logo
Jevon McSkimming ‘strongly denies' acting inappropriately in firearms licences vetting process

Jevon McSkimming ‘strongly denies' acting inappropriately in firearms licences vetting process

NZ Herald23-05-2025
A statement from the office of Police Commissioner Richard Chambers said police were 'aware of the allegation to which you refer'.
'It is being looked into as part of a wider investigation into concerns that have been raised. That is still under way.
'The police commissioner was first made aware of those concerns in March and directed the investigation occur. This is a separate issue to the criminal investigation into Jevon McSkimming.'
In response to questions from RNZ, McSkimming released a statement through his lawyer.
'Mr McSkimming strongly denies any allegation he acted in any way inappropriately in relation to the vetting process for firearms licences.
'As the overall operational lead on firearms, at one time Mr McSkimming raised issues about how the vetting process was being applied. He took those concerns to the executive leadership team and, following discussion at the ELT, the process was subsequently modified.'
In response to questions from RNZ, Mitchell said in a statement he was aware 'some concerns have been brought forward'. He said the police commissioner was 'looking into the matter'.
There were no timeframes for the various investigations at this time.
The firearms regulator was established after the Christchurch Mosque attacks in 2019.
According to its website, it has three main functions, including implementing the firearms licensing system, managing the Firearms Registry and educating people to enable compliance and promote the safe use of firearms.
RNZ revealed last week pornography found on McSkimming's work computer is being investigated as alleged objectionable material. He declined to comment on the allegations through his lawyer.
Last Friday evening, his lawyer Linda Clark was granted a rare 'superinjunction' by Justice Karen Grau that prohibited reporting that disclosed the nature of the allegedly objectionable material, as well as the existence of the injunction itself, until 2.15pm on Monday.
On Monday, Justice Cheryl Gwyn held a teleconference from the High Court at Wellington to discuss the injunction with Clark, the police, and legal counsel for RNZ, Stuff and NZME.
After that conference, the order prohibiting publication of the nature of the allegedly objectionable material was continued – but the order prohibiting the existence of the injunction was not continued, meaning RNZ can now report the fact of McSkimming's application and the interim result.
Chambers said in a statement last week that he appreciated the resignation of McSkimming raised questions, but said the criminal investigation couldn't be 'compromised by commenting on the circumstances of it at this point'.
'However, I can say that I have always made it very clear that trust and confidence in police is a top priority for me as commissioner,' Chambers said.
'I take very seriously anything that puts trust and confidence and the reputation of police at risk and will act to address it.
'I have high expectations of all police staff and will address it if those standards are not met, irrespective of rank or role.'
In announcing McSkimming's resignation last week, Mitchell said McSkimming resigned before he could be dismissed.
'I instructed the Public Service Commission to commence the process to remove Mr McSkimming from office after allegations of a very serious nature recently came to light, separate to the investigation that led to him being suspended.'
He did not say what the allegations were. Mitchell said the Policing Act was 'very clear'.
'A deputy commissioner of police must be a 'fit and proper' person. They are rightly held to the highest standards of conduct and this new information called into serious question Mr McSkimming's fitness for office.
'When Mr McSkimming was invited to respond to these allegations he chose to resign. Mr McSkimming's resignation has confirmed my view that his continuation in the role was untenable.'
Police advised Mitchell that their investigations into McSkimming would continue, notwithstanding his resignation.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Soldier admits handing info to person he thought was foreign agent
Soldier admits handing info to person he thought was foreign agent

1News

time34 minutes ago

  • 1News

Soldier admits handing info to person he thought was foreign agent

A soldier with links to far-right groups has admitted handing over and attempting to hand over sensitive military information to a person he thought was a foreign agent. But the soldier was actually caught in an undercover sting. He also possessed a video of the 2019 Christchurch Mosque attacks and the mosque attacker's manifesto, The Great Replacement. At a court martial at Linton Military Camp near Palmerston North today, the soldier, whose name is suppressed on a temporary basis, admitted one charge each of attempted espionage, dishonestly accessing a computer system and possessing an objectionable publication. The name of the foreign country the undercover agent said they were representing is suppressed. ADVERTISEMENT The charges The attempted espionage charge dates to between ,December 5 and 12, 2019 when the soldier attempted to hand information to the undercover agent he thought represented a foreign country. That information was likely to prejudice the security and defence of New Zealand, according to the wording of the charge. The soldier handed over phone directories for Linton Military Camp, Burnham Military Camp, Trentham Military Camp and the Hokowhitu campus in Palmerston North, as well as for the Messines Defence Centre. The latter document is classified. He also attempted to hand over maps and an annotated photo of Linton Military camp; a document setting out Linton's security vulnerabilities; his own ID card; access codes and information allowing for unauthorised access to Linton and Ohakea air base; and his name and passwords, which allowed unauthorised access to the Defence Force system. On December 12, 2019, the soldier accessed this system for dishonest reasons. He obtained property, maps, images and phone directories. This includes a map and phone director of Woodburn air base; a map of an ammunition depot at Kauri Point, Auckland; an aerial photo of a navy ship; and aerial photos and a phone director from Whenuapai air base in Auckland. ADVERTISEMENT On December 16 that year he possessed a recording of the Christchurch mosque attack, which is a restricted publication, and The Great Replacement. First of its kind This is the first military prosecution for espionage or attempted espionage. Fifty years ago, in the civilian court, Bill Sutch was acquitted on charges relating to his alleged passing of information to the Russians. In late 2020, 17 charges under the Armed Forces Discipline Act were laid against the soldier, including espionage and possessing objectionable material. A long period of pre-trial hearings then followed. The 17 charges were withdrawn in March and replaced with the three charges the soldier initially admitted in March, before confirming those pleas before Judge Kevin Riordan and a military panel today. The military panel accepted the guilty pleas and will decide the soldier's sentence. RNZ has previously reported the soldier, aged 27 at the time of his arrest, was a member of far-right groups the Dominion Movement and Action Zealandia.

'Rewriting of history': Robertson stands by Covid spending
'Rewriting of history': Robertson stands by Covid spending

Otago Daily Times

timean hour ago

  • Otago Daily Times

'Rewriting of history': Robertson stands by Covid spending

By Russell Palmer of RNZ Former Finance Minister Grant Robertson is standing by his economic spending decisions, and rejects the suggestion the last Labour government did not have enough real-world experience. He says Labour was "absolutely" ready for government when Winston Peters chose the party over National in 2017, and the high volume of working groups was a result of wanting to include people in the areas "where there was big change required". Robertson was being interviewed by Susie Ferguson on RNZ to promote his new book Anything Could Happen, which is available in bookstores from today. Covid-19 spending: 'Rewriting of history' He says Labour's election loss in 2023 was primarily because it was a "cost of living election". "There were other issues that sit beside that ... crime in Auckland was a big deal through that period of time, Covid, there was still some hangover from ... and just how much we'd been in people's lives. "I remember, and I recount in the book, door knocking in Wellington Central in that '23 campaign and a woman thanking me for for the work that we'd done and said 'but you've had nine years, and I think it's time for a change'. "It took me quite a while to convince her we had only had six. It sort of felt like nine for people because we were so involved in everybody's lives, but I fundamentally believe the core issue was around the cost of living - and people look for a change often when that's happening." Despite that, he stood by the fiscal decisions made at the time. "Treasury and others, as has been reported recently, were saying to us 'you need to be careful about the impact of what you're doing on inflation, on the economy' - and we knew that. "But as I say, Delta arrived August 2021, we had to deal with that - and actually the Treasury supported us continuing on with the spending that we were doing. It's a bit of a rewriting of history to be frank, to say that they didn't." He said the government did not know how long Covid was going to last, or the severity of the health or economic impacts - and was criticised by political opponents for not spending more in late 2021. "I remember vividly the day I got the report from Treasury in early 2020 to tell me that we were facing a scenario of 13.5 percent unemployment, and from my perspective as the person dealing more with the economic rather than the health side I just knew I wasn't going to stand by and let that happen." The Covid Recovery Fund was closed in 2022 but "then we get to the 2023 Budget and we're dealing with the Auckland Anniversary floods and Cyclone Gabrielle". "We all knew that we had to be careful with where we went, and we didn't introduce in large number of new measures after late 2021 but we did carry on with the ones we had, because we still needed to look after New Zealanders and businesses. "I get it that by 2022 the whole country - including us - was thoroughly sick of Covid." He said the more deadly Delta variant had needed additional support and interventions, and while the country reopening did not happen as fast as some would like, "we stayed the course on saving lives", pointing to a report from Michael Plank showing excess death rates significantly lower in New Zealand compared to other countries. Covid-19 division: 'This is not New Zealand' The policies were divisive though, and Robertson said his emotional response to the protest on Parliament's lawn was that "this is not New Zealand". As MP for Wellington at the time, he was perturbed seeing the physical and mental damage after the country pulled together during the pandemic. "They were being spat at for wearing masks, there were students going to the high schools around the area who had to be supported by security guards, and I just had that feeling 'this is not the country that I am so proud to be a part of'." "That was the big emotion that I had. And the fire, I remember thinking gosh, as well as the children's playground that's there in Parliament you've got two huge old trees that have been in the grounds forever and they appeared to be going up in smoke as well and it was just horrifying to watch. And then the violence that just followed on from that." He and other former ministers Jacinda Ardern, Chris Hipkins and Ayesha Verrall refused to attend the Covid-19 Royal Commission of Inquiry's public hearings last week. He said he felt he had cooperated, but was concerned about the nature of the public hearings, and "the precedent effect of calling ministers and former minsters to that, the capacity for material to be misused". "I think for me I'm up to about four and a half hours of interviews. When I finished my last set of interviews recently one of the staff at the Royal Commission said 'you've answered all of our questions and more', I left that meeting saying 'look, if you've got any further questions let us know'. He referred to the phrase the former ministers used in explaining why they were not appearing, that it would be performative, not informative. "This is meant to be a lessons learned exercise, I welcomed that, I think it's great that we've learned the lessons of Covid - but I think it was moving in a direction that was not really about that." Politics: 'We had a very clear plan' Robertson said Peters' announcement that he would go into government with Labour in 2017 was an "extraordinary few minutes in politics for everybody in New Zealand" - a genuine moment of not knowing what would happen. But Labour was, he said, "absolutely ready for government", pointing to the first 100 days plan, which included the Families Package: Family Tax credits, Best Start payments for young families, Winter Energy payments for older and poorer New Zealanders, and Accommodation Supplement increases. The government also set up the Royal Commission into Abuse in Care, and brought in a free first year of tertiary education. "We had a very clear plan. We also inherited a number of areas where there was big change required, and we wanted to involve and include people in that, and that's where you get working groups and so on coming from. "I felt like, you know, we balanced together some really important immediate issues that we were addressing, along with getting into those bigger topics which eventually turned into quite substantive change in the health system, vocational education, resource management and so on." He rejected the suggestion the 2017 Labour caucus had too many career politicians, and too little experience outside of politics. "I don't accept that at all. I mean, we had a good range of skills and backgrounds and experiences in our Cabinet." He said his understanding of the political and Parliamentary system was valuable, but he also learnt a lot about people from being an electorate MP. His electorate office was across the road from the Work and Income office and he would watch the people "at the end of their tether who we were there to help". "The same with refugees who resettled, or people who were struggling with housing, or the health system - you learn a lot, and we're all part of our communities, whatever working background that we might have had." Ardern approached him to take over from her when she was planning to step down as prime minister. Robertson said various factors led him to refuse the job - particularly, that he had seen what it required. "I obviously looked at Jacinda's decision in two ways. One was as her friend, where I could absolutely understand the reasons why she wanted to step away. As her political colleague, I was clearly concerned about what that meant for us as a government, and where we were heading." He said physical and mental health played a part in his decision not to take on the role, along with threats and abuse he faced towards the end of the Covid-19 response - but it was his decision years earlier not to pursue it that was a bigger factor. "And I felt that knowing up close what being prime minister was about, you need to be able to give that 120 percent, you can't go into it with any suggestion of doubts of whether you want to do the job - that would be incredibly selfish to do that. "So really those considerations were bigger for me." Childhood challenges Robertson's book also covers his early years as the son of a lay minister, as the sports-mad youngest of three boys, his struggles with telling his family about his sexuality, and the shock of his father's imprisonment. He told RNZ his father being sentenced for stealing from his employer was "devastating" both personally for him as a young student and for his family, particularly his mother. With her husband in jail and her children studying, the family had little income at that point. "My father was obviously the person who had to go to prison, and he'd done something very stupid to put himself in that position. But it reverberates quickly. "I loved my father very much. I was angry with him about what he'd done. He'd let down a lot of people around him and breached the trust of a lot of people around him, but I still needed to be there for him. "And so the next sort of 18 months or so that he was in prison, I visited him pretty much every week and learned a lot about what is good and mostly about what is bad in our prison system. And you know, just try to support him as best I could, but it was a devastating blow for everybody." He said he was fascinated as a 12-year-old by the 1984 election "which marks me out as a complete nerd, I realise", but politics was often discussed and debated within the family. "My mother is a very political person with strong views, and we heard about them a lot when we were at home. And you know that, I guess, flowed through to me." Opening up to his family about being gay was more of a struggle, however. "I didn't really have a word for it for a while, but particularly around the period of the Homosexual Law Reform Act that - obviously, there was huge debate, it was not a positive debate ... so that was, unfortunately for me, almost exactly the time that I was coming to understand that I probably was gay. "And I was growing up in the church and while it was a fairly liberal church environment it still, there was connotations and negativity ... I kind of kept it in a box for a long time. "One or two friends sort of found out, and then I had an unfortunate incident where I got very, very drunk and went to a party and the subject my sexuality was on show in a really unfortunate way ... I had a very supportive family through that period, and friends as well. But like a lot of teenagers, I was doing some pretty risky things while I was working out who I was."

A frame-by-frame analysis of Chris Luxon and Chris Hipkins dancing in public
A frame-by-frame analysis of Chris Luxon and Chris Hipkins dancing in public

The Spinoff

time2 hours ago

  • The Spinoff

A frame-by-frame analysis of Chris Luxon and Chris Hipkins dancing in public

The two Christophers danced together last weekend. Tara Ward breaks down this incredible moment in New Zealand history, move by move. The latest gem in the rich treasure chest that is Christopher Luxon's social media was unearthed on the weekend, and captured two of the country's political leaders as we have never seen them before. The prime minister uploaded a 15-second video of himself and Labour leader Chris Hipkins having a lovely time together, dancing in public like they were born to do it. The footage was taken at an Auckland event celebrating Indian Independence Day. Stuff reported that Indian singer Shibani Kashyap invited Luxon onstage to dance with her. Luxon then invited his colleague Hipkins onstage, telling the crowd the opposition leader was 'an outstanding dancer'. How Luxon knew this about Hipkins is another story that deserves to be told, but Stuff noted that Luxon declared, 'if I'm going to embarrass myself, he's going to embarrass himself'. Embarrass themselves? As if. No human or politician should ever feel ashamed about expressing their true self through the emotional medium of dance, which reveals more than words can ever say. Plus, music, dance and the creative arts contribute billions of dollars to the New Zealand economy, and this was clearly the moment the prime minister realised the value of shaking his moneymaker. 'Just two dads getting in the groove for Indian Independence Day in South Auckland,' Luxon captioned the video. Of course, it's not the first time New Zealand politicians have dared to display their fancy footwork in public. Act MPs Rodney Hide and David Seymour stumbled through reality show Dancing With the Stars NZ, while Luxon leapt into the 2023 election campaign. His wife Amanda recently revealed that she and her husband took ballroom dancing lessons while they were dating. 'He is a good dancer,' she told RNZ. The evidence speaks for itself, Aotearoa. The latest video only lasts a few seconds, but it is a spectacular, mesmerising piece of footage. Every time I watch, I see something new – a surprising piece of arm spaghetti, a jaunty purse of the lips, a desperate glance towards the horizon. It must be exhausting for Luxon and Hipkins to toe the political party line all the time, but in this glorious moment, their twinkletoes were finally free. Let's take a spin around the dance floor with a frame-by-frame analysis of this gift that keeps on giving. The video begins, as all good interpretive dances should, in the middle of a movement. Luxon's body is already compelled by the beat. Kashyap holds Luxon's right hand in the air while she sings, leaving him to jig on the spot while his left arm pumps and down. His knees bend together and his hips don't lie, sweeping from side to side with an easy fluidity. Behind him, Hipkins gives his best form two shuffle, elbows glued to his sides, legs spread. Both men are dancing like everyone is watching. Politics has been cast aside, official party talking points are discarded. Nobody is eating pavlova on top of a mountain, or mentioning how the coalition government reduced Matariki funding by 45%, or remembering that the prime minister didn't attend Waitangi this year. Here, the only conversation is the hidden language of the soul. Now, there is only dance. With a suppleness in his joints that just won't quit, Luxon pouts and begins to jog up the stage, but the camera is pulled towards the disco magnetism radiating from Hipkins. Unlike the full-body commitment of Luxon, Hipkins merely leans to the left (predictable) and slowly bops to the beat. His style is consistent, his manner unflappable. His feet barely move, but the grin never leaves his face. Luxon may have the stage, but nobody puts Baby in the corner. As his body frolics forward, Luxon turns his head back to where the nation's awkward uncle continues to rock and sway. Luxon says something unintelligible to Hipkins – we can only assume it is a scream for help – but Hipkins remains glued to the spot. Then, Luxon gets back on track. He's saying 'yes' to dance and bounds ahead of Kashyap, cutting shapes so enthusiastically that only his index finger remains in her grasp. She tries repeatedly to twirl him in a circle, but Luxon is oblivious. His body has been taken over by a force more powerful than a bad opinion poll. Fingers cannot stop him now. He is Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo in the Wicked press tour. He is defying gravity. Luxon has officially found 'the groove'. He uses his spare hand to reach down and undo the button on his suit jacket, so he can better release the dancer within. Having bounded to the end of the stage, Luxon extends his arm and waves frenetically at the crowd. He continues to bounce enthusiastically, then rhythmically bobs his head from side to side, making his shoulders rock up and down in unison. It looks, for a fleeting moment, like he's about to bust out 'I'm A Little Teapot'. Then, the video stops. This unforgettable vision is over all too soon, and we are forced to return to the bleak disappointment of our everyday lives. All we are left with is this final glimpse of the two leaders, dancing like their careers depend on it. Even though it only lasts a few precious seconds, this is a powerful reminder that politics is perhaps the greatest dance of all – and if you open your heart and your joints, the rhythm is indeed going to get you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store