
Too many blame those with the quietest voices
There was a post on X last month that quoted an elderly British couple as supposedly saying they were leaving England 'due to the amount of foreigners.' The account telling the story, Lord Miles Official, went on to say: 'They told me they sold their property portfolio because foreigners kept not paying rent. They both had branded aluminum hand luggage worth $3k. Millionaires leaving the UK.'
Campaigner Brendan Cox responded with the question: 'Leaving England because of the number of foreigners … to find a country with er … less foreigners?!'
There is not much else that really needs to be said about the absurd remarks of this couple or the Lord Miles Official account. But the level of misinformation being spouted by people like this seems to be getting worse.
I mentioned some figures in a previous op-ed I wrote that showed that, of the migrants coming into the UK, most were students on academic visas or health professionals on employment visas. The problem is that, rather than educating the electorate, politicians are simply pandering to certain misinformed views that are largely centered on hate.
A quick search on ChatGPT, which sourced His Majesty's Government, The Independent, the Migration Observatory, The Times and the Evening Standard, found the following: 'In the year ending December 2023, net migration to the UK was estimated at 685,000, a 10 percent decrease from the revised figure of 764,000 for the previous year. This suggests a potential downward trend, though it is too early to confirm.'
Politicians do not seem to be talking about the overseas students who pay inflated tuition fees or the health professionals who move to the UK to help with the shortage of qualified British doctors and nurses. Nor do they mention that the introduction of the Graduate Route visa is projected to yield a net fiscal benefit of £8.1 billion ($10.6 billion) over 10 years, as per a Migration Observatory analysis of Home Office figures.
And contrary to the views of some, while domestic students in the UK pay approximately £9,500 to £10,000 per year for an undergraduate course, overseas students pay double that.
Rather than educating the electorate, politicians are simply pandering to certain misinformed views that are largely centered on hate
Peter Harrison
I recently had a conversation with a fellow compatriot who told me, when I mentioned Brexit and the damage it had done and was still doing to the British economy, that I should get past this and move on. But the cost to the country's economy resulting from leaving the EU is climbing.
Bloomberg columnist Matthew A. Winkler wrote last year: 'Parting ways with the EU … has been disastrous for the UK.' The same publication reported in 2023 that Brexit was costing the British economy £100 billion every year through lost investment and labor shortages, among other factors.
Before Brexit, people from the European mainland would travel to the UK for seasonal work picking fruit and vegetables. Freedom of movement enabled them to do this and the farmers welcomed them with open arms. It was a workforce of willing and able people who turned up, did the work and then left. Some may have stayed, but most went back home to their families.
So, are politicians admitting this was a mistake and looking to repair the damage? Apparently not, as many are sticking to the hate-fueled anti-migrant message, because hate is easier to peddle.
Another group of people seemingly targeted by the politicians are those in receipt of benefits. Last month, Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones used the example of pocket money when talking about benefits cuts for disabled people. The government's own analysis suggested that more than 3 million families would be an average of £1,720 a year worse off by 2030 due to its welfare cuts. But the minister said this analysis did not take into account 'extra cash for training,' adding that it was like his children getting a Saturday job on top of their pocket money. He later apologized after his comments were branded 'offensive' and 'patronizing,' admitting they were 'tactless.'
But would he have apologized had the criticism not been so fast?
The truth is that there are people perfectly capable of working in the UK who do not because they say they would be worse off than if they remained on benefits. But they are a tiny minority.
Of course, it is much easier to blame others, especially those with a different mindset, set of beliefs or skin color
Peter Harrison
According to the Office of National Statistics, in the final quarter of 2024, 4.4 percent of people in the UK of working age were unemployed — that is 1.6 million people. But fewer than 20,000 of them were simply 'discouraged' or unwilling to work. Something needs to be done about those people, but they are not the drain on resources the government seems to want us to believe.
The intriguing thing is that, despite all this information being freely available, people around the world are still being driven by hate. And of course, it is much easier to blame others, especially those with a different mindset, set of beliefs or skin color.
I remember a conversation I had about 20 years ago, in which I said Western politics had hit a wall and that ultimately the voting public would tire of the cyclical nature of one group of well-intended politicians in gray suits taking over from another. I argued that people would start to recognize that little was changing, irrespective of who was in power.
British politics will continue in this loop until major wholesale changes take place. I suspect this will be through a change in the voting system that could ultimately force political parties to work together.
But until this happens, politicians will probably continue blaming those with the least amount of power, whether that is single parents, unemployed disabled people or those driven away from their home countries by abject poverty or war.
Little in British society will change, but many will continue to blame those with the quietest voices.
• Peter Harrison is a senior editor at Arab News in the Dubai office. He has covered the Middle East for more than a decade. X: @PhotoPJHarrison
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arab News
3 hours ago
- Arab News
European, NATO leaders to join Ukraine's Zelensky for meeting with Trump
KYIV, Ukraine: European and NATO leaders announced Sunday they will join President Volodymyr Zelensky in Washington to present a united front in talks with President Donald Trump on ending Russia's war in Ukraine and firming up US security guarantees now on the negotiating table. Leaders from Britain, France, Germany, Italy and Finland are rallying around the Ukrainian president after his exclusion from Trump's summit on Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Their pledge to be at Zelensky's side at the White House on Monday is an apparent effort to ensure the meeting goes better than the last one in February, when Trump berated Zelensky in a heated Oval Office encounter. 'The Europeans are very afraid of the Oval Office scene being repeated and so they want to support Mr. Zelensky to the hilt,' said retired French Gen. Dominique Trinquand, a former head of France's military mission at the United Nations. 'It's a power struggle and a position of strength that might work with Trump,' he said. Putin agreed at his summit in Alaska with Trump that the US and its European allies could offer Ukraine a security guarantee resembling NATO's collective defense mandate as part of an eventual deal to end the 3 1/2-year war, special US envoy Steve Witkoff said in an interview Sunday on CNN's 'State of the Union.' It 'was the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that,' said Witkoff, who called it 'game-changing.' Later, French President Emmanuel Macron said the European delegation will ask Trump to back plans they drafted to beef-up Ukraine's armed forces — already Europe's largest outside of Russia — with more training and equipment to secure any peace. 'We need a credible format for the Ukrainian army, that's the first point, and say — we Europeans and Americans — how we'll train them, equip them, and finance this effort in the long-term,' the French leader said. The European-drafted plans also envision an allied force in Ukraine away from the front lines to reassure Kyiv that peace will hold and to dissuade another Russian invasion, Macron said. He spoke after a nearly two-hour video call Sunday with nations in Europe and further afield — including Canada, Australia and Japan — that are involved in the so-called 'coalition of the willing.' The 'several thousand men on the ground in Ukraine in the zone of peace' would signal that 'our fates are linked,' Macron said. 'This is what we must discuss with the Americans: Who is ready to do what?' Macron said. 'Otherwise, I think the Ukrainians simply cannot accept commitments that are theoretical.' European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said earlier at a news conference in Brussels with Zelensky that 'we welcome President Trump's willingness to contribute to Article 5-like security guarantees for Ukraine. And the 'coalition of the willing' — including the European Union — is ready to do its share.' Macron said the substance of security guarantees will be more important than whether they are given an Article 5-type label. 'A theoretical article isn't enough, the question is one of substance,' he said. 'We must start out by saying that the first of the security guarantees for Ukraine is a strong Ukrainian army.' Along with Von der Leyen and Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni and Finnish President Alexander Stubb also said they'll will take part in Monday's talks, as will secretary-general of the NATO military alliance, Mark Rutte. The European leaders' support could help ease concerns in Kyiv and in other European capitals that Ukraine risks being railroaded into a peace deal. Neil Melvin, director of international security at the London-based Royal United Services Institute, said European leaders are trying to 'shape this fast-evolving agenda.' After the Alaska summit, the idea of a ceasefire appears all-but-abandoned, with the narrative shifting toward Putin's agenda of ensuring Ukraine does not join NATO or even the EU. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on NBC's 'Meet the Press' on Sunday that a possible ceasefire is 'not off the table' but that the best way to end the war would be through a 'full peace deal.' Putin has implied that he sees Europe as a hindrance to negotiations. He has also resisted meeting Zelensky in person, saying that such a meeting can only take place once the groundwork for a peace deal has been laid. Speaking to the press after his meeting with Trump, the Russian leader raised the idea that Kyiv and other European capitals could 'create obstacles' to derail potential progress with 'behind-the-scenes intrigue.' For now, Zelensky offers the Europeans the 'only way' to get into the discussions about the future of Ukraine and European security, says RUSI's Melvin. However, the sheer number of European leaders potentially in attendance means the group will have to be 'mindful' not to give 'contradictory' messages, Melvin said. 'The risk is they look heavy-handed and are ganging up on Trump,' he added. 'Trump won't want to be put in a corner.' Although details remain hazy on what Article 5-like security guarantees from the US and Europe would entail for Ukraine, it could mirror NATO membership terms, in which an attack on one member of the alliance is seen as an attack on all. Zelensky continues to stress the importance of both US and European involvement in any negotiations. 'A security guarantee is a strong army. Only Ukraine can provide that. Only Europe can finance this army, and weapons for this army can be provided by our domestic production and European production. But there are certain things that are in short supply and are only available in the United States,' he said at the press conference Sunday alongside Von der Leyen. Zelensky also pushed back against Trump's assertion — which aligned with Putin's preference — that the two sides should negotiate a complete end to the war, rather than first securing a ceasefire. Zelensky said a ceasefire would provide breathing room to review Putin's demands. 'It's impossible to do this under the pressure of weapons,' he said. 'Putin does not want to stop the killing, but he must do it.'


Leaders
9 hours ago
- Leaders
British Punk Duo Bob Vylan Speaks against Israel's Actions in Gaza
The punk-rap duo Bob Vylan made headlines around the world last month when they publicly expressed their solidarity with Palestine and criticized Israel's conduct of war in Gaza. At Glastonbury Festival in June, frontman rapper, Bobby Vylan, led chants of 'Free, Free Palestine' and 'Death, Death to the IDF (Israeli military).' Moreover, Bobby Vylan made a strong statement in support for Palestine, saying 'From the river to the sea, Palestine must be, and will be, free.' The incident triggered controversy across the world, drawing both criticism and support amid growing outrage over Israel's actions in Gaza. The UK Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, called the chant 'appalling,' while the British police investigated the incident. Moreover, the band has been dropped from several shows, including France and Germany, and had their US visas revoked. Many people across the UK interpreted the chant as a call for the death of Israeli soldiers. However, Bobby Vylan explained in an Instagram post that he was not calling 'for the death of Jews, Arabs or any other race or group of people.' 'We are for the dismantling of a violent military machine. A machine whose own soldiers were told to use 'unnecessary lethal force' against innocent civilians waiting for aid. A machine that has destroyed much of Gaza,' the British singer clarified. Short link : Post Views: 37


Leaders
9 hours ago
- Leaders
Trump Delivers Melania's 'Peace Letter' to Putin at Alaska Summit
US President Donald Trump presented a heartfelt letter from First Lady Melania Trump to Russian President Vladimir Putin during their recent summit in Alaska. This letter, which urged Putin to prioritize peace for the sake of children, came a day after the two leaders failed to reach a significant agreement. The First Lady's office on Saturday shared a Fox News article on X, showcasing the poignant letter. However, according to Fox News, Putin read the letter immediately after receiving it from Trump, while both delegations observed the moment. 'In today's world, some children are forced to carry a quiet laughter, untouched by the darkness around them,' the letter stated. Although it did not mention Ukraine directly, it conveyed a powerful message. 'Mr. Putin, you can singlehandedly restore their melodic laughter,' it continued. 'In protecting the innocence of these children, you will do more than serve Russia alone—you serve humanity itself.' Additionally, the letter emphasized the urgency of the situation, stating, 'Such a bold idea transcends all human division, and you, Mr. Putin, are able to implement this vision with a stroke of the pen today. It is time.' Trump's Evolving Perspective on Putin In July, Trump revealed that Melania, who hails from Slovenia, influenced his views on Putin. 'I go home, I tell the First Lady, 'You know, I spoke to Vladimir today, we had a wonderful conversation,'' Trump recounted. Melania responded with concern, saying, 'Oh really? Another city was just hit.' After beginning his second term, Trump sought to improve relations with Putin, promising to end the Ukraine war within 24 hours. Initially, he directed his frustration at Ukraine for not reaching a deal. However, he gradually expressed disappointment over Putin's ongoing military actions in Ukraine. Warnings and Shifts in Strategy Before the Alaska summit, Trump warned of 'severe consequences' if Russia did not agree to a ceasefire. Yet, following his meeting with Putin, he shifted his stance, stating that the best way to end the conflict 'is to go directly to a peace agreement.' Putin has consistently advocated for negotiations toward a final peace deal. However, Ukraine and its European allies criticize this approach, viewing it as a tactic to buy time while Russia continues its military advances. In conclusion, Trump's delivery of Melania's letter highlights the complex dynamics of international diplomacy and the ongoing quest for peace in a turbulent region. Short link : Post Views: 25