‘Starvation, pure and simple': UN warns of famine in Gaza as Israel plans full occupation
The UN's humanitarian office, OCHA, said 98 children had died from acute malnutrition since October 2023, with 37 of those deaths since last month.
About 100,000 people marched in Tel Aviv on Saturday night to protest against prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu's planned escalation of the offensive in Gaza into outright occupation of the territory.
Despite growing opposition to the planned expansion of the war, including from Ireland, Mr Netanyahu insisted on Sunday that his Gaza City takeover plan is the 'speediest' way to end the conflict.
'If we had a starvation policy, no one in Gaza would have survived after two years of war. But our policy has been the exact opposite,' Mr Netanyahu said.
On Sunday, prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended Israel's planned escalation of its offensive in Gaza into outright occupation of the Palestinian territory. Picture: Jim Watson/AFP/Getty
OCHA said otherwise. The UN's humanitarian office's coordination director Ramesh Rajasingham said the situation in Gaza had developed into full-blown starvation.
'This is no longer a looming hunger crisis — this is starvation, pure and simple,' he said.
Humanitarian conditions are beyond horrific. We have, frankly, run out of words to describe it.
As Mr Netanyahu was speaking, an emergency session of the UN Security Council was taking place, with the US backing Israel in its offensive as others warned against it.
'If these plans are implemented, they will likely trigger another calamity in Gaza, reverberating across the region and causing further forced displacement, killings, and destruction,' UN assistant secretary Miroslav Jenca told the UN Security Council.
Slovenia's ambassador to the UN, Samuel Zbogar, speaking on behalf of the five European members of the security council (France, Britain, Slovenia, Greece, and Denmark), said: 'This decision by the Israeli government will do nothing to secure the return of the hostages and risk further endangering their lives.
"It will also worsen the already catastrophic humanitarian situation in Gaza and risk further death and mass displacement of Palestinian civilians.'
Earlier, Ireland joined other European countries to write a letter imploring Israel not to expand the war in Gaza, stating that it would be a 'flagrant violation of international law'.
Yazan, a malnourished two-year-old boy, with his brothers at their family's damaged home in the Al-Shati camp, west of Gaza City in Palestine. Picture: Omar Al-Qattaa/AFP/Getty
Other signatories included foreign ministers in Iceland, Luxembourg, Malta, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, and Spain.
The letter stated that further escalation would 'only deepen' the humanitarian crisis and 'further endanger the remaining hostages' lives'. It stated:
This operation will lead to an unacceptable high toll of deaths and the forced displacement of nearly 1m Palestinian civilians.
'We firmly reject any demographic or territorial changes in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. Actions in this regard constitute a flagrant violation of international law and humanitarian law.'
The letter went on to call for an immediate ceasefire, the release of Israeli hostages held by Hamas, the delivery of humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip, and a pathway to a two-state solution.
Speaking in Offaly, Mr Harris said the conflict is at an 'extraordinarily dangerous moment'.
He added: 'We now see the Netanyahu government take an extraordinarily dangerous step in the absolute wrong direction. I think people in Ireland know, they know what famine is like. It's ingrained in our mindset, in our history. To be seeing a modern-day famine take place in the 21st century is utterly repulsive and repugnant to everything any decent person can stand for.'
The Guardian and Irish Examiner
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
France, Germany and UK call on Iran to resume nuclear discussions with US
France , Germany and the UK have told the UN they are prepared to trigger the reimposition of sanctions on Iran unless it resumes negotiations with the US over its nuclear programme. The foreign ministers of the three countries – known collectively as the E3 – wrote to the UN on Tuesday to raise the spectre of implementing a 'snapback' mechanism unless Iran takes action. But they said they had offered to extend a deadline to start the process if Tehran returned to the negotiating table. 'We have made it clear that if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, [the E3] are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism,' the ministers said in the letter, which was obtained by the Financial Times. The European powers have to decide whether to invoke snapback a month before crucial clauses of a 2015 nuclear deal Iran signed with the E3, the Obama administration, Russia and China, expire in October. READ MORE The accord, under which Iran agreed to strict limits on its nuclear activity in return for sanctions relief, has been in a state of collapse since US president Donald Trump unilaterally abandoned it during his first term. Iran responded by aggressively expanding its nuclear activity and was enriching uranium at levels close to weapons grade before Israel launched its 12-day war against the Islamic republic in June . Before the conflict, the Trump administration and Iran had been holding indirect talks in an effort to resolve the long-running stand-off over its nuclear programme. But Israel's attack, which was launched 48 hours before Tehran and Washington were to hold a sixth round of talks, upended the diplomatic process. The US briefly joined Israel in bombing Iran's main nuclear facilities. The E3 told Iran at talks in Turkey last month that they could extend the snapback deadline if Tehran agreed to resume talks with the US and co-operation with the International Atomic Energy Agency. One western diplomat said the talks had been 'difficult'. On Tuesday, the E3 said their offer of an extension 'remained unanswered by Iran'. The ministers said a 'limited extension' would provide more time for talks aimed at concluding a new nuclear agreement, while maintaining the ability to reimpose sanctions to prevent nuclear proliferation. Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi. Photograph: Sergei Karpukhin /AFP via Getty Images Following the Istanbul meeting in July, Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi told the FT that the E3 had no 'legal or moral grounds' to implement the snapback. He warned that Iran would exclude the European powers from future nuclear talks if they went through with the process. Mr Araghchi accused the E3 of failing to meet their commitments under the 2015 deal and said the snapback mechanism was 'not that important any more'. 'With the Europeans, there is no reason right now to negotiate because they cannot lift sanctions, they cannot do anything,' Mr Araghchi said. 'If they do snapback, that means that this is the end of the road for them.' In their letter, the E3 ministers said they were 'clearly and unambiguously' legally justified in reimposing sanctions on Iran because since 2019 – a year after Mr Trump withdrew from the nuclear accord – Tehran had 'wilfully' departed from its commitments under the deal. Tehran has said it remains open to talks with the Trump administration. But its stance hardened after Israel's assault. Mr Araghchi has said Iran wants assurances from the US that it will not be attacked during future talks, and wants 'confidence-building measures', including the US agreeing to compensate Iran for war damage. Iran announced after Israel's attack that it was suspending co-operation with the IAEA, which has had inspectors in the country. A senior IAEA official met with Iranian officials in Tehran on Monday, Iran's foreign ministry said, but the UN nuclear watchdog has not commented on the trip. The letter to UN secretary general António Guterres and the UN Security Council was signed by French foreign minister Jean-Noël Barrot, German foreign minister Johann Wadephul, and UK foreign minister David Lammy. It comes two months after the US and Israel struck nuclear sites in Iran. The Iranian mission to the UN did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the letter.- Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
Behind the Story: Why meeting Trump in Alaska is 'handing Putin victory'
A meeting with US President Donald Trump is 'handing victory' to Russian President Vladimir Putin, an expert has said. Keir Giles, senior consulting fellow of the Russia and Eurasia Programme at Chatham House in the UK, was speaking to the Behind the Story podcast as US and Russian leaders are due to meet in Alaska on Friday. Mr Giles said the outcome of the meeting, which is excluding European and Ukrainian leaders, is the biggest question. "Having seen all the things leading up to this it's like watching a low motion train crash when you know days in advance it's going to happen," he told hosts Carole Coleman and Louise Byrne. "Everybody knows that the outcome is going to be at best nothing, at worst disastrous – and yet nobody seems to be able to do anything about it." The White House has played down expectations for the talks, saying it would be a "feel-out" meeting. However, Mr Giles described the meeting as a win for President Putin "long before he sets foot on US soil". "Russia will be fully aware that this is something that US presidents normally reward Moscow for – for good relations and working constructively towards solving problems. "Instead, you've got, effectively, a workaround where an internationally wanted war criminal who can't travel anywhere else so he has to go to Alaska in order not to arrive somewhere where he's going to be arrested. "So, it's handing Putin a victory on a plate even before they start talking". The International Criminal Court (ICC) issued an arrest warrant for Mr Putin, accusing him of the war crime of illegally deporting hundreds of children from Ukraine, in 2023. Mr Giles said he doubts that Ukraine will be the only talking point during the meeting. "I would expect there to be demands on Trump from Putin that go much further than Ukraine," he explained. "For instance, Putin trying to encourage Trump into thinking the whole problem with Europe is to do with American support there, or NATO accepting new members in eastern Europe. "We've seen previously that Trump is quite willing to swallow the lies [and] disinformation, the manipulation of history that we've seen from Putin. "So it could be that Trump comes away from this meeting completely convinced that the best thing to do is withdraw American support from Europe altogether". Mr Giles said he believes the time for optimism is "long passed" on Ukraine. "There were opportunities to deter Russia from invading Ukraine in the first place but they have all been missed," he said. "All the ways in which Ukraine could have helped to bring this to a conclusion have been refused by the United States and by some of Ukraine's foremost backers in Europe as well." You can listen to Behind the Story which is available on the RTÉ Radio Player.
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Taoiseach: Ukraine must be at centre of any peace deal to end war with Russia
The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine, the Taoiseach has said. Micheál Martin made these comments after attending an online leaders' meeting of the so-called "Coalition of the Willing" in support of Ukraine. The meeting, hosted by French president Emmanuel Macron and British prime minister Keir Starmer, took place ahead of the US-Russia Summit in Alaska on Friday. Speaking after the meeting, the Taoiseach said European leaders remain committed to supporting Ukraine. The group also heard from Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who briefed them on the situation on the ground and outlined Ukraine's needs. While the group welcomed former US president Donald Trump's efforts, they insisted Ukraine must be at the centre of any peace deal. 'The initiative of President Trump towards ending Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine and achieving a just and lasting peace was warmly welcomed. We agreed that unity is vital and that close transatlantic coordination will continue as part of our efforts to secure a ceasefire and a durable peace. "Any diplomatic solution must protect Ukraine and Europe's security. It was also agreed that any meaningful negotiations on a just and lasting peace should be preceded by a ceasefire. 'We committed to continue to provide political, financial, economic, humanitarian, military and diplomatic support to Ukraine. There was also agreement to maintain pressure on Russia to agree to an unconditional ceasefire, including through the use of sanctions and other economic measures." Mr Martin said this is "a critical time for international security". "In the year when we mark its 80th anniversary, we must recommit ourselves to the primacy of the UN Charter. We cannot accept that international borders can be changed by force. For all our security, there must be respect for international law, including the principles of independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity. 'I also believe that the human dimension must be a key component of a just and lasting peace for Ukraine. The Ukrainian children abducted by Russia must be returned to their families and communities. 'Ireland will continue to support Ukraine, both bilaterally and through the EU, on its path towards EU membership and in its efforts to achieve a just and durable peace.'
