Bill regulating transgender Arkansans' bathroom use heads to House despite public pushback
Family Council attorney Stephanie Nichols (left) and Rep. Mary Bentley, R-Perryville, present Senate Bill 486 to the House Committee on State Agencies and Governmental Affairs on Monday, April 14, 2025. (Tess Vrbin/Arkansas Advocate)
The Arkansas House will consider a bill denounced by advocates for transgender Arkansans on Wednesday, the final day of the 2025 legislative session.
Senate Bill 486 would allow Arkansans to sue for damages if they encounter someone in a bathroom, changing room, shelter or correctional facility who does not align with the 'designated sex' of the restroom. The bill narrowly passed the House Committee on State Agencies and Governmental Affairs on Tuesday after 14 people spoke against it and no member of the public spoke for it.
'The intention here is to make it so that trans people cannot exist in public,' said Maricella Garcia, Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families' race equity director. 'If you cannot use the restroom, you cannot go out in public.'
Garcia was among several people who said that enforcing SB 486 would require policing and making assumptions about people's bodies and likely lead to frivolous lawsuits costing taxpayer money.
SB 486 is among many bills related to transgender Arkansans that Rep. Mary Bentley, R-Perryville, has sponsored in the past few legislative sessions, including one the Senate passed Tuesday pertaining to gender-affirming healthcare.
It's not good legislation, it's not good for our community and it's not good Christian values.
– Marie Mainard O'Connell, a Presbyterian pastor speaking against SB 486
Bentley sponsored Act 317 of 2023, which prohibits K-12 students from using bathrooms that do not match their gender assigned at birth and requires schools to have a 'reasonable accommodation,' such as a single-occupancy bathroom, for those unable or unwilling to do so.
Similarly, SB 486 states that shelters, correctional facilities and other entities must take 'reasonable steps' to comply with the policy; Bentley said signage indicating who is allowed and not allowed in a space would be sufficient, and she said SB 486 is meant to be an extension of Act 317.
Bentley also supported Act 619 of 2023, which initially would have criminalized entering and remaining in bathrooms and locker rooms that do not match an adult's gender assigned at birth if children are present. After hours of public pushback before the House Judiciary Committee, that legislation was amended to limit potential criminal charges and prosecutions to adults present in those spaces with criminal intent.
The conservative Family Council worked with lawmakers from both political parties to formulate the amendment to Act 619 two years ago. On Tuesday, Family Council attorney Stephanie Nichols said SB 486 would close 'loopholes' in the law to more closely regulate who can enter gender-specific bathrooms.
Evelyn Rios Stafford, a Washington County justice of the peace and Arkansas' first openly transgender elected official, spoke against Act 619 two years ago and against SB 486 Tuesday.
'We had a compromise that worked for everybody,' she said. '…Everybody walked away feeling that that was a bill that everybody can live with, and now I feel like that compromise and that promise is being broken.'
Arkansas House committee changes controversial public bathroom bill
Nichols and Bentley repeatedly said SB 486 protects women's and girls' privacy, the same argument supporters of Act 317 and Act 619 used. Rep. Cindy Crawford, R-Fort Smith, was the House sponsor of Act 619 and said Tuesday that not passing SB 486 'opens the door' to men entering women's bathrooms to commit sexual violence.
Several opponents of SB 486 said not only that transgender women in bathrooms are not a threat, but also that they are often survivors of sexual violence and that the bill does nothing to prevent such things.
'[This bill] exploits my trauma to push a political agenda that's rooted not in facts but in fear,' Brittany Stockton said. '…The idea that predators are pretending to be trans to attack people in bathrooms is a harmful myth.'
Multiple speakers also said transgender people face a higher risk of identity-based violence and harassment than other demographics. Marie Mainard O'Connell, a Presbyterian pastor and mother of a transgender teen, said she fears one day having to conduct a funeral service for a transgender person dead by suicide or targeted violence.
'If I have to perform that service, you're getting an invitation,' she told the committee.
Crawford said SB 486 is not intended to harm anyone and her 'heart hurts' for transgender people who feel targeted.
'Why should we protect this minority, trans people, when we are putting in danger young women and women in bathrooms that are designated for their sex?' Crawford said.
O'Connell responded to Crawford's statement by reminding the committee that one of Jesus' parables in the Bible involves a shepherd leaving 99 sheep behind to search for one that was missing.
'Please vote no on this,' O'Connell said. 'It's not good legislation, it's not good for our community and it's not good Christian values.'
Rep. Nicole Clowney, D-Fayetteville, said transgender people who no longer physically resemble their gender assigned at birth would be at risk of violence if the law requires them to use the bathroom that does not align with their identity.
Bentley said Clowney was 'way out there on a limb' and reiterated the 'reasonable steps' portion of SB 486.
'We have two sexes, male and female, no matter how [many] drugs you take or the kind of surgery you have,' Bentley said.
She introduced the bill to the committee Monday, but was asked to pull it down before public comment. House Minority Leader Andrew Collins, D-Little Rock, asked for an analysis of the bill's fiscal impact, expressing concerns that public buildings would incur significant costs in order to meet the accommodation standards in SB 486.
The fiscal impact statement from the Department of Finance and Administration asserts that SB 486 will not require the expenditure of state funds or 'the construction or modification of any state facilities.'
Rios Stafford disputed this and said not all government buildings in Arkansas have single-occupancy restrooms.
'Any county, any city that wants to do the right thing by their citizens is going to have to spend money and is going to have to spend a lot of money, and we know how much retrofitting a building costs, especially if it's an older building that was grandfathered in before the Americans with Disabilities Act,' Rios Stafford said.
The Arkansas Senate passed SB 486 along party lines April 2.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
On Tuesday, the Senate sent a bill to the governor's desk that would broaden the scope of a 2023 law that created civil liability for doctors who provide gender-affirming health care to transgender minors.
The Protecting Minors from Medical Malpractice Act, or Act 274 of 2023, created a 15-year window for adults to sue physicians for 'any physical, psychological, emotional, or physiological injury' incurred while the adult received hormone replacement therapy, puberty blockers or gender-affirming surgeries as a minor.
Bentley sponsored both Act 274 and its proposed amendment, House Bill 1916, which would add mental health care providers to the law's list of medical professionals liable for 'gender-affirming intervention.' She has repeatedly said gender-affirming medical care is harmful to minors; physicians who treat transgender children said otherwise during the 2022 trial over a Bentley-sponsored 2021 law that sought to ban this care.
The Senate Judiciary Committee passed HB 1916 Monday night. Bentley told the committee that gender-affirming care consists of 'grotesque experiments that stunt and suppress a child's natural development in service of scientific fantasies.'
All 29 Republican senators voted to send HB 1916 to Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders' desk Tuesday while all six Democrats voted against it.
Sen. Clarke Tucker, D-Little Rock, was the only member of the Judiciary Committee to vote against HB 1916 Monday. He said he agreed with public testimony that the bill's use of the phrase 'gender-affirming intervention' is too broad.
Psychologist Lindsey Thomas said HB 1916 would hold therapists liable for using transgender minors' preferred names and pronouns as 'gender-affirming intervention'; Bentley agreed that the bill would preclude this from happening.
Thomas also said HB 1916 would increase the costs of providers' medical malpractice insurance and increase wait times for all children to see a therapist in Arkansas.
The bill mentions hormones and puberty blockers, but the six health care professionals that opposed the bill Monday said mental health care providers do not prescribe these medications. Nine more people had signed up to speak against the bill but did not get to speak due to the committee's time constraints.
'We don't know if or when an issue of gender dysphoria might show up,' said Garry Teeter, a counselor and a Christian pastor. 'We may be working with that child for months or years, and then this comes up in therapy… At that point, it would be detrimental and harmful to the client for the therapist to say, 'Because of this particular law that's now being considered, we're no longer able to provide you the care that we have been providing.''
In March, members of the House Judiciary Committee, the public and the Arkansas Attorney General's staff expressed concerns that Bentley's House Bill 1668 would infringe on the right to freedom of expression. That bill would have created civil liability for any adult who aids a minor's 'social transitioning,' including 'changes in clothing, pronouns, hairstyle, and name.'
Bentley promised to amend HB 1668 but withdrew it the day after she filed HB 1916.
Committee awaits amendments to proposed liability for social transitioning of transgender minors
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Modesto City Schools trustee is critical of sex education plan for 5th-graders
A Modesto City Schools board member wants parents to know what's in a sex education curriculum designed for fifth-grade classrooms. Jolene Daly spoke at two recent gatherings, arguing that fifth-graders aren't psychologically prepared for the content about gender identity and sexual activity. Daly gave a scathing critique of the curriculum Saturday at Celebration Center, a church in Modesto. She said she spoke as a licensed family therapist, not as a school board member. 'It oversexualizes 10-year-olds,' Daly said. 'These children are not ready for this material.' The proposed fifth-grade sex education curriculum in Modesto City Schools is likely to run into some opposition several months after Stanislaus County voters swung conservative in the November presidential election and the culture wars were one of the issues. About 50 people attended Daly's talk at Celebration Center and more than 100 were at a June 2 event, she said. Several people at Saturday's presentation asked how to get involved with the school district's decision-making process. MCS trustees this month will consider two curriculum options: 'Puberty Talk for Grades 5 & 6' and 'Puberty: The Wonder Years, Grade 5.' A 16-member committee consisting of teachers, parents and board members reviewed curriculum choices and has recommended 'Puberty Talk.' The proposed sex education is under the school district's fifth-grade health curriculum, which focuses on hygiene, nutrition, puberty, internet safety, social influences, healthy communication and relationships. According to an MCS FAQ page, the California Healthy Youth Act also requires sex education topics when school districts offer health education. The classroom instruction must recognize diverse sexual orientations including same-sex relationships, teach gender concepts and cover gender expression, gender identity and the harm of negative stereotypes. The health education must include medically accurate, objective information appropriate for students 'of all races, genders, sexual orientations, ethnicities and cultural background,' the state law says. One of the goals is teaching fifth-graders, who are showing the early signs of puberty, to recognize sexual harassment and abuse and report inappropriate touching and child abuse, the school district says. During her talk Saturday, Daly contended that fifth-graders are too early in mental development for lessons about gender identity and the facts of sex. She referred to a student survey question in one curriculum that asks what transgender means. She also objected to proposed instructional content defining different sexualities and genders and what she said was content regarding hormone replacement therapy and masturbation. Daly said there's too much latitude for fifth-grade teachers to talk with students about sexual acts. It's too early for the kids to hear that sex is fun, Daly said, adding that the classroom material is not culturally sensitive to members of the Christian faith. According to the school district FAQ, fifth-grade sex education is widely taught in California to help students navigate the physical changes of puberty and learn the facts in a supportive educational setting. It follows a trend of young people experiencing puberty at younger age and dealing with developments including physical growth, change in voice, acne, body odor, oily hair and the need for good hygiene. To review the copyrighted curriculum materials, parents must go to the district's Department of Curriculum & Instruction, Professional Development Building B, at 1017 Reno Ave., at certain times through June 30. The school board is scheduled to hear more about the curriculum and receive community input Monday evening. The board could approve the curriculum June 23. The school district says parents can opt their children out of the sex education instruction. Forms will be sent home with children at least two weeks before the lessons, and a form will be provided on Parent Square. Daly said the Puberty Talk program is the sister curriculum of the Teen Talk sex education for eighth=grade students. She said local groups including Without Permission could educate students about human trafficking, harassment and other health education topics required by the state.
CBS News
3 hours ago
- CBS News
Kevin Hassett says if Senate finds Medicare abuse, then "we would look at it" in Trump bill
Kevin Hassett says if Senate finds Medicare abuse, then "we would look at it" in Trump bill White House National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett said Sunday the Trump administration is not targeting Medicare in its sweeping budget proposal, but signaled the administration would be open to changes if senators uncover fraud or abuse as they look at the bill. "If somebody finds waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare, then of course we would look at it," Hassett said on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan." "But there have been a lot of false stories about Medicare being on the table, and it's totally not on the table." Senate Republicans this week are working on the House-passed budget bill, dubbed the "One Big Beautiful Bill" by President Trump, which includes deep tax cuts, border security measures, and changes to Medicaid and food assistance programs. Hassett on Sunday pushed back against the idea that Republicans are targeting Medicare for cuts. "That story that got out last week was covered as our intent to go after Medicare," Hassett said bluntly. "And it was just a big fake news story." National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," June 2, 2025. CBS News Asked whether the administration would revisit the Medicare provision if the Senate identifies abuse, Hassett said they would. "I've seen a massive amount of waste, fraud and abuse in Medicaid, and I've not been briefed on Medicare waste, fraud and abuse. But if they find something then, of course, we would look at it," he said. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated earlier this week that the bill will add $2.4 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. Sen. Thom Tillis told Charlotte's WCNC on Thursday that he supports legislation that would address waste in the Medicare Advantage Program. This addition, he said, would not touch beneficiaries but would focus on "eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse of the Medicare Advantage program, including costly government overpayments to insurance companies." To pay for some of Mr. Trump's tax reforms, such as extending his 2017 tax cuts and eliminating tax on tips, there are cuts to several programs. Republicans have insisted they are not cutting Medicaid, and reductions in the low-income entitlement program have become one of the most charged parts of the bill. In a closed-door session with members of the Republican conference days before the bill's passage, sources in the room told CBS News Mr. Trump said, "Don't f*** around with Medicaid." House Republicans passed the bill late last month on a 215–214 vote, sending it to the Senate where GOP leaders are weighing revisions to secure enough votes under budget reconciliation rules. "What we want to see done now is we want the Senate to pass the bill, and then we want the House and Senate to work out their differences," Hassett said. "So right now, the Senate has to get the votes they need to pass the bill, and we're supporting them in that process." Some Republican senators, including Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Josh Hawley of Missouri, have voiced concerns about Medicaid provisions in the bill, particularly new monthly premium requirements for low-income recipients. Their opposition highlights ongoing uncertainty as Senate GOP leaders work to secure enough votes. The bill can't afford to lose more than four votes in the Senate, granted that all Democrats vote against it. Hawley has called the Medicaid work requirements "both morally wrong and politically suicidal." When asked about Hawley's concerns, Hassett said, "I'd have to go see what he has and talk to him about it. And I also would want to talk to the president about the specific matter. So I can't speak to that one." The administration has repeatedly argued that failure to pass the legislation could hurt the broader economy. "If we don't pass this bill, then we lose 6 to 7 million jobs and 4% GDP," Hassett said Sunday. "If we create the jobs that we have in the bill, then we're going to create a heck of a lot more insurance than what we're talking about in waste, fraud and abuse." Senate Republicans are expected to release their version of the bill in the coming days. If there are significant changes, it will then have to go back to the House for final passage before landing on Mr. Trump's desk.
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Zelensky says he understands Putin ‘much better' than Trump
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Ukrainian officials understand Russian leader Vladimir Putin 'much better' than President Trump, who has repeatedly said Putin wants peace, even as he rejects U.S. proposals for a ceasefire. 'With all due respect to President Trump, I think it's just his personal opinion,' Zelensky told Martha Raddatz on ABC's 'This Week' in an interview that aired Sunday morning. 'Trust me, we understand the Russians much better, the mentality of the Russians, than the Americans understand the Russians. I know for sure Putin doesn't want to stop the war.' Zelensky also took issue with Trump's comments in the Oval Office this week comparing Ukraine and Russia to children fighting. 'We are not playing in the park with the Russians like two boys, two kids. Putin is not a kid,' Zelenskyy said. 'So we can't compare and we cannot say okay, let them fight for a while.' 'And it's not about President Trump,' he added. 'Anyone living thousands of miles away can't fully understand the pain, even parents who live in Ukraine cannot feel the pain of those who lost their children.' Ukraine stunned Russia last weekend with drone attacks on Russian air bases, which it said destroyed dozens of bombers. The drones were smuggled into Russia on 18-wheeler trucks, which were parked near military bases and remotely opened ahead of the attack. Trump spoke with Putin on Wednesday, telling reporters that Russia planned to retaliate for the drone strikes. Russia killed five people in Ukraine in drone attacks the next day. Raddatz asked Zelensky if he believed that Trump thinks Russia is winning the war. 'I think he's publicly said about it, and I know that he shared this information with some people around him, and I think the separation — and I said it a lot of times, it's not true. It's not a victory when you spent, really spent one million people,' he said. Zelensky added that Trump 'must' impose stronger sanctions on Russia. Trump this week said he had yet to look at Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) Russia sanctions bill, which is co-sponsored by more than 80 senators, but said senators would not move without his blessing. Senators in both parties are itching for the green light. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters that the bill could hit the floor during the current four-week work period. '[The White House is] still hopeful they'll be able to strike some sort of a deal, but … there's a high level of interest here in the Senate on both sides of the aisle in moving on it,' he said. 'I think a genuine interest in doing something to make clear to Russia that they need to come to the table … I think that would have a big impact.'
