Today's workers ‘at greater risk of poverty in old age than their parents'
People looking to retire in 2050 are on course to receive £800 per year less than current pensioners, according to Age UK.
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) will resurrect the Pensions Commission, which last met in 2006, to 'tackle the barriers that stop too many from saving in the first place'.
At least 45 per cent of working-age adults are putting nothing into their pensions, work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall said.
The previous commission recommended automatically enrolling people in workplace pensions, which has seen the number of eligible employees saving rise from 55 per cent in 2012 to 88 per cent.
DWP analysis suggested 15 million people were undersaving for retirement, with the self-employed, lower paid and some ethnic minorities particularly affected.
Around three million self-employed people are said to be saving nothing for their retirement, while only a quarter of people on low pay in the private sector, and the same proportion from Pakistani or Bangladeshi backgrounds, are saving.
Women face a significant gender pensions gap, with those approaching retirement in line to receive barely half the income that men can expect.
Pensions minister Torsten Bell said: 'The original Pensions Commission helped get pension saving up and pensioner poverty down.
'But if we carry on as we are, tomorrow's retirees risk being poorer than today's. So we are reviving the Pensions Commission to finish the job and give today's workers secure retirements to look forward to.'
The commission will be led by Baroness Jeannie Drake, a member of the previous commission, and report in 2027 with proposals that stretch beyond the next election.
Age UK's Caroline Abrahams said the commission needed to address the state pension, which provides the bulk of retirement income for most pensioners.
She said: 'If we're to avoid future generations of pensioners experiencing financial hardship, we need reforms that enable more people to build a decent standard of living, and we need them sooner rather than later to maximise the numbers who can be helped.'
Ministers hope the Pensions Commission will build a consensus around changes, as its predecessor did, working with businesses and trade unions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Live
9 minutes ago
- North Wales Live
DWP issues PIP review update and explains how disabled people will be involved
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has issued an update over the continuing examination of the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) system. PIP is intended to help people with long-term health conditions or disabilities by providing financial assistance to cover their extra costs. The benefit comprises two elements: daily living support and mobility assistance, each offering standard and enhanced payment levels. Government ministers are presently scrutinising the PIP structure, including exploring methods to enhance the assessment procedure that applicants typically undergo to determine their entitlement amount. Liberal Democrat MP Sarah Gibson submitted a parliamentary written question concerning disabled people's participation in the review process. DWP minister Sir Stephen Timms, who is overseeing the review, responded on the Government's behalf. He stated: "We published the terms of reference for the review (the Timms Review) on 30 June 2025, and will be updating them shortly. As set out in the terms of reference, we are committed to co-producing the review with disabled people, the organisations that represent them, experts, clinicians, MPs, and other stakeholders. "We will engage widely over the summer to design the process for the work of the review and consider how it can best be co-produced to ensure that expertise from a range of different perspectives is drawn upon.", reports the Liverpool Echo. The minister also said that the team conducting the review will focus on involving disabled individuals in helping lead the process, to ensure the review hears from "those with relevant lived and professional experience". Labour had previously proposed a policy change to tighten the eligibility criteria for Personal Independence Payment (PIP), which would have introduced a new requirement for receiving the daily living component. Claimants would need to score a minimum of four points in one of the 10 activities to qualify for any payment. However, following significant pushback from MPs, including dissent within Labour ranks, the Government decided to apply this change solely to new claimants. Ministers have also said there will be no changes to the PIP eligibility rules until the review is finished. How much is PIP? These are the current weekly payment rates for PIP: Daily living element Lower - £73.90 Higher - £110.40. Mobility element Lower - £29.20 Higher - £77.05
The Guardian
10 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Keir Starmer urged to honour pledge to embed speaking skills in England's schools
The children's writer Michael Rosen, one-time political strategist Alastair Campbell and former education secretaries Charles Clarke and Estelle Morris have urged the prime minister to honour his pre-election pledge to embed speaking skills in England's schools. They are among 60 signatories to an open letter to Keir Starmer, calling on him to establish oracy as a core part of Labour's revised national curriculum and make it the fourth 'R' in education, alongside reading, writing and arithmetic. Supporters were delighted when Labour announced in 2023 that teaching oracy – often defined as developing skill in using spoken language – would be a central part of Labour's educational priorities if it won the next election. However, campaigners say it was not mentioned in the interim report of the government's curriculum and assessment review earlier this year, leading to fears oracy may have slipped down the educational agenda. The full report is due later this year. The letter, organised by Voice 21, the UK's leading oracy education charity, said: 'Two years ago you pledged that under your Labour government, every child would be supported to develop essential oracy skills – as part of the mission to ensure all young people are prepared for work and ready for life. 'We urge you to turn that promise into lasting change. In a world shaped by rapid advances in artificial intelligence, deepening social divides and persistent inequality, the skills of speaking, listening and communication have never been more urgently needed.' Rosen, who is a professor of children's literature at Goldsmiths, University of London, said: 'The backbone of language is our talk. It's the everyday way we make and change relationships, share the events of our lives, hear about other people's lives. 'It's where we forge our identities and culture, it's where and how we get a good deal of our understanding of what matters. We can learn and develop how to be better talkers and listeners. 'School is a perfect time for us to do that. This needs time and space and sensitive help from teachers. I hope this government backs an oracy programme in education.' Campbell, now a mental health campaigner and author, added: 'It's time every child had the chance to develop their oracy skills – it's key not just to confidence and deeper thinking but also for countering the rise in polarisation. Labour should make sure its curriculum review has a proper commitment to oracy.' Other signatories to the letter include author and educator Jeffrey Boakye, Nick Harrison, chief executive of the Sutton Trust, which champions social mobility, and Rupert Knight, associate professor in education at the University of Nottingham. Kate Paradine, Voice 21's chief executive, said: 'Sir Keir Starmer has acknowledged the importance of oracy and the need to embed it in the national curriculum. We are now urging the government to deliver on its manifesto commitment so that every child can benefit from a high-quality oracy education.' A Department for Education spokesperson said the government's plan for change would ensure every young person, irrespective of background, develops the skills needed to succeed in work and life, including in speaking and listening. 'We're already investing in evidence-based language interventions in the early years, including Nuffield Early Language Intervention, to support children's speech and language development and have strengthened our teacher training framework to place greater emphasis on high quality oral language. 'We will also consider how best to ensure pupils can communicate fluently and confidently as part of a cutting-edge curriculum, with final recommendations from the independent review due to be published in the autumn.'
The Guardian
10 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Indian prime minister makes UK state visit to sign landmark trade deal
India's prime minister, Narendra Modi, is visiting London to sign a landmark free trade agreement between his country and the UK, a pact viewed as a political and economic prize amid global trade tensions unleashed by the US president, Donald Trump. For Britain, eager to score a post-Brexit win, the deal is its most economically significant trade agreement since leaving the EU. For India, it marks its first major free trade pact outside Asia. For both, analysts say, the agreement signals a long-term economic partnership. 'The UK and India, in many ways we have complementarities. We have had a historical relationship. It's good to have a deeper trade relationship,' said Indian economist Sanjaya Baru. During Modi's two-day state visit starting on Wednesday, his fourth to the UK as prime minister, he will hold 'wide-ranging' talks with his counterpart, Keir Starmer, on trade, defence, technological cooperation and security, and will also pay a courtesy call on King Charles, according to an Indian government statement. India stood firm on key demands during negotiations, winning concessions on work visas, recognition of professional qualifications, and exemptions from national insurance contributions for Indian nationals working temporarily in the UK, all longstanding sticking points. Modi, accompanied by his commerce minister, Piyush Goyal, who led the negotiations, can claim India held its ground while the UK compromised, bolstering his message of India's rising global clout. However, the deal must still be ratified by both parliaments, likely delaying implementation until mid-2026. Under the agreement, 99% of Indian exports to the UK, spanning gems, textiles, engineering goods, leather, garments, and processed foods, will face zero tariffs. In return, the UK will see phased tariff cuts on 90% of its exports to India. Duties on scotch whisky will fall from 150% to 75% immediately and to 40% over 10 years. British cars, now facing tariffs of more than 100%, will see duties slide to 10% under a quota. Other gains include tariff relief on medical devices, pharmaceuticals, aircraft parts, and electronics. India's government hopes the agreement will inject new energy into its Make in India drive and revive foreign direct investment, which has slowed significantly. 'More than 5m export-related jobs in India can be linked to UK exports,' said Amrita Saha, a research fellow at the Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex. 'Overall, I believe this agreement is a positive step for India's labour-intensive sectors,' she told the Hindu newspaper. Crucially, India kept agriculture, an industry that employs more than 40% of its workforce, off the table. This red line for New Delhi has also stalled its trade talks with the US. Still, only the broad contours of the agreement, which marks a significant departure from India's traditionally protectionist trade stance, are public. 'We will have to look at the fine print the morning after,' Baru cautioned. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Some provisions, such as phased duty cuts on scotch and cars, could face backlash from domestic producers. Indian whisky makers have already voiced worries about 'unfair competition' from imports. Also, in a significant first, British firms will gain access to India's vast government procurement market, a potential breakthrough for sectors such as clean energy, transport, and infrastructure. Notably absent from the deal are financial and legal services, as talks on a bilateral investment treaty, which would offer investor protections, remain unresolved. Another sensitive issue, the UK's proposed carbon tax known as the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), was also left out. The policy, which would levy taxes on imports from countries with looser emissions rules, is seen by India as unfairly targeting developing economies. For now, the two sides appear to have kicked that issue down the road. However, 'the carbon tax remains the elephant in the room. It could wipe out the benefits of the free trade agreement for Indian exporters,' warned Ajay Srivastava, head of the Global Trade Research Initiative in New Delhi.
