Maid says she was tasked to clean window exteriors on 8th floor once a month, asks netizens for advice
SINGAPORE: A domestic helper has allegedly been tasked by her employer's mother to clean the exteriors of their windows, despite the unit being located on the eighth floor and lacking safety grilles.
According to the helper, she was comfortable cleaning the interior surfaces but avoided the exteriors due to safety concerns. However, while she was in the bathroom cleaning, her employer's mother approached her and questioned why the outside of the windows had not been done.
The helper then explained that the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) prohibits domestic workers from cleaning the exterior of windows unless certain safety conditions, such as having window grilles, are met. In response, the employer's mother reportedly said, 'You will stay here for two years, so who will clean the outside of the windows?'
Feeling pressured, the helper eventually cleaned the window exteriors, despite being aware of the risks involved. She later informed her employer about the incident and reminded them that breaching MOM's safety regulations could result in penalties, including fines of up to 'S$10,000, imprisonment, or even a ban on hiring domestic workers' in the future.
Looking for advice, she asked the 'MDW in Singapore' community, 'What should I do if they ask me to do it again? I have been staying with them for almost two months, and I have to clean it once a month. My employer is kind. I'm just concerned, what if some neighbours take pictures of me and then report them to MOM?' 'Have the courage to say no and explain why.'
In the comments, many netizens urged the worker not to put herself in danger again. One said, 'Just think that your life is more precious than that damn window, you must firmly say NO. If she insists, tell them that you will call police or MOM!'
Another commented, 'Treasure your life. Better to lose a job than losing ur life. You should be firm of NOT cleaning the exterior window. IF they insist, u can call the police directly for help.'
A third chimed in, writing, 'Don't always keep quiet, if you think it's dangerous and you're having second thoughts of doing it, have the courage to say no and explain why.. Communication is always the best.' MOM's safety rules
The MOM states that if employers live in a high-rise apartment and want their foreign domestic worker (FDW) to clean the windows or hang laundry outside, they must first ensure that 'window grilles are installed' and that an adult is present to supervise the task. If there are no grilles or no adult around to watch, the worker is not allowed to clean the exterior of the window.
MoM also makes it clear that FDWs must not 'climb onto window ledges, lean out of windows, or stand on chairs, stools, or any raised platforms' while cleaning or hanging clothes. They should also avoid 'overloading' the laundry pole, as doing so could cause them to lose their balance and fall.
Read also: Man who has been unemployed twice in the past 3 years says applying for jobs again terrifies him
Featured image by freepik (for illustration purposes only)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
Man linked to cross-border scam call syndicate arrested in Malaysia
SINGAPORE: A 41-year-old man will be charged in court on Tuesday (Jul 1) for his suspected involvement in a syndicate operating cross-border scams calls, following his arrest over the weekend. The suspect was arrested in Malaysia on Jun 28 and subsequently handed over to the Singapore Police Force (SPF). SPF said in a statement on Monday that he will be charged for being party to a criminal conspiracy to commit cheating offences. The arrest was made through "extensive intelligence sharing and joint investigations" between the Commercial Affairs Department and the Royal Malaysia Police's Johor Commercial Crime Investigation Department. The authorities said they had successfully disrupted a criminal syndicate allegedly operating Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications) devices to perpetrate scam calls in Singapore. VICTIMS LED TO BELIEVE THE CALLS ORIGINATED FROM SINGAPORE Preliminary investigations revealed that the man is believed to be involved in operating an "advanced" cloud-based remote operating system that enabled the syndicate to link to GSM mobile phone networks across Singapore and Malaysia. "This arrangement allowed the syndicate to operate remotely and route fraudulent calls through local mobile phone networks, leading victims in Singapore to believe that they were receiving calls from within Singapore," said the police. VoIP technology allows a person to make voice calls using a broadband Internet connection instead of a regular phone line. Such services may only allow a person to call other people using the same service, but others may allow calls to anyone who has a telephone number - including local, long distance, mobile, and international numbers, according to information from Federal Communications Commission in the US. Police added that they will continue to work closely with its foreign law enforcement counterparts to detect and deter transnational crime. "We will spare no effort to track down those who commit such crimes and ensure that they are brought to justice," SPF said. Those convicted of cheating may face a jail term of up to 10 years and a fine.
CNA
4 hours ago
- CNA
Billion-dollar money laundering case: Jail for personal driver who lied about 4 luxury cars out of greed
SINGAPORE: The personal driver of Su Binghai, a man implicated in the billion-dollar moneylaundering case, was sentenced to three months' jail on Monday (Jun 30) after lying that Su did not leave any valuable properties in his possession. In fact, Su had left four luxury cars to Liew Yik Kit along with instructions to sell them. Liew, a 42-year-old Singaporean, pleaded guilty to one count of lying to the police and one count of obstructing justice. Investigations into the complex case of money laundering date back to 2021, when the authorities received tip-offs on a group of foreigners using forged documents to launder money in the country. The police identified a group of foreign nationals involved in the laundering the criminal proceeds from overseas organised crime, such as scams and online gambling. The case came to a head on Aug 15, 2023, when the police conducted simultaneous raids across the island and arrested 10 individuals - nine men and one woman - from estates around the country. The authorities also seized more than S$3 billion (US$2.35 billion) worth of assets suspected to be linked to money laundering offences. All 10 have since been convicted and sentenced on a multitude of offences, chief of which was money laundering. Su, a Chinese national involved in a syndicate with some of the 10 arrested, has not been arrested. On Oct 9 last year, he and his wife Wang Manzu confirmed their consent to have their seized property surrendered to the state. An estimated total of more than S$316.6 million - including an estimated S$8,364,297 for the four cars - was surrendered. The police said in November last year that 15 of the 17 foreigners who had fled Singapore amid probes into the case had agreed to surrender about S$1.85 billion worth of assets to the state. Su was one of those who had agreed to surrender their assets in exchange for being removed from Interpol watchlists. His case is now closed and he is barred from returning to Singapore. ACCUSED WANTED TO TAKE CONTROL OF CARS QUICKLY On the day of the raids, Liew drove Su out of Singapore via Tuas Checkpoint in the evening. He dropped Su off at Kuala Lumpur International Airport on Aug 17, 2023, before heading back to Singapore alone. Before he flew off, Su told Liew to help him sell his four luxury cars, which were in his house. These were a Rolls Royce Phantom, a Rolls Royce Cullinan, a Ferrari F8 Spider and a Ferrari Stradale. Su left Liew the keys to his cars. Liew agreed as he expected to get about 1 per cent of the commission for the sale price of the four cars, and he estimated that the four cars were worth about S$8 million. On Aug 18, 2023, Liew went to Su's house and progressively drove the four cars to a multi-storey car park at Upper Boon Keng Road. He had not found a buyer at that point but wanted to take control of the cars quickly, the prosecution told the court. Liew then contacted a car brokerage company, Pro Carz, for the purposes of selling the vehicles before shifting them to another car park at Roxy Square in the Marine Parade area. By the time the police raided Su's house on Sep 4, 2023, the authorities could not find Su or the four cars. LIED DUE TO GREED Liew had his statement recorded on Sep 11, 2023. By then, he suspected that Su was wanted by the police as he had repeatedly failed to contact him. In his statement, Liew lied that Su had not left any valuable properties in his possession. He lied out of greed as he wanted the S$80,000 in commission expected from the sale of the cars, according to the prosecution. Concerned about investigations, Liew then drove the four cars back to the multi-storey car park at Upper Boon Keng Road to get rid of them. This car park was newly built, so the parking system was not ready. The four cars were left there until the police found them in October 2023. The authorities managed to trace the cars' movement to Roxy Square's car park, and found that a car dealer had applied for season parking for luxury cars there. The dealer revealed that the four cars were in Liew's possession. The authorities then arrested Liew on Oct 5, 2023. Liew lied to the police in one of Singapore's "biggest and more complex investigations", the prosecution said in seeking three to four months' jail for Liew. "As a result of his provision of false information to the police and the movement of the cars, the police only managed to recover the properties almost one month later, and only upon receiving intelligence and expending significant effort in investigations.
CNA
9 hours ago
- CNA
Doctor admits to forging certificates to provide aesthetic treatments
SINGAPORE: A doctor who wanted to provide certain aesthetic treatments at his new clinic forged certificates as part of the licence application process. Using his wife's certificates as templates, Bernard Tan Wen Sheng printed his name in a similar font size, placed it over his wife's name, then scanned the altered documents. He submitted four certificates, forged in this manner, to the authorities. In fact, Dr Tan did not attend two of the four workshops that were prerequisites to obtaining the certificates. He attended the other two workshops but had lost his original certificates. Tan pleaded guilty to two out of four counts of forgery on Monday (Jun 30), and one count of giving false information to a public servant. The remaining charges were taken into consideration for his sentencing. Dr Tan is still registered as a doctor, according to the Singapore Medical Council's database. His practising certificate is set to expire at the end of this year. USED WIFE'S DOCUMENTS Around February 2023, Dr Tan decided to set up his own practice, called Bay Aesthetics Clinic, at Marina Bay Link Mall. He had to apply for a clinic licence from the Ministry of Health (MOH) to do so. As part of the process, applicants must submit certificates of competence showing they have attended workshops and passed exams for each procedure the clinic intends to offer. When an MOH officer asked for certificates for botulinum toxin injections, fillers and chemical peels. Dr Tan realised he did not have the originals. He decided to alter his wife's certificates, which had been issued for During Dr Tan's application process, a staff member from MOH asked for certificates in relation to three services his clinic would provide: botulinum toxin injections, fillers and chemical peels. Dr Tan realised he did not have the original certificates and decided to alter his wife's certificates, which had been issued in 2017 for chemical peels, intense pulsed light (IPL) treatment for hair removal, filler injection and botulinum toxin injections. He placed a slip of paper with his name - printed in matching font size - over his wife's name, scanned the documents and emailed them to MOH on Feb 21, 2023. Dr Tan did not attend workshops related to chemical peels and IPL hair removal. He did attend workshops for filler injections and botulinum toxin injections on Mar 26, 2017, but had lost the original certificates. MAINTAINED LIE The MOH employee replied on Feb 27, 2023, to say that the Aesthetic Dermatology Education Group (ADEG), which had issued the certificates, could not find records of his attendance at the workshops for chemical peels and IPL hair removal. The MOH employee requested the original certificates or an email confirmation of his attendance by the ADEG. In the email, the employee warned Dr Tan against providing false information, drawing his attention to the relevant section and penalties under the law. In reply, Dr Tan insisted he had attended the workshops but lost the original certificates. He lied that the certificates he sent were "grainy" as his family members had scanned them after a fire in his home in October 2017l, which resulted in water damage to some of his documents. He maintained in a further email that the copies he scanned were from his original certificates. Dr Tan's application was approved on Mar 13, 2023, but he was only allowed to provide the services for filler injections and botulinum toxin injections, as MOH could only verify his attendance for these workshops. Dr Tan eventually attended the workshops for chemical peel and IPL hair removal on Apr 29, 2023. The prosecution sought four to six months' jail for Dr Tan. Deputy Public Prosecutor Ariel Tan said that had the forged certificates gone undetected, Dr Tan would have got away with a licence to provide four aesthetic services despite not being certified as competent to provide two of these safely. "Given that the offences were committed against a public institution, compounded by their effect on public health and safety, we submit that the accused's present offences must be met with a deterrent sentence to drive home the message that such offences will not be tolerated," Ms Tan said. Dr Tan's sentencing has been fixed for Jul 29. For providing false information to a public servant, Dr Tan can be jailed up to six months, or fined up to S$5,000 (US$3,900), or both.
