultures and serving her country.
As a diplomat representing a nation at war, she has witnessed extraordinary strength in Ukraine, where women hold families together. With more than 4 000 women on the front line.
Her Women's Month message draws on this shared resilience: 'Your courage matters, your voice matters and your dreams are powerful. Never doubt your ability to shape history; every great change begins with a woman who dares to act. Remember: 'Wathint' abafazi, wathint' imbokodo.'
Abravitova emphasises creating spaces where women can lead through mentorship and inclusive policies. 'Leadership isn't a title,it's responsibility, and women are ready,' she says
Pragmatic: Türkiye's ambassador, Nilvana Darama Yildirimgec, believes women are as capable as men.
Türkiye:
Diplomacy was a childhood dream for Türkiye's head of mission, ambassador Nilvana Darama Yildirimgec, connecting her love for her country with discovering the world.
Her Women's Month approach centres on individual empowerment: every woman is unique and special, should love who they are and view failures as opportunities for improvement.
On women's leadership, she emphasises that women are as qualified as men, and often more pragmatic and result-oriented. 'Women must trust their abilities and claim their rightful leadership roles through tact and intelligence, not by emulating male counterparts.'
Reflecting on her achievements, she notes that reaching diplomacy's pinnacle speaks for itself, with true recognition coming from others acknowledging one's effectiveness in strengthening international relations.
Progress: Bulgaria's ambassador, Maria Pavlova Tzotzorkova, calls for more women in leadership positions.
Bulgaria:
Ambassador Maria Pavlova Tzotzorkova entered diplomacy at the age of 30, choosing it over an academic career. That decision led her to represent Bulgaria on multilateral platforms, including a stint at the United Nations, where she dealt with global issues such as peace, human rights and sustainable development.
The UN role exposed her to diverse cultures and cemented her interest in international cooperation.
For Women's Month, she stresses celebrating women's roles in shaping society and calls for more women in leadership positions to drive change. She believes education is key to building women's confidence and resilience and sees government support as critical to eliminating stereotypes that hold women back.
Now serving in South Africa, she says the country's progress on women's rights has made her work even more fulfilling. She has helped strengthen Bulgaria-South Africa ties through official visits and partnerships and values the deep connections she's built with citizens.
Persist: Tunisia's ambassador, Karima Bardaoui, believes
women can achieve what can seem impossible.
Tunisia
: For Karima Bardaoui, diplomacy is a chance to proudly represent Tunisia. She views her job as a platform to build meaningful global relationships and drive change.
Her message for Women's Month draws from Mandela's words: 'It always seems impossible until it's done.' She urges women to persist through difficulties. She supports leadership systems that empower women through confidence-building, learning and reflection.
Bardaoui's achievements span several regions. In the Czech Republic, she helped launch a parliamentary friendship group. In South Africa, where she's been posted since 2023, she has collaborated with national science and tech bodies, notably under the 'Science Diplomacy Capital for Africa' initiative.
She is excited about Tunisia and South Africa co-hosting Women's Month celebrations, which are focusing on women in science. She sees it as a moment to spotlight the contributions of women scientists and deepen ties between the two nations.
Botswana:
High commissioner Sanji M Monageng's path to diplomacy is rooted in justice and bridge-building. A former judge of the International Criminal Court, her legal background gives her diplomatic work depth and purpose, especially in championing equality and human rights.
Her Women's Month message is: 'Your voices matter. Your dreams are real.' She encourages women to believe in their power to lead and create change, even when the path is hard.
She believes gender equality needs more than advocacy, it needs policy. Her approach includes pushing for fair recruitment, dismantling bias and ensuring those in power open doors for others. For her, systemic support and mentorship are non-negotiable for lasting change.
Monageng has helped deepen ties across continents while promoting women's leadership and pushing for gender equity at all levels of society.
Resilient: Palestine's ambassador, Hanan Jarrar, is proud of
South Africa taking Israel to the ICJ.
Palestine:
For Hanan Jarrar, Palestine's head of mission, diplomacy is deeply personal. Growing up under occupation in Palestine shaped her understanding of justice and resilience. Her life — from navigating military checkpoints to witnessing violence — fuelled her commitment to representing the Palestinian cause.
She entered diplomacy to give voice to her people's hopes and struggles. Her message for Women's Month reflects this: 'Even when the world is heavy, you carry it with grace.' She honours Palestinian women's courage, particularly those in Gaza, and sees resilience as a refusal to surrender.
Jarrar pushes for more than representation; she wants transformation. She supports confidence-building, mentorship and collective advancement among women: 'When one rises, she lifts others with her.'
She also works to deepen ties between South Africa and Palestine, going beyond politics to include cultural exchange and grassroots engagement. She's especially proud that during her tenure, South Africa became the first country to take Israel to the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
15 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
The state must listen and talk to the people
When it comes to civic engagement in South Africa, considerable attention is paid to protest action. Democratic participation is meant to influence decision-making processes. But its effect on local governance appears limited. One contributing factor may be how the government interacts with citizens. For example, planning and budget documents presented by the local government are often lengthy, use technical terminology and are released shortly before public consultations. As a result, the timeframe available for citizens to read, interpret and respond to them is constrained, which restricts the potential for informed input into planning, budgeting, and service delivery. From a data perspective, there is an overall decline in civic engagement. But what does this suggest, what modes of civic interaction are declining and what does this tell us about political behaviour in South Africa? Civic engagement encompasses multiple political and civic activities. The type of civic interaction that most South Africans participate in may give insight into how they are choosing to engage with the state. The 2025 Afrobarometer Discussions on civic participation often centre on elections and protest action. Elections are usually recognised as the bridge between citizens and politicians, and a Figure 1 compares civic engagement in South Africa to the regional averages. The figure indicates that national responses for attending a community meeting, joining others to raise an issue, contacting a councillor and participating in a demonstration or protest are higher than the regional averages. This suggests participation is deeply rooted in movement-based, consultative, and mobilised forms of civic engagement. This trend is based in the country's history of struggle-based activism, where civic engagement was often Cumulatively, targeting councillors, community meetings and participating in demonstrations shows that Responses also show that contacting an MP is the least common type of civic engagement (8%), while having voted in the 2019 election (61%) and discussing politics (57%) are the most common types of civic engagement. Afrobarometer data also suggests that, compared with other types of leaders, contact with local government officials is reported more frequently. One possible explanation is their accessibility, or that their Local governments are tasked with delivering basic services, enforcing the law and maintaining infrastructure. Given these responsibilities, citizen perceptions of political performance and institutional effectiveness may be shaped by their assessments of local government actors. Worth noting, from a regional perspective, is that South Africa has one of the highest levels of contact with a councillor (39%). Zimbabwe has an average of 42%, whereas the regional average stands at 28%. This highlights a proactive stance in seeking to address community issues and grievances through formal channels. Among the 39 African countries surveyed, about one in 10 (9%) of respondents say that they participated in a protest or demonstration, making it the least common mode of engagement. Alongside Cabo Verde, protest action is the third highest in South Africa (15%). When it comes to civic engagement in South Africa, considerable attention is paid to protest action. But data suggests that respondents who say they have taken part in demonstrations have decreased over the years. In 2017-18 and 2021-23 attendance in demonstrations or protests decreased from 27% to 14%. The 2015 Furthermore, the report found that those who regularly communicate with their councillors tend to believe that their voices are being acknowledged. These findings further highlight the importance of establishing transparent and responsive communication channels between the government and its constituents. It suggests that when citizens perceive their concerns are being recognised and addressed by their representatives, they are more likely to adopt non-violent methods of engagement. As depicted in Figure 2, long-term trends in civic and political engagement in South Africa are complex. While there has been a decline across most participation indicators, contact with councillors stands out as an exception, showing a steady recognition of them as accessible points of contact for community concerns, especially compared with other tiers of government. The data also shows two notable shifts from 2020, coinciding with the Covid-19 pandemic. First, contact with councillors continued to increase post-2020, possibly because of the need for assistance during the lockdown and service delivery disruptions. Second, the decline in protests is probably a result of movement restrictions. The July 2021 riots in KwaZulu-Natal and Gauteng were essentially anomalous, but nonetheless important. Despite these variations, active forms of participation, such as attending community meetings, protests, community mobilisation, and discussing politics, remain the most prevalent modes of engagement in South Africa. But the overall decline since 2018 is concerning and may reflect public frustration, political fatigue or a perceived ineffectiveness of participatory mechanisms. Last, the consistently low levels of direct contact with political leaders point to a persistent gap in state-society relations. This suggests that citizens do not view political elites as responsive or approachable, further entrenching disillusionment with formal political institutions. The trends in civic engagement point to a persistent disconnect between how citizens interact with the state and how the state engages with citizens. Citizens participate through bottom-up, localised and often informal channels, rather than formalised, institutional mechanisms. In contrast, the state prioritises institutionalised, top-down models of participation, often through structured consultations, national dialogues, public hearings or representative forums that may feel distant or inaccessible to many. This divergence limits meaningful democratic engagement, because citizens prefer participatory modalities. As democracy continues to evolve, the state must recognise and integrate community-driven forms of participation. Rather than relying on protests to be heard or treating grassroots efforts as oppositional, leadership should be people-centred and responsive to lived realities. In a context of deep inequality and institutional mistrust, state responses must be grounded in everyday experiences — flexible to new forms of engagement, and inclusive enough to bridge the widening gap between state and society. Dr Mmabatho Mongae is a lead data analyst at Good Governance Africa.
The Herald
21 hours ago
- The Herald
Shivambu was 'uncomfortable' with EFF's 'disruptive' behaviour in parliament
Shivambu said the protests were planned by one person in the party. 'It was not something that happened spontaneously, it's something that was planned in meetings, and I can tell you now, there was only one person who initiated those disruptions. It was not the leadership collective. That was mistaken for being the so-called militancy and radicalism.' He attributed this behaviour to the EFF's loss in elections last year. 'We kept asking how this relates to voters on the ground or to the people who sent us here. That's why there are 600,000 fewer people who voted for that organisation; they realised they sent them to represent them, but they are grandstanding. 'The saddest thing you will see is that the younger generations who get to associate with that organisation, even in councils and legislatures, just go and disrupt for no reason and engage in violence. They think that is being revolutionary because the leader says that is being revolutionary. What kind of revolution is that when it's just being disruptive, even when it's senseless?' He said this was one characteristic that would never define Mayibuye. 'We will engage robustly, tell the truth and claim no easy victories. We will not be disruptive for the sake of it. We won't be disrespectful and want to disrupt at any given point, even when there's an opportunity to provide leadership and guidance.' Shivambu also took a swipe at the MK Party, saying, 'One of the things that coincidentally define Mayibuye is that it's not an ethnic organisation, and it will never be an ethnic or tribal organisation.' He made reference to Mayibuye's leadership, saying members in top positions represent all languages in South Africa. 'That is the principle we apply in all the leadership collectives that we constitute. There will never be leadership in a province that is just one grouping of people that are leading; it'll also be reflective.' TimesLIVE
The Herald
21 hours ago
- The Herald
High court orders repatriation of ex-Zambian leader Edgar Lungu's body
The Pretoria high court on Friday ordered the repatriation of former Zambian president Edgar Lungu's body for a state funeral, siding with Zambia's government over his family who wanted him buried in South Africa, not in the presence of his successor. Lungu, Zambia's head of state from 2015 to 2021, died in South Africa on June 5 while receiving medical treatment. The high court halted plans for Lungu to be buried in Johannesburg on June 25, hours before a private ceremony was due to start. Zambia's government had approached the court arguing that Lungu should be given a state funeral and buried at a designated site in the Zambian capital Lusaka, like all other presidents since independence from Britain in 1964. Lungu's family said he did not want incumbent President Hakainde Hichilema, a long-standing political rival and his successor, at his funeral.
