The Squid Game Season 3 VIPs Were More Cringe Than Ever — Why Did Bad Line Readings Slip Through Again…?
The following contains spoilers for Season 3 of , now streaming on Netflix.
Almost exactly midway through 2025, we have a candidate for TVLine's annual Dumbest Line of Dialogue of the Year 'award'.
More from TVLine
Squid Game Recruits Oscar Winner to Bring Series Finale to a Tantalizing Close, Tease Potential U.S. Edition
Dept. Q Makes Nielsen Streaming Top 10 Debut - and With a Decidedly Older Audience
Save the Dates: The Chicken Sisters Season 2, Mom on Netflix and More
'!'
Squid Game Season 3 VIP
That goofy observation came to us courtesy of one of the golden-masked VIPs in Squid Game Season 3, now streaming on Netflix.
The idea behind the VIPs, I presume, is that somebody has to finance this highly illegal and incredibly deadly underground competition that dangles a 45.6 billion won (~$34 million) jackpot and comes with a pretty pricey infrastructure (guard salary/health plans, wardrobe, single-use coffins, Velcro patches, etc). And if you're going to front the Front Man some of those greenbacks, you deserve a front row seat for the competition's final rounds.
But just as much as Squid Game Season 3 masterfully ratcheted up the on-screen tension with a version of Jump Rope that got my own trick knee quaking, every iota of pent-up drama dissipated from the room each time they cut away to the masked VIPs' reactions and utterly inane commentary.
'You have the father, the mother and the baby all in the same game? I mean…,' remarked the long-haired VIP (aka TEMU Ellis from Die Hard), before he mimed his mind being blown.
'It's like watching one of those family reality shows,' sniffed the grey bearded VIP.
VIP jJnnifer tittered before chiming in, 'I must say, I'm quite impressed with the player pool this time.'
Squid Game's Season 3 VIPs were a different lot from those we who made us cringe during Season 1.
According to the closing credits and Google Translate, David Sayers played Richard; Hong Kong native Jane Wong played Jennifer; Jordan Lambertoni played Zach; Kevin Yorn (who reportedly is series creator/writer/director Hwang Dong Hyuk's lawyer!) played, well, Kevin; and a 'Bryan Bucco' played Zach.
Thing is, Squid Game auteur Hwang Dong Hyuk absolutely knows what he's doing — his directing of Season 1 won an Emmy, while his writing earned a nomination. So, why are the VIP scenes so very, very bad? They're not cartoonish in a fun way, nor do they effectively serve as social satire.
The VIP scenes could have been additive to the series, if, imagine, a Stellan Skarsgård type growled a wry observation during Sky Squid Game. Or if the actors/lawyer at hand were not done so dirty by the dialogue and editing.
But apparently zero lessons were learned, or cared to be learned, from Season 1. Which is… a choice?
How'd Squid Game End? Our Recap of the Unusual Season-Finale Showdown
View List
The matter of the painfully bad VIP scenes came up at the time of Season 1's release, and the actors from that troupe offered up theories on why the dialogue and line readings made our ears want to crawl up and die.
'Non-Korean performers often act with dialogue that is translated by a non-native – sometimes even by Google Translate — so it can sound unnatural,' one Season 1 VIP told the Guardian in fall 2021.
It's also possible that the person editing the footage doesn't speak English as a first language, and thus might use a poor take. 'If I was editing a Russian actor speaking Russian, I wouldn't have any idea if he was saying his lines correctly,' said the Season 1 VIP above, 'or if his intonation was natural.'
A second Season 1 VIP told the Guardian that 'heavy plaster masks' plus 'sitting 20 feet away from each other' added up to: 'We all had to yell our lines vaguely into the air, which added to the weird tonality of the delivery.'
To recap, the VIP scenes:
Were poorly written, and poorly acted (or edited)
Reliably killed tension
Were not dramatic in and of themselves (e.g. the inclusion of the baby could have been a point of debate… but wasn't)
Told us nothing we could not have presumed about the game's backers (e.g. they're deplorable, shallow), and
Arguably made the Front Man less menacing, the way he quietly did these idiots' bidding
So… why did we get them again, at the same quality level, in Season 3?
Best of TVLine
'Missing' Shows, Found! Get the Latest on Ahsoka, Monarch, P-Valley, Sugar, Anansi Boys and 25+ Others
Yellowjackets Mysteries: An Up-to-Date List of the Series' Biggest Questions (and Answers?)
The Emmys' Most Memorable Moments: Laughter, Tears, Historical Wins, 'The Big One' and More
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
an hour ago
- Tom's Guide
This iconic slasher movie is leaving Netflix — I'm not missing out and neither should you
Between the "Scream" franchise, "The Blair Witch Project"-induced "found footage" phenomenon and M. Night Shyamalan mind-benders like "The Sixth Sense" and Oscar-winning thrillers like "Silence of the Lambs," the 1990s were a great time for horror. One of the most crowd-pleasing (if not exactly critically acclaimed) titles in the slasher genre is "I Know What You Did Last Summer," which sees an iconic foursome of Jennifer Love Hewitt, Sarah Michelle Gellar, Freddie Prinze Jr. and Ryan Phillippe battle a hook-wielding maniac in their small seaside town. The movie comes from director Jim Gillespie and screenwriter Kevin Williamson, the latter of whom recently tapped into the "murderous coastal town" genre yet again with his new Netflix show "The Waterfront." And, as is always the case with the platform's ever-changing library, you now only have a few days left to catch the '90s horror favorite on Netflix before it departs the streamer on July 1. With "IKWYDLS" officially getting a present-day reboot scheduled for theatrical release on July 18, it's high time to revisit the jump-scare original. Here's why you should add "I Know What You Did Last Summer" to your watch list this weekend. "I Know What You Did Last Summer" centers on four teenage friends who accidentally hit a pedestrian following a beach trip to celebrate July 4. They don't alert the authorities and instead dispose the body, vowing to never discuss the horrible incident again. However, a year later, Julie James (Jennifer Love Hewitt), receives a letter revealing that someone else was on the road that night and knows exactly what they did. Seeking revenge, a hook-wielding killer fisherman begins haunting the four friends throughout their town of Southport, North Carolina, set on taking out the kiddos one by bloody one. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Again, the original "I Know What You Did Last Summer" wasn't exactly an immediate hit with professional critics. On Rotten Tomatoes, where the film holds an approval rating of 48%, the critical consensus reads: "A by-the-numbers slasher that arrived a decade too late, the mostly tedious 'I Know What You Did Last Summer' will likely only hook diehard fans of the genre." However, some critics were more charmed by the horror flick, which, along with "Scream" a year earlier, helped revive the slasher genre. Derek Elley of Variety called it a "polished genre piece with superior fright elements that should perform at better-than-average theatrical levels," while Richard Harrington of The Washington Post dubbed it "a smart and sharply-drawn genre film with a moral center, and with a solid cast of young actors to hold it." In the decades since its release, "I Know What You Did Last Summer" has endured among horror fans (and been the subject of many a funny parody) thanks to its very nineties-ness, from those Williamson-penned precocious teens to the megawatt '90s names playing them ("Party of Five" star Jennifer Love Hewitt, "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" icon Sarah Michelle Gellar.) It's a bloody-good-fun relic of a long-gone era, but one that's clearly still resonating with viewers all these years later. Watch on Netflix until June 30, 2025
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
From Ladder To Launchpad: How Gen Z Is Rethinking Careers
KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA - 2025/01/24: Tourists play a game of Snakes and Ladders at a Chinese temple ... More ahead of the Lunar New Year of the Snake celebrations. Lunar New Year which falls on January 29, 2025, welcomes the year of the Snake, which will be celebrated by the Chinese around the world. (Photo by Wong Fok Loy/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images) Snakes and Ladders (Chutes and Ladders for American readers) was the game I grew up with. A roll of the dice could catapult you up or send you sliding down. One lucky number and you were ahead. One unlucky square and you were back at the beginning. It was a game of chance—no strategy, no control. My Gen Z kids don't play it. Their world is Minecraft. They build. They create. They engineer landscapes from scratch. There's no dice. No shortcuts. Just trial, design and iteration. And that contrast says a lot about how Gen Z thinks about careers too. They don't want to climb someone else's ladder. They want to craft their own space, shape their own path and know that the work they do today builds toward something that's theirs. But that's hard to do when the systems they enter are still wired for a different game. If we want to help Gen Z grow, we can't leave it to luck. We have to help them build. It makes you wonder: is there a Minecraft: Career Edition? Even if there were, we'd still need to name the gap between building virtual worlds and navigating real ones. One lets you break blocks and build castles with a click. The other requires you to face uncertainty, figure out what matters, and make calls when no playbook is handed to you. Careers don't come with a tutorial. There's no sandbox mode for real life. That's what makes early career so complicated right now. Gen Z is often learning through simulations, digital experiences and secondhand stories. But what they need are real-world repetitions. Moments of stretch, ambiguity and contribution. Not in theory. In context. In the workplace. On teams that expect something of them. FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™ Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase Pinpoint By Linkedin Guess The Category Queens By Linkedin Crown Each Region Crossclimb By Linkedin Unlock A Trivia Ladder And that means leaders need to stop asking if Gen Z is prepared—and start creating the conditions that help them prepare. Trying To Build With Missing Blocks Many young professionals are ambitious, creative and eager to grow—but they're also navigating fog. Career guidance feels out of sync with what they're experiencing. The job they trained for might be evolving. The path they imagined might not exist. And the advice they're getting often comes from influencers, not insiders. CareerTok is full of well-meaning guidance, but much of it misses a deeper truth: growth isn't a formula. And belief in yourself, while important, needs to be anchored in something more durable than algorithms, AI prompts or viral social media tips. A Deloitte study found that just 6% of Gen Z say their top career goal is to reach a leadership role. But that doesn't mean they lack ambition. Learning and development rank among their top three reasons for choosing an employer. Nearly nine in ten say a sense of purpose is critical to their well-being. And many feel their managers are falling short—not on performance management, but on inspiration and mentorship. Gallup research reveals similar gaps. Younger employees report drops in clarity, recognition, and development—fundamental ingredients for growth. These aren't soft needs. They're the scaffolding for long-term success. The biggest challenge? Most of our systems still reward the straight line. But Gen Z grew up in a world that glitched and rebooted. They've watched careers evaporate, industries reinvent, and skills go obsolete before graduation. They aren't lost. They're living in a different context. One that doesn't promise certainty—but does demand adaptability. And they're not waiting to be told what to do. They're asking the right questions: What am I building here? What matters to me? How can I grow and still be myself? What Leaders Must Do Many leaders still expect younger employees to prove themselves the same way they did: stay put, follow instructions, pay dues. But Gen Z is responding to a different economy and different signals. They want growth, not grind. They want learning, not ladder-climbing for its own sake. And they want to feel seen as whole people, not just future high potentials. So what should leaders do? Most young professionals are used to being evaluated on what they lack. Flip the script. Start with what they naturally do best. Help them understand their true strengths not bemoan their weaknesses. Help them see how they think, relate and contribute. You're not just coaching a job. You're shaping a personal journey. Gen Z doesn't expect to have all the answers. But they want chances to explore. That means offering project work across teams, learning experiences outside their job family and mentorship that spans disciplines. Many leaders hide the zigzags in their own careers. That's a missed opportunity. Share your detours. Your failures. The moments that didn't make sense until later. Gen Z wants transparency over polish. Vulnerability builds trust. Instead of asking, 'Where do you want to be in five years?' try, 'What kind of work makes you feel alive?' or 'What problems are you curious about?' Let their questions shape the path, not your expectations. A role that doesn't fit isn't failure. It's data. Help them see how skills transfer, how to reframe setbacks and how to pivot without shame. Especially in a fast-moving world where AI and automation are redrawing the lines every week. From Ladders To Landscapes Many Gen Z employees are being called idealistic. Entitled. Too quick to leave. But they are not quitting growth. They are quitting environments that don't make space for it. The sooner we adjust our systems, the sooner we unlock their potential. Because they're not playing the old game. If their world is more Minecraft than Monopoly, our systems need to shift too. Minecraft doesn't reward luck or hierarchy. It rewards intention. Curiosity. Rebuilding when something breaks. Careers today need the same mindset. Not a fixed track but an evolving world built through trial, stretch, and imagination. You don't build a castle in Minecraft by rolling dice. You build it block by block—mistake by mistake, lesson by lesson. That's the kind of resilience and creativity Gen Z is already practicing. And it's time we helped them bring it into the workplace. The game Gen Z is playing isn't about reaching the top. It's about learning how to move with change. How to build range. And how to grow in ways that matter. The leaders who will shape the future are the ones who know this. And who are willing to change the gameboard.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Listen: Aespa returns with 'Dirty Work,' first single of 2025
June 27 (UPI) -- K-pop group Aespa released their first single of 2025 on Friday. The South Korean singers dropped the song "Dirty Work," as well as an English version, and a remix with Flo Milli. In the music video, Karina, Giselle, Winter and Ningning perform in an apparent prison. "Real bad business, that's dirty work," they sing. A previously issued press release described the concept as "a fresh contrast to their usual powerful charm."
