Sarawak's DUN expansion a strategic move to push for more parliamentary seats, says ex-EC deputy
KUCHING (July 11): Former Election Commission (EC) deputy chairman Datuk Seri Wan Ahmad Wan Omar has described the Sarawak government's move to expand the State Legislative Assembly (DUN) by 17 seats as a political strategy likely aimed at prompting the EC to consider increasing the number of parliamentary constituencies, in line with Sarawak's efforts to restore one-third representation in Parliament under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63).
He noted that while the EC retains full authority to initiate any redelineation process, the state's decision appears to carry clear political intent.
'If the state assembly has already passed the decision to increase the number of seats, it is clear the EC will have to redraw and adjust constituency boundaries,' he said in a Free Malaysia Today (FMT) report today.
'This includes potentially creating additional parliamentary seats to meet the terms agreed under the MA63 (Malaysia Agreement of 1963),' he added.
Wan Ahmad also highlighted the financial implications of such an expansion, pointing out that additional administrative and development funding would be required.
'Allocations for 17 new seats, infrastructure development, and other associated costs will increase tremendously.
'However, one positive aspect is that the creation of new constituencies could accelerate economic development in these areas,' he said.
Currently, Sarawak holds 31 of the 222 seats in the Dewan Rakyat — just under 14 per cent — far from the one-third threshold that the state is seeking to restore as part of its constitutional rights under MA63.
On Monday, the Sarawak DUN passed the Dewan Undangan Negeri (Composition of Membership) Bill 2025, increasing the number of state assembly seats from 82 to 99.
By comparison, the last redelineation exercise in 2015 added 11 state constituencies. redelineation Sarawak DUN seat expansion Wan Ahmad Wan Omar
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malaysiakini
13 minutes ago
- Malaysiakini
Boosting judicial integrity, regional representation
LETTER | I, Chin Tek Ming, a practising lawyer based in Sabah, fully support the recent remarks made by former MACC chief commissioner Latheefa Koya, as reported by Malaysiakini on July 13. In the report, Latheefa urged for constitutional amendments to enhance the independence, integrity, and transparency of the judiciary - especially through reforms to the Judicial Appointment Commission (JAC). Her call is both timely and necessary. Our judiciary faces a credibility crisis that demands urgent institutional reform. Most notably, the recent leak of the JAC meeting minutes has seriously undermined public confidence in the impartiality and transparency of judicial appointments. When such sensitive internal discussions are exposed, it not only damages trust in the institution but also exposes the vulnerability of judicial independence to political or external influence. Further compounding this concern is the retirement of two top judges without term extensions, despite precedent suggesting otherwise: Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, the chief justice, retired on July 1, without a six-month extension. Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim, the Court of Appeal president, retired on July 2, also without an extension. These abrupt transitions raise pressing questions about the continuity, independence, and succession planning within the judiciary. Greater Sabahan representation In light of these developments, I wish to reaffirm my earlier public statement published on Malaysiakini on June 9, which called for greater Sabahan representation in the higher judiciary and the JAC. As Malaysia continues to mature as a federation, it is vital that the spirit and terms of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) are respected and realised, particularly in key national institutions. I reiterate the following points: Judicial appointments must reflect regional balance, especially for Sabah and Sarawak. The omission of East Malaysian representation risks alienating a significant part of the Federation. The appointment of respected and experienced Sabahan jurists - such as Richard Malanjum and David Wong - to the JAC would enhance public trust, bring a regional perspective, and add legal wisdom to the selection process. The separation of powers between the executive, legislature, and judiciary must not only exist in principle but also be clearly seen in practice. Without visible independence and impartiality, the public's faith in the rule of law will continue to erode. In conclusion, I urge the government to take Latheefa's recommendations seriously and to ensure that any forthcoming constitutional amendment includes provisions that promote judicial independence, public accountability, and regional inclusivity, especially for Sabah and Sarawak. Only through such reforms can we rebuild confidence in our legal system and uphold the foundational democratic principle that justice must not only be done, but must also be seen to be done. The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.
The Star
19 minutes ago
- The Star
Sabah recommends 40% federal revenue be used for non-disputed items
KOTA KINABALU: Sabah is suggesting that 40% of federal revenue be allocated for non-disputed items, Deputy Chief Minister I Datuk Seri Dr Jeffrey Kitingan says. 'We have suggested implementing this 40% on items that are not disputed, such as the taxes collected from the state as a temporary measure,' he said after attending the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) technical committee meeting chaired by Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Fadillah Yusof here. He said these suggestions must not prejudice the final decision on the issues involving the state's claim to the 40% federal tax revenue return to the state as provided under Sections 112C and 112D of the Federal Constitution. It is understood that the technical committee were cautious due to the Sabah Law Society's (SLS) ongoing High Court case against the federal government over state rights to 40% revenue. Fadillah said the technical committee meeting on Monday (July 14) was specific to Sabah's claims for its revenue under Sections 112C and 112D only. He said they were looking at solutions outside the court jurisdiction, seeing that there is an ongoing case by the SLS at the moment. 'There are constraints in making decisions that are under the court's jurisdiction for the time being, so we must find solutions to areas outside the court's jurisdiction,' he explained. Fadillah said that this special technical meeting in Sabah is specific to the needs and claims in Sabah, and would be followed up with another technical meeting with Sarawak. He said an MA63 action council meeting to discuss Sabah and Sarawak's rights is scheduled to be held on Sept 12 in Kuala Lumpur. Earlier, he said that the suggestions from Sabah will be conveyed to the Prime Minister for consideration, and whether they will be adopted as an interim measure. The SLS court case e-review is set to be heard at the Kota Kinabalu High Court on Aug 7.
Barnama
an hour ago
- Barnama
PM Anwar Chairs 146th Meeting Of Menteri Besar, Chief Ministers
KUALA LUMPUR, July 14 (Bernama) -- Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim chaired the 146th Meeting of Menteri Besar and Chief Ministers in Putrajaya today. In a Facebook post, Anwar said the meeting serves as an essential platform to strengthen cooperation between the federal and state governments, particularly in coordinating policies and development initiatives. 'Through this synergy, we can ensure the smooth, comprehensive and inclusive implementation of the national development agenda for the well-being of the people and the overall progress of Malaysia,' he said.
