US Postal Service changes to mail delivery have started in Florida. Here's what to know
Changes have started in the United States Postal Service that will affect millions of customers across the country. The moves are designed to improve efficiency and cut costs, but some people might not get certain types of mail as quickly as they're used to.
In March, then-U.S. Postmaster General Louis DeJoy said he signed a deal with the Department of Government Efficiency, headed by Elon Musk, to assist the agency in addressing "big problems."
The first phase of the plan started on April 1. The USPS announced "refinements to service standards," which the agency said in a release are estimated to save the Postal Service at least $36 billion over the next ten years.
"USPS has already achieved $2.2 billion in annual transportation cost reductions by streamlining networks and optimizing air and surface options," the release said. "Additionally, it has decreased work hours by 50 million — translating to $2.5 billion in annual savings, by enhancing plant productivity and closing unnecessary facilities.
"At the same time, the Postal Service has increased revenue by $3.5 billion annually by adapting product offerings amidst significant declines in First-Class Mail volume," the USPS said.
The second phase of the plan is set to roll out later this year.
The organization relies on the sales of stamps and postage along with other products and services to fund operations. The USPS is independent, does not use tax dollars for operating expenses, and is meant to be self-financing.
However, the USPS has been struggling since the organization was hit by a couple of laws. First, in 1970, the Postal Reorganization Act required the postal service to serve all Americans while also breaking even, suggesting it should operate as a business rather than the government service it had been for nearly 200 years.
Then it was hamstrung by a bipartisan 2006 law that was meant to tweak some regulations and policies to help with falling revenue but a demand from the Bush administration, included a requirement to set aside billions each year to cover future retiree health and pension benefits for employees past, present and future. The law also restricted the USPS from offering any new services other than the ones it already offered.
The Postal Service Reform Act, passed with bipartisan support in Congress in 2022 and signed by former President Joe Biden, dropped the mandate to refund future retiree benefits and allowed the USPS to create "non-postal services" in partnership with state and local government, like fishing licenses and subway passes.
The change may have been too little, too late. Since electronic communication became more popular, the USPS has seen a sharp decline in first-class mail.
USPS revenue has dropped 80% since 1997, and volumes are the lowest since 1968, Reuters reported. It cost $9.5 billion in 2024 and is expected to cost another $6.9 billion in 2025, according to reporting from Government Executive.
According to Pew Research Centers, the USPS is the second-most popular federal agency: 72% of Americans like it, coming in second behind the National Park Service (76% in favor) and ahead of NASA (67%).
President Donald Trump is critical of the service, which delivers to 163 million addresses nationwide and employs 530,000 workers. He has floated the idea of merging it with the Commerce Department. That would halt the USPS's independent status and put it under his administration's control.
"It'll be a form of a merger, but it'll remain the Postal Service," Trump said. "And I think it'll operate a lot better than it has been over the years. It's been just a tremendous loser for this country."
The Washington Post, citing postal sources, said the plan would "probably violate federal law."
The Postal Service operates 303 facilities in Florida as of October 2024.
Here's what you need to know about confirmed changes to USPS services and mail delivery.
The department had been exempt from the DOGE cuts that have slashed thousands of jobs in several federal agencies, but DeJoy reportedly told Congress in a letter that USPS would cut 10,000 jobs over the next month through a voluntary early retirement program.
The reduction plan was announced in January and is different than the federal employee buyout offer announced for most civilian federal employees. According to a news release from the American Postal Workers Union, workers who opt to retire early can get a one-time $15,000 incentive paid in two parts.
DeJoy said the deal with DOGE and the General Services Administration will help with "identifying and achieving further efficiencies."
The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal, citing anonymous sources, said Trump wanted to merge the USPS under his administration and planned to fire the governing board of the postal service via executive order. The White House said no such order existed, but Trump did confirm that the merger was being considered.
Musk has said he wants to see it privatized.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has suggested that postal workers could carry out the U.S. census and handle tasks performed by Social Security employees as cost-cutting measures.
Newsweek reported the merger, if it goes through, could close offices, slow delivery, limit days of delivery, increase costs and lead to layoffs. Reduced delivery would likely hit rural areas hardest.
Some areas could get "2-3-day turnaround service within regions and specific local areas," according to the postal service.
Some post offices could have delivery extended by a day. The information provided didn't say which ones could expect delayed mail delivery caused by changes to regional transportation schedules.
"Under the new approach, while most mail will retain the same service standard, some mail will have a faster standard, and some will have a slightly slower standard. For First-Class Mail, the current service standard day range of 1-5 days is staying the same, while the day ranges for end-to-end Marketing Mail, Periodicals, and Package Services are being shortened. All Mail will benefit from more reliable service," a USPS news release reads.
The postal service said, "all packages will benefit from more reliable service." The 2-5 day range for USPS Ground Advantage will stay the same. However, some shipping products will have a slower delivery range going forward.
Five-digit zip code add-ons are meant to streamline sorting and delivery as compared to the current three-digit pairs.
USPS already has a map online that will let customers see how long it will take to deliver mail from one zip code to another. Customers can also look up service standards at usps.com.
Service standards will be "refined" for:
First-Class Mail.
Periodicals.
Marketing Mail.
Package Services (Bound Printed Matter, Media Mail, and Library Mail).
USPS Ground Advantage.
Priority Mail.
Priority Mail Express.
The next changes are set to take effect on July 1. More information will be released closer to that date.
That would require congressional approval.
The Postal Reorganization Act of 1970 made the Postal Service an independent agency under the executive branch. USPS is directed by a Board of Governors appointed by the president and approved by Congress.
The president can make nominations, but doesn't have direct oversight.
Contributing: George Petras, John Bacon, Phaedra Trethan, David Shepardson
This article originally appeared on Fort Myers News-Press: USPS changes will affect mail delivery in Florida. Here's how
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
29 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
SNAP user's testimony causes backlash, cruel feedback
After President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed the House, it introduced new fears for millions of Americans who rely on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to survive. The bill proposed an estimated $300 billion in cuts to SNAP over the next decade. If that portion of the bill passes the Senate as it is currently written, it would leave 12.6% of Americans potentially unable to afford shelter and food. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter The way it currently works is that states would begin to pay at least 5% of food benefit costs, and up to 25% if they have higher error rates, forcing states to choose between raising taxes, cutting other programs, or limiting SNAP access, per the Food Research & Access Center. Related: Scott Galloway sends bold statement on Social Security, US economy Republican senators pushed back hard on the cuts, leading to June 10 reports that the SNAP changes were being scaled down. The reworked plan cuts the state penalty for error from 25% to 15%, but Senate Agriculture Committee Chair John Boozman (R-Ark.) told Politico that they are "still negotiating." Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota took to social media on June 11 to share a video she surely thought would be of help to advocate for keeping SNAP intact. But her efforts have backfired. The video Klobuchar shared is of a SNAP recipient named Felecia talking about her experience as a mother of four living on SNAP benefits. Klobuchar said, "Today, we heard from Felecia, a single mom of four who works up to three jobs at a time to make ends meet. She counts on SNAP to help put food on the table. This is who Republicans in Congress are trying to take food away from. Listen to her story." In the video, Felecia says, "I would like to tell you my story on how SNAP benefit has helped me," becoming visibly emotional. "When I had my oldest daughter 21 years ago, I was working three jobs," Felecia said. "One job alone, I had to pay childcare. Another one to pay food, which wasn't enough. And one to pay the bills, and I still struggled alive." Related: Social Security income tax deduction hits major roadblock Felecia went on to say that she now has a full-time job as a bus monitor, but she only gets paid once a month, which is why she still needs SNAP. "By the time I get my bills paid, I have nothing left to pay for food and other basic needs. If it wasn't for SNAP benefits, I wouldn't be able to feed my children," she said. The comments on the video exploded, causing it to rake in 75,000 views and make the terms "SNAP" and "Felecia" go viral on X. But instead of garnering empathy, it achieved the opposite effect. People in the thread savagely attacked the mother of four, mostly with comments about her weight. "I'm not saying take her SNAP benefits, but what I'm saying is she doesn't need as much as she's getting," X user currermell said. "Either she's eating it all and her kids are already going hungry, or the handouts meant to sustain her life are having the opposite effect." Related: Walmart issues urgent message about the alarming cost of food "Do you know how many calories it takes to look like her? She's doing fine," X user Rafester said. Some opted to attack Felecia's relationship choices instead of her weight, saying, "Why does she have 4 children and no husband? Life choices matter. Sorry but 4 unplanned pregnancies and no partner present is absolute nonsense," X user fictitiousfruit said. A few rare voices in the thread abstained from insults. "Not a single person wants SNAP taken away from Felecia. Every single person wants SNAP revoked for people who aren't trying or aren't contributing to the country they take advantage of," user Zac DiSalvo said. The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Americans weigh in on Trump's deployment of troops to quell Los Angeles unrest
A new national poll indicates that Americans are divided over President Donald Trump's deployment of the National Guard and U.S. Marines to the nation's second most populous city. Aiming to extinguish escalating protests in Los Angeles sparked by immigration raids carried out by ICE at his administration's direction, Trump sent in National Guard troops and even mobilized Marines. The unrest and the moves by the president have dominated national headlines for a week. Forty-one percent of adults nationwide questioned in a Washington Post/George Mason University Schar School poll said they support the president's move, with 44% opposed and 15% unsure. The survey was conducted on Tuesday and questioned over 1,000 adults nationwide, including roughly 200 in blue-state California. First On Fox: Immigrant Voters Abandon Democrats On Immigration Issue Support for the president's actions among the California respondents stood at 32%, with 58% opposed. Read On The Fox News App The poll also highlighted an expected massive partisan divide. Click Here For The Latest Fox News Polling Eight-six percent of Republicans surveyed supported the president's deployment of the National Guard and Marines to the streets of LA, with more than three-quarters of Democrats giving a thumbs down on Trump's move. A third of independents approved of the sending of the troops, with nearly half opposed and nearly one in five unsure. Trump took control of California's National Guard without the permission of Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, the first time in 60 years that a president has federalized National Guard troops without a governor's request. Newsom, leading the resistance to Trump's moves, took legal action to try and reverse the order. Trump Deployment Of Troops To Quell La Rioters Latest Page In President's Political Playbook A federal district court judge this week ruled that Trump's moves were illegal and ordered him to return control of the National Guard troops to Newsom. But a federal appeals court quickly temporarily blocked the lower court judge's ruling. The survey also indicates Americans are divided over whether they support (39%) or oppose (40%) the protests. Just over one in five (21%) were unsure of their support or opposition. Seventy percent of Democrats — but just 39% of independents and only 6% of Republicans — support the aims of the protesters. According to the poll, Americans are also divided over whether the protests have been mostly peaceful (35%) or mostly violent (37%).Original article source: Americans weigh in on Trump's deployment of troops to quell Los Angeles unrest

Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Scott Galloway bluntly predicts major change for Netflix
Scott Galloway, the podcaster and New York University professor, explained his view on June 13 that the last significant battle in the streaming industry was a showdown between Netflix and Hollywood - and Netflix emerged victorious. By expanding production globally, taking advantage of broadband technology, and capitalizing on inexpensive funding, Netflix (NFLX) was able to make large-scale investments similar to Amazon's strategy, Galloway explained, leaving competitors unable to keep pace. The outcome? A major shift in value from traditional studios and entertainment talent to Netflix's investors and subscribers. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Netflix's newest version operates as more than just a subscription-based platform - it now combines both subscriptions and advertising in its business model. And nearly 94 million people have chosen Netflix's ad-supported plan since it was introduced fewer than three years ago, according to Galloway. Netflix has proven itself to be a master of adaptation in the media landscape. It started as a mail-order DVD business, toppling the giant Blockbuster. Then it evolved into a streaming powerhouse, upending Hollywood's dominance. Related: Jean Chatzky sends strong message to Americans on Social Security Now, after a decade without major changes, Netflix is transforming once more, Galloway wrote. The company is introducing AI-driven content recommendations, mobile-friendly vertical videos, and a refreshed visual design to take on platforms such as YouTube and TikTok. And once again, the streaming service faces a new challenge. Shutterstock Having won the last streaming war, Netflix now confronts a new threat, Galloway explained in his "No Mercy / No Malice" newsletter. In fact, this prominent challenger is in the ring with all streaming services. "The next streaming war?" Galloway wrote. "YouTube takes on the world." "This year, more people in the U.S. watched YouTube on TVs than on mobile devices - a first," he continued. "YouTube is now the No. 1 distributor of TV content, according to Nielsen. And for the past three months, YouTube registered the largest share of TV viewing (12%) among media companies; Netflix accounted for 7.5%." More on the U.S. economy: Jean Chatzky shares major statement about Social SecurityShark Tank's Kevin O'Leary has blunt words on 401(k) plansDave Ramsey strongly cautions U.S. workers on Social Security YouTube is essentially public access television scaled to the internet, but with vastly superior production quality, observed Galloway. His Markets podcast co-host Ed Elson notes that Gen Z sees YouTube - owned by Alphabet (GOOGL) - as an algorithm-driven force shifting influence away from established brands and toward individual creators. The biggest disruptor to Hollywood, Galloway argues, isn't Netflix chairman's Reed Hastings - it's MrBeast, the YouTube star who has perfected parasocial relationships. In 2023 alone, MrBeast amassed over a billion hours of watch time, surpassing the top Netflix shows. "But just as individual content creators disrupted Hollywood, AI may disrupt content creators," Galloway wrote. While Netflix is expected to invest around $18 billion in content this year, YouTube effectively operates with a content budget of zero, instead sharing ad revenue with its creators. MrBeast has revealed that producing a single video typically costs him $2.5 million. Yet in a striking shift, an AI-generated muzak channel recently surpassed him, becoming the fastest-growing channel on YouTube this month. Related: Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary makes bold prediction on U.S. economy Galloway argues that the rise of Netflix, YouTube and the competition for streaming audiences has cost us something vital: a shared cultural experience. In 1983, the final episode of M.A.S.H. was a national event, drawing 106 million viewers - nearly half of America, he recalls. By contrast, last year's most-watched scripted TV finale, "Yellowstone," reached just 13 million people, a mere 4% of the country. The shift from scheduled programming to unlimited, on-demand content has fragmented American culture, Galloway suggests - and this fact reflects the loss of two key societal pillars: collective experiences and a shared identity. "Without shared stories, we don't laugh together, love/hate the same heroes/villains, or believe in the same facts when we argue," Galloway wrote. "We lose our empathy, our ability to see each other as human." "It's hard to demonize someone you watched 'Cheers' with every Thursday night; it's easy to hate someone whose cultural references are completely foreign to your feed." Related: Scott Galloway makes major prediction on world economy; 401(k) impact seen The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.