Ian Hislop calls arrest of man holding Private Eye cartoon at Gaza protest ‘mind-boggling'
Jon Farley was picked up by police at a silent demonstration in Leeds on Saturday, which he described as a 'pretty terrifying and upsetting experience', for holding a sign that made a joke about the government's proscription of the group Palestine Action from the last issue of the fortnightly satirical magazine.
'[Police officers] picked me up, grabbed me, and took me to the side, and I ended up sitting on the pavement,' the 67-year-old said.
'I think that's when they said something about the placard. And I said: 'Well it's a cartoon from Private Eye. I can show you. I've got the magazine in my bag,' by which time, they were putting me in handcuffs.'
He was then arrested under section 12 of the Terrorism Act 2000, which prohibits support for a proscribed organisation.
'I thought, this is all a bit surreal,' said Farley, who had never been arrested before. 'I clearly wasn't any kind of physical threat. There was no need for them to act in the way they did.
'By this point I was in the van, so I wasn't going anywhere. I said: 'You take the handcuffs off and I'll show you the magazine because what you're doing is just daft.''
In the meantime police found out his name from his senior bus pass and he was taken to a police station.
Six hours later, after being questioned by counter-terror police, he was allowed to leave, under bail conditions that he attended no 'Palestine Action' rallies, which, as he pointed out, he had never done and would be illegal under terrorism laws anyway.
On Monday morning, a counter-terror officer called to tell him he would face no further action.
'So I said: 'If I go on another demo and I hold up that cartoon again, does that mean I will be arrested or not?' And she said: 'I can't tell you, it's done on a case-by-case basis.''
He said: 'There's been no apology, no explanation. It's this murky lack of clarity.'
Farley, who was left with minor bruising and cuts to his arms, said he was 'frustrated and angry' after the experience. 'I was just very shocked at first and then relieved, but now I'm thinking, hang on a minute, what happened here?
'What really concerns me is the whole atmosphere of intimidation.'
Farley, who had attended a number of peaceful demonstrations in the past, pointed out on the day he was arrested, 32 Palestinians were shot by the Israel Defense Forces in Gaza while queuing for aid, a subject referenced on his placard.
'I saw it in Private Eye and I thought: 'That's really well thought-out. It's got a bit of nuance about it.' But I don't think the cops do nuance.
'I found out later somebody said to one of the police: 'You know you can buy Private Eye in the newsagent just next to the van you're putting him in, are you going to arrest Ian Hislop?'
'So they're coming out with all this guff about: 'If it's in print, it's fine. But if you carry it on the demo [it's illegal].' That sounds to me like the police making up the law.'
Hislop, speaking from Private Eye's London office – having not been arrested – said the cartoon was 'quite blatantly an example of freedom of speech on the subject of a government policy'.
The editor of the 63-year-old satirical magazine said: 'I did think it was mind-boggling. I mean, ludicrous. He obviously couldn't believe it and the immediate response in the office was that someone said: 'Well, the jokes have been criminal for ages.''
He said the cartoon was 'actually a very neat and funny little encapsulation about what is and isn't acceptable, and it's a joke about – I mean, it's quite a black joke – but about the hypocrisies of government approach to any sort of action in Gaza.
'So it's not difficult to understand. It's critical, but it is quite clearly a joke. Seems to me absolutely extraordinary that someone could be arrested for holding it up.'
He added it was 'disappointing' that the arresting police officers did not appear to have heard of Private Eye. 'That's really depressing, isn't it? That's probably the most appalling thing,' he joked.
West Yorkshire police said: 'We are sorry that the man involved is unhappy with the circumstances of this arrest. As this is a new proscribed organisation, West Yorkshire police is considering any individual or organisational learning from this incident.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
STV News
26 minutes ago
- STV News
Teen who wanted to carry out 'Doomsday' mass shooting at school to be sentenced
An Edinburgh teenager who wanted to carry out a mass shooting at his own school is to be sentenced at the High Court in Glasgow. Felix Winter, now aged 18, repeatedly spoke about carrying out an attack at his secondary, referring to the day he would 'clear it out' as 'Doomsday'. Jurors previously heard the teenager 'idolised' the killers behind the Columbine High School massacre in Colorado in the United States in 1999, which saw 12 students and a teacher gunned down. A major police investigation began in the summer of 2023 after a photo circulated on social media showing Winter at school in full combat gear, carrying an imitation gun, which caused panic among pupils and parents. He had already been referred to a UK-wide anti-terrorism programme aimed at preventing radicalisation. He also held racist and pro-Nazi views. Winter pleaded guilty to a breach of the peace and a charge under the Terrorism Act. His offending took place between June 2022 and July 2023. Defence KC Shelach McCall told the court in March that a professor who assessed her client found a 'serious link' between his autism and his behaviour, arguing it was his condition – rather than extremism – that drove his obsession with school shootings. Ms McCall said Winter had made a 'marked improvement' since his offending. She said: 'He has expressed regret and recognises that he didn't previously appreciate how his behaviour was impacting on others. 'He accepts in the context of his plea of guilty and his remarks about school shootings in 2022, him dressing in that costume and carrying that in a school would generate alarm to those who came upon it but this was not his intent.' Winter will appear at the High Court in Glasgow on Wednesday, July 30. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
I went out to challenge the law used to ban Palestine Action. Would I be arrested too?
I packed a toothbrush, books and a notepad in a small rucksack, took my laptop from the house and hid it, gave my phone to a friend to look after and put a 'bust card' (lawyers' details and legal advice) in my back pocket. I wasn't certain I would be arrested, but I wanted to be ready. Then I stepped, with other, much braver people into a legal labyrinth. So broad are sections 12 and 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000, and so madly oppressive is the government's order applying it to the proscribed protest group Palestine Action that it is difficult, when contesting it, to tell which side of the law you might be on, and what the response of the authorities might be. When people who oppose all forms of violence, who are trying to stop war and terrorism, are arrested on terrorism charges, nothing makes sense any more. In some places, the police have gone berserk. South Wales police, for example, arrested, among others, two women of 75 and 80 who were sitting peacefully in Cardiff, holding signs the officers alleged were supportive of Palestine Action. They used the extended detention powers the act permits, denied one of them essential medicines, broke open the doors of their homes, seized not only electronic devices but also books about Palestine and a Palestinian flag and appeared to test the food in their kitchens for radiation. Obviously, if someone has been arrested under the Terrorism Act they must be planning an atrocity, perhaps cooking up a dirty bomb (doubtless a vegan one, to boot). West Yorkshire police arrested a man in Leeds for holding a cartoon from Private Eye satirising the government's ban. Armed police in Kent threatened to arrest a woman for holding a Palestinian flag, claiming that this, too, contravened the Terrorism Act. An officer told her: 'Mentioning freedom of Gaza, Israel, genocide, all of that all come under proscribed groups, which are terror groups that have been dictated by the government.' At least he got the dictated bit right. Other forces seem to have decided they had better things to do. Or maybe, just maybe, they've determined that our freedom of expression, enshrined in the Human Rights Act, overrides the ban on free expression applied through the Terrorism Act. The two are in direct conflict, leaving the police as confused as we are. On such judgments the future course of your life might hang: you can receive a 14-year sentence for expressing 'an opinion or belief that is supportive of a proscribed organisation', if you are 'reckless as to whether a person to whom the expression is directed will be encouraged to support' the group. Where the boundaries of this remarkably vague law lie is anyone's guess. Our local force, Devon and Cornwall, arrested eight people in Truro for holding signs they suspected to be supportive of Palestine Action. So when we informed the deputy chief constable and our local police station that we were planning to stage a similar protest, we had reason to expect arrests. It might sound crazy to invite the police to your protest when the stakes are so high, but there is a long tradition of such accountable actions. Protest is effective when other people can see you mean it: that you are prepared to stand for your principles – all the way to prison, if necessary. The most powerful response to an oppressive and unjust law, which limits freedom of speech, is to challenge it, openly and without fear. Around the country, many brave people have done so. Some belong to a remarkable breed of older dissidents. The woman I sat beside while we held our signs in the marketplace is an 80-year-old retired nurse called Mary Light. She is a gentle soul with a steely determination to see good done that puts me to shame. Rather than enjoying an easy retirement, she has been arrested 11 times for environmental and Palestinian causes. She has stepped up to oppose genocide while the UK government's contribution to international law consists of approving the sale of lethal weapons to Israel and fighting in court for this sale to continue. All while issuing meaningless homilies about maybe not using those weapons to kill quite so many unarmed civilians, if you would be ever so kind? My own placard sought to test the free speech implications of the law. It stated 'Palestine Action are protestors, not terrorists'. As I see it, this is simply an expression of opinion: a critique of an illiberal and draconian order. How the police and courts might see it is another matter. One person's legitimate expression of opinion can, it now seems, be another person's support for terrorism. Similar opinions have been expressed by the UN human rights commissioner, Volker Türk, and by MPs in parliament. In fact, when she was in opposition, the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, author of the ban on Palestine Action, chastised the Tories for doing what she has now done. She told them, 'the government are extending powers that we would normally make available just for serious violence and terrorism to peaceful protest'. She argued that the Tories' proposed legislation did not respect 'historic freedoms to protest'. Could we be arrested for making the same point? Two police officers arrived, loitered without intent, then dispersed before causing a public nuisance. I remain free, but aware that next time the outcome might be different. People calling for peace risk arrest and prosecution under the Terrorism Act, while the state terrorists murdering civilians every day are protected from our free speech. Misquoting Voltaire, people have often noted that 'those who believe absurdities commit atrocities'. But it is also true that those who facilitate atrocities become absurd. You do not need to support Palestine Action to note that they were seeking to uphold international law by trying to stop weapons from being supplied to a state committing genocide. Some were acquitted on this basis. Why has the UK government decreed they are terrorists? Perhaps because, by supplying weapons, it is complicit in that genocide. If you can turn the moral dial 180 degrees, maybe you can keep believing you are the good guys. The order the police are struggling to interpret is as ridiculous as it is oppressive. Oppression and absurdity are never far apart. George Monbiot is a Guardian columnist On Tuesday 16 September, join George Monbiot, Mikaela Loach and other special guests at the Guardian's climate assembly, live at the Barbican in London and livestreamed globally. Book tickets here or at
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Jon Burrows: UUP's newest MLA carries on tradition of men in uniform
Jon Burrows is the newest Stormont MLA for the Ulster Unionist Party (UUP), but he is not the only former police officer the party has tried to attract News NI understands the party approached Jim Gamble, the former head of the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Command Centre in the United Kingdom, to be its North Down candidate in the Westminster election in July immediately turned down the Gamble declined to comment when approached by the BBC. Instead, the party went for the former Army officer Colonel Tim Collins, who failed to win the notoriously told the BBC at the election count that the people of North Down "don't want someone who doesn't live in Northern Ireland"."They're interested in local politics," he added."They're not interested in cutting VAT, they're not interested in international affairs. "They're interested in potholes and hedges."He had already complained during the campaign that he could insure his Rolls Royce in England, where he lived, for what it costs to insure a Ford Fiesta in north the recruitment of Jon Burrows to replace Colin Crawford, who lasted less than a year in the North Antrim Stormont seat, carries on a tradition within the UUP of seeking to attract oven-ready high(ish) profile representatives who are no strangers to of the past four leaders of the UUP have been:Steve Aiken, a former Royal Navy submarine commanderDoug Beattie, a former Royal Irish Regiment officer well known for his service in Iraq and AfghanistanMike Nesbitt, a former TV news presenterIn addition, one of its nine current assembly members, Andy Allen, was seriously injured while serving in the Army in leader Robbie Butler is a former firefighter. The policy of bringing in high profile people from other walks of life is not entirely unique to the example, Sinn Féin now has an MP, Pat Cullen, better known for her role as boss of a UK-wide nursing trade the UUP unarguably is way out in front for bringing in candidates already well known in other fields. So why?"There is something that attracts seniority to the UUP," says former party staffer Michael Shilliday. "In the old days that was just "big house unionism". "Maybe it's still that."But really it is what the 'decent people' shtick from 2005 was all about."That's why these people see themselves reflected in the UUP."That is a reference to a disastrous 2005 general election campaign slogan: "Decent People Vote Ulster Unionist". I remember being in the BBC office in Stormont one morning when the party press officer walked in introducing a man he said was a former Royal Navy submarine what seemed like no time at all, Steve Aiken, to use the hackneyed line, went from the command of one sinking ship to he stepped down, he was replaced by Doug Beattie who promised a "union of people", before things the latest changes is Mike Nesbitt, another man who had no grounding in elected politics when he swapped his news anchor role at UTV for an even hotter seat at quitting the leadership the first time, following a disappointing assembly election, he is because there was no other obvious candidate and partly because he represented the best chance of salvation for a party which is rapidly using up its quota of last to former UUP director of communications Alex Kane "it's a hangover from the 1920s when the Ulster Unionists saw themselves as the party of service". "They still do," he adds."Service to the people, service to the country and for them that is represented by a uniform."In a way, Mike Nesbitt is the same. "He was seen in people's living rooms on television each night and that is a form of service too. "The problem is times have changed."But it also reflects a lack of candidates from those already within the ranks who have the track record necessary to win elections and that, long-term, is a problem for the once mighty party of unionism.
