Bhagwant Mann accuses centre of 'bias', advocates more water share for Punjab
Mann said that Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej rivers are already in deficit and water should be diverted from surplus to deficit basins.He said that Punjab has repeatedly requested to be included in negotiations for the allocation of Yamuna waters as a pact for Yamuna-Sutlej-Link Project was signed between the erstwhile Punjab and Uttar Pradesh on March 12, 1954, which entitled the erstwhile Punjab to two-thirds of the Yamuna waters.The chief minister said that this agreement did not specify any particular area to be irrigated by Yamuna waters, adding that before the re-organization, the Yamuna River, like the Ravi and Beas, flowed through the erstwhile state of Punjab.However, while apportioning the river waters between Punjab and Haryana, the Yamuna waters were not considered, whereas the waters of Ravi and Beas were duly taken into account, he lamented.advertisementCiting 1972 report by the Irrigation Commission, constituted by the Government of India, Mann said that it states that Punjab (post-1966, after its reorganisation) falls within the Yamuna River Basin.The chief minister said that if Haryana has a claim over the waters of Ravi and Beas rivers, Punjab should also have an equal claim on the Yamuna waters. He said that these requests have been ignored, adding that due to non-construction of storage structure on Yamuna River, water is going to waste.Bhagwant Mann pleaded that Punjab's claim should be considered during the revision of this agreement, and Punjab should be given its due rights to Yamuna waters.Raising the issue of "bias approach" of Bhakra Beas Management Board (BBMB), the chief minister said that the Board was constituted under the provisions of the Punjab Reorganization Act, 1966, with the mandate to regulate the supply of water and power from the Bhakra, Nangal and Beas projects to the partner states of Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan, Himachal Pradesh, Delhi and Chandigarh.He said that in the past Punjab has been very liberal in sharing water with the partner states to meet their drinking water and other genuine requirements as Punjab was relying upon its groundwater reserves to meet its demand of water, particularly for the paddy crop.advertisementMann said that as a result, the groundwater level has depleted to a huge extent, so much so that 115 blocks out of 153 blocks of the state (76.10 per cent) are over-exploited, adding that this percentage is the highest amongst all the States in the country.Noting that Punjab itself is running short of its water requirement and even its water share in the river waters is not sufficient to meet these requirements, he said despite our repeated request BBMB did not take any action to advise the other partner states to regulate the release of water to Haryana, and as a result, it exhausted its share by March 30, 2025.Mann said that considering the request of the Government of Haryana on humanitarian grounds, the state decided to release 4,000 cusecs of water out of Punjab's share to meet its drinking water requirement, though Haryana has only a genuine demand of 1,700 cusecs of water.The chief minister claimed that BBMB ignored the interest of Punjab and decided to release 8,500 cusecs of water to Haryana despite serious objections raised by Punjab.He said that this is against the spirit and provisions of the law as BBMB has taken this decision of taking Punjab's water against the consent of Punjab, adding that BBMB should be advised to restrain itself and act as per the provisions of law.advertisementHighlighting the issue of deployment of CISF personnel at Bhakra Nangal Dam, the chief minister said the security of Bhakra and Nangal Dams has been the sole responsibility of the concerned states since their construction.He said that the Ministry of Power (MoP) has taken the decision to depute CISF for the security of Bhakra Nangal Dams, which is an unnecessary and completely avoidable step as there is no need to disturb a well-established operational setup as it further degrades the right of Punjab with respect to these dams. In view of this, Mann requested that the decision to depute CISF may be revoked immediately.Demanding adequate representation to Punjab officers and officials in the Chandigarh Administration in the ratio of 60:40, the chief minister said that Chandigarh is the capital of Punjab and there is a well-established and time honoured convention, since the reorganisation of the state of Punjab in 1966, to fill all civil posts in Chandigarh administration from personnel drawn from the Punjab and Haryana in the ratio of 60:40.advertisementHowever, he said that in recent years this balance has been severely eroded with a systematic increase in deputations from the AGMUT and DANICs cadres, and added that key departments in the Chandigarh Administration hitherto managed by officers from Punjab have now been allocated to much junior officers from the AGMUT cadre.He alleged that this increasing centralisation and declining representation to Punjab in the administration of its own capital is against the very spirit of cooperative federalism.Raising the issue of immediate release of pending arrears under the Post-Matric Scholarship Scheme for Scheduled Caste Students for Academic Sessions 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20, the chief minister said that Punjab has the highest percentage of Scheduled Caste population (31.94 per cent) in the country and the Post Matric Scholarship scheme for SC Students for pursuing Higher Education was implemented as a 100 per cent centrally-sponsored scheme.He said that this scheme with a 'Committed Liability' of the state of Rs 60.79 crore proved to be highly beneficial for the Scheduled Caste students in Punjab adding that the Government of India changed the criteria of 'Committed liability' in 2018 and made it equivalent to "the total demand of the state as well as Centre" in the terminal year of the previous plan period/ Finance Commission.advertisementSpeaking on the issue of Desilting of Harike Head works, the chief minister said that it is located at the confluence point of rivers Sutlej and Beas and is the main control point for supply of water to South west Punjab, Rajasthan and also controlling flow into Pakistan.Mann said that there is an urgent need for carrying out de-silting of the reservoir at a cost Rs 600 crore approximately, adding that as reservoir area has been declared a Ramsar Convention site and is of national importance, the central government and Rajasthan must share the cost of project.Meanwhile, affirming Punjab's full alignment with the vision of Viksit Bharat @2047, the chief minister said that Punjab is committed to build a Rangla Punjab' -- a vibrant, inclusive, and progressive state.He said that Punjab Vision 2047 launched in 2023 aligns with Viksit Bharat goals with an ambitious target of 8 per cent-plus annual GDP growth through industrial and service-led development, adding that structural reforms are underway to boost business environment along with infrastructure and innovation.Tune InMust Watch
IN THIS STORY#Punjab
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
43 minutes ago
- News18
Karnataka Assembly passes gig workers welfare bill
Bengaluru (Karnataka) [India], August 19 (ANI): Karnataka Labour Minister Santosh Lad introduced the gig workers' welfare bill in the legislative session of the Assembly on Tuesday. After explaining, he stated that those working on digital platforms are gig workers. It includes food items, e-market, professional, transport, and health services. 'This new concept has come to the country," he said, 'Such an act is already in force in foreign countries. This commerce platform is growing year by year," the Minister Lad to NITI Aayog, 23.5 million workers will come under its purview. 'There are 4 lakh gig workers in Karnataka. Out of them, some own two-wheelers, rickshaws, and cars," he bill aims to introduce transparency in the system of automatic monitoring and decision-making, thereby holding digital platform collectors accountable. Minister Lad stated that this includes providing a dispute resolution mechanism, forming a welfare board, and establishing a welfare fund for platform-based gig noted that most gig work occurs in urban areas with traffic congestion, air pollution, and noise pollution. Due to pollution, a gig worker is suffering from health problems as if he had smoked ten cigarettes. The state government has provided health insurance of up to Rs 2 lakh to him, he Lad stated that 10,560 workers have already registered under this gig also stated that platform-based gig workers are required to register with the board, and that collectors or platforms must also register. Additionally, income security and proper working conditions are provided for gig workers, he members of the ruling and opposition parties welcomed the 'Gig Workers Bill'. The bill was then passed by voice vote when Assembly Speaker UT Khader put it to the ballot. (ANI)
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Karnataka Assembly passes gig workers' Bill; proposes 1%-5% fee on online aggregators
With the rise in the number of gig workers in cities and towns, the State legislative Assembly on Tuesday passed the Karnataka Platform Based Gig Workers (Social Security and Welfare) Bill, 2025, to protect the rights of workers, set up a welfare fund for them, and place obligations on aggregators. During the debate on the Bill, Labour Minister Santosh Lad said the Bill proposed a welfare fee in the range of 1% to 5% on the payout to the worker during each transaction, for different categories of aggregators of platforms. 23.5 million by 2030 The NITI Aayog said there would be 23.5 million gig workers in India by 2029-30. At present, there are four lakh gig workers, including part-time and full-time, in the State. About 10,500 workers have registered. The Minister said health issues were a major concern for the workers due to riding two-wheelers and pollution. Many workers earn ₹1,800 by working 16 hours a day, Mr. Lad said. He said the welfare board would take decisions on issuing health cards, safety guards, and other social security issues of workers. What Bill aims at The Bill is aimed at providing dispute resolution mechanisms, creating a welfare fund for gig workers, registering workers with the board, registering aggregators or platforms, and providing income security and reasonable working conditions to the workers. The Gig Worker's Social Security and Welfare Fund would be created for the benefit of registered platform-based gig workers. The fund would receive money from all contributions made by individual platform-based gig workers; grant-in-aid from the State Government and Central Government; and grants, gifts, donations, benefactions, bequests or transfers. A gig workers' welfare board will be established to ensure registration of workers by the platforms, welfare fee collection and implementation of social security schemes. Administrative costs It said not more than 5% of the fund would be used for administrative costs of the board or employees of the board. Aggregators include ride-sharing services, food and grocery delivery services, logistics services, e-Marketplace for wholesale/retail sale of goods and/or services, business-to-business /business-to-consumer, professional activity provider, healthcare, travel and hospitality and content and media services. The Bill has replaced the Ordinance.
Indian Express
13 hours ago
- Indian Express
Why Centre is considering ‘equivalence' in application of ‘creamy layer' condition in OBC quota
The government is considering ways to ensure 'equivalence' in the application of the 'creamy layer' condition in reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) across a range of jobs at central and state government organisations, public sector enterprises, universities, etc. A proposal has been prepared after consultations among several government ministries and departments, and bodies such as NITI Aayog and the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC), The Indian Express reported last week. The concept of 'creamy layer' In its landmark verdict in Indra Sawhney vs Union of India (1992), the Supreme Court upheld the government's decision to implement the recommendations of the Mandal Commission, but said that affluent sections among the socially and educationally backward classes, the so-called 'creamy layer', must be excluded from job quotas. Thereafter, on September 8, 1993, DoPT issued a circular identifying the creamy layer that would be ineligible for OBC reservation. Sons and daughters of high constitutional functionaries, and government, PSU, and armed forces officers were included in the list, along with 'professional class and those engaged in trade and industry', and 'property owners'. An 'income/ wealth test' was also mentioned. Specifically, an individual either of whose parents was a direct recruit to a Group A/ Class I government job, or if the parent was promoted to Group A before the age of 40, was not eligible for the OBC quota. An individual both of whose parents were direct recruits to Group B jobs would be part of the creamy layer. Children of armed forces officials only up to the rank of Lieutenant Colonel could avail of the quota. For those outside the government sector, the income ceiling was set at Rs 1 lakh per annum. It was subsequently revised upwards, and the limit has been Rs 8 lakh since 2017. However, income from salary and agricultural income is not included. 2004 'clarification' and after The above criteria were not comprehensive, especially with regard to jobs outside the government sector. So, on October 14, 2004, DoPT issued detailed 'Clarifications regarding creamy layer amongst OBCs' in order to determine 'the creamy layer status of sons and daughters of persons employed in organisations where equivalence or comparability of posts vis-à-vis posts in Government has not been evaluated'. It was determined that: 'Income of the parents from the salaries and from the other sources (other than salaries and agricultural land) is determined separately. If either the income of the parents from the salaries or the income of the parents from other sources (other than salaries and agricultural land) exceeds… Rs 2.5 lakh per annum [which was the creamy layer income ceiling for private persons at the time] for a period of three consecutive years, the sons and daughters of such persons shall be treated to fall in creamy layer…' However, these 'clarifications' were not widely implemented to deprive individuals of reservation benefits during the UPA years (2004-14), as the government sought to woo OBCs in pursuit of various social justice goals. In late 2014, DoPT started examining caste certificates issued by various authorities to determine their compliance with the 2004 'clarification'. Between the Civil Services Examinations (CSE) of 2015 and 2023 (batches of 2016-24), DoPT rejected caste certificates of more than 100 successful candidates who would have qualified as OBC under the September 1993 criteria, but who were put in the creamy layer in accordance with the new criteria. Interestingly, many of these individuals have appeared in other competitive examinations, and have been considered OBC on the basis of the same caste certificate. Efforts to find 'equivalence' The unresolved case of the more than 100 candidates determined by DoPT as being in the creamy layer led to consultations among various stakeholder ministries. While 'equivalence' has been established with regard to the various central PSUs, the process remains pending for others — and the sons/ daughters of a wide range of employees are put in the creamy layer based on their incomes, thanks to 'clarification' issued in 2004. In June this year, Home Minister Amit Shah and NCBC chairman Hansraj Ahir recommended to the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment that the policy under consideration should be implemented retrospectively so that these more than 100 candidates are also able to benefit. Views of the Ministries of Social Justice, Education, Law, and Labour, the Department of Public Enterprises and DoPT, as well as NITI Aayog and NCBC were sought in the matter. According to sources in the government, some of the issues in the proposal to establish 'equivalence' are: * Since the salaries of university teachers from assistant professor upward typically start from 'Level 10', which is equivalent to entry-level Group A posts in the government, it has been proposed that children of university teachers be categorised as creamy layer. *For central/ state autonomous and statutory bodies, it is proposed to establish 'equivalence' with central government officials, depending on their level/ group/ pay scale, which is aligned with the corresponding pay in central and state governments. * Non-teaching staff of universities are proposed to be placed in the creamy layer depending on their level/ group/ pay scale. * It is proposed that all executive-level positions in state PSUs be treated as creamy layer, akin to the 'equivalence' that has been in force for central PSUs since 2017. However, it has been proposed that executives whose income is within Rs 8 lakh — which is the ceiling for private persons — will not be categorised as creamy layer. * It is proposed that employees of government-aided institutions, which usually follow the service conditions and pay scales of the central or respective state government, be placed under appropriate categories based on the 'equivalence' of their post and service conditions and pay scales. The likely beneficiaries If the proposals are implemented, sons/ daughters of lower-level government employees with annual salaries of more than Rs 8 lakh are likely to benefit the most. It will correct the anomaly by which children of government teachers get the benefit of OBC quota, but children of employees of similar rank at government-aided institutions are denied on the basis of income. A similar situation exists in several state government organisations. In one of the cases before the government, the children of an individual who fills fuel in vehicles at a pump run by a state-owned oil marketing company have been declared creamy layer on the basis of income. Not much is expected to change for children of employees in the private sector. Sources in the government said it is noted in the proposal that it is difficult to establish 'equivalence' given the vast range of positions, pay, and perquisites in private employment, and creamy layer can be determined based on the income/ wealth criteria. The income ceiling was revised in 2004, 2008, 2013, and 2017.
