Taliban in crisis as leadership splits over women's rights
The Taliban is facing an internal revolt over women's rights that has become public and could lead to a full-blown conflict in Afghanistan, The Telegraph can reveal.
Mullah Haibatullah Akhundzada, the country's supreme leader, is battling a rebellion from senior cabinet ministers over his ban on girls' education and restrictions on women's economic participation.
Akhundzada, who has led the Taliban since 2016 and is now Afghanistan's de-facto leader, is at odds with Sirajuddin Haqqani, the interior minister, Mullah Yaqoob, the defence minister, and Sher Mohammad Abbas Stanikzai, the deputy foreign minister, who all want the Taliban to be more progressive.
Stanikzai has fled to Dubai after his criticism of the supreme leader led to an arrest warrant being issued, while Haqqani is also thought to be out of the country.
Now, Akhundzada has deployed soldiers to Kabul airport to stop other high-ranking officials from leaving.
Akhundzada, who is rarely seen in public and has almost no digital footprint, is facing his biggest crisis since the Taliban swept into power after the chaotic withdrawal of the US from the country in August 2021.
When they seized power Zabihullah Mujahid, the Taliban spokesman, assured the world that women would be allowed to work and study 'within the framework of Islam'. However, within weeks, these assurances began to unravel.
By September, the Taliban announced that only boys and male teachers would return to secondary schools, effectively barring girls from secondary education. In March 2022, they briefly declared that all students, including girls, would be allowed back to school, only to revoke the decision within hours, citing the need for an 'appropriate Islamic environment'.
In May 2022, the Taliban imposed a strict dress code for women, mandating full-body coverings, further restricting their public presence.
Mohammad Nabi Omari, the Taliban's deputy interior minister, was reportedly moved to tears while pleading for the reopening of girls' schools, arguing that even if girls' education wasn't a religious obligation, it was at least permissible.
His views were ignored.
Now, more than three years since the so-called 'temporary' ban on girls' education, another academic year is set to begin in March without any females the classroom. Hopes that restrictions would be lifted have faded, leaving an entire generation of Afghan girls facing a future without formal education.
Leaked audio messages from the deputy foreign minister has revealed evidence of the split.
'The restrictions imposed on women are the personal wish of some Taliban elders and are un-Islamic,' Stanikzai said. 'The obedience to a leader is conditional, and if a leader strays from the right path or issues harmful decrees, they should not be followed.'
Going further, at a graduation ceremony last month in southeastern Khost province, near the Afghan-Pakistan border, Stanikzai said: 'We are being unjust to 20 million people. There is no justification for this – not now or in the future. During the time of the Prophet Mohammed, the doors of knowledge were open for both men and women.
'There were such remarkable women that if I were to elaborate on their contributions, it would take considerable time.'
Shortly after Stanikzai's speech, Akhundhzada ordered his arrest to silence dissent within the leadership. Stanikzai escaped to the UAE before the authorities could arrest him. He claims that he is only there while 'recovering from a Covid-like infection'.
The comments mirror those of Haqqani and Yaqoob, who are against the 'monopolising' of power by Akhundzada's hardline faction in Kandahar.
Haqqani, a powerful figure within the Taliban, has also publicly questioned the ban on women's rights and the regime's reluctance to engage with the international community on women's issues.
The interior minister has been in Dubai and Riyadh since January 22 after the UN Security Council approved his travel-ban exemption. Although the Taliban's spokesperson acknowledged the trip, little has been disclosed about its purpose or Haqqani's delayed return.
Haqqani, whose 'Haqqani Network' has been linked to Pakistan's intelligence agency, ISI, remains on the US most-wanted list for orchestrating high-profile attacks against American and Nato forces for nearly two decades.
A formal split within the Taliban could weaken its control, sparking infighting, defections, and a loss of centralised authority. He could leverage his influence over fighters to challenge Akhundzada's dominance.
Haqqani is supported by Yaqoob, the son of Mullah Omar, the Taliban leader who gave refuge to Osama bin Laden and the al-Qeada terror group. As defence minister he has sway over a large number of troops.
Akhundzada may already be exacting his revenge.
In December, Khalil Rahman Haqqani, the refugee minister, was killed along with four others in a suicide attack in Kabul. He was a senior leader within the Haqqani Network and was aiding al-Qaeda's military in Afghanistan. After coming to power, he was known for lobbying behind the scenes for girls and women to attend secondary schools and universities.
'We shouldn't just shrug this all off. The fact that these internal divisions have been playing out for so long, combined with other notable developments like the still unexplained killing of a top Haqqani leader, indicate that the supreme leadership is struggling to quell these disruptions,' said Michael Kugelman, South Asia Institute director at The Wilson Centre think tank.
'That's significant for an organisation that demands and expects unquestioned loyalty and obedience from all.
'The fact that a leader as senior as Stanikzai left the country is quite significant and shows just how serious the spat has become, at least when it comes to tensions playing out on personal levels.'
The Telegraph can reveal that on Tuesday, a delegation of 14 officials was removed from a flydubai flight at Kabul airport and prevented from heading to Qatar, at least partly because there were two women in the group. The Haqqani-backed group were heading to the Afghanistan Future Thought Forum where discussions were thought to be centred around women's right to work and access to education.
Mujahid admitted that differences exist within the leadership but insisted there was no open conflict. Speaking in an X Spaces discussion, the Taliban spokesman said: 'Differences in viewpoints are normal. Every member of the Islamic emirate looks at an issue from a different perspective, and sometimes these matters even leak to the media. However, there are no disputes.
'Lately, we have seen false information and baseless propaganda aimed at misleading public perception. We do not harm each other over disagreements.'
Mr Kugelman said that for now Akhundzada remains in power.
'The supreme leadership in Kandahar remains in full control, with no indications of any type of mutiny,' Mr Kugelman said. 'We are seeing dissent from some prominent leaders, but it's not something that's morphed into some form of wider internal rebellion.'
While some senior Taliban figures, including Haqqani and Stanikzai, have openly criticised Akhundzada, others have expressed their discontent privately.
Taliban officials told The Telegraph that many enforced rules primarily focus on 'controlling women' and 'often don't even make sense'.
They accuse Akhundzada of creating an atmosphere of fear by linking every directive to religion, branding critics as 'enemies of Islam'.
Last year, Haqqani told a religious gathering in his native Khost region: 'This situation can no longer be tolerated.'
The Taliban's policies have plunged Afghanistan into an economic and humanitarian crisis. More than 25 million people – over half the population – now live in poverty with limited access to food. Nearly one million jobs have been lost as businesses struggled, and women remain locked out of education and the formal economy.
The UN has suspended several 'time-critical' aid programmes in Afghanistan following the Taliban's ban on women in humanitarian work, education, and the formal economy. The international community has repeatedly stated that recognition of the Taliban regime depends on respecting women's rights, forming an inclusive government, and ensuring Afghanistan is not used as a base for terrorism.
'The Taliban have always tried to present themselves as a united front under one supreme leader. But now, we're seeing cars in Kabul with pictures of Sirajuddin Haqqani and banners reading 'Haqqani Network'. This is a clear message – they no longer want to obey Kandahar,' said a doctor in Kabul, who requested anonymity.
'We are deeply worried. A split within the Taliban isn't just a possibility any more; it's becoming inevitable. The clouds of crisis are gathering, and it's no longer a question of if, but when. There are rumours that unknown armed men have taken over parts of Baghlan [province], and reports of Taliban fighters abandoning Panjshir [province] are only adding to the fear,' he added.
'Anyone who can replace this current hardline regime and bring back freedom of expression and education for all – including women – would be a welcome relief. We desperately need that change.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
Sydney Muslim cleric tells court Jewish people can't be offended by him calling them ‘vile' as lectures were private
A Sydney Muslim cleric being sued for alleged racial discrimination has told the federal court no Jewish person could be offended over a series of lectures in which he described Jewish people in the seventh century as 'mischievous', 'treacherous' and 'vile' because the lectures were delivered to a private Muslim audience. Wissam Haddad – whose legal name is William but who is also known as Abu Ousayd – is being sued by two senior members of Australia's peak Jewish body, the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ), over a series of lectures he gave in Bankstown in November 2023 and subsequently broadcast online, in which he is alleged to have maligned Jewish people. Haddad allegedly breached section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, which prohibits offensive behaviour based on race or ethnic origin. Haddad's defence argues the speeches were delivered to a known Muslim audience, in a private place, and fail the clause in 18C that the offensive act is unlawful when it is committed 'otherwise than in private'. In submissions filed before the federal court, Haddad argues four of the five speeches were delivered at his prayer centre, Al Madina Dawah Centre in Bankstown. 'The centre is a stand-alone building which is manifestly a private property – it is surrounded by high black fencing and its entrance carries a sign that says 'Private Property No Trespassing'.' Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Haddad's submissions to the court said there was no standing invitation for any non-Muslims to attend the centre. 'There will be no evidence that any of the speeches was attended or heard by anyone who was not a regular congregant of the centre and a practising Muslim.' The remaining speech was a conversation in a room between three people. Haddad was called as a witness late on Wednesday morning. He told the court uploading his speeches to social media was not part of his responsibilities. 'I'm not involved,' he told the court. But under repeated questioning from one of the applicant's barristers, Peter Braham SC, he told the court he knew his speeches would be posted online. 'Yes I did.' Haddad said the speeches were posted online by 'someone from the community'. Asked who it was, Haddad said: 'I'm not at liberty to give his name because I don't think it's relevant.' Peter Wertheim, one of the applicants in the case and ECAJ's co-chief executive, told the federal court on Tuesday that he was first alerted to the presence of Haddad's speeches online by coverage of them in mainstream media. He said Haddad's speeches used 'overtly dehumanising' language. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'Making derogatory generalisations, calling Jews a vile and treacherous people, calling them rats and cowards … are things which I think would be experienced by most Jews as dehumanising,' Wertheim said. His barrister, Braham, told the court Haddad's speeches repeated a range of offensive tropes and were designed to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate Jewish people. The court heard Haddad had sound recording and camera equipment installed to record his speeches, which Wertheim's barrister argued was for the purpose of disseminating his message far beyond his congregants. He would speak before a backdrop branded with the Al Madina Dawah Centre logo, but which also included logos of YouTube, Facebook, Instagram and other social media platforms. The applicants are seeking an injunction that Haddad's five offending sermons be removed from the internet, and an order that he refrain from publishing similar speeches in future. Wertheim and his co-applicant, Robert Goot, are also seeking publication of a 'corrective notice' on Haddad's prayer centre's social media pages, and to be awarded the legal costs of bringing their action. They have not sought damages or compensation. Haddad's barrister, Andrew Boe, argued the cleric's speeches were addressed to, and intended only for, a private Muslim congregation and that Haddad was not responsible for them being published online. Boe said it was unlikely a Jewish person would have discovered the speeches, to then be offended by them, if the recordings had not been covered and thus amplified by mainstream media. 'It would be analogous to a person of a prudish sensitivity seeking out pornography on the web and then complaining about being offended by it,' Boe told the court. Boe argued there must be room, in a democratic society, for 'the confronting, the challenging, even the shocking'. The hearing, before Justice Angus Stewart, is expected to run until the end of the week.
Telegraph
17 hours ago
- Telegraph
Undercover police inquiry set to be most expensive in history
The public inquiry into undercover policing is on course to become the most expensive in British legal history. Official figures obtained by The Telegraph have established that the cost of the decade-old inquiry could exceed £200 million. The figure would overtake the cost of the Bloody Sunday inquiry, which reached £191 million and would be more than five times the amount spent on the inquiry into the Manchester Arena terror attack. One policing chief described the time taken and spiralling costs as a 'national embarrassment'. Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary and a former policing minister, said the costs were 'out of control' and called for the inquiry to be rapidly wound up. One political source added: 'It has turned into a gravy train for lawyers.' The inquiry, which began on July 17 2015, has cost £102 million to date, while a further £68.6 million has been spent on dozens of experienced detectives, uniformed constables and staff. The 74 police officers and staff, which include a detective superintendent, detective chief inspectors, inspectors sergeants and constables, have been diverted to investigate the activities of undercover officers as far back as 1968, figures obtained under freedom of information laws reveal. The £68 million total police bill is the equivalent to employing 1,000 constables or policing a town the size of Bournemouth 24/7, according to this newspaper's analysis. With at least another two years to run, The Telegraph understands that the Home Office anticipates the costs of the inquiry are likely to hit between £130 million and £150 million on top of the £68.6 million for police investigators. The revelations come ahead of Rachel Reeves's spending review on Wednesday. Police chiefs have warned it could force them to deprioritise the investigation of other crimes if she fails to plug a £1.3 billion hole in their budgets. The inquiry was launched by Theresa May, the then home secretary, after a series of 'spy cop' scandals where undercover officers slept with women without disclosing their true identities, failed to reveal their roles in court cases and were involved in criminal acts. Martyn Underhill, a former Met detective and Dorset's first police and crime commissioner, said he had backed the need for an inquiry into activities that were a 'stain on policing', but he added: 'The time taken, and the spiralling costs, are now becoming a national embarrassment, akin to the Bloody Sunday inquiry. 'What is clear here is that the remit of the inquiry is too broad, and should have been limited to undercover cops establishing relationships on and off duty with targets, not a remit of all undercover policing. 'By the time the inquiry has reported to the Government, many of its findings will be out of date. This issue is now completely out of control, and UK Policing PLC has to carry some of that blame.' Mr Philp said: 'This public inquiry is totally out of control. It should not be taking more than 10 years and cost over £200 million. It is a total waste of money. 'It is also dragging police officers who served over 50 years ago through a legal process. It should be brought to a very rapid conclusion before any more time and money is wasted.' Endless legal tactics It is believed the Home Office originally envisaged the inquiry would last three years. It has had two judicial chairmen, Sir Christopher Pitchford, who stepped down as a result of ill health, followed by Sir John Mitting. Last week, Sir John announced that he will be stepping down next year after the publication of the second interim report. It is likely to cause further delays beyond the projected 2027 end date as a successor will have to be found. It is understood that ministers in the last government were told by the inquiry it could last until 2032, five years longer than the 12 years that it took the Bloody Sunday inquiry to complete its work. There are 249 core participants, all entitled to have reasonable legal costs paid. The issue of protecting the identities of undercover operatives has caused long delays and legal issues. The inquiry has released the cover names of 70 undercover officers from the Metropolitan Police's undercover unit the Special Demonstration Squad (SDS). The £170.6 million cost of the inquiry to date has put it on a par with the Grenfell Tower public inquiry, which cost £173.2 million. It is more than five times the Manchester Arena inquiry (£35.6 million), and 13 times the Chilcot inquiry into the Iraq war (£13.1 million). The independent inquiry into child sexual abuse (IICSA) cost £192.7 million. Those involved with campaigners targeted by undercover operatives said police must shoulder some of the blame for the lengthy delays and costs. They tried to 'keep things out of the public domain' for up to five years, said one, through 'endless' legal tactics and applications to the court to prevent officers being identified. Another insider questioned the decision to set up a public inquiry in the first place, pointing out that changes to police undercover practices were already underway and said the terms of reference and period of investigation for the inquiry had been set too wide.
Telegraph
18 hours ago
- Telegraph
One in five Afghans at risk from landmines
One in five Afghans is at risk of being killed or maimed by landmines and unexploded bombs, the world's biggest de-mining charity has warned. After 40 years of conflict, Afghanistan is second only to Ukraine in terms of its contamination with unexploded ordnance but risks becoming 'a forgotten humanitarian problem'. Some 6.4 million people – around a fifth of the country's total population – live in areas littered with landmines and unexploded ordnance, The Halo Trust has said in a new analysis of the threat facing Afghans. As a result, roughly 50 Afghans are being killed or severely wounded in explosive accidents every month. More than 80 per cent of victims are children, often sent to collect scrap metal that is subsequently sold-on in order for their families to make a living. The problem has been exacerbated recently by the expulsion of hundreds of thousands of Afghan refugees from neighbouring Pakistan and Iran. Many of those arriving back in the country fled following the Taliban takeover in 2021, and often have few means to support themselves. The Halo Trust has cleared over 800,000 landmines and 11 million pieces of unexploded ordnance from Afghanistan since it began working in the country in 1998. But recent cuts to foreign aid spending – particularly USAID, the US's foreign aid agency which was a major funder of international demining programmes – has forced the organisation to cut its mine-clearing staff in Afghanistan by almost half, from 2,200 to 1,000 people. 'Afghanistan is now a forgotten humanitarian problem. The Afghan people have struggled for over four decades of conflict, displacement, poverty, and we need the international community to continue to support people to the end of this journey and not leave them stranded halfway through,' said Dr Farid Homayoun, the Halo Trust's Afghanistan Programme Manager. Earlier this year, the Halo Trust sounded the alarm after several European countries announced plans to leave the Ottawa Treaty, a landmark agreement introduced in 1997 that bans the use, stockpiling, production, and transfer of anti-personnel mines. Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and Finland announced their intentions to withdraw in April, citing the threat of a Russian attack.
