
Billion-dollar money laundering case: Jail for personal driver who lied about 4 luxury cars out of greed
In fact, Su had left four luxury cars to Liew Yik Kit along with instructions to sell them.
Liew, a 42-year-old Singaporean, pleaded guilty to one count of lying to the police and one count of obstructing justice.
Investigations into the complex case of money laundering date back to 2021, when the authorities received tip-offs on a group of foreigners using forged documents to launder money in the country.
The police identified a group of foreign nationals involved in the laundering the criminal proceeds from overseas organised crime, such as scams and online gambling.
The case came to a head on Aug 15, 2023, when the police conducted simultaneous raids across the island and arrested 10 individuals - nine men and one woman - from estates around the country.
The authorities also seized more than S$3 billion (US$2.35 billion) worth of assets suspected to be linked to money laundering offences.
All 10 have since been convicted and sentenced on a multitude of offences, chief of which was money laundering.
Su, a Chinese national involved in a syndicate with some of the 10 arrested, has not been arrested.
On Oct 9 last year, he and his wife Wang Manzu confirmed their consent to have their seized property surrendered to the state.
An estimated total of more than S$316.6 million - including an estimated S$8,364,297 for the four cars - was surrendered.
The police said in November last year that 15 of the 17 foreigners who had fled Singapore amid probes into the case had agreed to surrender about S$1.85 billion worth of assets to the state.
Su was one of those who had agreed to surrender their assets in exchange for being removed from Interpol watchlists. His case is now closed and he is barred from returning to Singapore.
ACCUSED WANTED TO TAKE CONTROL OF CARS QUICKLY
On the day of the raids, Liew drove Su out of Singapore via Tuas Checkpoint in the evening.
He dropped Su off at Kuala Lumpur International Airport on Aug 17, 2023, before heading back to Singapore alone.
Before he flew off, Su told Liew to help him sell his four luxury cars, which were in his house. These were a Rolls Royce Phantom, a Rolls Royce Cullinan, a Ferrari F8 Spider and a Ferrari Stradale. Su left Liew the keys to his cars.
Liew agreed as he expected to get about 1 per cent of the commission for the sale price of the four cars, and he estimated that the four cars were worth about S$8 million.
On Aug 18, 2023, Liew went to Su's house and progressively drove the four cars to a multi-storey car park at Upper Boon Keng Road.
He had not found a buyer at that point but wanted to take control of the cars quickly, the prosecution told the court.
Liew then contacted a car brokerage company, Pro Carz, for the purposes of selling the vehicles before shifting them to another car park at Roxy Square in the Marine Parade area.
By the time the police raided Su's house on Sep 4, 2023, the authorities could not find Su or the four cars.
LIED DUE TO GREED
Liew had his statement recorded on Sep 11, 2023.
By then, he suspected that Su was wanted by the police as he had repeatedly failed to contact him. In his statement, Liew lied that Su had not left any valuable properties in his possession.
He lied out of greed as he wanted the S$80,000 in commission expected from the sale of the cars, according to the prosecution.
Concerned about investigations, Liew then drove the four cars back to the multi-storey car park at Upper Boon Keng Road to get rid of them.
This car park was newly built, so the parking system was not ready.
The four cars were left there until the police found them in October 2023.
The authorities managed to trace the cars' movement to Roxy Square's car park, and found that a car dealer had applied for season parking for luxury cars there.
The dealer revealed that the four cars were in Liew's possession. The authorities then arrested Liew on Oct 5, 2023.
Liew lied to the police in one of Singapore's "biggest and more complex investigations", the prosecution said in seeking three to four months' jail for Liew.
"As a result of his provision of false information to the police and the movement of the cars, the police only managed to recover the properties almost one month later, and only upon receiving intelligence and expending significant effort in investigations.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Certis to stop tracking live location of frontline officers on MC after union intervention
Certis acknowledged the need to work with its union partners to review its current processes for home visits. PHOTO: LIANHE ZAOBAO SINGAPORE - Security company Certis has agreed to stop asking officers to share their live location if they are not home while on medical leave, following intervention by the Union of Security Employees (USE). 'Certis, which is unionised under USE, has agreed to do so, and there will be no location tracking of officers on medical leave,' Ms Shirley Loo, USE's executive secretary said in response to The Straits Times' queries. The decision came days after Certis' medical leave policy drew criticism after an employee's tip-off to the media. The Singapore-headquartered company, which also has operations in Australia and Qatar, recently mandated that employees on medical leave must remain in their declared residential addresses in Singapore. If found to be elsewhere during unannounced house visits, they would be asked to share their live location via Whatsapp, or attend video calls, said a current officer in his letter to the media. Requesting anonymity, the officer said: 'I personally experienced this policy when I was on sick leave and asked to share my live location... This created immense psychological stress and violated my right to privacy. I complied under fear of reprisal.' The officer added that he was at his parents' home when asked to share his location. An internal employee memo seen by ST showed that two Certis officers were dismissed in April 2025 for 'malingering', a term referring to the falsification of illness. Both officers were found to be overseas during a house visit, according to the memo. It added that Certis maintains a resolute stance when addressing disciplinary matters such as 'falsification of records, misconduct, sleeping on duty and cases of absent without leave'. In a statement to The Straits Times earlier on July 1, Certis clarified that these employees were not dismissed solely because they were not at home while on medical leave. 'Termination of employment is decided upon the severity of an officer's misconduct, such as proven malingering, and only taken as a last resort after an extensive and fair process,' said the company spokesperson. He added that Certis visits officers at their homes or the hospital only when they are on frequent or extended medical leave. 'In rare instances, we have asked officers to share their live location, but this is only done where necessary to ensure their well-being, purely voluntary and is always handled with care for privacy,' said the spokesperson. 'The intent of such follow-ups is not punitive. Rather, it is to understand if our officers require further support and also to help manage our manpower planning more effectively,' he added. Certis said the policy was also necessary to help maintain operational readiness and ensure fairness, especially as it faces challenges in recruiting and retaining officers 'The policy is not designed to penalise employees but to address instances of system misuse,' the spokesperson said, adding that a very small number of frontline officers were found to have misused their medical leave. 'There have been situations where officers took MCs to travel overseas. These irresponsible behaviours affect overall team resourcing and are unfair to colleagues who need to cover additional shifts,' said the spokesperson. But Certis also acknowledged the need to work with its union partners to review its current processes, and confirmed that it would stop the controversial policy of requesting live locations from officers on medical leave. Ms Loo from USE, an affiliate of the National Trades Union Congress, said the union is working with Certis to improve their internal communication so that its policies are clearly explained to officers. She added that the union does not condone any abuse of medical leave, which undermines trust and affects the wellbeing of other officers. 'We will work with Certis to manage any alleged abuse of medical leave cases through fair and proper processes,' she said. Both Certis and USE also agreed to co-organise regular monthly engagement sessions, providing a platform for ongoing dialogue with frontline officers. In response to ST's query, the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) on June 30 said there could be legitimate reasons as to why an employee might not be at home when ill, and this should not be taken as conclusive evidence of misconduct. The ministry said employers must not discourage employees from taking sick leave, a statutory entitlement. Employees should be able to take sick leave to address their health needs and use it responsibly. MOM also encouraged employers to regularly engage their employees to address concerns and ensure that their policies are well-communicated. 'This will help to build trust between employers and employees, and create a positive workplace culture.' Sharon Salim is a business correspondent at The Straits Times, with a focus on jobs, workplace culture and trends. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.


CNA
4 hours ago
- CNA
Trial begins for 3 women charged over pro-Palestinian 'procession' to Istana
SINGAPORE: The trial of three woman accused of organising a pro-Palestinian procession to the Istana last year began on Tuesday (Jul 1), with the defence flagging its intention to rely on similar events that had taken place previously without prosecution. Siti Amirah Mohamed Asrori, 30, and Mossammad Sobikun Nahar, 26, and Annamalai Kokila Parvathi, 36, are each accused of organising a procession that took place between 2pm and 3pm on Feb 2, 2024 along the perimeter of the Istana, a prohibited area. All three Singaporeans appeared in a joint trial to contest one charge each under the Public Order Act. Their lawyer Uthayasurian Sidambaram told the court that his clients were not aware that using the route to hand deliver letters to the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) - located in the Istana - was prohibited. This was based on a similar event of a smaller scale that had occurred weeks before his clients' alleged offences without prosecution, he said. INVESTIGATION OFFICER TESTIFIES On Feb 2, 2024, a group consisting of about 70 people - according to information earlier provided by the police - assembled outside Plaza Singapura before making their way to the Istana. Their intention, according to the defence, was to deliver letters on the Palestinian cause to the PMO, which had a mail drop-off point located at the rear gate of the Istana. Without any opening remarks, the prosecution opened its case before District Judge John Ng by calling its first witness, investigation officer Muhammad Faizal. The prosecution then played four closed-circuit television camera (CCTV) clips of footage capturing the movement of the group as it proceeded to the Istana. The first recording showed the group gathering outside the main entrance of Plaza Singapura from 1.51pm on Feb 2, 2024. The three women were seen interacting with members of the group, with Mossamad and another woman seen taking out umbrellas with watermelon designs from a box. The watermelon colours are the same as those on the Palestinian flag, and the fruit has become a symbol of Palestinian solidarity. Members of the group are then seen walking with the umbrellas open. Questioned by the prosecution, Mr Faizal said that the area outside Plaza Singapura where the group gathered was not part of the prohibited zone. However he noted that other areas immediately outside the Istana where the group was seen moving along their route were prohibited areas. These included paths and grass verges along Buyong Road, Cavenagh Road, and the space outside the main gate of the Istana, along Orchard Road. DEFENCE ARGUES ABOUT PREVIOUS INCIDENTS Part of the defence will hinge on previous alleged instances of people delivering letters to the Istana, Mr Uthayasurian told the court. During his cross-examination of Mr Faizal, the defence lawyer sought to admit evidence related to five such incidents. He highlighted one of the incidents, on Jan 11, 2024, where he said a group of 17 had hand-delivered letters also relating to the Palestinian cause to the PMO. No action had been taken against them, he said. Based on this event, his clients believed that delivering letters in a group was legal, Mr Uthayasurian said. The prosecution, represented by Deputy Public Prosecutor Sunil Nair, objected to the evidence being admitted. Mr Nair said there was insufficient evidence of these past incidents to make meaningful comparisons. He added that knowledge of a previous offence where action was not taken could not be a defence for committing a crime. Taking the prosecution's point, Judge Ng rejected the defence's application to admit the evidence. In his cross examination of Mr Faizal, Mr Uthayasurian also asked the police officer if there were alternative routes to deliver letters to the rear gate of the Istana without using the prohibited zone. Mr Faizal replied no. Mr Uthayasurian then asked how Mr Faizal had come to the conclusion that the group constituted a procession. He replied that the group was proceeding with a cause and had common elements that were visible to the public, such as the watermelon umbrellas. Asked if the group had displayed placards or had shouted slogans, Mr Faizal said no. The defence then put it to Mr Faizal that all the individuals walking on the route had a letter to hand deliver to the PMO. IO Faizal agreed. Mr Uthayasurian asked him if anyone involved in the group had been given a warning that the event could not go on without a permit, and Mr Faizal responded that no application or permit had been applied for. The trial will resume on Wednesday with the prosecution expected to call more witnesses. A person convicted of organising a procession that is prohibited can be jailed for up to six months, or fined up to S$10,000 (US$7,900), or both.


CNA
5 hours ago
- CNA
Thai PM Paetongtarn Shinawatra suspended over leaked phone call
Scroll up for the next video X Thai PM Paetongtarn Shinawatra suspended over leaked phone call