logo
Calcutta HC grants interim stay on WB's OBC list notification till Jul 31

Calcutta HC grants interim stay on WB's OBC list notification till Jul 31

The bench warned that the executive cannot bypass legislative procedures, stating that half the process was followed and the rest done unilaterally
ANI General News
The Calcutta High Court on Monday gave an interim stay on the West Bengal government's recently issued notifications on the OBC list till July 31.
This order is a big setback for the Mamata government.
A division bench comprising Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty and Justice Raja Sekhar Mantha passed the interim order while hearing petitions challenging the state's classification of communities under the Other Backward Classes (OBC) category.
Judges said that necessary steps should be taken regarding the 66 communities belonging to the OBC category.
In this latest OBC notification there are listed 140 communities. However, OBC certificates issued before 2010 under the 1993 law remain valid for employment and admissions.
The bench warned that the executive cannot bypass legislative procedures, stating that half the process was followed and the rest done unilaterally.
Petitioners claimed the survey was flawed, with limited samples and negligible changes from the earlier list. The state admitted that college admissions and recruitment are stalled due to the case.
During the hearing, Solicitor General Ashok Chakraborty, representing the Centre, pointed out that the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC) had sought clarification from the state on how Muslim and OBC classifications were identified.
The NCBC minutes mentioned that several communities had converted from Hinduism to Islam, complicating census data.
Justice Rajasekhar Mantha raised the question to state, saying, "You have done half the work according to the 2012 OBC Act. Then you have gone back to the 1993 Act. Why is this? Why didn't you amend the 2012 Act? You have been providing benefits for the last 15 years. The law says that a survey has to be done after 10 years. That survey has not been done.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

After Parliament panel recommendations, Congress asks govt for law on reservation in private educational institutes
After Parliament panel recommendations, Congress asks govt for law on reservation in private educational institutes

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

After Parliament panel recommendations, Congress asks govt for law on reservation in private educational institutes

The Congress on Wednesday said the government should bring a new legislation in Parliament to allow 15 per cent reservations to Scheduled Castes , 7.5 per cent to Scheduled Tribes and 27 per cent to Other Backward Classes in private higher educational institutes after a Parliamentary Standing Committee on Education recommended it in its report. Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh said in a statement that the ball is now in the government's court, noting that it is no longer possible to ignore the demand of SCs, STs and OBCs for quota in private educational institutes. "The bipartisan Parliamentary Standing Committee on Education led by Digvijaya Singh has presented a report to Parliament today which advocates for reservations for SC, ST and OBC communities in private higher educational institutions (HEIs)," he said in a statement. Highlighting the key points of the report, he said Article 15(5) of the Indian Constitution, inserted by Manmohan Singh's Government in 2006 through the 93rd Amendment, allows the Government to mandate reservations for SC, ST and OBC students in private higher educational institutes. In May 2014, he said, in Pramati Educational and Cultural Trust versus Union of India, the Supreme Court of India upheld the validity of Article 15(5), making it clear that reservations are permissible in private higher educational institutes as well. Live Events "However, there is currently no law passed by Parliament which enforces Article 15(5) and mandates private HEIs to have reservations for SC, ST, and OBC community students. "The current representation of SCs, STs, and OBC communities in private educational institutions is abysmally low. The Committee looked at the student composition of three private Institutions of Eminence (IoE) recognised by the Union Government - 0.89 per cent of students are SC, 0.53 per cent of students are ST and 11.16 per cent of students are OBC," he noted. Ramesh said the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Education has therefore unanimously recommended that the Parliament pass a law implementing 15 per cent reservation for SC communities, 7.5 per cent reservation for ST communities, and 27 per cent reservation for OBC communities. "It is no longer possible to ignore the legitimate demand of SC, ST, and OBC communities for reservations in private higher educational institutes. In its 2024 Lok Sabha election 'Nyay Patra', the Indian National Congress had committed itself to bringing legislation to implement Article 15(5) of the Constitution of India in private educational institutions. The Parliamentary Committee has now given renewed impetus to this demand. "The ball is now in the Modi Government's court," the Congress leader said. The Congress has been making the demand for some time now and once again urged the government to bring a law in this regard. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has also been raising the demand for increasing the OBC quota after a caste census.

Let students dream
Let students dream

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Let students dream

A senior assistant editor with the Times of India, Mohammed Wajihuddin writes about Muslims, their issues, hopes and aspirations. Committed to upholding inclusiveness, communal amity and freedom to dissent and debate, he endeavours to promote peaceful existence. A passionate reader of Islam, he endeavours to save the faith from the clutches of the jihadists. An ardent lover of Urdu poetry, he believes words are the best weapons to fight jingoism. LESS ... MORE Students of AMU have called off their three-week strike, and those on a hunger strike ended it after VC Prof Naeema Khatun promised the students' union election in December. The demand to reduce the hiked fees has also been accepted. Khatun offered a glass of juice to the students on a hunger strike. This is neither the first time a VC visited the dharna spot and persuaded students to end the hunger strike by offering a glass of juice. Nor will it be the last. In its history of over a century, AMU has seen such situations several times. But one incident during the tenure of Dr Zakir Hussain as AMU's VC has gone down in the varsity's folklore. Former AMU Students' Union President and founder of Iqra International Educational Foundation Dr Abidullah Ghazi (1936-2021) did M A in Political Science from AMU–former Vice-president M Hamid Ansari was his classmate in the 1960s. Abidullah came from a family of noted Islamic scholars and freedom fighters. It was his great-grandfather, Abdullah Ansari, whom Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, AMU's founder, invited to set up the Sunni Theology Department at Mohammedan Anglo Oriental College. MAO College metamorphosed into AMU in 1920. Ansari also led the funeral prayer of Sir Syed in 1898. Abidullah Ghazi, in his Urdu autobiography 'Jahad-e-Musalsal: Aligarh Se Aligarh Tak,' recalls an interesting incident from his student days on the AMU campus. During his tenure as AMU's VC, Zakir Husain reduced the Muharram holidays, enraging Shia students. One student leader named Jaffer Mehdi Tabaan sat on a hunger strike to protest this decision. The Students' union meeting, attended by both Shia and Sunni students, decided to show solidarity with Tabaan as his condition worsened. Interestingly, even Zakir Sahab attended this meeting. Student leader Saeed Anda (Egg), who was notorious for coining colourful terms and slogans, gave a fiery speech in which he used a line that became memorable: 'Afsos hai ke is Jamia mein Zakir Hussain Zikre Hussain ko mana karta hai (It is regrettable that in this university a Zakir Husain is stopping pupils from commemorating Hussain).' In Muharram, especially in the initial 10 days, Shias intensely mourn the martyrdom of the Prophet's grandson Imam Hussain at Karbala (Iraq), and Zakir Sahab had substantially reduced the holidays for this commemoration. His argument was that the students should commemorate Hussain's martyrdom by attending classes. After giving a good speech on the life of Imam Hussain, Zakir Sahab went to meet the student who was on a hunger strike. He admired Tabaan's spirit and persuaded him to end the strike by offering him a glass of juice. That was Zakir Sahab, whom PM Pandit Nehru and education minister Maulana Azad had sent to Aligarh to save it from the stormy winds which threatened it in the aftermath of the partition. Zakir Sahab injected hope, confidence among the AMU community and saved the chaman of Sir Syed, which faced an existential crisis. Another interesting anecdote from Zakir Sahab's time as AMU's VC is that once a student delegation went to meet him with a complaint. The sherwani of one of the students in the delegation was unbuttoned. Zakir Sahab stood up from his chair, came closer to the student and spoke to him softly while buttoning his Sherwani. Such small gestures won the hearts of the students. To a VC, students are like his or her children. Youth is the time when we humans want to change the world. Blessed with boundless energy, many of the youth become idealists. This is a phase when they dream, create, experiment, commit mistakes and also disrupt the most. Let the students dream, create and commit mistakes. Post-script: I just saw a video clip of a student who was on a hunger strike. He claims he was offered juice by the VC. He took a sip but did not gulp it. He says the boys and girls who were on strike are not happy with the notice they received after the strike was called off. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.

Trump govt considering ban on Muslim Brotherhood—Is the West's romance with Islamism over?
Trump govt considering ban on Muslim Brotherhood—Is the West's romance with Islamism over?

The Print

time2 hours ago

  • The Print

Trump govt considering ban on Muslim Brotherhood—Is the West's romance with Islamism over?

Last week, almost no one noticed when Secretary of State Marco Rubio said he was considering a ban on the Muslim Brotherhood, describing them as 'a grave concern'. The Islamist organisation has long been proscribed in Egypt, Russia, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and most recently , in Jordan. Then, in 2003, a police search at Heathrow Airport found $340,000 packed in his hand baggage—a little over three kilos of neat, new $100 bills. Libya had paid the money to assassinate then-Saudi crown prince Abdullah bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, Alamoudi would admit at trial . Further investigation revealed the AMC was routing funds to Hamas and Hezbollah, the FBI said. For a time, Abdurahman Alamoudi flew with the angels , flitting across the landscape of the most powerful city on earth: Friend to America's most powerful, he served as Goodwill Ambassador for American Muslims for the State Department, and his American Muslim Council or AMC was described by the Federal Bureau of Investigation as 'the most mainstream Muslim group in the United States'. Together with President George Bush, he had mourned the victims of 9/11 at the Washington National Cathedral. Later, he opened the door for an Imam to read the opening invocation for a session of Congress. The Brotherhood, though, is also a critical ally of the nation which just donated President Donald Trump a Boeing 747, and has deep business ties to his family. For decades, Qatar has used the Brotherhood as a means to project influence across the Middle East, even providing Hamas with its headquarters and funding. Trump had promised to ban the Brotherhood in 2019, but the plan disappeared into the sands. For Trump, acting against the Brotherhood could offer a small, but politically significant prize: A weapon to smear the pro-Palestine organisations criticising his Israel policies, and rally his core White nationalist supporters around Islamophobia. The consequences of a ban, however, will stretch across the world, dramatically impacting the Islamist political landscape. The Global Brotherhood The Muslim Brotherhood was set up in 1928 by schoolteacher Hassan al-Banna, as the anti-colonial movement began to gather in Egypt. Frustrated at the religious establishment's failure to resist cultural Westernisation in cities like Cairo, al-Banna preached for religious revival in coffee shops, small mosques, and on the streets. Egypt's liberation, he insisted, could be brought about only by building a society based on the Sharia—not imports like liberalism or socialism. Foreign students studying in Cairo carried the message across the Islamic world, historian Lorenzo Vidino writes. From 1940 to 1944, as the Second World War raged, British diplomats sought to buy off the Brotherhood. Scholar James Heyworth-Dunne wrote in 1950 that al-Banna offered to end anti-British mobilisation in exchange for $40,000 and a car. The talks went nowhere. According to scholar Martyn Frampton, the Middle East Intelligence Committee identified Brotherhood operatives in Sudan, Algeria, Amman, Beirut, Aleppo, Saudi Arabia, Yemen and India in 1941. Even as the Brotherhood's special squads began using terrorism to eliminate their rivals, al-Banna reached out to diplomats from the United Kingdom and the United States, proposing a joint front against Communism. The relationship, however, proved unsustainable. In 1947, Brotherhood member Rifat Abd al-Rahman al-Naggar, an Air Force officer, bombed the King George Hotel in Ismailia. The assassination of Prime Minister Mahmud Fahmi al-Nuqrashi led Egypt to ban the Brotherhood, while al-Banna himself was murdered by secret police agents in February 1949. The Egyptian revolution of 1952, which brought President Gamal Abdel Nasser and the Free Officers movement to power, was greeted with joy by the Brotherhood. The Islamists had fought together with the Free Officers in Gaza against Israel and helped plot the downfall of King Farouk bin Ahmed Fuad's monarchy. The Brotherhood's insistence on Sharia, though, rapidly alienated them from Nasser, and the movement was crushed. Far from home, though, the Brotherhood found supporters willing to offer it refuge and resources. Al-Banna's successor, Sayyid Qutb, who studied in the US on a fellowship, returned repelled by the relative sexual freedoms of American women, and jazz, which he described as the music of 'savage Bushmen'. Egyptian Islamist leader Said Ramadan travelled with a delegation of anti-Communist clerics to meet with US President Dwight Eisenhower in 1953. The following year, he was granted asylum in Germany. Following this, French journalist Caroline Fourest has written that Ramadan emerged in Pakistan. Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan of Pakistan wrote the preface to one of Ramadan's books and gave him a slot on national radio. Ensconced in Karachi, Ramadan also became close to Abul A'la Maududi, who had founded the Brotherhood's Indian wing, the Jamaat-e-Islami. Large parts of Maududi's work, interestingly, are reproduced verbatim in Brotherhood literature. According to Framton, al-Banna himself wrote to Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, describing the accession of Hyderabad and Kashmir to India as an occupation of Islamic lands. Even as these events unfolded, Western intelligence services had begun rebuilding their contacts with the Brotherhood, journalist Ian Johnson revealed. The US and the UK had already started recruiting the remnants of the Muslim legion, hoping to use them against the Soviet Union. Also read: India's amphibious operations depend on contingencies. Can the Armed Forces adapt? The Brotherhood in America Later, some commentators would charge the Brotherhood with deception, arguing that it claimed to represent moderation while maintaining ties with jihadist terror. This, in Alamoudi's case, is demonstrably untrue. He publicly supported Hamas and Hezbollah, and demanded the release of Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, the Egyptian cleric jailed for plotting to blow up New York landmarks. In one phone call intercepted by the FBI, he claimed al-Qaeda's 1998 bombings in East Africa were wrong, but only because 'many African Muslims have died and not a single American died'. Yet, for reasons that have never been explained, Alamoudi worked with the Defence Department to recruit Imams to meet the religious needs of Muslims in the United States military. President George Bush, Senator Hillary Clinton, and Senator Cynthia McKinney all accepted campaign donations from Alamoudi. This, even though the AMC represented no significant group of Muslims. Foundations for enmeshing well-funded Brotherhood front-organisations across the West were laid decades before Alamoudi and the AMC emerged. Khurshid Ahmad, among Maududi's earliest followers—and later Senator, and Minister of Planning under General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq's regime—was assigned the task of propagating the Brotherhood's message in the West around 1968, Vidino records. Living in the UK, Khurshid and his colleagues from the Brotherhood began receiving funds from Saudi Arabia in 1973. This would flower into the Islamic Council of Europe (ICE), which operated from London's posh Belgravia neighbourhood. In 1977, at a conference in Lugano, Khurshid and other ICE leaders set up the Brotherhood's first operation in the US, the International Institute of Islamic Thought. From at least 1991, the Brotherhood had an informal manifesto guiding its operations in the US, advocating for creating networks of decentralised organisations. These efforts were driving a less genteel story, too. Like generations of jihadists, the young fighters who thronged to Pakistan to combat the Soviet Union in Afghanistan were drawn in by the Brotherhood's words and networks. Jihadist Abdullah Azzam, scholar Thomas Hegghammer has written, not only laid the foundations for Osama Bin Laden's al-Qaeda, but also for the Lashkar-e-Taiba. Also read: Washington must respect New Delhi's redlines. And repair India-US strained ties The best of enemies Following 9/11, Western diplomatic and intelligence services severed all contact with the Brotherhood. But the stand-off was not to last long. In 2006, journalist Martin Bright revealed that the UK's foreign office was considering reopening ties with figures it described as 'moderate Islamists'. The British government paid for Brotherhood ideologue Yusuf al-Qaradawi to attend a conference in Turkey, and funded two Islamist youth organisations at home, the Federation of Islamic Student Societies and Young Muslim Organisation. This process gathered momentum in the coming years, as the UK concluded that the war in Afghanistan was unwinnable. In 2011, the Foreign Office paid for Taliban leader Abdul Salaam Zaeef to attend a conference in London, and he was then privately hosted for a hunting vacation in Scotland. Leaked diplomatic correspondence reveals, Frampton and Ehud Rosen write, that American authorities were more hawkish in their public statements on the Brotherhood. Simultaneously, they intensified efforts to identify so-called moderates who would reject violence and thus hollow out the jihadist threat from within. The Brotherhood also proved a key ally in the long struggle to dethrone the regime of President Bashar al-Assad in Syria. The Alamoudi case wasn't the only one to show the perils of that path. The prosecution of the Holy Land Foundation—alleged to have channelled millions of dollars to Hamas—threw up disturbing evidence of connivance by linked organisations named as unindicted coconspirators: the Council on American-Islamic Relations and the North American Islamic Trust. The case collapsed in 2007, but documents released during the trial established deep links between these networks and the Brotherhood, Zeyno Baran notes. Across the Middle East, the Brotherhood's significance has appeared to wane, as new jihadist groups like the Islamic State have emerged, and the threat from al-Qaeda to the West has diminished. The ideas of the Brotherhood and its networks, however, continue to provide the bedrock for Islamist movements across the world, holding up a vast and complex system of ideological persuasion and fundraising. Banning the Brotherhood, as well as sister organisations like the Jamaat-e-Islami, won't end terrorism. To misuse the issue to smear Muslim communities as a whole—a real danger under Trump—holds out the threat of alienating millions of believers at least as hostile to terrorism as the rest of their nations. The decision will, however, signal the end of a toxic romance between Islamism and the West, and make clear that ideologies propagating hate and violence cannot be tolerated in democracies. Praveen Swami is contributing editor at ThePrint. His X handle is @praveenswami. Views are personal. (Edited by Prasanna Bachchhav)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store