Latest news with #StephanieNichols
Yahoo
16-04-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Bill regulating transgender Arkansans' bathroom use heads to House despite public pushback
Family Council attorney Stephanie Nichols (left) and Rep. Mary Bentley, R-Perryville, present Senate Bill 486 to the House Committee on State Agencies and Governmental Affairs on Monday, April 14, 2025. (Tess Vrbin/Arkansas Advocate) The Arkansas House will consider a bill denounced by advocates for transgender Arkansans on Wednesday, the final day of the 2025 legislative session. Senate Bill 486 would allow Arkansans to sue for damages if they encounter someone in a bathroom, changing room, shelter or correctional facility who does not align with the 'designated sex' of the restroom. The bill narrowly passed the House Committee on State Agencies and Governmental Affairs on Tuesday after 14 people spoke against it and no member of the public spoke for it. 'The intention here is to make it so that trans people cannot exist in public,' said Maricella Garcia, Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families' race equity director. 'If you cannot use the restroom, you cannot go out in public.' Garcia was among several people who said that enforcing SB 486 would require policing and making assumptions about people's bodies and likely lead to frivolous lawsuits costing taxpayer money. SB 486 is among many bills related to transgender Arkansans that Rep. Mary Bentley, R-Perryville, has sponsored in the past few legislative sessions, including one the Senate passed Tuesday pertaining to gender-affirming healthcare. It's not good legislation, it's not good for our community and it's not good Christian values. – Marie Mainard O'Connell, a Presbyterian pastor speaking against SB 486 Bentley sponsored Act 317 of 2023, which prohibits K-12 students from using bathrooms that do not match their gender assigned at birth and requires schools to have a 'reasonable accommodation,' such as a single-occupancy bathroom, for those unable or unwilling to do so. Similarly, SB 486 states that shelters, correctional facilities and other entities must take 'reasonable steps' to comply with the policy; Bentley said signage indicating who is allowed and not allowed in a space would be sufficient, and she said SB 486 is meant to be an extension of Act 317. Bentley also supported Act 619 of 2023, which initially would have criminalized entering and remaining in bathrooms and locker rooms that do not match an adult's gender assigned at birth if children are present. After hours of public pushback before the House Judiciary Committee, that legislation was amended to limit potential criminal charges and prosecutions to adults present in those spaces with criminal intent. The conservative Family Council worked with lawmakers from both political parties to formulate the amendment to Act 619 two years ago. On Tuesday, Family Council attorney Stephanie Nichols said SB 486 would close 'loopholes' in the law to more closely regulate who can enter gender-specific bathrooms. Evelyn Rios Stafford, a Washington County justice of the peace and Arkansas' first openly transgender elected official, spoke against Act 619 two years ago and against SB 486 Tuesday. 'We had a compromise that worked for everybody,' she said. '…Everybody walked away feeling that that was a bill that everybody can live with, and now I feel like that compromise and that promise is being broken.' Arkansas House committee changes controversial public bathroom bill Nichols and Bentley repeatedly said SB 486 protects women's and girls' privacy, the same argument supporters of Act 317 and Act 619 used. Rep. Cindy Crawford, R-Fort Smith, was the House sponsor of Act 619 and said Tuesday that not passing SB 486 'opens the door' to men entering women's bathrooms to commit sexual violence. Several opponents of SB 486 said not only that transgender women in bathrooms are not a threat, but also that they are often survivors of sexual violence and that the bill does nothing to prevent such things. '[This bill] exploits my trauma to push a political agenda that's rooted not in facts but in fear,' Brittany Stockton said. '…The idea that predators are pretending to be trans to attack people in bathrooms is a harmful myth.' Multiple speakers also said transgender people face a higher risk of identity-based violence and harassment than other demographics. Marie Mainard O'Connell, a Presbyterian pastor and mother of a transgender teen, said she fears one day having to conduct a funeral service for a transgender person dead by suicide or targeted violence. 'If I have to perform that service, you're getting an invitation,' she told the committee. Crawford said SB 486 is not intended to harm anyone and her 'heart hurts' for transgender people who feel targeted. 'Why should we protect this minority, trans people, when we are putting in danger young women and women in bathrooms that are designated for their sex?' Crawford said. O'Connell responded to Crawford's statement by reminding the committee that one of Jesus' parables in the Bible involves a shepherd leaving 99 sheep behind to search for one that was missing. 'Please vote no on this,' O'Connell said. 'It's not good legislation, it's not good for our community and it's not good Christian values.' Rep. Nicole Clowney, D-Fayetteville, said transgender people who no longer physically resemble their gender assigned at birth would be at risk of violence if the law requires them to use the bathroom that does not align with their identity. Bentley said Clowney was 'way out there on a limb' and reiterated the 'reasonable steps' portion of SB 486. 'We have two sexes, male and female, no matter how [many] drugs you take or the kind of surgery you have,' Bentley said. She introduced the bill to the committee Monday, but was asked to pull it down before public comment. House Minority Leader Andrew Collins, D-Little Rock, asked for an analysis of the bill's fiscal impact, expressing concerns that public buildings would incur significant costs in order to meet the accommodation standards in SB 486. The fiscal impact statement from the Department of Finance and Administration asserts that SB 486 will not require the expenditure of state funds or 'the construction or modification of any state facilities.' Rios Stafford disputed this and said not all government buildings in Arkansas have single-occupancy restrooms. 'Any county, any city that wants to do the right thing by their citizens is going to have to spend money and is going to have to spend a lot of money, and we know how much retrofitting a building costs, especially if it's an older building that was grandfathered in before the Americans with Disabilities Act,' Rios Stafford said. The Arkansas Senate passed SB 486 along party lines April 2. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE On Tuesday, the Senate sent a bill to the governor's desk that would broaden the scope of a 2023 law that created civil liability for doctors who provide gender-affirming health care to transgender minors. The Protecting Minors from Medical Malpractice Act, or Act 274 of 2023, created a 15-year window for adults to sue physicians for 'any physical, psychological, emotional, or physiological injury' incurred while the adult received hormone replacement therapy, puberty blockers or gender-affirming surgeries as a minor. Bentley sponsored both Act 274 and its proposed amendment, House Bill 1916, which would add mental health care providers to the law's list of medical professionals liable for 'gender-affirming intervention.' She has repeatedly said gender-affirming medical care is harmful to minors; physicians who treat transgender children said otherwise during the 2022 trial over a Bentley-sponsored 2021 law that sought to ban this care. The Senate Judiciary Committee passed HB 1916 Monday night. Bentley told the committee that gender-affirming care consists of 'grotesque experiments that stunt and suppress a child's natural development in service of scientific fantasies.' All 29 Republican senators voted to send HB 1916 to Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders' desk Tuesday while all six Democrats voted against it. Sen. Clarke Tucker, D-Little Rock, was the only member of the Judiciary Committee to vote against HB 1916 Monday. He said he agreed with public testimony that the bill's use of the phrase 'gender-affirming intervention' is too broad. Psychologist Lindsey Thomas said HB 1916 would hold therapists liable for using transgender minors' preferred names and pronouns as 'gender-affirming intervention'; Bentley agreed that the bill would preclude this from happening. Thomas also said HB 1916 would increase the costs of providers' medical malpractice insurance and increase wait times for all children to see a therapist in Arkansas. The bill mentions hormones and puberty blockers, but the six health care professionals that opposed the bill Monday said mental health care providers do not prescribe these medications. Nine more people had signed up to speak against the bill but did not get to speak due to the committee's time constraints. 'We don't know if or when an issue of gender dysphoria might show up,' said Garry Teeter, a counselor and a Christian pastor. 'We may be working with that child for months or years, and then this comes up in therapy… At that point, it would be detrimental and harmful to the client for the therapist to say, 'Because of this particular law that's now being considered, we're no longer able to provide you the care that we have been providing.'' In March, members of the House Judiciary Committee, the public and the Arkansas Attorney General's staff expressed concerns that Bentley's House Bill 1668 would infringe on the right to freedom of expression. That bill would have created civil liability for any adult who aids a minor's 'social transitioning,' including 'changes in clothing, pronouns, hairstyle, and name.' Bentley promised to amend HB 1668 but withdrew it the day after she filed HB 1916. Committee awaits amendments to proposed liability for social transitioning of transgender minors
Yahoo
02-04-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Religious freedom bill advances after Arkansans say it will foster anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination
Attorney Stephanie Nichols (left) of the Family Council's Arkansas Justice Institute speaks in support of House Bill 1615, sponsored by Rep. Robin Lundstrum (second from right), R-Elm Springs, before the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, April 1, 2025. Attorney Stephanie Taub (right) of the First Liberty Institute also supported the bill. (Tess Vrbin/Arkansas Advocate) An Arkansas House committee approved a bill Tuesday that supporters said would protect religious freedom, a day after the Senate rejected a bill with a similar stated goal. House Bill 1615 will be heard by the full House Wednesday after passing the Judiciary Committee on a split voice vote following nearly an hour of public opposition. The bill would 'prohibit the government from discriminating against certain individuals and organizations because of their beliefs regarding marriage or what it means to be female or male.' This would protect Arkansas government employees from adverse employment action if they refuse to do something within the context of their jobs that conflicts with their 'sincerely held religious beliefs,' such as providing a marriage license to a same-sex couple, according to the bill. House Bill 1669, which had similar language regarding the 'sincerely held religious beliefs' of parents seeking to foster or adopt children in Arkansas, failed in the Senate Monday after passing a House committee, the full House and the Senate Judiciary Committee in March. The bill's Republican sponsors, Rep. Mary Bentley of Perryville and Sen. Alan Clark of Lonsdale, said HB 1669 would ensure Arkansas does not join the ranks of states in which parents who do not accept or affirm LGBTQ+ children's identities are not allowed to foster or adopt. Sen. Jonathan Dismang, R-Searcy, said the bill would set a 'dangerous precedent' by shielding foster or adoptive parents from adverse government action if their faith-based actions harm children. He reminded the chamber that not all 'sincerely held religious beliefs' are Christian. Fifteen Republican senators voted for the bill, which needed 18 votes to pass. Dismang and three other Republicans joined the chamber's six Democrats in voting against the bill. Five more Republicans did not vote and four voted present. The Senate later expunged the vote, and the bill is on the upper chamber's Wednesday agenda. The original version of Act 733 of 2023 included language about foster care, adoption agencies and the issuing of marriage licenses similar to both HB 1669 and HB 1615. That legislation was amended to remove such specific language. Critics said it would not only empower anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination but also would contradict a similarly worded ballot measure that voters rejected in 2022. Rep. Robin Lundstrum, R-Elm Springs, is the primary sponsor of Act 733 and HB 1615. Attorneys from the conservative First Liberty Institute and the Family Council's Arkansas Justice Institute supported Lundstrum in presenting the bill to the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday. Attorney J.P. Tribell was the only opponent of Bentley's bill in the March 12 House committee hearing, but one of eight opponents of HB 1615 Tuesday. '[There are] some rural counties where possibly everybody in the courthouse might be opposed to gay marriage, and if somebody wants to get a marriage license and they can find nobody, at what point do we determine that there's an undue burden on the person seeking a marriage license?' Tribell said. 'Do they have to drive two to three hours to get to Little Rock to do that?' Civics educator Gail Choate said HB 1615 espouses the 'opposite logic' of Act 116 of 2025, which all but one of HB 1615's 13 sponsors supported. Act 116 prohibits public entities from engaging in identity-based 'discriminination' or 'preferential treatment' in contracting and hiring practices. 'This bill does not evaluate individuals based on their actions, their qualifications or their ability to contribute to society,' Choate said. 'It singles them out solely based upon their identity.' Other opponents of the bill spoke on behalf of themselves or their loved ones in the LGBTQ+ community. Kaymo O'Connell, a transgender high school senior from Little Rock, expressed concern about experiencing employment discrimination upon entering the workforce in the near future. HB 1615 allows government employees who issue marriage licenses to recuse themselves from doing so. Marie Mainard O'Connell, Kaymo's mother, said HB 1615 lacks a public notification process for such recusals. 'That's where the harm occurs,' she said. '[People] are harmed when they expect to be cared for, and then they are told, 'I don't believe that about you, I don't have to care for you that way.' That creates a moment of trauma.' Social worker Kirsten Sowell and therapist Courtney Frierson said HB 1615 would create a conflict between their ethical codes, which include acceptance of LGBTQ+ people, and the fact that the state issues their professional licenses. 'If my licensing board receives a complaint based on someone's religious disagreement with my inclusive care, who are they supposed to protect: me or the complainant?' Frierson said. 'That's a legal gray zone, and it's not theoretical, it's coming.' No members of the public or of the House Judiciary Committee spoke in favor of HB 1615. Opposition on the committee primarily came from its Democrats, including Rep. Nicole Clowney of Fayetteville, who called it 'blatant viewpoint discrimination.' 'We heard a lot of abstract ideas about religious freedom [today],' she said. 'We did not hear from one person who is for this bill who is currently being persecuted.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
