
Men Are Already Writing Off Ukraine's New Prime Minister
Some Ukrainian and Western observers have suggested that Svyrydenko isn't up to the task, in part because they characterize her as a mere 'loyalist' to Zelensky. She ' would do everything saluting, without fail,' an anonymous source in Zelensky's party told New Voice, a Ukrainian magazine. 'I don't believe she can reform our country,' Oleksiy Goncharenko, a member of Parliament, told me as he left a legislative session last week where he'd voted against her candidacy. 'If she tries to criticize the president, she will end up like General Zaluzhny,' he continued, referring to Ukraine's former army chief, whom Zelensky had dismissed after their differences became public.
The new prime minister is also facing overtly sexist criticism. 'Svyrydenko is exactly the girl who all of you, dear students, are familiar with from school: She always sits at the front desk' and 'carefully writes down the teacher's notes,' Oleh Posternak, a Ukrainian political strategist, wrote in a Facebook post that a national media site republished.
Very few women have led former Soviet states, and they have virtually all received this kind of disparagement from men. In 2018, Georgia elected its first female president, Salome Zourabichvili, who'd run as an independent. Before she even took office, political observers called her a 'finger puppet' of the billionaire leader of the ruling party, which had endorsed her. Today, many in Georgia credit Zourabichvili with uniting the opposition, and she condemned as 'totally falsified' a recent election won by the party of her former patron.
In Moldova, many discounted Maia Sandu, who became the country's first female president in 2020. Sandu's rival in the race, the pro-Russian incumbent, Igor Dodon, criticized her for not having children—a line of attack that MAGA would later take up against Kamala Harris in the 2024 U.S. presidential race. In Dodon's view, Sandu's lack of offspring meant that she was ' not interested in what is happening in the country.' Her opponents launched a misinformation campaign about her, much of which centered on the coronavirus pandemic. 'The fake news scared people that I would close schools, hospitals, and even churches,' Sandu told me at the time. Instead, Sandu invested in the country's medical and educational sectors, recruited European Union support for her agenda, and oversaw funding for the restoration of Orthodox churches. She has also been an effective reformer, working to root out the country's extensive corruption.
Anne Applebaum: The country that suffers whenever Russia schemes
Svyrydenko has a chance to leave a similar legacy in Ukraine. She has ample experience working with foreign governments, whose support is now existentially important to Ukraine. Early in her career, she served as the country's only permanent representative in China, bringing investment to her hometown of Chernihiv. As deputy prime minister, Svyrydenko negotiated billion-dollar reconstruction projects and trade agreements with the European Commission and Emirati leaders, as well as a $400 million investment from Turkish business interests. She also helped broker a natural-resources agreement with U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to create a joint investment fund to rebuild Ukraine.
Her appointment last week was part of a larger government reshuffle by Zelensky, who reassigned the previous prime minister, Denys Shmyhal, to the role of defense minister. In her new role, Svyrydenko will be tasked with rehabilitating the economy, boosting the domestic production of weapons, and strengthening Ukraine's armed forces, in part by securing financing from allies and the International Monetary Fund. One of her first actions as prime minister was to advance talks with the United States about a major potential investment in Ukraine's drone industry.
Nevertheless, and despite her strong résumé, Svyrydenko will have to contend with broad reservations in Ukraine about female leadership. According to a 2020 study conducted by the research group Rating, Ukrainians are more likely to prefer male political executives. Sometimes bad actors take advantage of this trust gap. Katerina Sergatskova, the executive director of the 2402 Foundation, which supports and trains Ukrainian journalists, has seen many Ukrainian women in public life become the target of harassment. 'It is political sexism. The attacks are well-organized campaigns,' Sergatskova told me. She has experienced such a campaign herself, which included death threats that forced her to stay out of Ukraine for a time.
Sergatskova noted that many in Ukraine are comparing Svyrydenko to the country's first female prime minister, Yulia Tymoshenko, who took office in 2005 and faced several corruption charges. One case resulted in a criminal conviction against her and two and a half years in prison, which the U.S. condemned as politically motivated. After the 2014 revolution, which ousted Ukraine's pro-Russian regime, the supreme court overruled Tymoshenko's conviction and ordered her release. Nevertheless, a large majority of the Ukrainian public still don't trust her.
Zelensky has fought against Ukraine's abiding suspicion of female politicians by promoting a new generation of them into leadership positions. In addition to picking Svyrydenko as prime minister, he also announced the appointment of Olha Stefanishyna as Ukraine's new special representative to the United States. The approach sets him apart from Vladimir Putin. Valentina Matviyenko, one of two women who serve on the Russian president's permanent security council, put on a Barbie-pink suit last year and derided feminism as 'an anti-male, anti-traditional-values movement.' Meanwhile, Russia bans and prosecutes feminist groups, and Putin tells Russian women to have 'minimum two children.'
For those who fear that Svyrydenko will be no more than a Zelensky loyalist, she is already facing her first test. This week, Zelensky tightened the administration's control over two independent agencies tasked with fighting government corruption. Sevgil Musayeva, the editor in chief of the newspaper Ukrainska Pravda, described the move as a step toward authoritarianism. 'Svyrydenko has a chance to act now and speak against this decision that is undermining democracy, which our soldiers are dying for,' Musayeva told me. 'But such action would require a lot of her courage.'
Two days after Zelensky reined in the government watchdogs, Svyrydenko met with G7 ambassadors in Kyiv to discuss anti-corruption policy —a subtle acknowledgment, perhaps, that the president had gone too far. But not everyone is convinced that Svyrydenko will be able to stand up to Zelensky. 'Officially, we are a parliamentary-presidential republic,' Goncharenko, the legislator, told me last week. 'I wish that were true. But we live in wartime; the decisions are made by the president.' Goncharenko isn't holding out hope that Svyrdrydenko will be able to make her own choices: 'If she contradicts his policy, he will simply fire her.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
18 minutes ago
- CNBC
Why the U.S.-EU trade agreement is unlikely to derail Europe's defense boom
Europe's defense stocks wobbled at the start of the week, as investors pored over the details — still lacking in some areas — of the framework trade agreement struck by the U.S. and European Union on Sunday. An initial concern was that a commitment by the EU to increase its purchases of U.S. goods, in particular military equipment, could come at the cost of the European defense firms that have staged a massive rally this year on expectations of a regional spending spree . Those include France's Thales , which fell 4.3% on Monday; Germany's Renk and Rheinmetall , which were down 5.1% and 3.3%, respectively, and Italy's Leonardo , which dipped 0.74%. Analysts told CNBC such fears were unfounded, and that European defense firms were set to remain the primary beneficiary of bigger national budgets in the coming years — particuarly since they lack the output capacity to meet all the region's needs themselves. According to a White House summary of the deal, the EU would make $600 billion in new investments in the U.S. by the end of President Donald Trump's term in 2028, in addition to the $100 billion that EU firms currently invest annually. It adds that the bloc "agreed to purchase significant amounts of U.S. military equipment," with Trump telling reporters that it would make "hundreds of billions of dollars" of arms purchases. In its own read-out, the EU said only that companies in the bloc "have expressed interest in investing at least $600 billion" in "various sectors" in the U.S. by 2029, specifying instead its intention to buy 700 billion euros ($810 billion) worth of U.S. liquified natural gas, oil and nuclear energy products, and 40 billion euros worth of AI chips. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen did not mention U.S. military purchases in her own statement on the deal , which comes two weeks after she put forward a proposed 2 trillion euro, seven-year budget including a fivefold increase from current spending on defense and space. Overall, the EU has this year outlined plans to mobilize around 800 million euros in new defense spending as part of a major rearmament push, including via loans and the relaxation of fiscal spending constraints. Lack of capacity The numbers mentioned in the trade agreement are a source of uncertainty, Peter Schaffrik, global macro strategist at RBC Capital Markets, told CNBC. "For defense in particular, this is relevant as we know that not all of the European spending can be done with European firms. Therefore, it is unclear whether the sums mentioned are in addition to what was planned, and whether the spending takes place over a short or long time frame (i.e. 10 years) is also highly uncertain." U.S. military suppliers such as Lockheed Martin , Northrop Grumman and Raytheon were already expected to significantly benefit from higher EU spending as they extend existing contracts and win new ones, despite calls by European bosses and leaders to keep as much funding as possible in the region. Dmitrii Ponomarev, exchange traded fund product manager at investment management firm VanEck, noted that Europe accounted for approximately 35% of all U.S. arms exports between 2020 and 2024, and that the U.S. supplied about 64% of arms imported by European NATO states. The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute has "raised concerns about the EU's ambitions for domestic defense manufacturers, citing historical difficulties in scaling up production, cost inflation from protectionist policies, and a persistent mismatch between supply and demand within the bloc," Ponomarev said. "U.S. defense contractors are likely to be the primary beneficiaries of this deal. While European defense firms initially reacted negatively to the news, they could still benefit in the long term, assuming the overall size of the European defense market grows faster than local companies can absorb." Push to spend local Capital will flow from private sector companies to where it's seeking the highest return if the U.S. makes its economy, markets and regulation more attractive than Europe, said Dean Turner, chief euro zone and U.K. economist at UBS Global Wealth Management's investment office. But from the current announcement, it remains hard to know what is new and additional or was going to happen anyway, he said. "In my mind, timing is the issue. If countries wish to invest in defense equipment, their procurement options at this stage are somewhat limited. In Europe we have lots of defende manufacturers, but probably not enough with capacity to deliver that kind of boost to output," he said. "Of course some money will flow to the U.S., it has to as it's the only provider of a number of key NATO-compliant defense systems. A lot will flow to the U.K. I'd still be of the view that it's Europe's intention, which [French President Emmanuel] Macron and others have been clear about, that much more of this spending has to be done locally." "So just because of a trade agreement — I'd hesitate to even call it a deal at this point — it won't be transformational in terms of U.S. defence." 'Smoke and mirrors' Simon Evenett, professor of geopolitics and strategy at IMD business school and co-chair of the World Economic Forum's Global Future Council on Trade and Investment, said the word "investment" is used "very loosely in all of the Trump trade deals," including the recent announcement of a $600 billion U.S. investment commitment by Saudi Arabia . "You unpack it and it involves spending on defense, investments by the private sector, it involves a wide range of things. What does this mean in the context of the EU-US deal? At this stage, who knows," Evenett said. The European Commission has signaled that the $600 billion refers to private sector investment, implying no additional spending by European governments beyond energy purchases, he said. "In short, this agreement involves a lot of smoke and mirrors ... this deal just buys time for further specifics to be articulated."
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Video appears to show Putin's bodyguards armed with a handheld anti-drone interceptor
A new video appears to show one of Putin's bodyguards equipped with an interceptor drone. The footage aligns closely with Putin's inspection of commanders at this year's Victory Day parade. The device closely resembles the Yolka, designed to crash into incoming attack drones. A newly surfaced video appears to show a member of Russian leader Vladimir Putin's security detail holding an interceptor drone while watching over his boss. The undated clip was posted on Tuesday by Serhii "Flash" Beskrestnov, a Ukrainian analyst known locally for his expertise on drone warfare. The video appears to depict Putin inspecting and greeting senior uniformed officers in a parade-like fashion at Moscow's Red Square — a sign that the footage was filmed during a Victory Day parade on May 9. In the footage, shot on the sidelines of the parade, a man can be seen in the foreground following Putin's movements while holding a device resembling a Russian Yolka interceptor drone and its launcher. The Yolka, fired from a handheld launcher, features four fins on its front and another four larger fins with propellers on the back. In the clip, similar fins with propellers can be seen on the device in the man's hands. The Yolka is a kinetic interceptor that's meant to fly into the path of an incoming first-person-view drone and destroy the attacking device by collision. Business Insider could not independently verify the authenticity of the footage. However, parts of the video align closely with a livestream of Putin meeting contingent commanders at this year's Victory Day parade. Several officers, such as a colonel of the Russian army and a colonel of the Russian airborne forces, are seen in both videos saluting and shaking hands with Putin. The man seen holding the device is also dressed consistently with what Putin's bodyguard detail was wearing on that day: with a suit, navy blue tie, and a red lanyard. Additionally, two of Putin's other bodyguards, seen in the clip of the apparent drone, can also be seen in official TV footage of the parade segment. The appearance of a Yolka drone in Putin's security detail coincides with Russia's heightened drone defenses at this year's parade, which Ukraine threatened to disrupt with uncrewed aerial system attacks. Long-range drone strikes that month had forced Moscow's four airports to close multiple times. The Yolka, however, is more suited to fighting lighter drones, and its appearance at the parade could indicate that Russia also prepared a contingency for a drone attack from within the city. While militaries have historically relied heavily on electronic warfare to counter uncrewed aerial threats, the recent rise of unjammable fiber-optic drones, which use cables instead of radio, has put greater emphasis on air defenses that use kinetic force. Read the original article on Business Insider


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Wednesday Briefing: U.K. May Recognize a Palestinian State
The U.K. will recognize a Palestinian state if there's no cease-fire Britain's prime minister, Keir Starmer, announced yesterday that his country would recognize the state of Palestine in September if Israel did not agree to a cease-fire with Hamas and halt a war that has brought starvation to Gaza. Starmer's announcement followed a similar one by France last week. Here's what it would mean if both countries recognized a Palestinian state. In addition to a cease-fire, Starmer said the Israeli government would have to agree not to annex the occupied West Bank and commit to a peace process that would result in a Palestinian state. Israel is highly unlikely to accept these demands. Starmer's government has faced political pressure as the British public has recoiled from images of starving children in Gaza. 'The situation is simply intolerable,' he said. Aid chaos: The desperation on the ground in Gaza can be seen from orbit. A satellite captured an image of hundreds of people crowding around an aid convoy in Khan Younis. More Gaza news: A U.N.-backed food security group said that 'the worst-case scenario of famine is playing out in Gaza,' and Gaza's health ministry announced that the death toll from the war had exceeded 60,000. Bezalel Smotrich, Israel's far-right finance minister, said that the country was 'closer than ever' to rebuilding settlements in Gaza. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a MAGA stalwart, described the situation in Gaza as a 'genocide,' breaking sharply with her party in an indication of the right's growing skepticism about Israel's actions. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.