
Tales from the Florida condo crisis: Homeowners describe hardships after cost hikes
Many Florida condo owners are angry about cost increases they didn't expect and how those increases are eroding their buying power.
Many are frustrated by decisions of their management companies and governing boards, and want proof that their funds are being spent correctly.
More than 75 condo unit owners conveyed two emotions — anger and frustration — to the South Florida Sun Sentinel, which in early February asked the public to describe how they were being affected by rising condo maintenance costs.
Some owners are angry that monthly maintenance fees have doubled in recent years, thanks to increases in insurance costs and new laws enacted after the Surfside tower collapse in 2021 requiring condo associations to fully fund their reserves.
Relief could come soon, however, as legislators debate bills aimed at easing the burden in the upcoming legislative session that begins March 4.
One proposal, by Sen. Rosalind Osgood, a Democrat representing central Broward County, and Rep. Mitch Rosenwald, a Democrat representing eastern Broward in the House, would provide one-time $2,500 grants to help low-income senior condo owners facing assessments to fund their condominiums' reserves.
Another bill, filed by Osgood without a House companion, would exempt condo buildings with five or fewer stories from requirements to conduct structural integrity reserve studies and allow them to waive or reduce reserve requirements to fully fund reserves.
Currently buildings three stories and higher must undergo the study and fully fund their reserves. And those requirements, which took effect Jan. 1 for most condo buildings, have hit condo owners in the wallet.
Many of the owners who responded said the increases were forcing them to consider relocating. Some have already noticed that more units in their complexes are being offered for sale. But moving is easier said than done when buildings need safety improvements that cost more than owners are able to pay.
'Seems like everyone is in the same boat here,' said Henry Marcus, owner of a unit in Manor Grove Townhomes in Wilton Manors, about the financial difficulties many unit owners are facing. 'It's tragic, really. So many older folks had to put their units on the market. Florida is no longer for retirees or the middle class.'
But selling isn't always easy, as untold unit owners are learning.
Dawn Munera, a Pembroke Pines condo owner who also is a real estate broker, said that mortgage guarantor Fannie Mae refuses to back loans in complexes with reserve shortfalls. Those condos require all-cash buyers, or creative and unconventional lenders.
Here are four stories detailing hardship being felt by some South Florida condo owners, based on emails and interviews with the Sun Sentinel:
Doris Gustafson has never wanted to leave the home she bought in The Reflections community on Pine Island Drive in Davie back in 2008.
'It's a lovely community with really neat townhomes,' she said. 'They're not boxy little icky-looking things. I came in and instantly fell in love. Inside is full of angles and vaulted ceilings. They're really quite nice.'
But a near doubling of the monthly maintenance fees within the community in recent years — from $380 to $635, she says — has hit the 75-year-old retiree hard because she depends solely on Social Security for her income. And inflation-triggered increases in her benefit haven't kept up with rising costs of food, medicine and transportation in addition to the maintenance fee hike.
'I'm going to have a CT angiogram this month (February) and my copay is $150 for that,' she said recently. 'Well that kind of blows my budget out of the water for this month.'
Real Estate | Florida's condo crisis: Lawmakers don't expect 'bailout' money for owners
Real Estate | Some Florida condo associations missed a key deadline. Here's what's next.
Real Estate | This Sunrise condominium lost its windstorm insurance — so buyers can't get financed
Like others in similar situations, Gustafson said she has considered selling her home and moving elsewhere in the region.
'Even if I could find a home in Delray Beach, and buy something for cash with the profit I would make on my house, then the condo fees would be higher and I'd be in the same boat. They could go up at any time. And you're stuck. I mean, do I move out of state? Away from my doctors? Away from my friends?'
She has decided to take in a roommate to help cover costs. Sharing her unit will require her to move her artwork and supplies out of the upstairs bedroom she had been using as a studio.
The thought of bringing in a tenant 'terrifies me,' she said. 'Having a stranger living with me is creepy, to put it mildly. I can't have an old lady up there because the stairs are steep. So I would probably need a younger person. I'm near Nova Southeastern University. A doctorate student who would be studying all the time would be nice.'
Real Estate | Florida's condo crisis: Lawmakers don't expect 'bailout' money for owners
Real Estate | Some Florida condo associations missed a key deadline. Here's what's next.
Real Estate | This Sunrise condominium lost its windstorm insurance — so buyers can't get financed
She said she sometimes feels guilty for complaining about her situation. 'I know there are other people who are in much more difficult circumstances than I am,' she says. 'But I'm 75 years old. I bought my house. I planned my life. And this is not supposed to be it — over 300 stupid dollars.'
The first special assessment notice that Graham Brunk received for concrete restoration work at The Lakeshore Club condo building in West Palm Beach was for close to $9,000, he said, adding that unit owners were told that the painting and restoration company agreed to do the work for about $700,000.
Brunk, 37, understood. He knew the six-story, 80-unit building was approaching 50 years old and the collapse of the Champlain Towers South in Surfside was still on everyone's minds.
It wasn't difficult for unit owners to notice issues that needed to be addressed. 'Standing on my balcony, I saw a lot of chips and cracks in the concrete,' he said. While engineering studies provided to unit owners did not identify anything in immediate danger of collapse, 'there were definitely things that were very crucial that needed addressing sooner rather than later.'
As work got underway, the company removed two sets of floor-to-ceiling sliding glass doors from Brunk's unit and replaced them with temporary barriers to keep the weather out, Brunk said.
Initially, the company thought it would only have to remove sliding doors from a handful of units, he said. 'But once they started — they worked on the building from north to south — they found a lot more units that needed this kind of work done.'
Suddenly, the job price had increased from $700,000 to $1 million, he said. 'And then from $1 million to $1.3 million.'
Then the additional assessment notices started to arrive. 'So my $9,000 turned into another $4,000 assessment. And another $4,000 assessment. And another $4,000 assessment. Every time it was like, 'This is the last one.''
Although Brunk's weather barrier was installed around April, work at his unit, which required removal of the weather barrier, didn't commence until July, he said. Brunk soon realized, 'I really should not have been there' while the work was underway.
Dust piled up inside of his unit and he had to move all of his furniture 5 feet away from the opening. 'It's not that big of a condo to begin with, so it was difficult to walk around the unit. There was no sunlight, so it was pretty depressing to be at home. Just the experience of having to live through it was traumatizing to me.'
The final cost of the project ended up at about $2.5 million, and his share totaled $27,654, Brunk said.
He was able to cover the first $18,800 out of his savings. The last $9,000 was charged to a credit card that he said offered 0% interest on cash advances for 12 months.
'I've been fortunate that I could pay for this, but I wonder about my neighbors,' he said.
Twenty-four hours after Nayara Silva listed her condo at Cypress Bend 2 in Pompano Beach for sale, she got an offer for her full asking price, she said.
But then the lender told her late last year that it couldn't finance a loan for her buyer, she said, because 20% of unit owners in her building were more than 60 days delinquent on special assessment payments.
The delinquencies made the building ineligible for funding by mortgage loan underwriters Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, 'regardless of down payment,' the loan officer told her in an email obtained by the Sun Sentinel. He added, 'Sorry for the bad news.'
Silva, 33, said that when she purchased the condo unit in January 2020, the monthly maintenance fee was just $350 and included cable, water, security and property maintenance.
By 2024, those fees had swollen to $916 'because of the 40-year inspection requirement and (rising) insurance,' she said.
During the five years she lived in the unit, she had invested $50,000 in upgrades and remodeling.
After getting married, Silva and her husband decided to look for another home that wouldn't require such high monthly maintenance fees. They found a townhome in Deerfield Beach and made an offer. Then, five days before their would-be buyer was scheduled to close on Silva's condo unit at the end of last year, they got the bad news from their lender that the unit was ineligible for its financing.
Florida condominiums currently occupy 1,398, or 28.6%, of about 3,900 properties on Fannie Mae's blacklist, said Jake Marcus, partner in the Braintree, Massachusetts, office of condo firm Allcock Marcus, which has obtained a copy of the list that's supposed to be available only to lenders and condo associations. That's nearly double the 763 Florida condos on the list that totaled 2,306 properties in November 2023, the firm said.
Issues that can land associations on the list include inadequate reserves or insurance, too many delinquencies, too much commercial space, structural or construction issues, outstanding special assessments and too many rentals.
Marcus said that Silva's condominium is on the do-not-lend list, but the cited reason is 'critical repairs (needed) or deferred maintenance.'
When reached by email and phone, a woman who answered the phone at the property manager's office acknowledged receiving an email from the Sun Sentinel seeking clarification for why Silva's buyer was turned down for a loan. 'I'm not going to discuss any of that with you,' she said.
Silva said the couple decided to rent out the condo unit but are only breaking even because of the assessments and monthly fees.
She's hoping that outstanding issues can be corrected 'so we can sell the property and get back what we invested.'
Twenty-five years ago, Tony Ferrari, now 63, was working as a computer repairman on Long Island in New York. His life changed forever on the day he was asked to retrieve a monitor from a high shelf.
'You remember, they were big and heavy in those days,' he said. He was 'twisted' atop the ladder when he lifted the monitor above his head, herniated 'a bunch of disks,' and almost fell to the floor, he said.
The mishap was followed by back surgery, 'a small Worker's Compensation settlement,' seven years of physical therapy, and a move to Florida. Eight years ago, he purchased a small condo in Greentree Villas in Boynton Beach and now struggles to make ends meet on a monthly Social Security Disability check.
'I've been on disability for quite a few years now,' he said. 'It started out with very low costs, but now my $1,500 monthly check is consumed by just the condo fee right off the bat, (costing) almost $600. So you have electric and food and your car insurance and just regular basic things — nothing extravagant — and it eats up my check easily.'
Getting by was a lot easier, he said, when his monthly maintenance cost was only $230. After a series of annual increases, he says that monthly bill is now $580. In 2023, he was charged a $1,523 assessment to cover an insurance shortfall, according to a document Ferrari shared with the Sun Sentinel.
This year he expects his association to send out another assessment asking owners to pay $10,000 to $15,000 to replace their roofs.
Ferrari hopes to avoid that by selling his unit and finding a new place to live, possibly in a nearby mobile home park where he'll still have access to his familiar neighborhood, friends and doctors.
He says he'd prefer to stay where he is. 'I like my place, I have a nice villa, one-car garage. It's nothing amazing. It suits me, but it's just way too expensive.'
While he knows mobile home park fees can increase as well, he figures he can buy a mobile home for about half of what he can get by selling his condo and bank the rest.
'I'm hoping that, you know, I can settle down and be happy and just enjoy where I live as I get older and older. But, you know, there's got to be someplace else.'
Ron Hurtibise covers business and consumer issues for the South Florida Sun Sentinel. He can be reached by phone at 954-356-4071 or by email at rhurtibise@sunsentinel.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Maybe drive to a fork in the road? Idaho reintroduces ‘famous' license plate
Idaho is going retro. The state is bringing back its 1950s-era 'World Famous Potatoes' license plate, in part to help promote agriculture programs. Sleek in its black-and-white design, this plate gives Idahoans the option to personalize their vehicle while supporting the Idaho Potato Commission and highway infrastructure. The plate will cost $70, in addition to any registration fees for its initial issuance. Of this, $45 is allocated to state highway infrastructure and $25 to agricultural promotions through the commission, according to its president and CEO, Jamey Higham. It will be available to purchase starting June 18, according to a press release. 'It's a little more expensive than the usual plate that you get,' Higham said. 'The money to help with roads and stuff through the transportation department, and some of the money will also go to helping promote research for potatoes in our industry within the commission.' The bill to reboot the plate was sponsored by Rep. Douglas Pickett, an Oakley Republican and rancher, and was introduced on Feb. 11. It passed the House and Senate with no opposition. 'It was really easy to actually build a consensus for it, and kind of exciting to see such widespread support for something like that,' Pickett told the Idaho Statesman. Demand for a black license plate has been high in Idaho, according to Pickett and Higham, and they both said they've received good feedback regarding the resurgence of the 'World Famous Potatoes' plate. 'We've been thinking about it for a couple of years, and we actually had quite a few requests to have a black license plate because it's starting to be popular all over the West,' Higham said. Pickett said there was 'a lot of demand' to have a black plate. 'People like to personalize their vehicle, it's sort of a personal expression,' he said. Higham says he has gotten 'overwhelmingly positive' comments about the license plate. Pickett said there could be some apprehension to purchase it because Idahoans believe that areas funded by the other available plates could lose money when they drop those. 'There was a little concern about competition with the Idaho heritage plate. ... But at the end of the day, it boiled down to what people actually want, and people actually decided to have an alternative, and so I think it's important to give people those options,' Pickett said. The plate for the Idaho Heritage Trust helps support historic preservation efforts in the state. Pickett and Higham both said the 'World Famous Potatoes' license plate is what Idaho is all about. 'Our population is increasingly urban, but yet our interest in our identity as the home of the world famous Idaho potatoes remains intact, and people still identify with that as Idahoans,' Pickett said. 'It's just something that I think is kind of nostalgic for Idahoans to reflect back on a plate from the past.' Both men said they think it will be well-received. 'We have a lot of other great industries in Idaho, we really do, but somehow the potatoes have been kind of the iconic one that people recognize us for,' Higham said.

Los Angeles Times
3 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
What will happen to food assistance under Trump's tax cut plan? A look at the numbers
President Trump's plan to cut taxes by trillions of dollars could also trim billions in spending from social safety net programs, including food assistance for lower-income people. The proposed changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program would make states pick up more of the costs, require several million more recipients to work or lose their benefits, and potentially reduce the amount of food aid people receive in the future. The legislation, which narrowly passed the U.S. House, could undergo further changes in the Senate, where it's currently being debated. Trump wants lawmakers to send the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' to his desk by July 4, when the nation marks the 249th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. Here's a look at the food assistance program, by the numbers: The federal aid program formerly known as food stamps was renamed the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, on Oct. 1, 2008. The program provides monthly payments for food purchases to low-income residents generally earning less than $1,632 monthly for individuals, or $3,380 monthly for a household of four. The nation's first experiment with food stamps began in 1939. But the modern version of the program dates to 1979, when a change in federal law eliminated a requirement that participants purchase food stamps. There currently is no cost to people participating in the program. A little over 42 million people nationwide received SNAP benefits in February, the latest month for which figures are available. That's roughly one out of every eight people in the country. Participation is down from a peak average of 47.6 million people during the 2013 federal fiscal year. Often, more than one person in a household is eligible for food aid. As of February, nearly 22.5 million households were enrolled in SNAP, receiving an average monthly household benefit of $353. The money can be spent on most groceries, but the Trump administration recently approved requests by six states — Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Nebraska and Utah — to exclude certain items, such as soda or candy. Legislation passed by the House is projected to cut about $295 billion in federal spending from SNAP over the next 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office. A little more than half of those federal savings would come from shifting costs to states, which administer SNAP. Nearly one-third of those savings would come from expanding a work requirement for some SNAP participants, which the CBO assumes would force some people off the rolls. Additional money would be saved by eliminating SNAP benefits for between 120,000 and 250,000 immigrants legally in the U.S. who are not citizens or lawful permanent residents. Another provision in the legislation would cap the annual inflationary growth in food benefits. As a result, the CBO estimates that the average monthly food benefit would be about $15 lower than it otherwise would have been by 2034. To receive SNAP benefits, current law says adults ages 18 through 54 who are physically and mentally able and don't have dependents need to work, volunteer or participate in training programs for at least 80 hours a month. Those who don't do so are limited to just three months of benefits in a three-year period. The legislation that passed the House would expand work requirements to those ages 55 through 64. It also would extend work requirements to some parents without children younger than age 7. And it would limit the ability of states to waive work requirements in areas that lack sufficient jobs. The combined effect of those changes is projected by the CBO to reduce SNAP participation by a monthly average of 3.2 million people. The federal government currently splits the administrative costs of SNAP with states but covers the full cost of food benefits. Under the legislation, states would have to cover three-fourths of the administrative costs. States also would have to pay a portion of the food benefits starting with the 2028 fiscal year. All states would be required to pay at least 5% of the food aid benefits, and could pay more depending on how often they make mistakes with people's payments. States that had payment error rates between 6-8% in the most recent federal fiscal year for which data is available would have to cover 15% of the food costs. States with error rates between 8-10% would have to cover 20% of the food benefits, and those with error rates greater than 10% would have to cover 25% of the food costs. Many states could get hit with higher costs. The national error rate stood at 11.7% in the 2023 fiscal year, and just three states — Idaho, South Dakota and Vermont — had error rates below 5%. But the 2023 figures are unlikely to serve as the base year, so the exact costs to states remains unclear. As a result of the cost shift, the CBO assumes that some states would reduce or eliminate benefits for people. The House resolution containing the SNAP changes and tax cuts passed last month by a margin of just one vote — 215-214. A vote also could be close in the Senate, where Republicans hold 53 of the 100 seats. Democrats did not support the bill in the House and are unlikely to do so in the Senate. Some Republican senators have expressed reservations about proposed cuts to food assistance and Medicaid and the potential impact of the bill on the federal deficit. GOP Senate leaders may have to make some changes to the bill to ensure enough support to pass it. Lieb writes for the Associated Press.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
An Open Letter to the President: Addressing our Debt
Donald J. TrumpThe Mar-a-Lago Club1100 South Ocean BoulevardPalm Beach, Florida Dear President Trump: I voted for you in all three of your presidential campaigns. The first time, I cast my vote with cautious optimism. The third time, with enthusiasm. And I contributed financially to your campaign. You have achieved what few thought possible - a triumphant return, driven by a deep-seated belief among millions of Americans that only you can effectively challenge the entrenched political establishment. Your first 100 days were extraordinary, but if your presidency is to be remembered not just as bold but also historic, one challenge must rise above all others: - the national debt. The national debt, currently $37 trillion, is the result of pervasive fiscal irresponsibility, accumulated over many decades. Our annual interest payments now exceed $1trillion - more than we spend on our national defense. This is not just a financial burden. It is a threat to the survival of our country as a democratic republic. Without immediate, decisive action, the consequences are predictable: more credit downgrades, more increases in interest rates, and crippling obligations to service the debt. What would happen to our great country if annual interest payments exceeded not just our defense budget but also Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare? Mr. President, if we are to remain a vibrant nation, this exploding national debt has to be attacked immediately and significantly. That will not happen without your leadership. Sadly, the Republican Party has shown that it is not a reliable ally. Even before Republicans regained control of the House, they held a secret vote. By a margin of 158 to 2 they brought back earmarks - the very same pork barrel spending practices that Speaker John Boehner put to bed. Since then, the Democratic Congress never dared to bring back earmarks. House Republicans did. The results were predictable, and immediate: $16 billion in earmarks. More than 7,500 pet projects. In the Senate, eight of the 12 largest earmarkers are Republicans. In the House, 48 of the top earmarkers are Republicans. Here are the largest earmarkers: Sen. Susan Collins of Maine (population 1.4 million) secured $870 million in earmarks. Sen. Lisa Murkowski grabbed $851.1 million in earmarks. Sen. Mitch McConnell took nearly $500 million in earmarks. My own congressman, Brian Mast, walked away with $437 million in earmarks. Obviously, eliminating pork barrel spending wont, by itself, address the structural problems in Washingtons budget process - or make the "big, beautiful bill" currently being debated in Congress deficit-neutral. But if members of Congress cant even control themselves, what kind of example do they set for the American people? How can politicians ask their fellow Americans to sacrifice when they wont do it themselves? Actions speak louder than words. Fiscal irresponsibility dominates the culture within Congress, within our government. That culture, obviously, will not change on its own. It can be changed. But only with your leadership. Mr. President, fortunately, today you have a tool to attack waste, fraud, duplication, and incompetence. Because of the cloud, Big Data, and the Freedom of Information Act, you can deliver every government expenditure to every citizens cell phone, iPad, and computer. You can bring a new era to government, i.e., transparency. Mr. President, you can be the launch pad for transparency. Imagine a government where every single taxpayer dollar that government spends is tracked and reported to the public. Imagine the cultural shift from secret votes, from wasteful spending to one where every government official knows their budgets will be scrutinized in detail. Mr. President, here are several all-encompassing, culture-changing, deficit-attacking actions you can announce tomorrow: Lead by example: Cut White House expenses by a defined percentage. Report the savings to the public every quarter. Challenge Congress: Ask every member to cut their office and committee budgets. Suggest at least 10%. Publish a quarterly report on every senator and representative. Eliminate pork-barrel projects: Call on Congress to abolish earmarks. Shine a light on every remaining earmarker until they fall in line. Mobilize the bureaucracy: Instruct all agencies to focus on rooting out waste, fraud, duplication, and incompetence, and report the progress quarterly. Say explicitly that you will monitor progress and report the bold and expose the complacent. Bringing transparency to government can do more than clean up wasted taxpayer dollars. It can rebuild trust. It can remind the American people that the government can still work for them. It will solidify your legacy as the chief executive who did not just talk about draining the swamp, you did it. Imagine our country if we did not have to spend $1 trillion each year on interest payments. That is the future Americans deserve. Mr. President, you have been given a historic mandate. You can leave office with a legacy as the president who did not just promise to "Make America Great Again," but who actually did it. America cannot be made great again without addressing the greatest threat to our countrys survival as a democratic republic - the exploding national debt. Respectfully, Thomas W. Smith Thomas W. Smith is the founder of Prescott Investors, Inc.