Why CEO Health Is The Leadership KPI That Drives Everything Else
Inside boardrooms and quarterly reviews, executives obsess over key performance indicators: revenue growth, profit margins, net promoter scores, and employee engagement, to name a few. But amid all the dashboards and data, one KPI remains underrepresented: CEO health.
Executive well-being is more than a personal matter. It's a strategic asset and impactful KPI that shapes performance and potential from the top down. When neglected, it becomes a hidden liability with impactful costs. According to a widely reported Deloitte study, 75% of C-suite leaders have considered leaving their roles for ones that better support their well-being.
When a leader's physical, mental, or emotional bandwidth is depleted, their decision-making abilities falter, the organizational culture weakens, and loyalty erodes. Health is the invisible infrastructure beneath every board-level priority. Below are three critical domains directly influenced by executive well-being.
1. Decision-Making And Perceived Leadership Effectiveness
The quality of leadership is inseparable from the quality of a leader's decisions. Yet many executives operate under conditions that steadily erode their cognitive edge: unmitigated stress, fragmented sleep, suboptimal nutrition, and inconsistent physical activity. There's a difference between mentally existing throughout the day and mentally thriving.
A study published in The Leadership Quarterly found that a one-standard-deviation decline in a CEO's mental health was associated with a 6% drop in firm performance. The effects extended beyond mood, showing up in slower execution, diminished judgment, and weakened presence. And when a CEO is off their game, the consequences cascade through balance sheets, team dynamics, and investor confidence.
Well-being also communicates before words are spoken. CEOs who run marathons—or engage in other intense physical training, a proxy for cardiovascular fitness and stress resilience—have been linked to greater firm value, stronger M&A outcomes, and more stable stock performance.
2. Connectivity And Talent Optimization
An executive's habits become organizational norms. Leaders who visibly prioritize recovery, boundaries, and health send a signal far louder than any company memo.
A study in the Transdisciplinary Journal of Management confirmed that health-promoting leadership directly elevates performance by improving employee well-being. And research from Frontiers in Psychology reinforced this, finding that such leadership reduces burnout and increases engagement by creating a climate where people can consistently operate at their best.
Leaders who model strategic energy allocation—whether it's deliberate recovery, mindful delegation, or strategic disconnection—build teams that are more loyal, more resilient, and more productive. In today's talent economy, where replacing key performers is both costly and time-consuming, well-being is a KPI that positively impacts numerous organizational metrics.
3. Stakeholder Trust And Company Image
Executives are constantly communicating, even before they speak. Body language, energy levels, facial tension, and vocal tonality all contribute to the perception of confidence, credibility, and control. In high-stakes settings, executive presence precedes executive messaging.
A leader who appears physically depleted or emotionally flat can unintentionally project instability. Stakeholders and investors make micro-judgments long before financial results are released, and in a 24/7 media environment, those impressions travel fast. Markets have historically responded to health-related executive signals.
When Steve Jobs appeared visibly unwell at public events, Apple shares dipped. When Jamie Dimon underwent emergency heart surgery in 2020, JPMorgan's stock dropped nearly 8%. Both companies eventually rebounded, but the initial response reveals a larger truth: markets react to leadership uncertainty, especially when it stems from health issues. The same principle applies internally. Just as investors respond to perceived stability, teams and stakeholders respond to how leaders communicate under pressure.
Trust isn't built on flawless execution. It's shaped by emotional intelligence. A recent study titled "The Trust Dilemma" found that CEOs who expressed personal vulnerability, authentically and strategically, were viewed as more trustworthy by investors. This type of transparency, especially in challenging moments, served as an emotional buffer, improving credibility and confidence. Perception is reality in leadership.
CEO Health: The KPI That Influences All Others
In leadership, it's not just about what gets done, but how it gets done, and how long it can continue to get done. The infrastructure behind all of it is a leader's capacity. And that capacity is built through health and well-being. CEO health isn't just a personal obligation. It's an organizational driver. Decision-making, team performance, cultural integrity, vision building, and stakeholder trust are all downstream of executive well-being. And unlike market volatility or external risk, CEO health is a variable leaders can fully control.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Many Think Doctors Are Overpaid And That's Why Healthcare Is So Pricey, But One U.S. Surgeon Actually Ran The Numbers Against Global Peers
A common complaint in the American healthcare debate is that physicians make too much money, and that their pay is a major reason healthcare is so expensive. But a U.S. surgeon recently spent an administrative day crunching the numbers, and he argues the reality doesn't match the outrage. 'Physician salaries account for roughly 8.6% of total healthcare costs [in the U.S.],' the surgeon wrote in a Reddit post on r/Salary. 'It's around 10% in Canada, 15% in Germany, 11% in France, 11.6% in Australia, and 9.7% in the UK.' Don't Miss: Deloitte's fastest-growing software company partners with Amazon, Walmart & Target – Many are rushing to grab $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. A Closer Look At The Numbers He also did his own calculations using Canadian healthcare spending figures. Canada spent $372 billion on healthcare last year. With an average physician salary of $384,000 and 97,384 physicians nationwide, the total salary cost works out to about $37.4 billion—roughly 10% of total healthcare spending. That figure aligns closely with the U.S., suggesting that doctors' share of healthcare spending isn't uniquely bloated in America. 'This just means that our healthcare system as a whole is riddled by parasites such as insurance companies and admin,' he added. Critics often argue that U.S. physicians earn much more than their international peers. But when the Reddit poster compared salaries of engineers, teachers, lawyers and plumbers in the U.S., Canada, Germany, and France, he found similar ratios to physician salaries across all professions. Trending: This AI-Powered Trading Platform Has 5,000+ Users, 27 Pending Patents, and a $43.97M Valuation — For example, the ratio of physician to engineer pay was 2.7 in the U.S., compared to 3.2 in Canada and 1.9 in Germany. When it came to teachers, the ratio was 4.1 in the U.S. and 4.7 in Canada. 'It seems like Germany underpays teachers relative to physicians, but the USA is very close to France and Canada,' he noted. So What's Actually Driving Costs? Commenters overwhelmingly agreed that doctors aren't the problem. 'Healthcare is now the largest employer in the country and it's got very little to do with doctors, nurses and surgeons,' one person wrote. 'It's admin. It's always been admin,' said another. 'There are, what, a dozen administrators per doctor in the average hospital?' Medical equipment sales, pharmaceutical pricing, and insurance company practices were also frequently blamed. 'Stryker (NYSE:SYK) generated +$20 billion in 2024,' one commenter said. Another added, 'We're paying double what we should for care, not 6% more.' The thread also dug into why training more doctors isn't as simple as it sounds. Opening more residency spots requires adequate patient volume and teaching staff resources that aren't easy to scale overnight. 'You need to do X number of Y procedures to be competent,' the surgeon explained. 'It's not as easy as just 'training more doctors'. There are many moving parts.'Meanwhile, some emphasized the optics: the public sees doctors making six or seven figures and assumes they are to blame, even though health insurance CEOs routinely earn $20 million or more. 'Physicians are easy targets,' one longtime medical professional wrote. 'We are much more poorly organized than big pharma or the hospital lobby.' Others chimed in from outside medicine. 'Make a button on an app more responsive and get $500K, no one cares. Save lives and make $300K, pitchforks,' one person joked. A dentist said their patients wrongly assume they keep the entire cost of a procedure. 'For a cancer procedure that costs over $20,000 before insurance, I take home $1,600. But laypeople think I take home all $20,000.' One user summed it up plainly: 'Anyone who thinks physicians make too much money is an idiot. I'm not a physician, I work in tech. But I'd rather fire every insurance company admin and funnel that money back into pay for doctors, nurses and other people doing the actual useful jobs.' Read Next: Here's what Americans think you need to be considered 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? STRYKER (SYK): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Many Think Doctors Are Overpaid And That's Why Healthcare Is So Pricey, But One U.S. Surgeon Actually Ran The Numbers Against Global Peers originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
16-07-2025
- Forbes
Why CEO Health Is The Leadership KPI That Drives Everything Else
CEO health is the KPI driver influencing all other metrics. Inside boardrooms and quarterly reviews, executives obsess over key performance indicators: revenue growth, profit margins, net promoter scores, and employee engagement, to name a few. But amid all the dashboards and data, one KPI remains underrepresented: CEO health. Executive well-being is more than a personal matter. It's a strategic asset and impactful KPI that shapes performance and potential from the top down. When neglected, it becomes a hidden liability with impactful costs. According to a widely reported Deloitte study, 75% of C-suite leaders have considered leaving their roles for ones that better support their well-being. When a leader's physical, mental, or emotional bandwidth is depleted, their decision-making abilities falter, the organizational culture weakens, and loyalty erodes. Health is the invisible infrastructure beneath every board-level priority. Below are three critical domains directly influenced by executive well-being. 1. Decision-Making And Perceived Leadership Effectiveness The quality of leadership is inseparable from the quality of a leader's decisions. Yet many executives operate under conditions that steadily erode their cognitive edge: unmitigated stress, fragmented sleep, suboptimal nutrition, and inconsistent physical activity. There's a difference between mentally existing throughout the day and mentally thriving. A study published in The Leadership Quarterly found that a one-standard-deviation decline in a CEO's mental health was associated with a 6% drop in firm performance. The effects extended beyond mood, showing up in slower execution, diminished judgment, and weakened presence. And when a CEO is off their game, the consequences cascade through balance sheets, team dynamics, and investor confidence. Well-being also communicates before words are spoken. CEOs who run marathons—or engage in other intense physical training, a proxy for cardiovascular fitness and stress resilience—have been linked to greater firm value, stronger M&A outcomes, and more stable stock performance. 2. Connectivity And Talent Optimization An executive's habits become organizational norms. Leaders who visibly prioritize recovery, boundaries, and health send a signal far louder than any company memo. A study in the Transdisciplinary Journal of Management confirmed that health-promoting leadership directly elevates performance by improving employee well-being. And research from Frontiers in Psychology reinforced this, finding that such leadership reduces burnout and increases engagement by creating a climate where people can consistently operate at their best. Leaders who model strategic energy allocation—whether it's deliberate recovery, mindful delegation, or strategic disconnection—build teams that are more loyal, more resilient, and more productive. In today's talent economy, where replacing key performers is both costly and time-consuming, well-being is a KPI that positively impacts numerous organizational metrics. 3. Stakeholder Trust And Company Image Executives are constantly communicating, even before they speak. Body language, energy levels, facial tension, and vocal tonality all contribute to the perception of confidence, credibility, and control. In high-stakes settings, executive presence precedes executive messaging. A leader who appears physically depleted or emotionally flat can unintentionally project instability. Stakeholders and investors make micro-judgments long before financial results are released, and in a 24/7 media environment, those impressions travel fast. Markets have historically responded to health-related executive signals. When Steve Jobs appeared visibly unwell at public events, Apple shares dipped. When Jamie Dimon underwent emergency heart surgery in 2020, JPMorgan's stock dropped nearly 8%. Both companies eventually rebounded, but the initial response reveals a larger truth: markets react to leadership uncertainty, especially when it stems from health issues. The same principle applies internally. Just as investors respond to perceived stability, teams and stakeholders respond to how leaders communicate under pressure. Trust isn't built on flawless execution. It's shaped by emotional intelligence. A recent study titled "The Trust Dilemma" found that CEOs who expressed personal vulnerability, authentically and strategically, were viewed as more trustworthy by investors. This type of transparency, especially in challenging moments, served as an emotional buffer, improving credibility and confidence. Perception is reality in leadership. CEO Health: The KPI That Influences All Others In leadership, it's not just about what gets done, but how it gets done, and how long it can continue to get done. The infrastructure behind all of it is a leader's capacity. And that capacity is built through health and well-being. CEO health isn't just a personal obligation. It's an organizational driver. Decision-making, team performance, cultural integrity, vision building, and stakeholder trust are all downstream of executive well-being. And unlike market volatility or external risk, CEO health is a variable leaders can fully control.
Forbes
08-07-2025
- Forbes
Workplace Well-Being Isn't Working—Here's What To Do Instead
Sammy Rubin is the founder and CEO of YuLife, the lifestyle insurance company providing life insurance, well-being and rewards in one app. We're living through a paradox. More and more employers are investing in well-being, and yet stress, burnout and disengagement are higher than ever. What went wrong? Flexible hours. Mindfulness apps. Gym memberships. Mental health webinars. These are all well-intentioned initiatives, and yet the results often don't match the investment. Gallup reports that only 21% of employees in 2024 felt engaged at work. Mental health-related absenteeism is rising. Productivity growth remains sluggish. I propose that it's not the idea of well-being that's failed; perhaps it's how we're defining and measuring success. The Paradox Of Progress Deloitte found that 81% of employers have increased their focus on mental health since the pandemic. But my company's 2025 well-being trends report found that while investment is up, outcomes are still flat. Just 17% of employees would be "very likely" to recommend their employer based on well-being. Most organizations are doing something about well-being. The question is: Are they doing the right things? Burnout is rising as job insecurity, economic pressures and an always-on work culture are taking their toll. People want flexible working, paid wellness days and healthcare. But in my experience, these only work when backed by a strong culture, consistent engagement and meaningful measurement. The Measurement Problem Too often, we confuse outputs with outcomes. It's natural to measure what's easy to track, but many of those metrics offer little insight into actual well-being. • Absenteeism is a lagging indicator—by the time it rises, it's already too late. • Employee assistance program (EAP) usage and gym subsidies mostly reflect those already proactive. • Annual engagement surveys can be skewed by recency bias or fatigue. These signals can lull leadership into thinking well-being is 'covered,' even while employees quietly struggle. Worse, they often miss the people who need support most, like carers, neurodiverse individuals or those managing chronic stress. I believe that if we stick to outdated metrics, we'll keep designing interventions that miss the mark. A New Well-Being Framework To succeed, we must stop treating well-being as a perk. It's not a policy—it's a culture. It needs to be woven into the everyday rhythms of work. To do this, I recommend adopting a model we use at my company called "everyday well-being." This model is based on small, consistent behaviors and supported by gamification, community and meaningful measurement. Gamification is central to this model—not as a gimmick, but as a behavioral science tool. It can help drive engagement through play, competition, purpose and habit formation rather than through pressure. When people enjoy a process, they are more likely to repeat it. Whether through step challenges, meditation streaks or team quests, you can help employees build healthy habits in ways that feel natural—and, yes, joyful. What To Measure Well-being should also be inclusive. It should reach all employees—remote or in-office, introvert or extrovert—and meet them where they are. That means tracking real-time behavioral signals, not just policy uptake. Here are a few of the metrics I've found to be the most useful for ensuring that well-being is embedded rather than just bolted onto your company culture: • Behavioral Micro-Metrics: Step counts, sleep streaks or hydration tracking can offer real insights into routine and resilience. • Challenge Participation: Engagement in team-based challenges can signal motivation, belonging and psychological safety, and I've found there to be a strong link between participation and employees' mood scores. • Mood Check-Ins: Real-time check-ins, via short prompts or surveys, can help flag patterns before they become problems. A slump in energy midweek? That may be a signal to act. • Recovery Rates: It's not just about stress—it's about bounce-back. In my experience, agency, community and supportive leadership can lead to quicker recoveries. • Cultural Signals: Does your leadership model well-being? Is it okay to log off at 5 p.m.? Culture can often determine whether team members' well-being is lived or just listed. Why Gamification Works Gamification is often misunderstood as fluff, but done right, it's a science-backed strategy for behavior change. Gamified environments drive higher habit formation and sustained engagement. In one trial done by my company, we found that users exposed to gamified features in our app were more than twice as likely to maintain new healthy behaviors. I believe this is because gamification isn't just about rewards—it taps into purpose, curiosity and community. Some users are motivated by leaderboards, others by quiet streaks or personal quests. That diversity is key, so ensure your gamification methods appeal to all types of "players." A Call To Business Leaders This is how we can go from reactive to proactive: not by waiting for people to reach burnout, but rather by helping them build resilience every day. If the first wave of your workplace well-being hasn't worked, it doesn't mean the idea has failed. It may just mean you've been using the wrong map. Don't abandon well-being because the first iteration didn't deliver what you hoped. Instead, take a step back and consider: Are you measuring the right things? Are you designing programs for real people with real constraints, not just the most engaged few? Are you embedding well-being into the flow of your team's work or bolting it on as an afterthought? It's time to refocus on long-term impact, better measurement and human-centered design. That means creating environments where small, daily actions lead to lasting change. Where technology supports rather than replaces human connection. And where culture reinforces rather than contradicts the message that well-being matters. Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
