Thailand races against time to avoid crippling 36% US tariffs in digital trade talks
BANGKOK (The Nation Thailand/ANN): Thailand has assembled a technical negotiation team to engage with Washington over punitive tariffs, with just weeks remaining before a 36% levy threatens to devastate the kingdom's largest export market.
The Thai government also confirmed yesterday that it has established a high-level technical team following the United States' acceptance of bilateral trade negotiations.
Officials are working against a 8 July deadline to conclude talks before Washington imposes retaliatory tariffs that could severely impact Thailand's $35.4 billion trade surplus with America.
A Ministry of Commerce source revealed that senior officials will engage directly with the US Trade Representative (USTR) and Department of Commerce via video conference, citing time constraints that prevented Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Pichai Chunhavajira from travelling to Washington.
"With only one month remaining before the US's 90-day deadline, there were concerns about time constraints," the source said. "Therefore, negotiations will proceed via online systems, which is similar to negotiating Free Trade Agreements."
The talks centre on Thailand's ambitious five-point proposal aimed at reducing its trade surplus with the US by 50% within five years whilst strengthening strategic partnerships between the two nations.
Key negotiation points include:
Thailand plans to dramatically increase imports of American energy products including crude oil, liquefied natural gas, and ethane, alongside aircraft components, military equipment, and agricultural commodities such as maize, soybeans, and beef.
The kingdom has also committed to reducing import duties on 11,000 items by 14% under the Most Favoured Nation system, whilst eliminating non-tariff barriers that restrict American agricultural products including cherries, apples, wheat, and meat.
Bangkok is particularly keen to address concerns over "Made in Thailand" product misrepresentation, where goods from third countries are trans-shipped through Thailand to the US market. Officials pledge stricter enforcement of rules of origin to protect Thai product integrity.
The government is also promoting increased Thai private sector investment in America, particularly in energy projects such as LNG facilities in Alaska and large-scale agricultural ventures.
Currently, Thai companies operate 70 investments across 20 US states, creating over 16,000 jobs with a combined value of $16 billion.
Poj Aramwattananont, Chairman of the Thai Chamber of Commerce, welcomed Washington's willingness to negotiate as "a positive signal," expressing confidence that Thailand's comprehensive proposal addresses all aspects of tariff reduction.
However, time pressures are mounting. Poj warned that goods shipped from Thailand today might take over 30 days to reach American ports, potentially missing any tariff relief if negotiations drag on.
The stakes are considerable for Thailand's export-dependent economy. In 2024, the United States remained Thailand's primary export destination, accounting for 18.3% of total shipments.
Bilateral trade reached $74.5 billion, with Thailand exporting $55.0 billion whilst importing just $19.5 billion.
The 36% retaliatory tariff places Thailand 20th among 185 global trading partners and ninth in Asia, behind nations including Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Vietnam, Sri Lanka, Iraq, and Bangladesh.
Both sides are now racing to conclude negotiations before the deadline, with Thailand's economic future hanging in the balance as it seeks to maintain access to its most lucrative overseas market. - The Nation Thailand/ANN
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
America's cold shoulder to foreign students is worrying Asia
The Harvard Students for Freedom rally in support of international students at the Harvard University campus in Boston recently. The US government said it intends to cancel most foreign student visas. — AFP AN Ivy League degree has long been central to the Asian Dream – a ticket to success and status. But President Donald Trump's message to international students is clear: Far fewer of you are welcome. The blunt statement and growing chaos across the university sector has left families wondering if sending their children to America is still worth it. The White House's immediate target is Chinese students allegedly connected to the Communist Party. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said the United States plans to start 'aggressively' revoking their visas. Students affected would include 'those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.' The US will also enhance scrutiny 'of all future visa applications from the People's Republic of China and Hong Kong,' he added. It's unclear how these rules will be executed; the move follows a short period of improved ties between the superpowers after they agreed to a truce in the trade war. China's Foreign Ministry has expressed its dissatisfaction, saying it had lodged a protest with the US. The impact is wider than Washington and Beijing's geopolitical rivalry. The decision to ban Harvard from enrolling international students is focusing minds in Asia, even though a federal judge has temporarily blocked the policy. Many families are wondering if other universities will be next. The rhetoric coming out of the White House is hardly reassuring. 'We have people who want to go to Harvard and other schools; they can't get in because we have foreign students there,' Trump had said. Students of other universities protesting in support of international students at Harvard University. — Bloomberg This attitude, combined with a directive ordering US embassies worldwide to stop scheduling interviews for student visas sends a chilling message to Asian students: The Ivy aspiration is no longer as accessible as it once was. The worries are pouring in on my parent chat groups. Many have already spent thousands of dollars preparing children for a future at a prestigious American university – hiring expensive college counsellors, visiting campuses, and investing countless hours navigating complex application processes. That's not to mention time spent on preparing for standardised tests and extracurricular activities, all in an effort to perfect the profile for a prospective candidate. There are also legitimate concerns about what happens to deposits and scholarships, all of which are up in the air as students and their families figure out what the new rules mean for them. It's no small cost. An average American degree can set an international student's family back approximately US$100,000 (RM42,300) over four years, excluding living costs. An Ivy League degree? It's more than triple that. Parents spend decades making sacrifices and putting aside the massive investment required to help their kids go to their dream university. The money is worth it, the thinking goes, because eventually their child will reap the rewards. The schools get something out of this, too. Foreign applicants are more likely to pay full tuition, essentially subsidising American students who receive aid. Over a million international students studied in American universities in the 2023-2024 school year, according to data from Open Doors, an information resource for foreign students studying or teaching in the US. Asians made up a significant proportion, with Indians and Chinese citizens accounting for over half. America is not going to lose its appeal overnight. It's still a coveted place to study, both because of its world-class tertiary education and the potential to find lucrative employment after graduation. But other countries are becoming more attractive because of the Trump administration's crackdown. Some parents I've spoken to will simply go elsewhere. Canada and the United Kingdom, already popular alternatives, are poised to scoop up disillusioned applicants. Closer to home, Australia and New Zealand are also promoting their schools. Asian universities that offer top-tier programs will appeal to anxious Asian families. Schools such as the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, the University of Tokyo, and Malaysia's Sunway University are offering credit transfers and other incentives to attract ambitious students and families looking for quality education without the uncertainties tied to American foreign policy. For many Asian students who have dreamt of studying and working in cities like New York or Los Angeles, the political gyrations affecting their futures are no doubt disappointing. But this is about more than visas and policies. It's about the hopes of a generation searching for a place to study, grow, and build their future. Trump has just made the US seem like a far less inviting option. — Bloomberg Opinion/TNS Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China.
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Does the US ‘need' Canada?
US President Donald Trump had one big question on his mind as Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney headed to Washington last month. 'I very much want to work with him, but cannot understand one simple TRUTH,' Trump said in a social media post, reiterating several ways he believes Canada benefits unfairly from its trade relationship with the United States. The president also repeated his incorrect claim that the United States is 'subsidising' Canada to the tune of US$200bil, alluding to the country's trade deficit with Canada, which is the value of what the United States imports minus its exports. In fact, the trade deficit last year was US$63.3bil, according to US data. And if Canada's energy exports were stripped out, it turns into a trade surplus. For Trump, it all boils down to one point: does the United States need Canada? 'We don't need their cars, we don't need their energy, we don't need their lumber, we don't need ANYTHING they have, other than their friendship,' he said in the social media post. But industry groups say differently. The auto industries in Canada and the United States have become highly interconnected over the past three decades – especially between Detroit and Windsor, Ontario, the busiest commercial crossing along the border – as the countries knocked down trade barriers. In 2023, the US imported about 1.24 million vehicles from Canada, the fourth-highest tally behind Mexico, Japan and South Korea. The US is the world's top oil producer, but its refineries rely on crude oil, a variety that Canada specialises in extracting. Retooling US refineries to eliminate the need for crude oil would cost billions and companies are not willing to make those investments, especially because of the uncertainty over Trump's trade policies. Besides oil, Canada in 2023 supplied nearly 100% of the natural gas and 85% of the electrical energy imported by the US, according to Canada's energy regulator. Canada also provides more than one-fourth of the uranium the United States imports to run nuclear reactors, federal data shows, more than any other nation. Howard Lutnick, the US Commerce Secretary, is investigating whether lumber imports are a threat to national security. In 2021, the United States purchased US$28bil worth of lumber from Canada, nearly half of lumber imports. American industry groups have estimated that the tariffs on lumber that Trump has introduced will increase home costs by an average of about US$9,000. For now, the US lumber industry cannot meet the demand from homebuilders, according to a recent analysis by Fastmarkets, and it would take the country at least 10 years to whittle down its need for imported lumber. Farmers this year were reminded of the US agriculture industry's reliance on Canadian imports of key chemical ingredients used in fertiliser, like potassium-rich minerals called potash. The United States imports 85% of its potash from Canada, which is the world's largest exporter of the minerals. But Trump's tariffs on Canada will make potash more expensive for farmers to import and the increases could be passed down to grocery store shoppers, according to the Fertilizer Institute, a US industry group. Trump says the US needs Canada's friendship. Many Canadians say forget about it. The usually warm relationship between the two countries is in tatters, with Canada invoking a defensive tactic used in hockey – 'elbows up' – as its posture against Trump's economic attacks and threats to make Canada a US state. Toronto residents Douglas Bloomfield (right) and son Phoenix holding a Canadian flag and an ice hockey stick in front of the White House as a protest against US tariffs. — AP Canadians have taken to boycotting American-made products and shirking summer travel to the US, with the number of flights scheduled to the country from Canada down by 21%, a New York Times analysis shows. — ©2025 New York Times Company This article originally appeared in The New York Times
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
UN now pushing for ratification of treaty to protect the planet's fragile oceans
NICE, France (Reuters): United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Monday urged world leaders to ratify a treaty that would allow nations to establish protected marine areas in international waters, warning that human activity was destroying ocean ecosystems. Guterres, speaking at the opening of the third U.N. Ocean Conference in Nice, cautioned that illegal fishing, plastic pollution and rising sea temperatures threatened delicate ecosystems and the people who depend on them. "The ocean is the ultimate shared resource. But we are failing it," Guterres said, citing collapsing fish stocks, rising sea levels and ocean acidification. Oceans also provide a vital buffer against climate change, by absorbing around 30% of planet-heating CO2 emissions. But as the oceans heat up, hotter waters are destroying marine ecosystems and threatening the oceans' ability to absorb CO2. "These are symptoms of a system in crisis - and they are feeding off each other. Unravelling food chains. Destroying livelihoods. Deepening insecurity." The High Seas Treaty, adopted in 2023, would permit countries to establish marine parks in international waters, which cover nearly two-thirds of the ocean and are largely unregulated. Hitherto, only an estimated 1% of international waters, known as the "high seas", have been protected. The drive for nations to turn years of promises into meaningful protection for the oceans comes as President Donald Trump pulls the United States and its money out of climate projects and as some European governments weaken green policy commitments as they seek to support anaemic economies and fend off nationalists. The United States has not yet ratified the treaty and will not do so during the conference, Rebecca Hubbard, director of The High Seas Alliance, said. "If they don't ratify, they are not bound by it," she said. "The implementation will take years, but it is critical we start now, and we won't let the U.S. absence stop that from happening." French President Emmanuel Macron, the conference's co-host, told delegates that 50 countries had now ratified the treaty and that another 15 had promised to do so. The treaty will only come into force once 60 countries ratify it. Macron's foreign minister said he expected that would happen before the end of the year. The United States has not sent a high-level delegation to the conference. "It's not a surprise, we know the American administration's position on these issues," Macron told reporters late on Sunday. Britain's Prince William on Sunday said protecting the planet's oceans was a challenge "like none we have faced before". Ocean experts have also seized on the conference as an opportunity to rally investment for the ocean economy, which has long struggled to attract sizeable funding commitments. At a two-day gathering of bankers and investors in Monaco over the weekend, philanthropists, private investors and public banks committed 8.7 billion euros over five years to support a regenerative and sustainable blue economy. Investments in ocean health totalled just $10 billion from 2015-2019 - far below the $175 billion per year needed, the U.N. has said. To address this gap, the U.N. said on Sunday it was starting work to design a new financing facility, to be launched in 2028, which aims to unlock billions of dollars to restore ocean health by mobilising new and diverse sources of capital. (Reporting by Manuel Ausloos and Clotaire Achi in Nice, Benoit van Overstraeten in Paris, Virginia Furness in London; Writing by Richard Lough; Editing by Hugh Lawson) - Reuters
