logo
IMF Cuts Malaysia's GDP Forecast To 4.1%

IMF Cuts Malaysia's GDP Forecast To 4.1%

BusinessToday23-04-2025

The International Monetary Fund has downgraded Malaysia's real gross domestic product (GDP) growth forecast for 2025 to 4.1 percent, from 4.7 per cent previously, reflecting a broader downward revision across the region.
In its April 2025 World Economic Outlook, titled A Critical Juncture amid Policy Shifts, the fund also projected Malaysia's economy to expand by 3.8 per cent in 2026.
The IMF trimmed its global growth forecast for 2025 to 2.8 per cent, down 0.5 percentage point from its January estimate.
Among Malaysia's regional peers, the IMF cut Indonesia's 2025 outlook to 4.7 per cent from 5.1 per cent.
The Philippines is now expected to grow by 5.5 per cent, down from 6.1 per cent, while Thailand's forecast was revised to 1.8 per cent from 2.9 per cent.
The fund said major policy shifts were reshaping the global trade landscape and reigniting uncertainty, once again testing the global economy's resilience.
'Since February, the United States has announced multiple waves of tariffs against trading partners, some of which have invoked countermeasures.
'Markets initially took the announcements mostly in stride, until the United States' near-universal application of tariffs on April 2, which triggered historic drops in major equity indices and spikes in bond yields, followed by a partial recovery after the pause and additional carve-outs announced on and after April 9,' it said.
The IMF reiterated that the global economy is at a critical juncture, with signs of stabilisation emerging through much of 2024, after a prolonged and challenging period of unprecedented shocks.
'Inflation, down from multidecade highs, followed a gradual though bumpy decline toward central bank targets. Labour markets normalised, with unemployment and vacancy rates returning to pre-pandemic levels,' it added.
On productivity, the IMF noted widening discrepancies, as manufacturing activity continues shifting from advanced economies to emerging markets.
Industrial production plunged in all countries at the onset of the pandemic. The recovery paths, however, have been decisively different.
Production has soared in China and has also expanded in smaller European Union economies and the Asean-5 (Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand), whereas it has struggled to return to pre-pandemic levels in Japan and the largest EU countries,' it added.
Meanwhile, the IMF said industrial production in the United States has rebounded more strongly than in other advanced economies.
On commodities, the IMF projected fuel prices to fall by 7.9 per cent in 2025, led by a 15.5 per cent drop in oil prices and a 15.8 per cent fall in coal prices. These declines are expected to be partially offset by a 22.8 per cent rise in natural gas prices, driven by colder-than-expected weather and the cessation of Russian gas flows to Europe via Ukraine since January.
Non-fuel commodity prices are forecast to increase by 4.4 per cent in 2025. Related

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ASEAN Chief: Stronger Local Action, Simpler Rules Key To Unlocking Regional Trade Potential
ASEAN Chief: Stronger Local Action, Simpler Rules Key To Unlocking Regional Trade Potential

BusinessToday

time2 hours ago

  • BusinessToday

ASEAN Chief: Stronger Local Action, Simpler Rules Key To Unlocking Regional Trade Potential

Strengthening grassroots implementation, streamlining business processes and deepening public–private collaboration is critical to unlocking the full potential of regional trade agreements, said ASEAN Secretary General Dr Kao Kim Hourn at the 2025 RCEP Local Governments and Friendship Cities Cooperation Forum. Citing the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and the ASEAN-China Free Trade Area (ACFTA) as key trade frameworks, Kao emphasised their complementary roles in expanding market access, enhancing supply chain resilience and boosting regional competitiveness. 'Public–private partnerships are essential not just for integrating businesses into regional value chains, but also in shaping more responsive policies,' he said, calling for greater support for micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs), which face persistent financing and regulatory hurdles. Kao urged local governments to drive progress through targeted outreach, advisory support and streamlined administration to help MSMEs thrive under these trade frameworks. He praised city-level initiatives that facilitate trade adoption via policy dialogue, capacity building and incentives, helping businesses navigate complex trade rules. RCEP, comprising 15 economies including all 10 ASEAN members plus China, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand, represented US$29.4 trillion in GDP (28% of global GDP) and US$13.5 trillion in trade (28% of global trade) as of 2024. ASEAN's trade with RCEP partners hit US$1.3 trillion, or 34.5% of its total trade. In China, RCEP usage surged 38% in 2024, as businesses tapped the agreement to expand exports and diversify supply chains. On the ACFTA front, Kao spotlighted the upcoming ACFTA 3.0 upgrade, which aims to modernise trade with China by integrating digital economy tools, green initiatives and deeper supply chain links. Negotiations were recently concluded, with a signing slated for the 47th ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur this October. 'ACFTA and RCEP are mutually reinforcing, enabling ASEAN and Chinese firms to broaden their global supply chain footprints,' Kao said. 'Together, they will help build resilient, connected, and future-ready economies.' Related

Japan, EU to form competitveness alliance to strenghthen trade ties
Japan, EU to form competitveness alliance to strenghthen trade ties

New Straits Times

time3 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Japan, EU to form competitveness alliance to strenghthen trade ties

BRUSSELS: Japan and the European Union are set to launch a "Competitiveness Alliance" aimed at boosting corporate resilience and deepening trade and economic security cooperation, Kyodo news agency quoted diplomatic sources on Saturday. The initiative is expected to be announced at a summit in July, which will likely see Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba host European Council President, Antonio Costa and European Commission President, Ursula von der Leyen. The new framework aims to reinforce efforts by both parties to uphold a rules-based economic order. It will build on the existing Japan-EU free trade agreement, which eliminates tariffs and other trade barriers between the two economies that together represent 20 per cent of global gross domestic product. Under the alliance, Japan and the EU will work together to diversify supply chains for rare earth minerals, amid growing concern over China's export restrictions on these critical resources used in smartphones and high-tech manufacturing. The framework also includes plans to align subsidy policies for green technologies, including electric vehicles and hydrogen production, to reduce development costs and ensure fair competition for manufacturers on both sides. On the global trade front, the alliance will support reforms at the World Trade Organisation (WTO), which many view as weakened in addressing Chinese trade practices and broader systemic issues. Japan and the EU will also seek stronger engagement with emerging economies of the Global South, promoting shared values such as free and fair trade, and adherence to the rule of law. The EU, meanwhile, is exploring closer cooperation with the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), which includes Japan, the United Kingdom, and 10 other countries. Some EU members have called for deeper collaboration in setting rules on digital trade and climate-related business practices.

Secret Russian intelligence document shows deep suspicion of China
Secret Russian intelligence document shows deep suspicion of China

The Star

time4 hours ago

  • The Star

Secret Russian intelligence document shows deep suspicion of China

NEW YORK: In public, President Vladimir Putin of Russia says his country's growing friendship with China is unshakable – a strategic military and economic collaboration that has entered a golden era. But in the corridors of Lubyanka, the headquarters of Russia's domestic security agency, known as the FSB, a secretive intelligence unit refers to the Chinese as 'the enemy'. This unit, which has not previously been disclosed, has warned that China is a serious threat to Russian security. Its officers say that Beijing is increasingly trying to recruit Russian spies and get its hands on sensitive military technology, at times by luring disaffected Russian scientists. The intelligence officers say that China is spying on the Russian military's operations in Ukraine to learn about Western weapons and warfare. They fear that Chinese academics are laying the groundwork to make claims on Russian territory. And they have warned that Chinese intelligence agents are carrying out espionage in the Arctic using mining firms and university research centres as cover. The threats are laid out in an eight-page internal FSB planning document, obtained by The New York Times, that sets priorities for fending off Chinese espionage. The document is undated, raising the possibility that it is a draft, though it appears from context to have been written in late 2023 or early 2024. Ares Leaks, a cybercrime group, obtained the document but did not say how it did so. That makes definitive authentication impossible, but the Times shared the report with six Western intelligence agencies, all of which assessed it to be authentic. The document gives the most detailed behind-the-scenes view to date of Russian counterintelligence's thinking about China. Since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, Moscow's new bond with Beijing has shifted the global balance of power. The rapidly expanding partnership is one of the most consequential, and opaque, relationships in modern geopolitics. Russia has survived years of Western financial sanctions following the invasion, proving wrong the many politicians and experts who predicted the collapse of the country's economy. That survival is in no small part due to China. China is the largest customer for Russian oil and provides essential computer chips, software and military components. When Western companies fled Russia, Chinese brands stepped in to replace them. The two countries say they want to collaborate in a vast number of areas, including making movies and building a base on the moon. Putin and Xi Jinping, China's leader, are doggedly pursuing what they call a partnership with 'no limits'. But the top-secret FSB memo shows there are, in fact, limits. 'You have the political leadership, and these guys are all for rapprochement with China,' said Andrei Soldatov, an expert on Russia's intelligence services who lives in exile in Britain and who reviewed the document at the request of the Times. 'You have the intelligence and security services, and they are very suspicious.' Putin's spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov, declined to comment. The Chinese Foreign Ministry did not respond to requests for comment on the document. The Russian document describes a 'tense and dynamically developing' intelligence battle in the shadows between the two outwardly friendly nations. Three days before Putin invaded Ukraine in 2022, the FSB approved a new counterintelligence programme called 'Entente-4', the document reveals. The code name, an apparent tongue-in-cheek reference to Moscow's growing friendship with Beijing, belied the initiative's real intent: to prevent Chinese spies from undermining Russian interests. The timing almost certainly was not accidental. Russia was diverting nearly all of its military and spy resources to Ukraine, more than 6,500km from its border with China, and most likely worried that Beijing could try to capitalise on this distraction. Since then, according to the document, the FSB observed China doing just that. Chinese intelligence agents stepped up efforts to recruit Russian officials, experts, journalists and businesspeople close to power in Moscow, the document says. To counter this, the FSB instructed its officers to intercept the 'threat' and 'prevent the transfer of important strategic information to the Chinese'. Officers were ordered to conduct in-person meetings with Russian citizens who work closely with China and warn them that Beijing was trying to take advantage of Russia and obtain advanced scientific research, according to the document. The FSB ordered 'the constant accumulation of information about users' on Chinese messaging app WeChat. That included hacking phones of espionage targets and analysing the data in a special software tool held by a unit of the FSB, the document says. The possible long-term alignment of two authoritarian governments, with a combined population of nearly 1.6 billion people and armed with some 6,000 nuclear warheads, has stoked deep concern in Washington. Some members of the Trump administration believe that, through outreach to Putin, Washington can begin to peel Russia away from China and avoid what Secretary of State Marco Rubio has called 'two nuclear powers aligned against the United States'. 'I'm going to have to un-unite them, and I think I can do that, too,' President Donald Trump said shortly before his election in November. 'I have to un-unite them.' Read one way, the FSB document lends credence to the theory that, with the right approach, Russia can be cleaved away from China. The document describes mistrust and suspicion on both sides of the relationship. China is conducting polygraphs on its agents as soon as they return home, tightening scrutiny of the 20,000 Russian students in China and trying to recruit Russians with Chinese spouses as potential spies, the document says. But another reading of the document leads to the opposite conclusion. The fact that Putin is apparently well aware of the risks of a closer relationship with China and has decided to push ahead anyway could suggest little opportunity for the United States to get Russia to change course. 'Putin believes that he can go much deeper into this Chinese embrace, and it's not risk-free, but it is worth it,' said Alexander Gabuev, the director of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Centre, who reviewed the document at the request of the Times. 'But we also see there are people within the system who are sceptical of that approach.' Putin has courted Xi for years, in more than 40 personal meetings, and has cemented a far deeper partnership with China since invading Ukraine. The two countries have a natural economic synergy, with Russia being one of the world's largest energy producers and China the world's largest energy consumer. That poses a delicate challenge for Russian counterintelligence agents. The document shows them trying to contain the risks posed by Chinese intelligence without causing 'negative consequences for bilateral relations'. Officers were warned to avoid any public 'mention of the Chinese intelligence services as a potential enemy'. Most likely written for circulation to FSB field offices, the directive offers a rare glimpse into the inner world of one of the most powerful parts of the Russian intelligence establishment: the FSB's Department for Counterintelligence Operations, known as the DKRO. The document was written by the DKRO's 7th Service, which is responsible for countering espionage from China and other parts of Asia. Anxiety about Russia's susceptibility to an increasingly powerful Beijing dominates the memo. But it is unclear how common those worries are across the Russian establishment, beyond the counterintelligence unit. Even allied nations regularly spy on one another. 'To go back to the old adage, there is no such thing as friendly intel services,' said Paul Kolbe, a senior fellow at Harvard's Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, who served for 25 years in the CIA Directorate of Operations, including in Russia. 'You don't have to scratch very deep in any Russian military or intel official to get deep suspicion of China. In the long run, China is, in spite of the unlimited partnership and how useful they are, also a potential threat.' Soon after Russian troops pushed across the border into Ukraine, officials from Chinese defence firms and institutes tied to Chinese intelligence began flooding into Russia. Their goal, according to the FSB document, was to better understand the war. China has world-class scientists, but its military has not fought a war since a month-long conflict with Vietnam in 1979. The result is anxiety in China about how its military would perform against Western weapons in a conflict over Taiwan or the South China Sea. Chinese intelligence officials are eager to understand Russia's fight against an army backed by the West. 'Of particular interest to Beijing is information about combat methods using drones, modernisation of their software and methods for countering new types of Western weapons,' the FSB document says, adding that Beijing believes the war in Ukraine will become drawn-out. The conflict has revolutionised warfare technology and tactics. China has long lagged behind Russia in its aviation expertise, and the document says that Beijing has made that a priority target. China is targeting military pilots and researchers in aerohydrodynamics, control systems and aeroelasticity. Also being sought out, according to the document, are Russian specialists who worked on the discontinued ekranoplan, a hovercraft-type warship first deployed by the Soviet Union. 'Priority recruitment is given to former employees of aircraft factories and research institutes, as well as current employees who are dissatisfied with the closure of the ekranoplan development programme by the Russian Ministry of Defence or who are experiencing financial difficulties,' the report says. It is not clear from the document whether those recruitment efforts are limited to hiring Russian specialists for Chinese ventures or also extend to recruiting them as spies. The document also shows that Russia is very concerned about how China views the war in Ukraine and is trying to feed Beijing's spies with positive information about Russian operations. And it commands Russian counterintelligence operatives to prepare a report for the Kremlin about any possible changes in Beijing's policy. Western leaders have accused China of providing Russia with essential weapons components and working to conceal it. The FSB document lends support to that claim, stating that Beijing had proposed establishing supply chains to Moscow that circumvent Western sanctions and had offered to participate in the production of drones and other unspecified high-tech military equipment. The document does not say whether those proposals were carried out, though China has supplied Russia with drones. The FSB memo also hints at Chinese interest in the Wagner mercenary group, a Russia-backed paramilitary group that propped up governments in Africa for years and fought alongside Russian troops in Ukraine. 'The Chinese plan to use the experience of Wagner fighters in their own armed forces and private military companies operating in the countries of South-east Asia, Africa and Latin America,' the directive says. The wording of the report does not indicate whether the FSB believes that China wants to recruit former Wagner fighters for its own formations or simply wants to learn from their experience. Russia has long feared encroachment by China along their shared 4,200km border. And Chinese nationalists for years have taken issue with 19th-century treaties in which Russia annexed large portions of land, including modern-day Vladivostok. That issue is now of key concern, with Russia weakened by the war and economic sanctions and less able than ever to push back against Beijing. The FSB report raises concerns that some academics in China have been promoting territorial claims against Russia. China is searching for traces of 'ancient Chinese peoples' in the Russian Far East, possibly to influence local opinion that is favourable to Chinese claims, the document says. In 2023, China published an official map that included historical Chinese names for cities and areas within Russia. The FSB ordered officers to expose such 'revanchist' activities, as well as attempts by China to use Russian scientists and archival funds for research aimed at attaching a historical affiliation to borderlands. 'Conduct preventative work with respect to Russian citizens involved in the said activities,' the memo orders. 'Restrict entry into our country for foreigners as a measure of influence.' The concerns about China expanding its reach are not limited to Russia's Far East borderlands. Central Asian countries answered to Moscow during the Soviet era. Today, the FSB reports, Beijing has developed a 'new strategy' to promote Chinese soft power in the region. China began rolling out that strategy in Uzbekistan, according to the document. The details of the strategy are not included in the document other than to say it involves humanitarian exchange. Uzbekistan and neighbouring countries are important to Putin, who sees restoring the Soviet sphere of influence as part of his legacy. The report also highlights China's interest in Russia's vast territory in the Arctic and the Northern Sea Route, which hugs Russia's northern coast. Historically, those waters have been too icy for reliable shipping, but they are expected become increasingly busy because of climate change. The route slashes shipping time between Asia and Europe. Developing that route would make it easier for China to sell its goods. Russia historically tried to maintain strict control over Chinese activity in the Arctic. But Beijing believes that Western sanctions will force Russia to turn to China to maintain its 'aging Arctic infrastructure', according to the FSB document. Already, Russian gas giant Novatek has relied on China to salvage its Arctic liquefied natural gas project, after previously using the American oil services firm Baker Hughes. The FSB asserts that Chinese spies are active in the Arctic, as well. The report says Chinese intelligence is trying to obtain information about Russia's development of the Arctic, using institutions of higher education and mining companies in particular. But despite all of these vulnerabilities, the FSB report makes clear that jeopardising the support of China would be worse. The document squarely warns officers that they must receive approval from the highest echelons of the Russian security establishment before taking any sensitive action at all. - The New York Times

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store