Taliban in crisis as leadership splits over women's rights
The Taliban is facing an internal revolt over women's rights that has become public and could lead to a full-blown conflict in Afghanistan, The Telegraph can reveal.
Mullah Haibatullah Akhundzada, the country's supreme leader, is battling a rebellion from senior cabinet ministers over his ban on girls' education and restrictions on women's economic participation.
Akhundzada, who has led the Taliban since 2016 and is now Afghanistan's de-facto leader, is at odds with Sirajuddin Haqqani, the interior minister, Mullah Yaqoob, the defence minister, and Sher Mohammad Abbas Stanikzai, the deputy foreign minister, who all want the Taliban to be more progressive.
Stanikzai has fled to Dubai after his criticism of the supreme leader led to an arrest warrant being issued, while Haqqani is also thought to be out of the country.
Now, Akhundzada has deployed soldiers to Kabul airport to stop other high-ranking officials from leaving.
Akhundzada, who is rarely seen in public and has almost no digital footprint, is facing his biggest crisis since the Taliban swept into power after the chaotic withdrawal of the US from the country in August 2021.
When they seized power Zabihullah Mujahid, the Taliban spokesman, assured the world that women would be allowed to work and study 'within the framework of Islam'. However, within weeks, these assurances began to unravel.
By September, the Taliban announced that only boys and male teachers would return to secondary schools, effectively barring girls from secondary education. In March 2022, they briefly declared that all students, including girls, would be allowed back to school, only to revoke the decision within hours, citing the need for an 'appropriate Islamic environment'.
In May 2022, the Taliban imposed a strict dress code for women, mandating full-body coverings, further restricting their public presence.
Mohammad Nabi Omari, the Taliban's deputy interior minister, was reportedly moved to tears while pleading for the reopening of girls' schools, arguing that even if girls' education wasn't a religious obligation, it was at least permissible.
His views were ignored.
Now, more than three years since the so-called 'temporary' ban on girls' education, another academic year is set to begin in March without any females the classroom. Hopes that restrictions would be lifted have faded, leaving an entire generation of Afghan girls facing a future without formal education.
Leaked audio messages from the deputy foreign minister has revealed evidence of the split.
'The restrictions imposed on women are the personal wish of some Taliban elders and are un-Islamic,' Stanikzai said. 'The obedience to a leader is conditional, and if a leader strays from the right path or issues harmful decrees, they should not be followed.'
Going further, at a graduation ceremony last month in southeastern Khost province, near the Afghan-Pakistan border, Stanikzai said: 'We are being unjust to 20 million people. There is no justification for this – not now or in the future. During the time of the Prophet Mohammed, the doors of knowledge were open for both men and women.
'There were such remarkable women that if I were to elaborate on their contributions, it would take considerable time.'
Shortly after Stanikzai's speech, Akhundhzada ordered his arrest to silence dissent within the leadership. Stanikzai escaped to the UAE before the authorities could arrest him. He claims that he is only there while 'recovering from a Covid-like infection'.
The comments mirror those of Haqqani and Yaqoob, who are against the 'monopolising' of power by Akhundzada's hardline faction in Kandahar.
Haqqani, a powerful figure within the Taliban, has also publicly questioned the ban on women's rights and the regime's reluctance to engage with the international community on women's issues.
The interior minister has been in Dubai and Riyadh since January 22 after the UN Security Council approved his travel-ban exemption. Although the Taliban's spokesperson acknowledged the trip, little has been disclosed about its purpose or Haqqani's delayed return.
Haqqani, whose 'Haqqani Network' has been linked to Pakistan's intelligence agency, ISI, remains on the US most-wanted list for orchestrating high-profile attacks against American and Nato forces for nearly two decades.
A formal split within the Taliban could weaken its control, sparking infighting, defections, and a loss of centralised authority. He could leverage his influence over fighters to challenge Akhundzada's dominance.
Haqqani is supported by Yaqoob, the son of Mullah Omar, the Taliban leader who gave refuge to Osama bin Laden and the al-Qeada terror group. As defence minister he has sway over a large number of troops.
Akhundzada may already be exacting his revenge.
In December, Khalil Rahman Haqqani, the refugee minister, was killed along with four others in a suicide attack in Kabul. He was a senior leader within the Haqqani Network and was aiding al-Qaeda's military in Afghanistan. After coming to power, he was known for lobbying behind the scenes for girls and women to attend secondary schools and universities.
'We shouldn't just shrug this all off. The fact that these internal divisions have been playing out for so long, combined with other notable developments like the still unexplained killing of a top Haqqani leader, indicate that the supreme leadership is struggling to quell these disruptions,' said Michael Kugelman, South Asia Institute director at The Wilson Centre think tank.
'That's significant for an organisation that demands and expects unquestioned loyalty and obedience from all.
'The fact that a leader as senior as Stanikzai left the country is quite significant and shows just how serious the spat has become, at least when it comes to tensions playing out on personal levels.'
The Telegraph can reveal that on Tuesday, a delegation of 14 officials was removed from a flydubai flight at Kabul airport and prevented from heading to Qatar, at least partly because there were two women in the group. The Haqqani-backed group were heading to the Afghanistan Future Thought Forum where discussions were thought to be centred around women's right to work and access to education.
Mujahid admitted that differences exist within the leadership but insisted there was no open conflict. Speaking in an X Spaces discussion, the Taliban spokesman said: 'Differences in viewpoints are normal. Every member of the Islamic emirate looks at an issue from a different perspective, and sometimes these matters even leak to the media. However, there are no disputes.
'Lately, we have seen false information and baseless propaganda aimed at misleading public perception. We do not harm each other over disagreements.'
Mr Kugelman said that for now Akhundzada remains in power.
'The supreme leadership in Kandahar remains in full control, with no indications of any type of mutiny,' Mr Kugelman said. 'We are seeing dissent from some prominent leaders, but it's not something that's morphed into some form of wider internal rebellion.'
While some senior Taliban figures, including Haqqani and Stanikzai, have openly criticised Akhundzada, others have expressed their discontent privately.
Taliban officials told The Telegraph that many enforced rules primarily focus on 'controlling women' and 'often don't even make sense'.
They accuse Akhundzada of creating an atmosphere of fear by linking every directive to religion, branding critics as 'enemies of Islam'.
Last year, Haqqani told a religious gathering in his native Khost region: 'This situation can no longer be tolerated.'
The Taliban's policies have plunged Afghanistan into an economic and humanitarian crisis. More than 25 million people – over half the population – now live in poverty with limited access to food. Nearly one million jobs have been lost as businesses struggled, and women remain locked out of education and the formal economy.
The UN has suspended several 'time-critical' aid programmes in Afghanistan following the Taliban's ban on women in humanitarian work, education, and the formal economy. The international community has repeatedly stated that recognition of the Taliban regime depends on respecting women's rights, forming an inclusive government, and ensuring Afghanistan is not used as a base for terrorism.
'The Taliban have always tried to present themselves as a united front under one supreme leader. But now, we're seeing cars in Kabul with pictures of Sirajuddin Haqqani and banners reading 'Haqqani Network'. This is a clear message – they no longer want to obey Kandahar,' said a doctor in Kabul, who requested anonymity.
'We are deeply worried. A split within the Taliban isn't just a possibility any more; it's becoming inevitable. The clouds of crisis are gathering, and it's no longer a question of if, but when. There are rumours that unknown armed men have taken over parts of Baghlan [province], and reports of Taliban fighters abandoning Panjshir [province] are only adding to the fear,' he added.
'Anyone who can replace this current hardline regime and bring back freedom of expression and education for all – including women – would be a welcome relief. We desperately need that change.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
35 minutes ago
- The Guardian
How ordinary men became unpaid Taliban enforcers in their own homes
To be a father of daughters in the Taliban's Afghanistan has become a daily nightmare for Amir. Now, he says, he is more prison guard than loving parent, an unwilling and unpaid enforcer of a system of gender apartheid that he despises yet feels compelled to inflict on his two teenage girls in order to protect them from the Taliban's rage and reprisals. Just a few years ago, Amir's daughters had a life and a future. They went to school, to see friends and moved around their community. Now, he says he would prefer it if his daughters never left the house. He, like many other fathers in Afghanistan, has heard stories about what can happen to young women who find themselves in the crosshairs of the Taliban's 'morality police'. In the rare instances when their begging and pleading to be allowed out in the world gets too much for him, he ensures they go accompanied by a male member of the family and are fully covered. 'I insist that they wear the hijab and I tell them they are not allowed to laugh outside the house or at the market,' he says. 'The 'morality police' are very strict, and if they don't comply, they might get detained.' Last summer, three years after they swept to power in August 2021, the scale of the Taliban's ambition to erase women from public life was laid bare in their unveiling of an extensive set of 'vice and virtue' laws. Under the new rules, women were told to cover themselves completely when outside the house; not to allow their voices to be heard talking loudly; to only appear in public with a male escort and never to look at a man who was not their direct relation. When the rules were announced, it was unclear how a relatively small number of 'morality police' employed by the Taliban would enforce and implement these rules. Yet, in the months since the rules were announced, it has been fathers, brothers and husbands who have become, in effect, unpaid foot soldiers imposing the Taliban's oppressive regime on Afghanistan's women and girls. They are driven not just by fear of what will happen to women if apprehended by Taliban enforcers. Under the Taliban's new rules, if a woman is deemed to be found in breach of its morality rules, it is her male relative, not her, who could be punished and face fines or even prison. The Guardian and Rukhshana Media spoke to more than a dozen men, as well as young women across Afghanistan, about how the Taliban's morality laws were changing their attitudes and behaviours towards the women in their families. 'Men have become unpaid soldiers of the Taliban,' says Jawid Hakimi, from Bamyan province. 'We are forced, for the sake of our honour, reputation and social standing, to enforce the Taliban's orders on the women in our families. Day by day, society is adjusting to the Taliban's rules, and their restrictions [on women] are gradually reshaping society according to their vision – and we feel compelled to align our families with their expectations. It is a suffocating atmosphere.' Parwiz, a young man from a province in the north-east of Afghanistan says when his sister was detained by the Taliban's 'morality police' for not wearing a hijab, he was terrified for her safety and determined that this would never happen again. 'I was forced to go to the police station, where I was insulted and told I had to do whatever the Taliban said,' he says. 'When I came home, I took out all my anger and frustration on my mother and sister.' Other men who spoke of how the fear of social shame if they were punished for 'immoral' behaviour was spilling over into repression and violence towards their female family members. Freshta, a young woman from Badakhshan province, says she is beaten by her husband if she leaves the house, even to get food at the market. 'I went to the corner of the street to buy vegetables and I had put on a long, black hijab but no burqa. When I returned, he hit me across the face and beat me. He said: 'Do you want us to break the rules? What if one of my work colleagues saw you?' For months now I have barely left the house. He says if I do leave I need to wear the burqa.' Rabia, 22, says he cannot risk the family facing the 'dishonour' of his elder sister Maryam going out and people thinking that she is dressed immodestly. 'Our pride doesn't allow it. We have shame, we have honour. We can't bear the thought that, God forbid, something might be said about her in the city or the market,' he says. Young women spoke of the pain of their families turning into enforcers of a morality code imposed on them by an extremist ideology that had already stripped them of their right to education, work and self-autonomy. 'My father's behaviour changed after the Taliban came. Before that, he didn't care much about our [his daughters'] clothing,' says 25-year-old Masha. 'Before, he never told us not to wear something or to avoid certain places, but as soon as the Taliban came he changed. He said: 'If you consider me your father and care about the dignity of your family you will wear the hijab. Don't wear makeup, not even a strand of your hair should be visible, don't wear high-heeled shoes, and you don't need to go out so often. Tell me or your brothers so we can get it for you from the market,'' she says. 'So now every time I have my period I have to go without sanitary products or medicine. I just stay inside.' Richard Bennett, the UN's special rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Afghanistan says that, while he has documented 'acts of resistance' from Afghan men against the Taliban's institutionalised repression of women, 'within families, male family members are increasingly enforcing restrictions on their female relatives, and more women report needing permission to leave their homes. There are also increasing reports of female family members ensuring compliance.' 'The presence of de facto officials and suspected informers in communities, the threat of constant surveillance and the unpredictability of enforcement are further contributing to feelings of insecurity, heightening psychological stress and anxiety, especially among young women,' he says.
ITV News
14 hours ago
- ITV News
Trump's new travel ban set to come in to effect on Monday
President Trump's new travel ban is set to come in to effect on Monday, restricting travel to the US from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries. The move comes amid growing tensions in the US as Donald Trump continues delivering on his election promise to increase immigration enforcement. The order banning travel from certain countries was signed by Trump on Wednesday and applies to citizens from: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also increases travel restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the US and don't hold a valid visa. Mohammad Sharafoddin, his wife and young son walked at times for 36 hours in a row over mountain passes as they left Afghanistan as refugees. They had hoped to one day bring their niece to the US to join them - from Monday that will no longer be possible as Afghanistan joins a list of 12 countries restricted from travelling to America. 'It's kind of shock for us when we hear about Afghanistan, especially right now for ladies who are affected more than others with the new government,' Mohammad Sharafoddin said, referring to the country's Taliban rulers. 'We didn't think about this travel ban.' The new ban does not revoke visas previously issued to people from countries on the list, according to guidance issued Friday to all US diplomatic missions. Travelers with previously issued visas should still be able to enter the U.S. even after the ban takes effect. Many immigration experts say the new ban is designed to beat any court challenge by focusing on the visa application process and appears more carefully crafted than a hastily written executive order during Trump's first term that denied entry to citizens of mainly Muslim countries. "We don't want them," says Donald Trump as he signs the travel restrictions executive order. In a video posted Wednesday on social media, Trump said nationals of countries included in the ban pose 'terrorism-related' and 'public-safety' risks, as well as risks of overstaying their visas. He also said some of these countries had 'deficient' screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their citizens. Trump also tied the new ban to a terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. The man charged in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. US officials say he overstayed a tourist visa. The ban was quickly denounced by groups that provide aid and resettlement help to refugees. 'This policy is not about national security — it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America, a nonprofit international relief organisation. Venezuela President Nicolás Maduro's government condemned the travel ban, characterizing it in a statement as a 'stigmatization and criminalization campaign' against Venezuelans.
South Wales Guardian
a day ago
- South Wales Guardian
Badenoch says organisations should be able to decide if staff can wear burkas
Mrs Badenoch also said people who come to her constituency surgeries must remove their face coverings 'whether it's a burka or a balaclava'. Ms Badenoch posted a video on X of part of her interview with the Telegraph, in which she said: 'My view is that people should be allowed to wear whatever they want, not what their husband is asking them to wear or what their community says that they should wear. 'I personally have strong views about face coverings. 'If you come into my constituency surgery, you have to remove your face covering, whether it's a burka or a balaclava. 'I'm not talking to people who are not going to show me their face. 'Organisations should be able to decide what their staff wear for instance, it shouldn't be something that people should be able to override.' She added that France has a ban and has 'worse problems than we do in this country on integration'. The Telegraph asked me about Burqa Bans. I don't like these sorts of face coverings in fact I won't hold my constituency surgeries with people in face coverings….but burqa bans won't fix the problem of cultural separatism. There are better ways. More in my response below👇 — Kemi Badenoch (@KemiBadenoch) June 8, 2025 On Wednesday, Reform's newest MP Sarah Pochin asked Sir Keir Starmer during Prime Minister's Questions whether he would support such a ban. Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice said his party has 'triggered a national discussion'. Asked if he wants to ban burkas, Mr Tice told GB News on Sunday: 'We've triggered a national discussion. I'm very concerned about them (burkas). 'Frankly, I think they are repressive. I think that they make women second-class citizens. 'We're a Christian nation. We have equality between the sexes, and I'm very concerned, and if someone wants to convince me otherwise, well come and talk to me. 'But at the moment, my view is that I think we should follow seven other nations across Europe that have already banned them.' He called for a debate on the topic to 'hear where the country's mood is'. Meanwhile, shadow home secretary Chris Philp said 'employers should be allowed to decide whether their employees can be visible or not', when discussing face coverings. Asked on the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme if the Conservative Party's position is not to speak to people who cover their face, Mr Philp said of Mrs Badenoch: 'Well she was talking specifically about her constituency surgery I think, and it is definitely the case that employers should be allowed to decide whether their employees can be visible or not. 'But I don't think this is necessarily the biggest issue facing our country right now. 'There's a legitimate debate to have about the burka. 'You've got, obviously, arguments about personal liberty and choice and freedom on one side, and arguments about causing divisions in society and the possibility of coercion on the other. 'That is a debate I think we as a country should be having, but as Kemi said, it's probably not the biggest issue our nation faces today.' Asked if he would talk to people who would not show their face, the Croydon South MP said: 'I have in the past spoken to people obviously wearing a burka – I represent a London constituency – but everybody can make their own choices, that's the point she was making, each employer should be able to make their own choices.'
