Nasa is building a JCB to excavate Moon rocks. See pics here
The tests were conducted at the Granular Mechanics and Regolith Operations Lab at the agency's Kennedy Space Center in Florida.Nasa said that the opposing motion of the drums helps RASSOR grip the surface in low-gravity environments like the Moon or Mars. With this unique capability, RASSOR can traverse the rough surface to dig, load, haul, and dump regolith that could be used in construction or broken down into hydrogen, oxygen, or water, resources critical for sustaining human presence.During the test, Nasa proved the ability of a bucket drum excavator to build surface features out of regolith. Bucket drums will be used on NASA's IPEx (In-Situ Resource Utilization Pilot Excavator).The ISRU Pilot Excavator (IPEx) will excavate soil on the surface of the Moon, or regolith, and take the material to a processing plant where usable elements such as hydrogen, oxygen and water can be extracted for life support systems.SEE PICS HERE
Drew Smith, a robotics engineer, makes adjustments to the Regolith Advanced Surface Systems Operations Robot (RASSOR) during testing. (Photo: Nasa)
advertisement
On the surface of the Moon, mining robots like RASSOR will excavate the regolith and take the material to a processing plant. (Photo: Nasa)
An integrated test of the MARCO POLO/Mars Pathfinder in-situ resource utilization, or ISRU, system takes place at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida. (Photo: Nasa)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
14 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump administration moves to shut down NASA carbon monitoring missions
The Trump administration is looking to end two NASA missions that monitor carbon dioxide emissions and plant health, tools experts say are crucial in the global fight against climate change. According to the Associated Press, President Donald Trump's proposed budget for the 2026 fiscal year allocates no funding for the Orbiting Carbon Observatories (OCO) program. These include a free-flying satellite launched in 2014 and a high-precision instrument attached to the International Space Station since 2019. NASA, in a statement emailed on Wednesday, said the missions are 'beyond their prime mission' and are being terminated 'to align with the President's agenda and budget priorities.' Despite the administration's stance, climate scientists warn that the two missions are far from obsolete. David Crisp, a retired NASA scientist who led their development, described the observatories as 'more sensitive and accurate than any other systems in the world,' reported AP, and a 'national asset'. Among their breakthroughs are discovering that the Amazon rainforest now emits more carbon dioxide than it absorbs, and that boreal forests in Canada and Russia are becoming unexpected carbon sinks. The satellites can also detect photosynthesis in plants, which helps monitor droughts and predict food shortages, a factor closely linked to civil unrest and famine. 'This is really critical,' Crisp said. 'We're learning so much about this rapidly changing planet.' The missions remain funded through the end of the current fiscal year on September 30. However, the future remains uncertain. A House bill closely aligns with Trump's request and would eliminate the missions, while a Senate version preserves them. With Congress currently in recess, it's unclear if a final budget will be approved before October 1. Lawmakers may opt for a temporary resolution to maintain current funding. Some congressional Democrats have also warned NASA that terminating missions or withholding appropriated funds could be illegal, according to AP. In a last-ditch effort, Crisp and other scientists are looking to build an international coalition, including partners from Japan and Europe, to keep the ISS-mounted instrument operational. NASA has announced it will accept outside proposals through August 29. However, the free-flying satellite may be de-orbited, causing it to burn up in Earth's atmosphere. According to National Public Radio, NASA personnel have already begun planning for its shutdown. Efforts are also underway to find private or philanthropic funding to keep the satellite running, though Crisp called this a flawed solution. 'It's a really, really bad idea to try and push it off onto private industry or private individuals or private donors,' he said according to AP. 'It just doesn't make sense.' (With inputs from AP, The Mirror US)
News18
an hour ago
- News18
US in Race With China to Claim Best Part of Moon: NASA Chief
Washington, DC [US], August 7 (ANI): The United States is in a new space race with China to claim the most resource-rich part of the moon, NASA's interim administrator Sean Duffy said while announcing plans to install a nuclear reactor on the lunar surface by 2030.'We're in a race to the moon, in a race with China to the moon. And to have a base on the moon, we need energy," he said Addressing a press conference on Tuesday (local time) titled 'Unleashing American Drone Dominance" held by the US Department of Transportation, which Duffy also leads. Duffy explained that energy is the key to setting up a permanent base, and that's why he wants a 100-kilowatt nuclear reactor placed on the moon within the next five years. He said such a reactor would generate about the same amount of electricity that a typical US household uses in 3.5 NASA administrator also said that there is a specific region on the moon that is especially valuable, and that both the US and China are eyeing it.'There's a certain part of the moon that everyone knows is the best," he said. 'We have ice there. We have sunlight there. We want to get there first and claim that for America" he ice and continuous sunlight make certain parts of the moon, especially near the south pole, ideal for setting up a permanent base. These conditions are important for both sustaining human life and generating also addressed concerns about launching nuclear material into space. He made it clear that the reactor would not be active when launched from Earth.'We're not launching this live. That's obviously if you have any questions about that, no, we're not launching it live," he comparing the Artemis lunar program to the historic Apollo missions of the 1960s and 70s, Duffy admitted that NASA's current efforts haven't captured public attention in the same way.'A lot of people don't know even what Artemis is. Everyone knew what Apollo was. We all knew. The whole world knew what Apollo was. We were going to the moon, Artemis is, we're going back," Duffy said. (ANI)
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump moves to shut down NASA missions that measure carbon dioxide and plant health
The Trump administration is seeking to terminate two NASA missions crucial for monitoring carbon dioxide emissions, plant health, and predicting food shortages. These missions, including a satellite and an instrument on the International Space Station, provide unique and accurate data. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Trump administration is moving to shut down two NASA missions that monitor a potent greenhouse gas and plant health, potentially shutting off an important source of data for scientists, policymakers and Donald Trump's budget request for fiscal year 2026 includes no money for the Orbiting Carbon Observatories, which can precisely show where carbon dioxide is being emitted and absorbed and how well crops are said in an emailed statement on Wednesday that the missions were "beyond their prime mission" and being terminated "to align with the President's agenda and budget priorities".But the missions, a free-flying satellite launched in 2014 and an instrument attached to the International Space Station in 2019 that include technology used in the Hubble Space Telescope, still are more sensitive and accurate than any other systems in the world, operating or planned, and a "national asset" that should be saved, said David Crisp, a retired NASA scientist who led their helped scientists discover, for example, that the Amazon rain forest emits more carbon dioxide than it absorbs, while boreal forests in Canada, Russia and places where permafrost is melting absorb more than they emit, Crisp also can detect the "glow" of photosynthesis in plants, which helps monitor drought and predict food shortages that can lead to civil unrest and famine, he said."This is really critical," Crisp said. "We are learning so much about this rapidly-changing planet."The decision to end the missions is "extremely shortsighted", said Jonathan Overpeck, a climate scientist at the University of Michigan."The observations provided by these satellites ... (are) critical for managing growing climate change impacts around the planet, including in the US," he to CongressCrisp and others hope Congress will vote to preserve funding for the missions, which are funded through the fiscal year that ends on September 30.A bill in the House closely aligns with the president's request and would eliminate the missions, while a Senate version preserves them. But with Congress in recess, it is unclear whether a budget will be adopted before the new fiscal year that begins on October it does not, Congress could adopt a resolution to continue current funding until a budget is passed, though some lawmakers fear the Trump administration could try to delay or withhold that Democrats warned acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy last month that it would be illegal to terminate missions or impound funds already appropriated by said the administration's move to eliminate funding aligns with other actions to cut or bury climate science."The principle seems to be that if we stop measuring climate change, it will just disappear from the American consciousness," said University of Pennsylvania climate scientist Michael planCrisp and others also are trying to put together a coalition of outside partners -- including from Japan and Europe -- that could fund and operate the instrument attached to the space station. NASA said it will accept outside proposals through August free-flying satellite, though, is at risk of being brought down, meaning it would burn up in the atmosphere. National Public Radio first reported that NASA employees were making plans to end the said advocates are hoping NASA also allows outside control of that satellite, which covers more of the globe, but there are legal hurdles to overcome because it would mean giving control of a US satellite to a group that could include foreign partners."We are going out to billionaires. We are going out to foundations," Crisp said. "But ... it is a really, really bad idea to try and push it off onto private industry or private individuals or private donors. It just does not make sense."
