Millions on NHS waiting lists yet to have first appointment
Figures from NHS England last month suggest nearly half of those waiting for hospital care have not had their first appointment with a specialist or a diagnostic test since their GP referral.
An analysis by health data specialist MBI Health suggests nearly three million out of the 6.23 million patients (48 per cent) waiting for treatment are left in limbo.
Experts referred to the issue as a 'frontlog' and warned the crisis 'has gone unchallenged for too long'.
MBI's analysis also found that around 70 per cent of referral-to-treatment pathways fall into the category of being 'unseen' since the patient's GP referred them to a specialist.
Delays in making a first assessment can lead to late diagnosis, worsening symptoms and pressure on emergency services.
The analysis found that ear, nose and throat, trauma and orthopaedics, gastroenterology, ophthalmology and gynaecology and obstetrics departments were consistently the specialist departments with the greatest number of patients not seen for the first time.
'That's a breakdown'
As part of the Government's 10-year health plan, the NHS is expected to meet its target of carrying out 92 per cent of routine operations and appointments within 18 weeks by March 2029 – a target that has not been achieved for almost a decade.
The latest figures show how challenging that target will be given an estimated one million of the three million unseen patients have already gone more than 18 weeks without receiving any care.
'If accurate, three million people are trapped in an invisible waiting-list crisis, stuck without basic diagnostic tests of first appointments while their conditions worsen,' Rachel Power, the chief executive of the Patients Association, told the Guardian.
'The scale is staggering, as nearly half of all patients on a waiting list haven't been seen by anyone. That's not a healthcare service; that's a breakdown.
'These aren't just statistics. They're people checking their phones daily for hospital calls that never come, unable to plan their lives while their symptoms deteriorate.'
Last month it was found people of working age are making up a growing proportion of those on the NHS waiting list for treatment in England.
Data tables published for the first time by NHS England also show people in the most deprived parts of the country are more likely to wait more than a year to start hospital treatment than those in the least deprived.
The figures, analysed by the PA news agency, showed 56.1 per cent of those on the list at the end of June this year were of working age (defined as age 19 to 64), up from 55.8 per cent a year ago and 55 per cent in June 2022.
At the same time, the proportion of people on the waiting list under the age of 19 has fallen, standing at 10.8 per cent in June this year, down from 11.2 per cent a year earlier and 11.9 per cent in June 2022.
The proportion who are over 65 has remained broadly unchanged at around 33.1 per cent.
People of working age are also more likely to have to wait more than a year to start treatment (three per cent of patients in this age group at the end of June) than those over 65 (two and half per cent).
However, the proportion is the same as those under 19 (also three per cent).
An NHS spokesman said: 'NHS staff have made significant progress in reducing waiting lists in the last year, which are down by more than 260,000 since June 2024.
'All patients are assessed by clinicians as they are added to waiting lists, and we will continue with our plan to improve waiting times for patients throughout the year.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sector Update: Health Care Stocks Mixed in Afternoon Trading
Health care stocks were mixed Tuesday afternoon, with the NYSE Health Care Index up 0.3% and the Hea Sign in to access your portfolio
Entrepreneur
19 minutes ago
- Entrepreneur
Don't Just Sell Video Visits: Build a Healthtech Revenue Engine
What we learned at a high cost is that telehealth is not just about video visits, but about establishing a scalable revenue model. Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. Before founding Bask Health, my brother and I once pitched a telehealth startup idea to a VC with a 40-slide deck and a "disrupt healthcare" tagline. He stared at us like we were pitching a smoothie truck. Turns out, nobody cares how "virtual" your care is if you can't explain your revenue model in under 30 seconds. That was a $22,000 lesson in developer costs, regulatory hurdles and hubris. So here's what we wish someone had told us on day one: you're not selling video calls, you're building a real business. In 2025, that means more than convenience. It means unit economics that hold up, multiple buyers beyond just patients and infrastructure that doesn't implode at scale. Below, we'll break down the four core revenue pillars in modern telehealth and how to stress-test each one before you burn through your seed round. Join top CEOs, founders and operators at the Level Up conference to unlock strategies for scaling your business, boosting revenue and building sustainable success. The Nut Graf Telehealth businesses built for 2025 and beyond can't survive on DTC visits alone. The ones that scale combine four revenue streams: Direct-to-Consumer, Employer, Payor and Ancillary, into a model that balances margin, compliance and demand. Here's how to structure yours and how to kill what isn't working, fast. 1. Don't just sell to patients: Land the employer account When we built our first virtual clinic, we assumed individuals would pay out of pocket for convenience. They did, but not in the volumes needed to cover CAC. The real ROI showed up when we signed our first self-insured employer. That one deal brought in 3x the monthly revenue of our entire DTC base. It was the clearest signal we'd seen: B2B revenue can subsidize your B2C growth. What works: Target companies struggling with chronic care costs or absenteeism.; Bundle care options: behavioral health, dermatology, menopause, etc.. Offer reporting dashboards and custom onboarding. Watch for: Stay HIPAA-compliant and FMLA-aware, especially if you're integrating with existing employer EAPs; Procurement cycles that take forever if you don't have a warm intro. Expect to hire B2B sales muscle early, or founder-led selling won't scale. Related: Healthtech Is the New Healthcare 2. Payor reimbursement is a slow game. Play it anyway We avoided insurance in the early days. Too slow. Too complex. But here's the truth: the payor model is hard to start and impossible to ignore. Yes, CMS still reimburses for telehealth, but the rules shift constantly. In 2025, audio-only visits are covered under limited conditions. Some CPT codes only apply to rural areas. And even if you're eligible, collecting payment is a marathon of prior auths and claim resubmissions. What works: Start small: pilot with Medicaid MCOs or carve-outs; Get surgical with your billing codes (RTM, CCM, POS-10, etc.); Hire someone who lives in your state's MAC guidance. Watch for: 60–90 day payment cycles (prepare your burn rate accordingly); Denials for bad documentation or misused modifiers; Overestimating what "covered by insurance" actually means. Related: Why Entrepreneurs Can't Rely on Traditional Retirement Plans (And What to Do Instead) 3. Ancillary services make or break unit economics We once sold $49 telehealth visits with a $120 CAC. It was cute until we looked at our bank account. We fixed it by integrating ancillary services, labs, pharmacy delivery, diagnostics, which turned $49 tickets into $149+. Patients don't want five apps. They want one seamless care journey. Bundling services increases LTV, improves outcomes, and gives you new margin layers to play with. What works: Partner with compounding pharmacies and lab networks. Use API-first infrastructure to automate fulfillment. Track where the drop-off happens between consultation and care. Watch for: State-specific lab-direct and prescribing laws; Ongoing logistics management (especially for shipping); Upfront build time, your developers will hate this unless you buy instead of build. 4. Stress-test your margins with this 4P matrix Before we launch any new care line, we run it through what we call the 4P Matrix: Category questions to ask Patient: Who pays? Individual, employer, or insurer? Payor: Which CPT codes or bundles apply? What's reimbursable? Partner: Are there labs, pharmacies, or vendors to integrate with? Peripherals: What are the add-ons? (RPM, async care, diagnostics?) If any one "P" is weak, you'll feel it in your burn rate within 60 days. If two are weak, you're bleeding cash. And if you can't tighten the loop within one quarter, sunset the service. Don't pitch telehealth. Pitch an economic engine. Investors don't want to hear about your "care journey." Employers don't care how empathetic your UI is. And patients? They want outcomes, fast. If you want to build a profitable telehealth company in 2025: Get clear on who pays and why. Design services that integrate seamlessly. Obsess over margin layers, not marketing buzzwords; And for the love of Wi-Fi, don't duct-tape your HIPAA compliance. Telehealth isn't a shortcut; it's infrastructure. But if you build it right, you're not just riding a trend. You're building healthcare's new backbone.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Girl who died in hospital ‘should have been watched at all times', inquest hears
A teenager who died after an agency worker with false identity papers left her unsupervised at a children's mental health hospital should have been kept within eyesight at all times, an inquest has heard. Ruth Szymankiewicz was being treated for an eating disorder at Huntercombe Hospital in Berkshire and had been placed under strict one-to-one observation when on February 12 2022 she was able to shut herself in her bedroom alone for 15 minutes, a jury inquest held at Buckinghamshire Coroner's Court heard on Tuesday. The 14-year-old girl self-harmed and died two days later at John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford. It later emerged the member of staff responsible for watching Ruth at the hospital's psychiatric intensive care unit – a man then known as Ebo Acheampong – had been using false identity documents and was hired under a false name. The teenager was last captured on CCTV walking out of the ward's day room 'completely on her own' before going straight to her bedroom and closing the door behind her, coroner Ian Wade KC told the hearing. Jurors were shown the footage in which 15 minutes pass before a nurse opens the door, then covers her mouth in what appears to be an expression of shock. Ellesha Brannigan, who worked as a clinical team leader on the ward, told the court on Tuesday she ran to Ruth's bedroom after the alarm was raised and found the teenage girl lying unconscious. 'She was just still,' Ms Brannigan said, adding the teenage girl was not breathing and staff initiated chest compressions in an attempt to revive her. About a week prior, Ruth's care plan had been escalated to 'level three observation' after a similar self-harming incident, Ms Brannigan told the court. 'Level three observation is within eyesight at all times,' she told the hearing. Staff members would take turns watching Ruth for 60 minutes at a time, the inquest heard. Ms Brannigan further told the inquest 'level two observation' would have still required a member of staff check on the patient 'every five or 10 minutes'. Asked by the coroner if there were circumstances in which a member of staff responsible for a level three observation could take their eyes off the patient, she replied: 'No. 'If they (the patient) are prescribed level three observation, you must comply with what is prescribed.' The coroner previously said Mr Acheampong will not be giving evidence at the inquest as he fled the UK for Ghana shortly after Ruth's death. The inquest continues.
