X tests... centrism
Whatever your opinion of X, you probably don't think of it as a platform known for fostering agreement. The company is apparently trying to change that, though, and is in the early stages of an experiment that aims to boost posts that are widely agreeable to the site's users.
With a new test , described by X as an "experimental pilot," the app will begin asking a small subset of users what they think of a particular post in their timeline. A screenshot shared by X shows that people can respond with a range of positive or negative opinions, like "it makes a meaningful point," "it's funny" or "it doesn't interest me." X will then use those responses to help it "develop an open source algorithm that could effectively identify posts liked by people from different perspectives."
The concept is somewhat similar to Community Notes, which already attempts to take differing perspectives into account when ranking fact checks. The new program, though, isn't about surfacing fact-checked content but boosting posts that are likely to be, well, liked.
X's post about the test suggests it has lofty goals. "This experimental new feature seeks to uncover ideas, insights, and opinions that bridge perspectives," the company wrote. "It can bring awareness to what resonates broadly. It could motivate people to share those ideas in the first place."
Whether an open source algorithm based on data about users' likes can actually accomplish that, though, is unclear. A report published today by Pew Research shows that there is still a significant partisan divide in terms of how X is perceived and experienced by users. Overcoming that could be more difficult than boosting a few extra posts.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Use of Community Notes on Elon Musk's X has plummeted in 2025, data shows
Participation is plummeting in the community-driven feature that X owner Elon Musk touted as the solution to the social media site's misinformation problems. Submissions to X's Community Notes, which add user-generated context and corrections to the platform's posts, have cratered this year, according to an NBC News analysis of X data. Fewer submissions has led to fewer notes getting displayed. And the number of notes isn't the only issue: In May, technical glitches led to the disappearance of notes from the main X site, which X acknowledged in a post. Musk, who once routinely touted the feature, now rarely mentions it. The system saw a peak of nearly 120,000 user-created notes in January. But the monthly counts have been cut in half since then, with fewer than 60,000 in May. Only a small percentage of notes created are displayed on the site, and displayed notes have declined by similar proportions, according to the analysis. Worldwide, traffic to X has ticked down since January from about 4.7 billion visits to 4.4 billion in May, according to estimates provided to NBC News from the analytics company Similarweb, though the rate of decline in Community Notes submissions is sharper than the rate of traffic decline. The drop in Community Notes submissions began in February, the same month Musk said without evidence that the system was being gamed by foreign governments and needed to be fixed. For a Community Note to be posted, an approved contributor must submit it for review. Then, other Community Notes contributors vote on contributions to certain posts, and an algorithm determines which contributions are ranked most 'helpful' by a diverse group of voters. A spokesperson for X attributed the decline to 'natural swings in note volume based on world events.' '[Last year] was a big year in that regard,' the spokesperson said in an email, citing high volumes around elections worldwide. In 2025, misinformation about a variety of non-election-related topics has gone viral on the site, from videos about the U.S. Agency for International Development to lies about the Los Angeles wildfires. X is also adjusting its algorithm to reduce the need for notes, the spokesperson said: 'If people are seeing fewer posts that might benefit from notes, they'll naturally feel less of a need to write or request a note.' The notes' decline has real stakes for X. Experts say the dwindling submission numbers to Community Notes could run the social media site afoul of European regulators, who were already investigating the company over its ability to meet European Union regulations. The European Union's Digital Services Act requires certain sites such as X to reduce, via content moderation tools, the amount of misinformation published. 'In Europe, keeping Community Notes functional isn't a nice-to-have,' Matt Navarra, a social media consultant in the U.K., told NBC News. 'It's a compliance issue.' The product that would become Community Notes debuted with the name Birdwatch in 2021. That was before Musk's October 2022 purchase of the company, when it was still called Twitter. According to current documentation, 'Community Notes aims to create a better-informed world, by empowering people on X to collaboratively add helpful notes to posts that might be misleading.' After Musk rebranded the product, he quickly scaled access to it for users, beginning in December 2022, as he pulled back on content moderation and shifted the platform's policies. The company cut employees who worked on election integrity and countering misinformation, loosened rules around hate speech, and reinstated the accounts of extremists who had been banned. X also churned through trust and safety leads. By 2024, Community Notes had taken off. X data shows note submissions had been climbing steadily. X CEO Linda Yaccarino told a marketing convention audience in April that the company had expanded Community Notes from 70 countries in May 2024 to 200 in 2025. The system has also been adopted by other platforms. Meta announced in March that it was using some of X's technology for its own Community Notes system, and TikTok announced a similar feature called Footnotes in April. When a Community Notes note is displayed alongside a post, the spread of that particular piece of misinformation is kneecapped, Keith Coleman, a vice president at X who works with the Community Notes team, said on a podcast: 'The thing will be going viral, note appears, resharing drops 50-60% and that's it. The virality quickly goes to zero.' Many X users now regularly turn to the platform's artificial intelligence chatbot, Grok, for fact-checking and context, though that has not been without its own issues. Still, the decline could be particularly problematic for a system that relies on volunteers who have faith that their time and effort are contributing to something valuable. 'When users stop seeing notes, they stop believing the system works, and that's when the trust dies,' Navarra said. 'So, yeah, absolutely, volume matters. The more notes being written and shown, the more coverage you get for viral posts, misleading content and general misinformation.' This article was originally published on
Newsweek
10 hours ago
- Newsweek
How rising US national debt impacts the average American
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The federal debt in America is rising, and financial analysts are warning that it could have a substantial impact on everyday Americans. The U.S. national debt stands at 36.9 trillion today. While many Americans may not think about how the federal deficit affects their lives, America's excessive borrowing can drive up interest rates and increase the risk of inflation. Why It Matters The federal debt plays a role in interest rates, which can have significant effects on the larger U.S. economy. If the government is forced to print more money to handle its debt, inflation can skyrocket for Americans as well. U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks during a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office at the White House on June 05, 2025 in Washington, DC. U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks during a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office at the White House on June 05, 2025 in Washington, To Know Concerns over the budget deficit have been increasing for Americans in recent years. A 2023 Pew Research survey found that 57 percent believed reducing the budget deficit should be a 'top priority,' a 12-point jump from just the year prior. Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, said not all deficits are bad, but America's has surpassed that level. "A government deficit often leads to a private sector surplus—meaning more money in the hands of consumers. That dynamic can work well as long as inflation stays in check and interest rates remain low, keeping the cost of servicing the debt manageable," Thompson told Newsweek. "Right now, however, the cost of servicing the debt has surpassed even the cost of funding our military—and it's only getting worse as interest rates stay higher for longer." For the average American, the debt will likely be a "pain point" as investors demand a higher rate of interest on their economic debt, forcing mortgage rates higher. "The tax debate is pivotal since the majority of government inflows come from those very taxes, and if we continue to lower taxes or keep them low, we won't have the money to cover the outlays, which will invariably increase. This will have to be resolved with higher future taxes to bring down the deficit—effectively robbing the future to pay for today," Thompson said. With President Donald Trump in office, many are waiting to see how new Republican leadership could affect America's looming debt pile. In the Pew Research poll, Republicans were far more likely to prioritize reducing the debt at 71 percent compared to Democrats at 44 percent. A more recent Gallup poll discovered that 53 percent of Americans say they worry about the budget deficit a "great deal" in March. Meanwhile, 28 percent said they worried about it "a fair amount." However, the debt is already likely hitting Americans' wallets, said Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of "That grocery trip that used to run $100? We're talking about losing $300 to $1,250 in actual buying power over the last few years," Ryan told Newsweek. "It's not just you, it's not just inflation. It's partly because when the government keeps borrowing money, it drives up prices for everything." Those looking to buy a house will also face higher mortgage rates as a result of the deficit, but fixing it would likely require higher taxes, according to Ryan. "The job market will get tighter," Ryan said. "When businesses have to pay more in taxes and deal with higher interest rates, they hire fewer people and give smaller raises. So even if you keep your job, that promotion or raise you're hoping for? It will be harder to come by." Retirement accounts would also likely experience a "rollercoaster" as the government gets back on track. "We're basically stuck between a rock and a hard place. Keep ignoring the debt, and it slowly strangles everything. Higher prices, fewer opportunities, less money in your pocket," Ryan said. Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill is predicted to add $2.4 trillion to the U.S. federal debt, likely exacerbating the concerns over interest rates and the larger economy. "The Congressional Budget Office just confirmed that Donald Trump's Big Beautiful Bill is, in Elon Musk's words, a 'disgusting abomination,'" Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) said in a statement. "This independent analysis blows a hole through Congressional Republicans' lies—this bill will rip health care away from millions of people and still jack up the debt to fund trillions in tax breaks for billionaires and billionaire corporations." When it comes to Americans' views on Trump's proposed tax cuts in the past, 52 percent said that the tax cuts in 2017 would increase the deficit in the long run because the government would take in a lot less money that it won't be able to recover. Meanwhile, 38 percent believed the tax cuts would decrease the deficit in the long run because they would stimulate the economy and bring in more money for the government, according to Gallup. What People Are Saying Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "Government spending is contributing to our national debt as tax revenues and economic growth aren't keeping pace with rising outlays, leading to increasing deficits over time." Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of told Newsweek: "You know that feeling when looking at your credit card bill, wondering how you're gonna dig out of this hole? That's basically where we are as a country. And just like when you're drowning in debt at home, we've got two main choices: make more money or spend less." Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "The national debt is in many ways a phantom thief, as it slowly steals away buying power by being a key contributor to inflation over time even if Americans don't physically see its effects. In past decades, the impact of the deficit was more muted, as relatively small amounts of additional funding were needed to keep the government functional. In recent years, however, this has escalated dramatically due to multiple wars, the Great Recession, and the pandemic which called for additional government spending." What Happens Next As the debt continues to grow, future Americans may suffer, financial analysts warn. "The longer-term implications may be dire for future generations, having to be saddled with monumental debts they cannot outrun and becoming a debtor nation," Thompson said. "I know it sounds like some Orwellian nightmare, but if we continue down this path, this is the future we are destined to become. All once-great nations come to an end—it will just happen more quickly for the U.S. if this continues." For many Americans, it's a situation of "the longer we wait, the more painful it will be," Ryan said. "The debt isn't some abstract problem for future generations to worry about," Ryan said. "It's in your grocery bill today, your mortgage payment this month, and your tax return next year. And when we finally get around to dealing with it—and we will, because math always wins in the end—it's gonna cost you even more."
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
X Tests New Process To Reduce Political Division
This story was originally published on Social Media Today. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Social Media Today newsletter. You have to give credit where credit's due: While I don't believe that X's Community Notes approach is an effective way to combat the spread of misinformation in the app (at least as a sole measure, outside of internally-staffed moderation), I do respect that the Community Notes development team is continually working to implement new updates to address key concerns with the Notes system. Today, X's Community Notes team has announced a new experiment that will highlight content which sees agreement from users of differing political perspectives, in the hopes of reducing division and angst in the app. As you can see in this example, X will soon begin showing some users (Community Notes contributors to start with) prompts in the lower segment of some X posts that have been liked by people from opposing sides of the political spectrum. And if you tap through on the 'What do you think?' text, you'll be able to give the X team more insight as to what you like, or don't, about that specific post, which could help X address common elements of division on content. As explained by X: 'A subset of Community Notes contributors - representing a wide range of viewpoints - will occasionally see a new callout in the product. The callout shows based on early and limited Like signals on the post. Contributors will then be able to rate and provide more feedback about the post, helping to develop an open source algorithm that could effectively identify posts liked by people from different perspectives.' X says that these ratings won't affect a post's reach or visibility, but that: 'Depending on insights and feedback from the pilot test, it is possible that in the future, ratings could help spotlight posts that are liked by people who normally disagree.' Why is that important? Because political disagreement is a key flaw within the Community Notes system, with Community Notes only being displayed in the app when Notes assessors of differing political perspectives agree that a note is warranted. It's this proviso that's led to many, many Community Notes never being shown, to anybody, despite these posts often including blatant misinformation. Indeed, according to analysis conducted by the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) last year, 73% of submitted Community Notes relating to political topics are never displayed on X, despite them often providing valuable context, while another study conducted earlier this year by Spanish fact-checking site Maldita found that 85% of all Community Notes are never displayed to X users for the same reason. On some issues, users are never going to agree, and those often relate to divisive misinformation about hot-button political issues. That's worsened in the current landscape, where even the U.S. President is prone to amplifying questionable claims. As such, Community Notes often fails to keep people informed of relevant context, because people don't agree on the need for such on certain points. But maybe, if X is able to showcase more cases of agreement, that will ease disputes, and get people to view things in a more objective way. I mean, it seems unlikely that Republican and Democrat aligned voters are ever going to agree that the 2020 U.S. Election was manipulated or not, no matter evidence is produced, but maybe, if X can build more community alignment into the system, by showcasing such to respective users, that could at least open more conversation around more topics, as opposed to siloing people into their own echo chambers. It's worth a shot, and it's a fairly simple measure, at this stage, to better demonstrate relative agreement. And if X can somehow dilute this aspect, and ensure more relevant, valuable Community Notes are displayed in the app, that could be a big step forward in ensuring greater protection for X users.
