How to Choose the Right Oppo Smartphone for Your Budget?
To know the Oppo mobile price in Bangladesh, you need to define your budget bracket, then dive into the models that make the most sense. Let's understand which Oppo model best suits your needs and saves you from overpaying.
Here are the most important features that shape whether a phone truly serves you well:
A processor, RAM, and thermal design affect everything from app speed and multitasking to AI capabilities and future upgradability. All‑Big‑Core architectures use MediaTek's Dimensity 9400 and Qualcomm's Snapdragon 8 Elite chips for greater power efficiency performance. For longevity and future‑proofing, ensure you have at least 12 GB LPDDR5X or higher RAM for multitasking, gaming, or future OS upgrades.
All modern smartphones offer advanced fast-charging systems and high-capacity batteries. If you want at least 8 hours of smooth screen time, use a smartphone with a 6,000 mAh battery. And for fast charging, look for the 80–150 W wired charger.
Aim for OLED or AMOLED displays for vivid color panels for smoother scrolling or gaming. High-refresh (90–144 Hz) rate extends battery life without sacrificing motion clarity. Screens with good high brightness and HDR support elevate streaming and outdoor viewing.
If camera quality is your priority, look for night mode and AI-enhanced HDR rather than pixel count, sensor quality, and smart video options like 8K, AI stabilization, and RAW/cinematic modes.
Investing in a long-lasting smartphone can be a wise decision when you're aiming to balance durability, ease of repair, and environmental impact. Choose a phone with top-tier materials for durability, local support, and warranty for repairability and longevity to reduce e-waste.
Here are some of the best Oppo smartphones you can add to your bucket list-
Oppo A60 is ideal for users who want fast wired charging and long battery life within a budget. Let's see what it has to offer:
Display: 6.67″ AMOLED display, (720 x 1604) pixels, up to 1,200 nits brightness, and 120 Hz refresh rate.
Processor: Android 14, Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 (4 nm) + Adreno 810
Memory/Storage: 8 GB LPDDR5X RAM, 256GB storage
Cameras: Rear 50 MP main camera with LED flash, HDR, panorama, 16 MP front camera.
Battery & Charging: 5000 mAh battery with 80 W SuperVOOC USB Type-C charger
Other Features: Stereo speakers, side-mounted fingerprint, IP54-rated splash-resistant, and 1-year official warranty.
Oppo Reno 12 F 5G is an impressive mid‑range phone with a good performance, battery life, and AI‑enhanced cameras. Here are the key specifications:
Display: 6.67″ flat AMOLED screen display, (1080×2400) pixels FHD+ resolution, 120 Hz refresh, and 600 nits brightness.
Processor: MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm)
Memory/Storage: 12GB LPDDR4X@2133 MHz RAM, 512 GB UFS 2.2 storage, and micro‑SD expansion support.
Cameras: 50 MP wide lens, 8 MP ultrawide with 112° field, and 2 MP macro sensor rear camera and 32 MP front camera.
Battery & Charging: 5,000 mAh battery with 45 W SuperVOOC 2.0 fast charging
Other Features: Stereo speakers, in‑display optical fingerprint, and face recognition
OPPO A58 is a great budget-friendly option with some exciting features. If someone needs everyday reliability at a low cost, they can go for the OPPO A58. Here's what it offers:
Display: 6.72″ FHD+ (2400×1080) pixels resolution, 90 Hz refresh rate
Processor: MediaTek Helio G85 process
Memory/Storage: 8 GB LPDDR4X RAM with 128 GB storage
Cameras: Dual rear camera with 50 MP wide and 2 MP depth, 8 MP fixed-focus selfie camera.
Battery & Charging: 5,000 mAh battery with 33 W SuperVOOC fast charging
Other Features: Stereo speakers, Biometrics, and Sensors
OPPO Find X8 Pro is a device that bridges ultra‑premium design, powerful AI photography, good battery life, and multi‑year durability. If you're budgeting for top-tier phone specs, this is the ideal smartphone for you. Here are the key features of this model-
Display: 6.78″ LTPO AMOLED display, QHD+ (1264 × 2780) pixels resolution, 120 Hz refresh rate, Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Dolby Vision / HDR10+
Processor: MediaTek Dimensity 9400, Android 15 / ColorOS 15 with 4–5 major Android upgrades and 5+ years of security patches
Memory/Storage: 12 / 16 GB LPDDR5X RAM, 256GB to 1TB storage
Cameras: 50 MP Quad rear camera with 3x, 6x ultra‑wide, periscope, 32 MP front, 4K60 HDR video, Dolby Vision.
Battery & Charging: 5910 mAh silicon‑carbon battery with 80 W SuperVOOC charger
Other Features: eSIM support, Wi‑Fi 6E, quick Button for fast camera access.
Oppo K13 5G is the best phone for those who want industry-leading battery life and prefer fast charging. It has a smooth display experience without spending flagship money. Here are the key specifications-
Display: 6.67″ flat AMOLED display,(2400×1080) FHD resolution, 120 Hz refresh rate, and up to 1,200 nits.
Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 with Adreno 810 GPU
Memory/Storage: 8 GB LPDDR4X RAM and (128 / 256 GB) storage
Cameras: 50 MP rear camera and 16 MP front camera
Battery & Charging: 7,000 mAh silicon-carbon cell massive battery with 80 W SuperVOOC
Choosing the right Oppo smartphone matching your budget, usage, and longevity expectations can be overwhelming. Check certain features like local 5G bands, VOOC charging, and authentic Oppo after‑sales and warranty service before buying. You can find the best smartphone from OPPO within your budget and get maximum value.
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
an hour ago
- Tom's Guide
Motorola Razr (2025) review: Still the budget foldable phone to beat
Past Motorola Razr models have proven you don't need to spend big to enjoy a solid foldable flip phone. And that's good news now that the Motorola Razr (2025) is available as a low-cost alternative to the premium Motorola Razr Ultra (2025). If you don't have the $1,299 to spend on the Ultra, the regular Razr puts a foldable phone in your hand at a fraction of the cost. But other phone makers have taken notice of the success Motorola has enjoyed by offering more affordable versions of its flip phones. Samsung's Galaxy Z Flip 7 may have claimed the top spot in our best foldable phone rankings, but there's now a lower-cost version of that phone, the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE, looking to grab the budget-minded shoppers who might otherwise turn to Motorola. Does the latest Razr offer enough to keep those shoppers from turning to Samsung and its assorted Flip models? And what sacrifices do you have to make in exchange for the Razr's reduced price compared to more premium flip phones? My Motorola Razr (2025) review looks to answer both questions. Motorola Razr 2025 Starting price $699 / £799 / AU$1,199 Inner display 6.9-inch AMOLED (2640 x 1080; 165 Hz) Outer display 3.6-inch pOLED (1066 x 1056; 90 Hz) Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 7400X RAM 8GB Storage 256GB Rear camera 50MP main (f/1.7), 13MP ultrawide (f/2.2) Front camera 32MP (f/2.4) Battery 4,500 mAh Wired charging 30W Wireless charging 15W Dimensions 2.91 x 6.74 x 0.29 inches (open), 2.91 x 3.47 x 0.62 inches (closed) Weight 6.63 ounces Colors Pantone Spring Bud, Pantone Gibraltar Sea, Pantone Parfait Pink, Pantone Lightest Sky The Motorola Razr 2025 debuted at the same time as the rest of Motorola's new foldable flip phone lineup, which includes the Razr Plus and the Razr Ultra. The standard Motorola Razr is the cheapest of the bunch, with a starting price of $699. That's $300 less than the Motorola Razr Plus and a full $600 cheaper than the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025. More important, you can get the standard Razr for less than both the $1,099 Galaxy Z Flip 7 and the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE, which at $899 is supposed to be Samsung's answer to Motorola's lower-cost offering. On paper, at least, Samsung is going to need to come up with a cheaper answer to compete with this particular model. That $699 buys you a Razr with 256GB of storage and 8GB of memory. In addition to buying the phone unlocked through Motorola and Amazon, you'll find the Razr at carriers such as Verizon and Visible. In the U.K. and Australia, where the phone is sold as the Razr 60, you'll pay £799 or AU$1,199, respectively. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Though the Razr 2025 is the cheapest of Motorola's three new foldables, it actually bears a strong resemblance to the Motorola Razr Ultra. The two models share the same 2.9 x 3.5 x 0.62-inch dimensions when folded shut, and the standard Razr actually weighs roughly 0.4 ounces less. The biggest differences are in the materials. The standard Razr features Gorilla Glass Victus rather than the more durable Gorilla Glass Ceramic found on the Ultra. And instead of the different finishes you find on the Razr Ultra, the 2025 Razr sports a textured vegan leather back, at least on the half of the phone that doesn't feature the cover display. That's hardly a complaint, as I think the vegan leather material outkicks the Razr's midrange roots — it certainly gives the phone a grippier feel than you'd get from a metal or plastic back. The cheaper Razr comes in a variety of Pantone color choices in Sea (a dark blue), Parfait Pink, Lightest Sky (a silvery white) and Spring Bud. That's the mint green color of my review unit, and it really adds a splash of personality to make this Motorola flip phone stand out in a mix of black and white clamshell models. The Razr 2025 also benefits from the reinforced hinge that Motorola features on its other flip phones, so you should be able to open and close your phone without incident. IP48 water and dust protection means your phone can withstand a dunk in 1.5 meters of water, though smaller dust particles pose a challenge, as they do for most foldable phones. Nothing's really changed from the Motorola Razr (2024) in terms of screen size — the 2025 model still sports a 6.9-inch internal display and a 3.6 cover screen, with each panel offering refresh rates of 165Hz and 90hz, respectively. What has changed is how the standard Razr's screens compare to other flip phones. For instance, a noticeably thinner bezel on the Razr Ultra's cover display gives you a 4-inch area to work with. Likewise, the Galaxy Z Flip 7 has a larger 4.1-inch outer screen as well, suggesting that the smaller secondary panel is the price you pay if you opt for a cheaper flip phone. That said, it's a trade-off I'm happy to make, as I'd save anywhere from $4000 to $600 by opting for the Razr (2025). The 3.6-inch outer display doesn't feel that cramped, as I'm still able to run apps without ever opening my phone. And the 6.9-inch panel that awaits when I open the phone compares favorably to what I get from the Razr Ultra (7 inches) and the Z Flip 7 (6.9 inches). Motorola Razr (2025) Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 Brightness (nits) 1,916 1,835 1,989 sRGB % 207.3 (Vivid) / 129.6 (Natural) 214.3 (Vivid) /123.2 (Natural) 151.7 (Vivid) / 126.7 (Natural) DCI-P3 % 146.8 (Vivid) / 91.8 (Natural) 151.8 (Vivid) / 87.3 (Natural) 107.4 (Vivid) / 89.8 (Natural) Delta-E rating (Closer to 0 = better) 0.34 (Vivid) /0.21 (Natural) 0.33 (Vivid) / 0.26 (Natural) 0.23 (Vivid) /0.23 (Natural) You may be giving up screen space with the Razr 2025, but you're not sacrificing screen brightness. At a maximum reading of 1,916 nits on our light meter, the Razr 2025 is slightly brighter than the 1,835-nit Razr Ultra, and not far off the pace of the Galaxy Z Flip 7 and its 1,989-nit reading. Like the Ultra, the Razr shows off more colors, to the point of almost being oversaturated, compared to the Galaxy Z Flip 7. It certainly captures higher percentages of the sRGB and DCI-P3 color spectrums than the 2024 Razr, which topped out at 189.1% and 134%, respectively, in its Vivid setting. The colors on the Razr 2025 are more accurate than last year's phone, though you have to switch the Razr (2025) display to a natural setting to approach the color accuracy of the Galaxy Z Flip 7. Watching "The Empire Strikes Back" on the Razr's main display, the AT-AT walkers emerged from the icy environs of the planet Hoth, with their striking gray exterior contrasting against the blue sky. And in the "Highest 2 Lowest" trailer on YouTube, the red lights bathed Denzel Washington's skin in a dimly light scene, while the red, white and blue colors of the Puerto Rican flags popped in brighter settings. Forget about the telephoto lens that comes on the more expensive Razr Plus model or the Ultra's higher-resolution ultrawide camera — the standard Razr plays it safe with a 50MP main shooter and a 13MP ultrawide camera on the cover display, along with a 32MP selfie cam when you open up the phone. If these camera specs sound familiar, it's because they match what the Motorola Razr (2024) offered, right down to the 120-degree field of view on the ultrawide lens. They're also remarkably similar to the camera specs of both the Galaxy Z Flip 7 and the lower-cost Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE. (Those phones have a 12MP ultrawide camera to the Razr's 13MP shooter, and the front camera tops out at 10MP.) I'll have my colleague John Velasco test Motorola's cheapest foldable against those Samsung models to see if the Razr can hold its own on the camera front. For now, I went out a shot a bunch of photos with both the 2025 and 2024 Razrs to see if Motorola continues to improve its photo processing powers, particularly in low-light where the Motorola Razr (2024) struggled last year. I saw some slight improvement when shooting a mural at dusk. The 2025 Razr did a much better job balancing the yellow light of a nearby streetlamp than the 2024 model was able to, even if I think there's too much shadow on the left side of the girl's face. But the Razr 2024 shot is too washed out to be something I'd like to share. The Razr 2025 doesn't fare as well when the lights are lower, as there's not much focus in the shot of an agapanthus plant after the sun went down. Still, the 2025 model does manage to tease some color out of the petals, something that's beyond the Razr 2024's capabilities. These two shots are among the better composed ones I took at night with the Motorola Razr (2025), by the way. While the night photos have improved marginally year over year, I still wouldn't be terribly confident in the quality of any low-light photos captured by the phone. Things are much better in good lighting. A close-up of a Matilija poppy looks sharp when photographed by either the 2025 or 2024 Razr, though I detect slightly more detail in the petals of the 2024 shot. Still, both phones managed to capture the flecks of yellow pollen on the white petals, while keeping the full shot of the flower in focus. There's also very little separating this photo of a fried chicken sandwich, with both Razrs getting all the color details right, from the green of the lettuce and jalapeño peppers to the day-glo orange hot sauce. I think the Razr 2025 loses a little focus on the right side of the shot, but its recreation of the air bubbles in the sandwich roll look a little sharper to my eye. Portrait mode seems better on the Razr (2025), as my daughter's skin is warmer and more consistent in that camera phone's shot. The 2024 model offers a more washed-out look, and even her hair isn't as vibrant as the 2025 model depicts it. That said, I'm not terrible impressed with the bokeh effect produced by either phone. There's some background blur in the immediate radius around my daughter, but some of the orange tree leaves at the further edge of the shot are more in-focus than I'd like. It pulls some of the emphasis away from my daughter, who really should be the centerpiece of this shot. One of the benefits of a flip phone is that you can use the more powerful main camera to take a selfie, with the device's cover screen serving as a view finder. The main camera on the Razr 2025 delivers a sharp, richly colored self-portrait with warm skin tones similar to the ones that made that portrait shot of my daughter so appealing. I do think the focus is a little soft in the 2025 photo compared to the selfie snapped by the Razr 2024. As for the 32MP selfie cam on the main display of the Razr, the 2025 model continues the trend of warm skin tones — a positive step for the photo processing on Motorola's flip phone. Otherwise, I'd be hard-pressed to spot any differences from one model to the next. The same can be said for the ultrawide photos captured by both the 2025 and 2024 Razrs. Colors look equally sharp in both photos, and the ultrawide cameras contend with the shadows on what turned out to be a very sunny day in Oakland. As you might expect from the identical camera specs, there's not much movement between the photo quality of the Razr 2025 and Razr 2024. The improvements that are visible are in speciality modes like portrait shots and, to a lesser extent, low-light photos, which suggests Motorola has put some effort into boosting image processing on its phones. The Ultra model of this year's Razr flip phones may feature a top-of-the-line Snapdragon 8 Elite, but to keep the standard Razr's cost low, Motorola has turned to the decidedly more midrange MediaTek Dimensity 7400X. It's not a bad system-on-chip, and it's certainly up to the demands of most every day tasks, from running apps to support the phone's AI features. But this is no speed demon. The benchmark results we recorded bear that out. It's no surprise that the Motorola Razr's Dimensity 7400X chipset would lag behind the Snapdragon 8 Elite-powered Razr Ultra (2025), or even the Galaxy Z Flip 7 and its Exynos 2500 silicon when we ran CPU and GPU tests. But the gains over the Motorola Razr (2024) and an older MediaTek Dimensity 7300X chipset are marginal at best. Motorola Razr (2025) Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 Motorola Raz (2024) Chipset Dimensity 7400X Snapdragon 8 Elite Exynos 2500 Dimensity 7300X Geekbench (single core / multicore) 1089 / 3075 2719 / 8342 2286 / 8079 1055 / 2999 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited (FPS) 22.2 145.3 114.6 19 Adobe Premiere Rush video transcoding (Mins:Secs) 1:21 0:59 1:04 0:54 On Geekbench, which measures CPU performance, the newer Razr posted gains of 3% over the 2024 Razr in both the single- and multicore tests, suggesting a minimal year-over-boost. The 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited graphics test saw the 2025 Motorola Razr's frames per second inch up to 22.2 from just under 19. And it actually took this year's phone 27 seconds longer to transcode a video using Adobe Premiere Rush. In real word use, the Dimensity 7400X performs well enough, handling switching between apps and Google's Gemini Assistant. I'm not going to pretend that PUBG Mobile gameplay was the smoothest I've encountered — there were a few stutters when scenes would load — but side-scrolling games like Jetpack Joyride played just fine. If you accept the fact that you're not getting world-beating performance with this phone — and if you're shopping for a sub-$1,000 foldable device, that's probably a compromise you're comfortable making — you won't be disappointed by the good-enough experience of running apps and playing games on the Razr 2025. Motorola has jumped into the AI mix, and while the features available on the Razr (2025) aren't as extensive as the Galaxy AI capabilities Samsung includes on both new models of its Z Flip phone, they prove to be pretty useful additions. More important, they're the same ones you'll find on Motorola's more expensive Razr models, so you're not short-changing yourself by opting for the entry-level Razr, at least not when it comes to AI. Of the AI capabilities on board the Razr, I found Remember This to be the most useful. Let's say I come across an article or a recipe or something else I want bookmarked for later. I can touch the Moto AI logo on the side of the Razr's display and then select Remember This. I can even store a phrase I'm likely to remember, so that when I ask the on-board assistant to help me recall what I saved, I can just use that search phrase. Pay Attention also proved to be useful in my testing. This feature turns your phone into a voice recorder, capturing voice memos, lectures and discussions in meetings. You'll get an auto-generated transcript and summary — the transcripts of my recording proved pretty accurate in my testing, though the summaries occasionally missed key details. A third AI feature, Catch Me Up, summarizes all your incoming notifications to let you know who's called or messaged you while you were focusing on different tasks. I generally like Motorola's take on Android, where additions like gesture shortcuts are generally helpful. (As an example, a twist of your wrist activates the camera of the Razr when it's folded shut so you can use the cover screen as a view finder.) I'm less enamored with Motorola's lackluster support policies — just three years of software support for the Razr (2025) when the most recent Galaxy Z Flip releases can count on seven years. It's not surprising to see Motorola phones last long on a charge — not even foldables, which tend to draw a lot more power than a standard handset. Motorola devices are mainstays on our best phone battery life list, and that includes the Razr Ultra. Sadly, the standard Razr can't quite reach those lofty heights, though its 4,500 mAh battery is a touch smaller than the 4,700 mAh power pack Motorola equips the Ultra model with. Still, the standard Razr lasted 13 hours and 36 minutes on our battery test, in which phones surf the web until they run out of power. That time is around 3 hours better than the average smartphone we test. It also beats the Galaxy Z Flip 7, which ran out of power just shy of the 12.5 hour mark. So you're getting a longer-lasting phone for less if you turn to Motorola's entry-level flip phone. I like the fact that the Razr supports wireless charging — it's not a feature that midrange phones always offer. And while the 30W wired charging speeds for the 2025 Razr aren't blazing fast, they'll get the job done when you need to top off the battery. Using a 45W Samsung charger, we got the Razr to a 42% charge after 30 minutes of powering up a drained phone. The entry-level Razr continues to deliver good value for money, with a durable design, long-lasting performance and the same AI features found on more expensive Motorola models. The cameras produce good-enough photos in most circumstances, and the less-than-robust chipset is unlikely to cause most users much fuss. If you want a foldable phone that doesn't break the bank, the 2025 Razr delivers. The question as to whether the Razr is a better option than Samsung's low-cost Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE is one I can't answer until I — or one of my Tom's Guide colleagues — spends more time with Samsung's phone. On paper, at least, the Razr feels like the more appealing option. It may not have the extensive AI tools found on a Samsung phone, but the Flip phones we have tested struggle to keep up with Motorola's models when it comes to battery life. And the Razr remains $200 cheaper than the reduced price for Samsung's FE model. Unless you really long for the full Galaxy AI experience or prefer the longer software support Samsung provides its phones, there's no need for bargain hunters to look beyond the Motorola Razr (2025) if they're looking for the best value among foldable phones. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Digital Trends
15 hours ago
- Digital Trends
You Asked: Is a 5-Year-Old OLED Outdated? Best 48-inch TVs?
In this episode of You Asked, we cover some of your most pressing TV questions. Is upgrading from the LG C8 to the Sony A95L worth it? What's the real difference between Hisense's Q7 and U7 series? And if you're shopping for a great 48-inch TV, which models should you actually consider? We also help troubleshoot an issue that's cutting off parts of the screen on some TVs. How much have flagship OLEDs improved in 5+ years? @samstraus1511 asks: I know this is an old video and a dumb question, but how much better is the Sony A95L compared to this? (He's referencing a review of the LG C8 from 2018.) I'm looking to upgrade from my 55-inch C8, which is still great, but I am a picture enthusiast and looking to upgrade. Is it a major jump? Any info would be great. First of all, there are no dumb questions—just occasionally dumb answers from yours truly. But that's why I have all of you to help out in the comments. Second, this is the approach I think more people could learn from. You're riding out your LG C8, which, like you said, is still great and was actually named our 2018 Best TV of the Year. Before upgrading, you're trying to gauge if it's worth it. I think we get so hyped up on spec sheets that we forget we're living in a golden age where it takes a while for picture quality to take a significant leap. It's just not happening year over year, aside from some top-tier TVs that make big changes to hardware. To answer your question: I think the biggest improvements will be in how the TV handles color gradient and upscaling—both tied to processing. That's certainly improved since the C8 was released, and Sony has been one of the best, if not the best, in that department for a while. By the numbers, overall brightness and peak brightness are also higher on the A95L. That may not be as noticeable when viewing SDR content, but for HDR, in a peak 2% window, there's a difference of about 500 nits, according to Ratings measurements. This makes a difference for bright objects on screen—like the sun—that will really pop on the A95L. Plus, with a QD-OLED panel on the Sony, you're going to get enhanced color volume and brighter details. You're also getting a quality-of-life improvement with the interface. It should be a bit snappier, more responsive, and—in my opinion—easier to use with Google TV. So, will you notice a difference? Yes. Is it significant? Also yes. Is it a good time to buy one? I would say yes to that, too. It looks like the A95L has come down another $200 or so over the last month. All in all, hats off to the LG C8 for still holding its own seven years after its release. But there have been significant enough advances to warrant an upgrade—and be happy with the money spent. Comparing Hisense U7N, TCL QM7, and TCL QM8 @tyronetozer8005 asks: At the moment, I'm using the LG CX and starting to get burn-in. The Hisense U7 that you mentioned—is that the same as the Q7N? I know different countries name them differently. Or… my other option will be the TCL QM7 or QM8. Out of those, which would you recommend? I can get the Hisense 100-inch for a really great price. Lots of good options here. Let me immediately point out that the Q7N is not the same as the U7—and the difference is in that first letter. The 'Q' in Q7N means it's a QLED, quantum dot TV. The 'U' in the U7 series means it's a ULED TV, which is a considerably better performer. It has Mini-LED backlighting, full-array local dimming, higher brightness, and some of Hisense's best processing. So, if you go that route: U7, not Q7. And on that note, we just posted a video fully explaining Hisense's 2025 TV lineup—that might help answer some questions as well. Compared to the TCL options you mentioned, the U7N is in the same ballpark as the QM7. I'll also note that both are 2024 models, and the updated 2025 versions do differ a bit more. I'm going off what you said in your question. The TCL QM8, however, is the standout of the bunch. If that's within your budget, it's the winner—hands down. It's the brightest in both SDR and HDR viewing and has superior contrast to match. As for getting the Hisense at 100 inches: if you've got the room and aren't sitting too close, go for it. But if you're within 10 feet, maybe save the money with a smaller option and add a good soundbar system to match the high-quality visuals with superior audio. Why is my TV cutting off the image? @jeanannleone4154 asks: What kind of TV can I buy so that I can see the whole picture? I'm tired of having heads cut off and writing at the bottom of the screen that I can't see—like weather warnings, etc. It is very frustrating. Is it impossible to find a TV like this? Hey Jean—that's definitely frustrating. And it sounds like you've had this issue with multiple TVs. If that's the case, I'd say it's probably not the TV. My guess, not knowing how you're receiving the signal, is that it's a display settings issue—particularly with something like your cable box. If the display settings are off there, it's going to cut things off no matter what TV you have. Check to make sure you're using the correct aspect ratio—typically 16:9 for modern content and local programming that would have weather warnings. If you're using a cable box remote, look for words like Aspect, Zoom, or Format to make sure it's not cropping the image. If you're still having problems, let us know your setup. Take a few pictures of that and your remote and send them to youasked@ and we can go from there to help. Best 48-inch TV recommendations @RachelleM-j4m asks: What do you recommend for a 48-inch TV? You certainly kept the question simple—but without more info, like your budget and picture preferences, it's a bit open-ended. Still, let's run through a few good ones. If you want the best picture quality at that size, OLED is the way to go. The LG B4 or B5 would be a great budget option, as long as you're in a space without a lot of ambient light. You'd be getting all the great contrast of OLED with good processing. But if you need more brightness, look at the C4 or C5 instead. That's the best OLED LG makes at 48 inches. Samsung has the S90F, which for their 2025 lineup is the only OLED they make in the 48-inch size. However, in that case, I'd say if you can swing it, maybe step up to the 55-inch S90F instead. That's where you get the superior QD-OLED panel instead of W-RGB OLED. As for Mini LED TVs, the Samsung QN90F (2025) and QN90D (2024) are both available at 50 inches. They're among the best non-OLED TVs you can buy. But if it were me, I'd start looking at 55-inch models and comparing prices—if you have the space. You'll get far more options from Sony, Hisense, and TCL when it comes to Mini LED TVs, and chances are, you'll find some pretty sweet deals right now.
Digital Trends
16 hours ago
- Digital Trends
The wait for MacBook Pro's most-awaited upgrade could end next year
Remember when we first started hearing rumors of an OLED screen upgrade for the MacBook Pro? Yeah, it's been roughly two years since. In that span, Apple has put an OLED panel on the iPad Pro, but hasn't given the same treatment to its laptop. It seems the wait will finally come to an end next year. Or a year later. According to Bloomberg, the MacBook Pro refresh with an OLED display is very much on the table and will finally hit the shelves. For real, this time. 'It's arriving between the end of 2026 and early 2027 and should boast the M6 chip,' says the report. Recommended Videos To recall, when Apple introduced the new design language for the MacBook Pro with a notch at the top, it was speculated that the flagship laptop would finally graduate from an LCD to an OLED panel. Instead, Apple borrowed the mini-LED screen from the iPad Pro and put it on the MacBook Pro. It's not bad, but not nearly as dazzling as an OLED screen. If Bloomberg's claims turn out to be true, MacBook Pro fans will finally get treated to an OLED screen late in 2026, or in the first half of 2027. It's worth keeping in mind that Apple still has a slate of M5-series Mac machines slated to arrive next year, as per the outlet. Depending on the launch window, the M6 series MacBook Pro could very well get pushed into 2027, unless Apple decides to refresh the portfolio within a year. This scenario seems unlikely, but not entirely implausible. A true rebirth of an icon? Notably, an OLED panel will not be the only upgrade on the M6 generation MacBook Pro. Bloomberg has previously reported that Apple will also overhaul the design with 'new cases.' What direction Apple takes from here would be interesting to witness. As far as the silicon goes, work on the M6 series processors is currently underway under the codename 'Komodo' at Apple. The company is reportedly planning a successor generation, dubbed M7 (Borneo), and an 'even more advanced' generation that internally goes by the name Sotra. We are also hearing rumors that a cellular modem, based on the same underlying tech as the in-house C1 modem fitted inside the iPhone 16e, will also make its way to the MacBook Pro. It's plausible that just like iPads, Apple will also offer its flagship laptop in WiFi-only and 5G-ready variants in the coming years.
