Thousands of women's photos STOLEN from dating app used by 1.6 million as hackers break into messages
The app was designed to keep women safe by allowing them to do background checks on their dates - but the data breach has now left female users at risk.
2
Tea for Dating Advice was hacked on Friday, exposing the personal information of its female user base
Credit: Tea
Who is affected by the data breach?
After hackers gained "unauthorised access" to Tea Dating Advice, they leaked the private information of its women user base.
Boasting 1.6 million subscribers, an estimated 72,000 images submitted by women
This includes photos the women submitted as part of a photo identification process to set up their account for the women-only app.
The platform's privacy policy claims that these photos are "deleted immediately" after the account has been authenticated.
Read more Tech
However,
Members of the forum claimed to have discovered an exposed database of users that had subscribed to the app.
They proceeded to share screenshots of the women's personal data and pictures across social media.
The breach affects members who signed up before February 2024.
Most read in Tech
On Friday,
The company said it was "working with some of the most trusted cyber security experts" as they try to "protect this community - now and always".
Inside romance scam factory...we target lonely singles on dating apps but what they don't know is if we refuse...we die
What is Tea Dating Advice?
Tea Dating Advice provided a similar service to popular Facebook groups like
On the platform, women post pictures and information about men that they are dating, trying to warn others about their own negative experiences.
This could range from raising awareness of a partner who was abusive, to someone who ghosted after a first date.
Individuals will share their own anecdotal experiences, including anonymous dating reviews, to potentially pre-warn other users
To access the app, users must first upload selfies to verify that they are a woman.
Once on the site, they can then share, or search for photos of men - usually through screenshots of social media and other dating apps.
According to the app's website, this serves a number of functions:
Find verified green flag men
Run background checks
Identify potential catfish
Verify he's not a sex offender
Check for a criminal history
Check for hidden marriages
Users can search for men using reverse image search, or by looking up their phone numbers.
It allows them to "share experiences and seek advice within a secure, anonymous platform".
The app also donates 10% of its profits to the National Domestic Violence Hotline, with its main purpose being to protect women.
Founder Sean Cook created Tea in November 2022 after seeing his mum navigate online dating.
Not only was she catfished, but he was horrified to learn that she had been unknowingly engaging with men who had criminal records, making him realise that "traditional dating apps do little to protect women".
Thus, he was inspired to create a platform that made dating feel "safe, informed and empowering".
Users cannot take screenshots while using the app, helping to maintain privacy of its users.
Why has it faced criticism?
The app received backlash by some claiming it is anti-men and an invasion of privacy.
They fear that it puts men at risk of invasion of privacy and defamation, with women taking out their anger after a bad date, rather than exposing legitimate concerns.
These concerns were reflected in a lawsuit against Meta for posts made in the Are We Dating the Same Guy Facebook group.
Nikko D'Ambrosia took legal action against Meta because of a number of claims made about him on Facebook.
The lawsuit was later thrown out by a federal judge
Defamation laws in the US make it difficult for men to make a successful claim if they are posted on the app.
The Sun has reached out to Tea for comment.
2
The platform posts 1.6 million subscribers, with 72,000 images leaked in the breach
Credit: Getty
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Extra.ie
30-07-2025
- Extra.ie
Australia outlaws YouTube for teens as media ban widens
Australia has announced that YouTube is going to be added to the sites covered by their unique social media ban for teenagers. The video-sharing site was originally exempt from the ban but that decision has now been reversed with the possibility of a legal challenge now on the way. Due to a survey which found that 37% of minors reported harmful content on the site, the worst showing for a social media platform, Australia decided to comply with their internet regulator's urges. Australian PM Anthony Albanese confirmed the ban extension. Pic:Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese stated: 'I'm calling time on it.' He went on to highlight that Australian children were being negatively affected by online platforms and reminded social media platforms of the responsibility that they have to keep users safe.. The PM added: 'I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs.' The ban will broaden to include YouTube from December onwards. YouTube has hit back at the decision, stating that it is used by nearly three-quarters of Australians aged 13 to 15 and should not be classified as social media because its main activity is hosting videos. A YouTube spokesperson wrote: 'Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens. It's not social media.' Platforms that were already covered by the ban, such as Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok, were unhappy with YouTube's exemption last year and complained that it has key similarities to their products, including letting users interact and recommending content through an algorithm based on activity. Originally, the government had exempted YouTube due to its popularity with teachers but now all accounts for under-16s will be outlawed, with parents and teachers allowed to show videos on it to minors. YouTube have hit back at the decision. Pic:Angela Falkenberg, President of the Australian Primary Principals Association, stated: 'Teachers are always curators of any resource for appropriateness (and) will be judicious.' Adam Marre, Chief Information Security Officer at cybersecurity firm Arctic Wolf, added that social media platforms like YouTube have been flooded with misinformation due to the rise in Artificial Intelligence. He said: 'The Australian government's move to regulate YouTube is an important step in pushing back against the unchecked power of big tech and protecting kids.' The decision now brings a potential legal challenge from Alphabet, the company that owns YouTube, after they already threatened to withdraw some Google services from Australia in 2021 to avoid a law forcing it to pay news outlets for content appearing in searches. Last week, YouTube told Reuters that it had written to the government urging it 'to uphold the integrity of the legislative process'. Australian media then said YouTube threatened a court challenge, but YouTube did not confirm that. Communications Minister Anika Wells told Australian parliament: 'I will not be intimidated by legal threats when this is a genuine fight for the well-being of Australian kids.' The Australian government is due to receive a report in the near future on tests of age-checking products, with the results set to influence the enforcement of the ban introduced last November. Currently, social media platforms that fail to take the 'reasonable steps' to keep out Australians younger than 16 will face a fine of up to A$49.5million (€27.9million).
RTÉ News
30-07-2025
- RTÉ News
Australia widens teen social media ban to YouTube, scraps exemption
Australia said it will add YouTube to sites covered by its world-first ban on social media for teenagers, reversing an earlier decision to exempt the Alphabet-owned video-sharing site and potentially setting up a legal challenge. The decision came after the internet regulator urged the government last month to overturn the YouTube carve-out, citing a survey that found 37% of minors reported harmful content on the site, the worst showing for a social media platform. "I'm calling time on it," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in a statement, highlighting that Australian children were being negatively affected by online platforms, and reminding social media of their social responsibility. "I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs." The decision broadens the ban set to take effect in December. YouTube said it is used by nearly three-quarters of Australians aged 13 to 15, and should not be classified as social media because its main activity is hosting videos. "Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens. It's not social media," a YouTube spokesperson said by email. Since the government said last year it would exempt YouTube due to its popularity with teachers, platforms covered by the ban, such as Meta's Facebook and Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok, have complained. They said YouTube has key similarities to their products, including letting users interact and recommending content through an algorithm based on activity. The ban outlaws YouTube accounts for those younger than 16, allowing parents and teachers to show videos on it to minors. "Teachers are always curators of any resource for appropriateness (and) will be judicious," said Angela Falkenberg, president of the Australian Primary Principals Association, which supports the ban. Artificial intelligence has supercharged the spread of misinformation on social media platforms such as YouTube, said Adam Marre, chief information security officer at cyber security firm Arctic Wolf. "The Australian government's move to regulate YouTube is an important step in pushing back against the unchecked power of big tech and protecting kids," he added in an email. The reversal sets up a fresh dispute with Alphabet, which threatened to withdraw some Google services from Australia in 2021 to avoid a law forcing it to pay news outlets for content appearing in searches. Last week, YouTube told Reuters it had written to the government urging it "to uphold the integrity of the legislative process". Australian media said YouTube threatened a court challenge, but YouTube did not confirm that. "I will not be intimidated by legal threats when this is a genuine fight for the well-being of Australian kids, "Communications Minister Anika Wells told parliament today. The law passed in November only requires "reasonable steps" by social media platforms to keep out Australians younger than 16, or face a fine of up to A$49.5 million (€27.9m). The government, which is due to receive a report this month on tests of age-checking products, has said those results will influence enforcement of the ban.
Irish Examiner
29-07-2025
- Irish Examiner
Colman Noctor: New, strict online age verification will keep Ireland's children safer
On July 21, there was a landmark shift in Ireland. Part B of the online safety code, framed by Coimisiún na Meán, was introduced. The code requires video-sharing platforms — such as YouTube, Facebook, TikTok, Instagram, and X — to enforce age-verification procedures before users can view adult or harmful content. While part A covered general harmful content and took effect in November 2024, part B has an additional age-assurance requirement that safeguards younger people. This means Ireland has moved beyond self-declaration, which often involved simply clicking 'Yes, I'm over 18' to access adult content. These selected platforms must now adopt real age-verification methods to safeguard young and vulnerable users. Practically, when your child tries to access adult content, they might be asked to take a short, live selfie video or connect their account to an age-verifying app. If they fail the age-verification test, some content will be locked behind a barrier, and there will be no easy workaround. That's the intent. So, what does this mean for parents? As a result of part B, several video platforms are now required to block access to pornography, extreme violence, self-harm content, eating-disorder promotion, cyberbullying, or hate speech. Unless effective age verification confirms the user is over 18, they will be unable to access the content. So, self-declaration is no longer sufficient. These platforms must also have visible and easy-to-use parental controls, such as time limits or restrictions on who can post or view videos on a child's account, along with clear mechanisms to report harmful content and established procedures for resolving complaints. Crucially, these platforms are now subject to enforcement and can be fined up to €20m, or 10% of annual turnover — whichever is greater — for infringement of these directives. For parents, this signifies a shift from self-regulation and parental vigilance towards holding tech firms legally accountable — assigning some responsibility to platforms for keeping children safe. CyberSafe Kids describes this as a crucial milestone of online platforms accepting legal responsibility. However, this directive is not the panacea that we might assume it to be. A major limitation of this legislation is that it only applies to 10 sites headquartered in Ireland, including Facebook, Instagram, X, YouTube, Udemy, TikTok, LinkedIn, Pinterest, Tumblr, and Reddit. Unfortunately, it does not cover non-video sharing platforms; therefore, significant problem areas — such as online gaming, pornography sites, and notably Snapchat — are unaffected. Some other shortcomings include that the directive does not specify particular technologies for verifying age. As a result, various platforms suggest solutions that differ in their robustness — ranging from 'live selfies' or facial age-estimation AI to document upload or digital ID tokens. Like any safeguards or identifier technology, there have been criticisms from certain groups, including European Digital Rights (EDRi), which warns that many age-verification systems pose serious privacy and surveillance risks, especially when biometrics or identity documents are involved. They call on regulators to require zero-knowledge proofs, data minimisation, and alternatives for those without a formal ID. Given these changes, parents should talk to their child about the new verification steps, and explain how they might come across them on TikTok, Instagram, or YouTube, and make sure they never share sensitive documents or photos without understanding the process. Parents should familiarise themselves with platform settings, including parental controls, reporting tools, privacy defaults, and content ratings. Coimisiún na Mean has mandated these platforms to highlight these features, so we should take advantage. Parents and schools must continue to promote digital literacy, so children know why some content is age-restricted and how recommendation algorithms can still promote harmful content, even behind age-restricted screens. Parents are encouraged to report any violations of these new directives. If your child sees harmful content or has bypassed the verification tools, parents should first contact the platform to report these issues and, if unresolved, contact Coimisiún na Meán. How does Ireland's recent approach compare internationally? The UK's Children's Code requires online services to use strong privacy settings for children and minimise data collection, but it does not mandate strict age verification. The Australian federal government, through the Online Safety Amendment (approved in late 2024), plans to ban under-16s from social media, enforcing this via age verification and imposing heavy fines on platforms. It is one of the stricter regimes globally, alongside Singapore, whose regulators require app stores to screen users' ages, blocking those under 18 from downloading adult apps and under-12s from downloading popular social-media apps. Although not as strict as Australia or Singapore, Ireland is among the first EU countries to implement legally binding age- verification requirements, specifically for video- sharing platforms, with plans for robust enforcement and penalties. It aligns with the EU Digital Services Act by requiring age verification in service design rather than relying on self-regulation. This represents a step in the right direction, but the fact that the code only applies to platforms with EU headquarters in Ireland is deeply problematic. Consequently, Snapchat, and other services based elsewhere, will be outside the scope of these rules, although they remain subject to the EU's Digital Services Act, which has less-rigorous age-verification measures. Even with content restrictions, algorithms can still promote harmful suggestions, especially for self-harm or eating-disorder content, which is not always blocked by age gates. Part B of Ireland's Online Safety Code does not guarantee that teenagers will not encounter troubling content. Still, in collaboration with families, schools, and civic groups, it might provide a stronger framework than ever before. For parents aiming to keep children safe in today's digital world, the law is catching up, but your involvement remains important. While this new online code makes parenting children in a technological age a shared responsibility rather than an individual one, it's also realistic to recognise that there are still limitations to ensuring children's safety online. Unfortunately, recommendation algorithms (like those promoting trending or extreme content) aren't directly regulated under this code, though they are covered by the EU's Digital Services Act. This code only applies to 10 video-sharing platforms based in Ireland, and many other apps and games remain outside its scope. Underage users can still create fake ages or use older siblings' IDs, though the new tools will make this more difficult. Not all platforms are required to verify users in the same way, so some may operate more smoothly, while others might be more frustrating or invasive. This new online code marks a significant shift from passive gatekeeping to active protection. Let's hope it has the teeth needed to be effective by following through on the sanctions it promises. It is our first step to keeping children in Ireland safe online. Dr Colman Noctor is a child psychotherapist
