logo
Kneecap describe decision to ban them from Hungary as ‘political distraction'

Kneecap describe decision to ban them from Hungary as ‘political distraction'

Rhyl Journal24-07-2025
The trio, who are outspoken supporters of Palestine, were due to perform at Sziget Festival on August 11 and remain on the line-up on its website.
Government spokesman Zoltan Kovacs wrote on social media platform X that the decision to ban Kneecap was because the group's 'members repeatedly engage in antisemitic hate speech supporting terrorism and terrorist groups'.
But in a statement posted on Instagram, Kneecap described the decision to bar them from entry as 'political distraction' and pointed out that none of the group has any criminal convictions.
A spokeswoman for Sziget Festival also described the move as 'unnecessary and regrettable'.
'Cancel culture and cultural boycotts are not the solution,' she added.
The statement from Kneecap said: 'To the tens of thousands of fans who we were buzzing to see in person at Sziget, we're sorry we won't be with you.
'The authoritarian government of Viktor Orban say we 'pose a national security threat'.
'Which is f****** outrageous coming from a man who welcomed Netanyahu, a wanted war criminal, like a hero just a few weeks ago.
'There is no legal basis for his actions, no member of Kneecap has ever been convicted of any crime in any country. We stand against all hate crimes and Kneecap champions love and solidarity as well as calling out injustices whenever we see it.
'It's clear that this is political distraction and a further attempt to silence those who call out genocide against the Palestinian people.'
Kneecap have had several shows cancelled in recent months, including TRNSMT festival in Glasgow and at the Eden Project in Cornwall.
They claim this is part of a smear campaign against them because of their vocal support for Palestine and criticism of Israel's actions in Gaza, which they say is a genocide.
The statement posted earlier on Thursday by Mr Kovacs said: 'Hungary has zero tolerance for antisemitism in any form.
'Their planned performance posed a national security threat, and for this reason, the group has been formally banned from Hungary for three years.
'If they enter, expulsion will follow under international norms.'
The spokeswoman for Sziget Festival said: 'Following concerns raised by government and pressure groups across Hungary over the past weeks at the prospect of Kneecap performing, we have liaised closely with the band and they reassured us that their performance would not contravene either Sziget's values or Hungarian law.
'Over the past 30 years, Sziget has served as a free and safe place for different cultures, hosting artists and visitors from around the world, earning significant recognition in the international community and enhancing Hungary's reputation.
'We fear that the government's decision announced today to ban Kneecap may not only damage the reputation of Sziget, but also negatively affect Hungary's standing worldwide.'
Kneecap – comprised of Liam Og O hAnnaidh, Naoise O Caireallain, and JJ O Dochartaigh – were formed in Belfast and released their first single in 2017.
They hit the headlines recently after O hAnnaidh, who performs under the name Mo Chara, was charged with a terror offence relating to allegedly displaying a flag in support of Hezbollah.
In May, the Metropolitan Police said the group were being investigated by counter-terrorism police after videos emerged allegedly showing them shouting 'Up Hamas, up Hezbollah' and 'Kill your local MP'.
The group apologised to the families of murdered MPs and said they have 'never supported' Hamas or Hezbollah, which are banned in the UK.
They were also investigated over their set at Glastonbury Festival in June, but last week Avon and Somerset Police confirmed they would be taking no further action.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What a slippery, hateful toad Fred Goodwin was
What a slippery, hateful toad Fred Goodwin was

Spectator

time2 hours ago

  • Spectator

What a slippery, hateful toad Fred Goodwin was

Make It Happen is a portrait of a bullying control freak, Fred Goodwin, who turned RBS into the largest bank in the world until it came crashing down in 2008. Fred the Shred's character makes him a tough subject for a drama. His morning meetings were called 'morning beatings' by terrified staff. He ordered executives to pitch him an idea in the time it took him to eat a banana. Inciting arguments between staff amused him and he once sacked an employee for saying 'I tried' instead of 'I succeeded'. He was obsessed with colours and fabrics and he personally oversaw the design of the carpets and even the handwash at the bank's headquarters. But James Graham's play offers us very few clues about the origins of his character flaws. We learn nothing of Goodwin's childhood or his family, and his romantic side is confined to a hasty fling with a female employee. All we see are the outward workings of his soul. And it's ugly. It's also suburban. He's just another corporate hyena who happens to roam across an exceptionally broad hunting ground. As a person he's as much fun as a Dalek. The story is told through his relationship with the upbeat Alistair Darling and the morose, brooding Gordon Brown (Andy Clark) whose personality seems eerily similar to Goodwin's. At times, Brown threatens to take over the drama. Lurking in Goodwin's office is the spirit of his mentor, Adam Smith, played by Brian Cox. It's hard to play a ghost on stage because the undead have no stake in real-life events, and Cox portrays him as an amusingly cantankerous buffer who reacts with outrage when he learns that his legacy has been misappropriated by greedy bankers. He wants them to read his other book, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, but Goodwin has never heard of it. Cox works well with the excellent Sandy Grierson who plays Goodwin as a slippery, hateful toad. The script is a little over-busy and it keeps flitting from one genre to another. Bits of history give way to snatches of drama and dance routines. There are communal songs, displays of video graphics and amusing props for parodies of TV game shows. But it seems perfunctory rather than dazzling. The production feels like a town-hall pageant designed to give employment to every artisan and mummer in the district. The level of ambition is low and the actors have to deal with a scruffy set composed of platforms, wooden steps and boxy angular backdrops. Lazy work. The crowd in Edinburgh seemed to like this show without loving it. That's about right. Palestine: Peace de Resistance is a one-man cabaret by Sami Abu Wardeh who was brought to Britain from Kuwait as a kid and raised in Battersea. His Palestinian father taught him Arabic and he learned English from his Liverpudlian mum. He's a gifted performer with lots of personality and he uses the conflict in Gaza as a pretext to showcase his many talents. He dances, sings, plays the guitar and does pretty good bird impressions too. His parody of a Spanish flamenco artiste is spot-on. He links his material very tenuously to a history of anti-colonial uprisings across the world but he says little about Palestine itself, except 'free Palestine'. Britain seems to infuriate him. So does British history. 'I am here because you were there,' he yells accusingly at the crowd, finding them guilty of actions committed before they were born by governments they didn't elect. Sami is luckier than most because he has the option of settling overseas in a region more closely aligned with his outlook. But he prefers Britain. Good for him. Another professional malcontent, Katie Boyle, recounts her tribulations as a white migrant in America. She dislikes her mother, Catholicism and Ireland where she was born and raised. She moves to America where she dislikes Republicans, Texas and Arizona which 'is full of coloniser energy'. Right-wing Americans amuse her because 'they hate gay people even though they dress like them'. This is a puzzling production. The title refers to Roe vs Wade which suggests a show about the politics and morality of abortion. Instead, it's a list of incoherent grievances. With Donald Trump's second inauguration, Boyle foresees America 'sinking into fascism'. At the very same moment she applies for US citizenship. Is she complicit in the political trend she affects to disparage? Better not ask. Another political tribunal at Monkeypox Gospel. A camp New Yorker, Ngofeen Mputubwele, finds Belgium guilty of spreading the disease across the world. He tells us that monkeypox was incubated in the Congo by hungry locals whose diet of bushmeat caused the virus to develop. The first case was recorded in 1970. The Belgians, he adds, withdrew from the Congo 1960. His accusation doesn't quite add up. Maybe no one will notice.

Mossad's secret allies in Operation Wrath of God
Mossad's secret allies in Operation Wrath of God

Spectator

time2 hours ago

  • Spectator

Mossad's secret allies in Operation Wrath of God

More than half a century ago Palestinian terrorists stormed the 1972 Munich Olympics, murdering two of the Israeli team and taking another nine hostage. The West German authorities, ill-equipped to deal with such incidents, agreed to fly the terrorists and their hostages to Egypt. Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, offered to mount a rescue operation. The Germans launched their own, resulting in the deaths of a police officer, four of the seven terrorists and all the hostages. One consequence was the Israeli government's Operation Wrath of God, a programme to assassinate any leaders or planners associated with the massacre. Ten missions were organised in Europe, each signed off by the Israeli prime minister Golda Meir on condition that no innocent bystanders were killed. There have been several books about the operation and a 2005 film by Steven Spielberg. Aviva Guttmann's account does not merely rehearse the stories, though each operation is outlined. Rather, she shows how the security services of European nations cooperated in identifying, monitoring and investigating international terrorists in general and how this aided Mossad in its pursuit of vengeance. Cooperation was via the Club de Berne, an intelligence exchange between eight countries founded in 1969 in response to the growth of international terrorism. Soon expanded to include other countries, among them Israel, it handled communications via encrypted telegrams (which Guttmann calls cables) using the code word Kilowatt. Guttmann found these communications in publicly available Swiss archives. She analyses each assassination, showing how the exchange of Kilowatt information helped Mossad identify and locate their targets, how the various security services learned about terrorist tactics, such as the recruitment or duping of young European women, and how hitherto unknown plots to murder or hijack were prevented. The first assassination was only a month after Munich. Wael Zwaiter, a young Palestinian translator in Rome, returned to his flat to find two men on the stairway leading to his apartment. They shot him 11 times, a bullet for each Munich victim. Journalistic opinion at the time and since concluded that Mossad got the wrong man – a bit-part player at best. But the Kilowatt telegrams show that he had an important logistical role. One operation that Mossad very definitely got wrong was in the small Norwegian town of Lillehammer in 1973 when they shot an innocent Moroccan waiter alongside his seven-months pregnant wife. Not only that, but the assassins were caught. Contributing factors to this debacle were an inexperienced, hurriedly assembled team and insufficient research – the poor man was confused with a real terrorist solely on photographic resemblance. Mossad teams generally comprised about 15 people – two to do the killing, two to guard them, two to organise cover and facilities, six to eight to research the target's routines and movements and two to communicate both within the team and back to Israel. Guttmann's principal concern – oft-repeated – is that European security services 'played a vital role in the organisation and execution of Operation Wrath of God'. The extent to which they did so knowingly is not always clear, although they could not have failed to know after Lillehammer. There is no doubt, though, that the information they exchanged with Israel (including their own investigations into Mossad killings) facilitated assassinations within their own borders. 'One would simply not expect Europeans to help kill Palestinians… Governments… failed in their duty to keep safe all citizens,' Guttmann notes. Her disapproval is evident throughout, though not explicitly stated or argued. This is a pity because the opposite case – whether it can be justifiable to murder those seeking to murder you – is nowadays too prevalent to be dismissed without argument. We witness its effects daily on our screens. She concedes, however, that all participants benefitted from the exchange and that Israel was itself a significant contributor. But in claiming that the various agencies 'did not need to respect the same normative considerations as official foreign policy lines' she implies that they acted independently or against their own governments' policies. On this side of the Channel at least, actions by the intelligence agencies, including exchanges with liaison services, require government approval. MI5 does not simply do what it likes. It is not the case that relying on 'foreign intelligence shows… weakness and dependency', as Guttmann says of Mossad. Nor are attributing information to 'friendly services within the region', or claiming a source has 'direct access', forms of boasting; they and other formulae are necessary and conventional guides to assessing reports. She is on firmer ground in questioning the effectiveness of targeted killings, as assassinations are now often called. In the short term they can be highly disruptive and satisfy an understandable thirst for revenge; but in the longer term leaders may be succeeded by those with renewed determination and security. Half a century on, the causes that prompted Wrath of God are with us still.

Madonna looks sensational as she poses in boa and stockings for sexy shoot days before 67th birthday
Madonna looks sensational as she poses in boa and stockings for sexy shoot days before 67th birthday

Scottish Sun

time2 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Madonna looks sensational as she poses in boa and stockings for sexy shoot days before 67th birthday

Madonna is planning to celebrate her birthday with 29-year-old boyfriend Akeem Morris TAKE A BOA Madonna looks sensational as she poses in boa and stockings for sexy shoot days before 67th birthday Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) MADONNA goes hell for feather — posing in a boa and stockings days before turning 67. The Queen of Pop also crawled on all fours in jewellery and towering heels for a racy shoot. Sign up for the Entertainment newsletter Sign up 5 Madonna posed in a boa and stockings days before turning 67 Credit: Instagram 5 The singer also crawled on all fours in jewellery and towering heels for a racy shoot Credit: Instagram She is working on her 15th studio album — a sequel to 2005's Confessions on a Dance Floor — which will be her first since 2019's Madame X. Madonna is expected to go on hols with boyfriend Akeem Morris, 29, for her birthday next week. Last year she celebrated in Pompeii. Other birthdays have included trips to Lisbon and Sicily. Meanwhile, Madonna has spent the past few years working on a movie about her life. Actress Julia Garner was lined up to play the Hung Up hitmaker in the film before it appeared to be left on the shelf over two years ago. Now it seems that plans have been re-imagined with Julia confirming last month she is still lined up to play the iconic popstar in a Netflix miniseries about her life. Madonna and Julia are working with filmmaker Shawn Levy on the project, which is in the early stages of development. Confirming that the project was still happening, despite the uncertainty, Julia told the SmartLess podcast: 'Yeah, I mean, that's supposed to still happen." However, she did appear to hint that the project may still be far off hitting screens as she affirmed that "anything that's great, takes time". Madonna, 66, shows off bra under sheer top as she gyrates with boyfriend Akeem Morris at his 29th birthday party 5 Madonna turns 67 in just over a week Credit: Instagram 5 The singer is working on her 15th studio album Credit: Instagram

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store