
Taliban in crisis as leadership splits over women's rights
The Taliban is facing an internal revolt over women's rights that has become public and could lead to a full-blown conflict in Afghanistan, The Telegraph can reveal.
Mullah Haibatullah Akhundzada, the country's supreme leader, is battling a rebellion from senior cabinet ministers over his ban on girls' education and restrictions on women's economic participation.
Akhundzada, who has led the Taliban since 2016 and is now Afghanistan's de-facto leader, is at odds with Sirajuddin Haqqani, the interior minister, Mullah Yaqoob, the defence minister, and Sher Mohammad Abbas Stanikzai, the deputy foreign minister, who all want the Taliban to be more progressive.
Stanikzai has fled to Dubai after his criticism of the supreme leader led to an arrest warrant being issued, while Haqqani is also thought to be out of the country.
Now, Akhundzada has deployed soldiers to Kabul airport to stop other high-ranking officials from leaving.
Akhundzada, who is rarely seen in public and has almost no digital footprint, is facing his biggest crisis since the Taliban swept into power after the chaotic withdrawal of the US from the country in August 2021.
When they seized power Zabihullah Mujahid, the Taliban spokesman, assured the world that women would be allowed to work and study 'within the framework of Islam'. However, within weeks, these assurances began to unravel.
By September, the Taliban announced that only boys and male teachers would return to secondary schools, effectively barring girls from secondary education. In March 2022, they briefly declared that all students, including girls, would be allowed back to school, only to revoke the decision within hours, citing the need for an 'appropriate Islamic environment'.
In May 2022, the Taliban imposed a strict dress code for women, mandating full-body coverings, further restricting their public presence.
Mohammad Nabi Omari, the Taliban's deputy interior minister, was reportedly moved to tears while pleading for the reopening of girls' schools, arguing that even if girls' education wasn't a religious obligation, it was at least permissible.
His views were ignored.
Now, more than three years since the so-called 'temporary' ban on girls' education, another academic year is set to begin in March without any females the classroom. Hopes that restrictions would be lifted have faded, leaving an entire generation of Afghan girls facing a future without formal education.
Leaked audio messages from the deputy foreign minister has revealed evidence of the split.
'The restrictions imposed on women are the personal wish of some Taliban elders and are un-Islamic,' Stanikzai said. 'The obedience to a leader is conditional, and if a leader strays from the right path or issues harmful decrees, they should not be followed.'
Going further, at a graduation ceremony last month in southeastern Khost province, near the Afghan-Pakistan border, Stanikzai said: 'We are being unjust to 20 million people. There is no justification for this – not now or in the future. During the time of the Prophet Mohammed, the doors of knowledge were open for both men and women.
'There were such remarkable women that if I were to elaborate on their contributions, it would take considerable time.'
Shortly after Stanikzai's speech, Akhundhzada ordered his arrest to silence dissent within the leadership. Stanikzai escaped to the UAE before the authorities could arrest him. He claims that he is only there while 'recovering from a Covid-like infection'.
The comments mirror those of Haqqani and Yaqoob, who are against the 'monopolising' of power by Akhundzada's hardline faction in Kandahar.
Haqqani, a powerful figure within the Taliban, has also publicly questioned the ban on women's rights and the regime's reluctance to engage with the international community on women's issues.
The interior minister has been in Dubai and Riyadh since January 22 after the UN Security Council approved his travel-ban exemption. Although the Taliban's spokesperson acknowledged the trip, little has been disclosed about its purpose or Haqqani's delayed return.
Haqqani, whose 'Haqqani Network' has been linked to Pakistan's intelligence agency, ISI, remains on the US most-wanted list for orchestrating high-profile attacks against American and Nato forces for nearly two decades.
A formal split within the Taliban could weaken its control, sparking infighting, defections, and a loss of centralised authority. He could leverage his influence over fighters to challenge Akhundzada's dominance.
Haqqani is supported by Yaqoob, the son of Mullah Omar, the Taliban leader who gave refuge to Osama bin Laden and the al-Qeada terror group. As defence minister he has sway over a large number of troops.
Akhundzada may already be exacting his revenge.
In December, Khalil Rahman Haqqani, the refugee minister, was killed along with four others in a suicide attack in Kabul. He was a senior leader within the Haqqani Network and was aiding al-Qaeda's military in Afghanistan. After coming to power, he was known for lobbying behind the scenes for girls and women to attend secondary schools and universities.
'We shouldn't just shrug this all off. The fact that these internal divisions have been playing out for so long, combined with other notable developments like the still unexplained killing of a top Haqqani leader, indicate that the supreme leadership is struggling to quell these disruptions,' said Michael Kugelman, South Asia Institute director at The Wilson Centre think tank.
'That's significant for an organisation that demands and expects unquestioned loyalty and obedience from all.
'The fact that a leader as senior as Stanikzai left the country is quite significant and shows just how serious the spat has become, at least when it comes to tensions playing out on personal levels.'
The Telegraph can reveal that on Tuesday, a delegation of 14 officials was removed from a flydubai flight at Kabul airport and prevented from heading to Qatar, at least partly because there were two women in the group. The Haqqani-backed group were heading to the Afghanistan Future Thought Forum where discussions were thought to be centred around women's right to work and access to education.
Mujahid admitted that differences exist within the leadership but insisted there was no open conflict. Speaking in an X Spaces discussion, the Taliban spokesman said: 'Differences in viewpoints are normal. Every member of the Islamic emirate looks at an issue from a different perspective, and sometimes these matters even leak to the media. However, there are no disputes.
'Lately, we have seen false information and baseless propaganda aimed at misleading public perception. We do not harm each other over disagreements.'
Mr Kugelman said that for now Akhundzada remains in power.
'The supreme leadership in Kandahar remains in full control, with no indications of any type of mutiny,' Mr Kugelman said. 'We are seeing dissent from some prominent leaders, but it's not something that's morphed into some form of wider internal rebellion.'
While some senior Taliban figures, including Haqqani and Stanikzai, have openly criticised Akhundzada, others have expressed their discontent privately.
Taliban officials told The Telegraph that many enforced rules primarily focus on 'controlling women' and 'often don't even make sense'.
They accuse Akhundzada of creating an atmosphere of fear by linking every directive to religion, branding critics as 'enemies of Islam'.
Last year, Haqqani told a religious gathering in his native Khost region: 'This situation can no longer be tolerated.'
The Taliban's policies have plunged Afghanistan into an economic and humanitarian crisis. More than 25 million people – over half the population – now live in poverty with limited access to food. Nearly one million jobs have been lost as businesses struggled, and women remain locked out of education and the formal economy.
The UN has suspended several 'time-critical' aid programmes in Afghanistan following the Taliban's ban on women in humanitarian work, education, and the formal economy. The international community has repeatedly stated that recognition of the Taliban regime depends on respecting women's rights, forming an inclusive government, and ensuring Afghanistan is not used as a base for terrorism.
'The Taliban have always tried to present themselves as a united front under one supreme leader. But now, we're seeing cars in Kabul with pictures of Sirajuddin Haqqani and banners reading 'Haqqani Network'. This is a clear message – they no longer want to obey Kandahar,' said a doctor in Kabul, who requested anonymity.
'We are deeply worried. A split within the Taliban isn't just a possibility any more; it's becoming inevitable. The clouds of crisis are gathering, and it's no longer a question of if, but when. There are rumours that unknown armed men have taken over parts of Baghlan [province], and reports of Taliban fighters abandoning Panjshir [province] are only adding to the fear,' he added.
'Anyone who can replace this current hardline regime and bring back freedom of expression and education for all – including women – would be a welcome relief. We desperately need that change.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
18 hours ago
- The Guardian
Sydney cleric being sued for alleged antisemitism says case is an existential battle ‘between Islam and unbelievers'
A Sydney Islamic cleric being sued in the federal court for alleged racial discrimination of Jewish people has described his case as an existential battle 'between Islam and unbelievers'. Wissam Haddad, also known as Abu Ousayd, is being sued by Australia's peak Jewish body over a series of lectures he gave in November 2023, in which he is alleged to have maligned Jewish people as 'vile', 'treacherous' and cowardly. The lectures quoted ayat and hadith from the Qur'an about Jews in Medina in the 7th century and, the federal court claim alleges, made derogatory generalisations about Jewish people, including that they are 'wicked and scheming' and 'love wealth'. The claim, brought by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, alleges Haddad breached section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act – prohibiting offensive behaviour based on race or ethnic origin – during the sermons delivered at the Al Madina Dawah Centre (AMDC) in Bankstown in November 2023, speeches subsequently broadcast online. But, Haddad's defence case argues, his sermons were delivered in 'good faith' as religious and historical instruction. If his sermons are found to breach 18C, then, he argues, the law is unconstitutional because it restricts the free exercise of religion. On Tuesday morning, the long-running dispute, which failed to find resolution at conciliation, comes before Justice Angus Stewart in the federal court, in a case set to test the limits of religious expression and hate speech under Australian law. The court is likely to be asked to adjudicate whether Haddad's sermons, in which he quotes the Qur'an and offers interpretation of it, amount to incitement or are protected religious expression. Ahead of the trial, Haddad, argued on Instagram that the case was existential for the practice of Islam in Australia. 'What I am currently facing in the federal court is not an issue of Abu Ousayd or Al Madina Dawah Centre versus the Jewish lobby … rather, it's a battle between Islam and kuffar,' he said, using an Arabic word, usually translated as 'unbelievers'. He said the claim against him sought to criminalise Islamic scripture. 'They wish to take and make those ayat and hadith and historic accounts that speak about the Jews: to what they see as insulting, they seek to make it criminal.' Ayat are verses in the Qur'an, the Islamic holy book, while hadith are reports attributed to the Prophet Muhammad. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Two prominent members of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, Peter Wertheim and Robert Goot, have sought an injunction from the court ordering the speeches still online be removed, and banning Haddad and his centre from publishing similar content online in the future. The ECAJ claim has also asked the court to order Haddad's centre to publish a 'corrective notice' on its social media pages. It has applied for the cost of its legal action to be covered, but it has not sought damages or compensation. In a statement, Wertheim said the ECAJ had attempted 'in good faith' to resolve the matter by conciliation through the Australian Human Rights Commission, but that attempts to broker a resolution failed. He said the ECAJ took the matter to court 'to defend the honour of our community, and as a warning to deter others seeking to mobilise racism in order to promote their political views'. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'We are all free to observe our faith and traditions within the bounds of Australian law, and that should mean we do not bring the hatreds, prejudices and bigotry of overseas conflicts and societies into Australia.' In his defence documents, Haddad argues his lectures 'were not reasonably likely to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate Jewish people in Australia' given their context and audience. He said his sermons were delivered in 'good faith' and 'for the genuine purpose of … delivering religious historical and educational lectures … to congregants of the AMDC'. He said he had given some of the addresses in response to requests from the Islamic community 'to provide sermons which address the Gaza War, and engaging in political commentary on the Gaza War from a religious perspective'. However, his defence states, if the court finds his sermons have breached section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, he argues the law is unconstitutional under section 116 of the constitution, which protects the 'free exercise of any religion'. Both Haddad and the ECAJ will rely on lay witnesses and expert testimony in the week-long court case. The ECAJ has enlisted professor of theology at Notre Dame University, Gabriel Reynolds; Haddad will call Sheikh Adel Ibrahim from the Greenacre Prayers Hall in Sydney to give evidence. Haddad has never been charged with any terrorism-related offences, but has previously boasted of his friendship with Australian Islamic State fighters Khaled Sharrouf and Mohamed Elomar, and Briton Anjem Choudary, an extremist preacher jailed for life in the UK last year. A former Asio spy who infiltrated Haddad's organisation between 2016 and 2023 told the ABC's Four Corners program that young people in Haddad's prayer centre were being indoctrinated into supporting Islamic State. Section 18C is the most contested and controversial section of the Racial Discrimination Act. Several high-profile cases have seen it argued the section restricts freedom of speech and political communication in Australia.


Metro
19 hours ago
- Metro
Piccadilly restaurant that kicked out Tommy Robinson 'in the right' not to serve him
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Staff at West End restaurants have backed the Hawksmoor steakhouse for refusing to serve far right activist Tommy Robinson. Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, was asked to leave the venue after managers said staff and other diners were uncomfortable with his presence. Yaxley-Lennon, 42, said he and four others were told to leave the Hawksmoor near Piccadilly Circus, on Thursday. He has accused the restaurant of 'discriminatory behaviour' due to his political beliefs. The campaigner protests against what he brands 'radical Islam'. Hawksmoor said the group left the restaurant 'politely' adding that its decision was 'not about politics or belief' and it was 'not trying to engage in a public debate'. Video footage posted on X by a member of Yaxley-Lennon's group shows a member of staff telling them that his colleagues felt 'uncomfortable serving' them. The staff member is then heard saying that he had a 'duty of care'. They apologise any inconvenience and tell the group they do not have to pay for the drinks they have already consumed. Posting on X, Yaxley-Lennon said: 'Restaurants and businesses should not be political. We weren't loud, aggressive or inappropriate, so this can only be my politics.' He called for a boycott of the restaurant and for his followers on X to leave reviews. But restaurant and hotel staff at venues near the Hawksmoor backed the venue in its decision to exclude the activist. A worker at the Cafe Royal on Piccadilly told Metro: 'It's a difficult one as we have a duty to serve. But I think the waiter is within their rights to say they are uncomfortable and report it to management. 'Then the manager can make a decision. I've never had these problems before where I work. 'But personally I do not like what Tommy Robinson has to say and would say because of his controversial views some would not be happy to service his meal or sit near him.' A waiter at a restaurant close to the Hawksmoor told Metro: 'We are all talking about it around here. We in hospitality are from all over the world. The opinions of this man (Yaxley-Lennon) are uncomfortable for us. I am Muslim and his views offend me and I wouldn't want to serve him. I think that is my right.' Most staff Metro spoke to said they felt obliged to serve members of the public unless they 'crossed a line'. A chef at a hotel where A-listers and celebrities are frequent visitors said: 'Mainly we just get on with it because they are the paying customer. But sometimes you have to draw a line. I think the Hawksmoor was within its rights to do that.' Another chef at a high end Italian restaurant close to Hawksmoor said that everyone had the right to be served but that in some top restaurants anyone filming, as the group had done and posted on X, could be seen as breaking rules. He told Metro: 'I have worked in some very expensive restaurants with lords, ladies and celebrities eating. They had policies of no pictures or filming. I don't know what the Hawksmoor policy is but the group filming the staff could have made the situation worse.' More Trending The Hawksmoor steakhouse chain has seven restaurants in London, with branches in Liverpool, Edinburgh, Manchester and abroad. In a statement Hawksmoor said: 'On Thursday, a public figure was asked to leave one of our restaurants because guests and staff felt uncomfortable and had complained. 'The party left peacefully and politely on request.' It added it wanted to welcome guests 'regardless of background or views' and its team had to deal with a 'huge amount of fallout… some of which is quite concerning'. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Londoners are flocking to the 'hidden gem' neighbourhood with the best-connected new homes MORE: 'Edgers' are the cheeky commuters invading the National Rail network MORE: Bizarre moment plane-spotter filmed man running around on Heathrow runway


BBC News
21 hours ago
- BBC News
'We were friends of the US': Fearful Afghans face Trump travel ban
Ahmad has been hiding in Afghanistan for former Afghan military employee is living in fear of being found by the Taliban, which seized power in 2021 as US forces withdrew from the Central Asian a result, Ahmad is unable to get a job or access medical care, relying on donations from friends outside the country to survive. His son, 12, is unable to go to they are found, Ahmad says, the Taliban "will remove" hope had been refugee resettlement in the US, but - with just a medical check to complete - the process was put on pause by the Trump he hoped. Then, on Thursday he woke to the news that US President Donald Trump had issued a new order banning the entry of Afghan passport holders to the US, citing national security threats."I am not a threat to the United States," Ahmad told the BBC. The BBC is not using his real name because of concerns about his safety."We were friends of the United States," he added. Why are these 12 countries on the list?How nations have responded Everything else we know about the ban - so farTrump's new ban dodges pitfalls from last time, experts sayChad halts US visas in revenge for Trump travel ban Trump's sweeping travel ban came into force on Monday, blocking people from Afghanistan and 11 other countries, including seven from Africa, as well as countries like Haiti and Yemen, from entering the US. There are partial bans on seven other to the ban, Afghanistan was included because the Taliban are considered by the US government to be a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) group, and the country does not have "a competent or co-operative central authority for issuing passports or civil documents", or "appropriate screening and vetting measures". It also notes a relatively high rate of people overstaying their Trump administration has, however, recently dropped temporary protected status for more than 9,000 Afghans living in the US, arguing its assessments showed the security and economic situation in Afghanistan had those living in Afghanistan are faced with a series of restrictions brought in by the Taliban government in line with its strict interpretation of Sharia ones affecting women - including the enforcement of head coverings, restrictions on travel and education over the age of 12 - amount to a "gender apartheid", according to the United Nations. The Taliban says it respects the rights of women in line with Sharia and Afghan culture.A different UN report from 2023 found there were credible reports that hundreds of former government officials and armed forces members had been killed since the group returned to power in 2021, despite a general amnesty. The Taliban has previously said all Afghans could "live in the country without any fear" - and those abroad should come back and help rebuild the country."There is a general amnesty," Mohammad Suhail Shaheen, Taliban ambassador to Qatar, told the BBC earlier this year. "Countrywide security is prevalent in Afghanistan. Every citizen and traveller can travel to any corner of the country without any obstacles or any difficulties."There are exceptions to Trump's ban - including for Afghans who worked directly with the US military before the Taliban back took control of the country in Ahmad, whose application for resettlement was backed by a former US service member, does not qualify for a Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) because he did not work directly for the he is far from the only one. Trump to end protected status for Afghans Some 200,000 Afghans have been resettled since the US military's chaotic withdrawal, but there are still tens of thousands more waiting for a have fled across the border to neighbouring Pakistan to wait for a decision to be made on their who spoke to the BBC's Afghan Service, is currently in Pakistan - which has been expelling tens of thousands of Afghans in recent months. If the path to the US is closed to her, she is not sure what to do next."Returning to Afghanistan is not an option for us - it would be incredibly challenging," she said. "Our children have already lost years of education, and we have no hope of safely going back." More than 8,300 family members of US citizens are ready for an interview in Afghanistan, with more than 11,400 others awaiting family reunification, according to US Department of State data shared by who asked to be identified by his nickname, is one of the 200,000 Afghans who have already reached the US, because he worked directly for the US military. He is now a US sister, however, remains in Afghanistan where she and her husband are "living in a hide and seek game", he says. They change their address and city every couple months in order to stay passed the background and medical checks for refugee resettlement, but like the others who spoke to the BBC, they became trapped when the process was paused in latest order has made Mojo, who lives in Houston, Texas, and the rest of his family lose "all our hope completely" ."I wish that he would change his mind, make some exception, change the rules or take his order back and let people have a peaceful life," he said. Pakistan expels tens of thousands of AfghansAfghans hiding in Pakistan live in fear of forced deportationEx-US generals describe chaos of Afghanistan withdrawal The ban also affects Afghans who are not trying to reach the US for Ghafari is studying at Cornell University in New York state, but is currently in Germany for the summer with her young said she began a "frantic" race back to the US on Thursday in order to continue her studies, before the start of the travel ban on ban has put her under "immense pressure" and has made her feel "very vulnerable", the the 30-year-old former politician told the makes it worse, she said, was that she regularly had to return to Germany every few months to maintain her residency status there too. Describing her situation as "precarious", she said she worried about how she could make her regular trips to Germany when the travel ban VanDiver, of AfghanEvac, said the ban broke a promise Americans had made to Afghans over the 20 years they were in the country."This policy punishes people who escaped the Taliban, risked everything to support democracy, are already vetted, were told by the US government to wait," he wrote on social media platform X."They're not threats. They're our allies - and they're being left behind."Meanwhile, many of those still in Afghanistan have other problems to contend one Afghan man in Kabul told AFP news agency: "We don't even have bread, why are you asking me about travelling to America?"Additional reporting by Azadeh Moshiri and Gabriela Pomeroy