Core public health functions that we really need
I am a retired public health nurse with 27 years experience in communicable disease surveillance. I hunted down scary diseases to prevent others from getting sick. I worked with dreaded diseases such as meningitis, tuberculosis, measles, and syphilis. I witnessed the suffering and death of infectious diseases. But good things happened, too. With awe and amazement, I watched vaccination programs eliminate common diseases.
When I became a nurse in 1982, the most common form of infant meningitis was from a bacteria called Haemophilis influenza type b, or HIB. HIB disease causes severe infections, hospitalizations and death. If the baby survived, they were often left with neurological problems. Introduced in 1987, the HIB vaccine virtually eliminated this condition. Medical schools lamented that their interns would complete their entire training without ever having the chance to treat a case of HIB meningitis!
I worked in the Texas School for the Blind, which cared for children damaged by rubella. Mexico did not have the rubella vaccine until 1985. If contracted in the first sixteen weeks of pregnancy, rubella causes severe birth defects such as profound intellectual impairment, blindness and deafness. The kids I saw in Texas had microcephaly, or abnormally small heads. It marked me forever to sit in a room full of disabled children knowing it was only lack of political will which sealed their fate.
The public health laws are effective! School vaccination requirements have given us a society where we are not afraid of dying from a plague. Polio has become a distant memory in our grandparents lives. Congenital rubella is very rare. Measles was eradicated from the US in the year 2000.
But this can break down if we are not vigilant. Measles is burning through the country. We have handicapped ourselves by firing the people who respond to public health emergencies. We need epidemiologists and nurses on the ground coordinating efforts.
Success of public health victories means that people have forgotten the horrors of disease. No one has seen the lockjaw of tetanus, or infants choking from pertussis, or malformed skulls of congenital rubella. Our very success has opened the door to complacency. Parents are misled by conspiracy theorists. Pockets of susceptible populations combined with malpractice of cutting our essential public health programs puts our country in a precarious position. It is just a matter of time before measles comes to your day care, your school, your church.
This comes at a time when access to health care is being curtailed. Cuts to Medicaid will leave children and pregnant women uninsured. Rural hospitals will be forced to close. Clinics will be shuttered. Nursing Homes will be emptied. This administration is taking us backwards to an unkind past.
An example of what we should not do is from the state of Idaho. A new law prohibits publicly funded medical services to undocumented persons. The law forbids prenatal care, immunizations, and communicable disease testing to 'illegals.' This is in direct contradiction to the guidelines of the CDC. The cruel law makes Idahoans less safe, and thereby, surrounding states such as Utah less safe.
By not immunizing everyone, you create a reservoir of susceptible people where measles can thrive. By prohibiting communicable disease testing, you hamstring public health investigators who seek out deadly diseases like tuberculosis. I was a TB nurse for eight years. We treated people who had been contagious for months before diagnosis. A single case of TB can infect hundreds of others. By refusing prenatal care, women can die from gestational diabetes or eclampsia, a dangerous complication of pregnancy. Idaho will have blood on its hands.
We need a coherent, comprehensive public health policy. The drastic cuts to the CDC, NIH, and the safety net programs will adversely affect us all. U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has turned his back on expert advice of the public health pioneers who have wrought health victories that were unimaginable to our grandparents. We must demand that our legislators carry out their responsibility to provide essential services to their constituents.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Kennedy is gutting health advisory panels to weaken the Affordable Care Act
The famous thumbs-down by Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) in 2017 resulted in the notorious failure to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act. Subsequent legislative attempts also crashed and burned, teaching Republicans the importance of discretion in their efforts to sabotage that law. Consequently, both congressional Republicans and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. have instead turned to subtler tactics to undermine the Affordable Care Act's impact. Mark Twain once quipped that history does not repeat itself, but it often rhymes. The U.S. once again finds itself in a period of health insurance rescission amid unified Republican control of government, though there are key differences from 2017. The Affordable Care Act now enjoys not only record enrollment of 24.3 million people in marketplace plans, but also record high approval of 66 percent, according to the June Kaiser Family Foundation tracking poll. In light of this popularity, as well as political scientist David Mayhew's characterization of members of Congress as ' single-minded seekers of reelection,' it is hardly surprising that congressional Republicans' preferred strategy has transitioned to subverting the act's progress. They have done so by undercutting enhanced subsidies and dismantling the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Under the Affordable Care Act, the recommendations of both of these committees are required to be covered by private health insurance, as well as, in some cases, Medicaid and Medicare. As such, they are critical in safeguarding the nation's health. These are but two of the many ways that the second Trump administration is defined by full-frontal assaults on the American public health infrastructure. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices is a federal advisory committee composed of medical and public health experts who formulate recommendations on vaccine availability and eligibility. Its recommendations carry a great deal of weight, guiding the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's adult and childhood vaccination schedule, and ensuring that vaccines are available to children who are underinsured or uninsured through the Vaccines for Children Program. Vaccine For Children's origins in the 1993 measles epidemic, and the role of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices in recommending vaccines to be covered by the program, bring into sharp relief why it is so critical in mitigating the damage of America's ongoing spread of measles cases. The prior outbreak resulted in 55,000 cases, more than 11,000 hospitalizations and 166 deaths. The culprit? Undervaccination, in no small part due the cost of vaccination. Today, the Affordable Care Act stipulates that insurers shall cover without cost-sharing all vaccines recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, and so must Vaccines for Children. Nonetheless, online misinformation has initiated a precipitous decline in vaccine coverage, which may have contributed to the U.S. surpassing the most measles cases since the disease was declared to be eliminated in 2000. Kennedy is undermining the advisory committee's work by installing anti-vaccine members who were not properly vetted. His actions are a viable path toward eliminating insurance coverage for lifesaving vaccines such as measles, mumps and rubella, which costs around $200 without insurance. This, in turn, will result in more infectious disease outbreaks. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, a national panel of volunteer independent experts, examines which preventive services and medications insurers must cover under the Affordable Care Act with a broader lens. Their task includes the thorough assessment of preventive strategies ranging from cancer screenings to medications that prevent HIV transmission. The Affordable Care Act's preventive services mandate recently came under scrutiny in Kennedy v. Braidwood Management. In June, the Affordable Care Act emerged unscathed again in a 6-3 holding that it could constitutionally compel private insurers and Medicaid expansion programs to cover the preventive services recommended by the Preventive Services Task Force. Unfortunately, the decision also gave Kennedy complete control over the makeup of the task force, leading to his plans to dismiss all of the current serving members. These no-cost preventive services identified by the Preventive Services Task Force panel are accessed by approximately 100 million people each year. But according to Kennedy, their recommendations are too ' woke,' and warrant termination of all members. Kennedy provided no scientific, policy or economic justification for this action, nor did he bother to define the meaning of too woke, leaving us to guess what might be problematic for him. Perhaps he objects to Preventive Services Task Force-guided insurance coverage for such critical services as screening for anxiety disorders in adults, including those who are pregnant and postpartum. Or perhaps it's biennial mammography for women between the ages of 40 and 74, screening for HIV in adolescents and adults between the ages of 15 and 65 or screening for prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in adults between the ages of 35 and 70 who are overweight or obese. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations span a broad range of common health conditions with significant health and financial burden for the United States and beyond. They also help to reduce evidence gaps and promote the delivery of accessible, evidence-based medicine. For all the administration's expressed concerns about the cost of medical care, they may not have heard the adage that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. And while Preventive Services Task Force recommendations have the added bonus of promoting health equity due to the lack of patient financial responsibility for the identified health services, its approach is rooted in science, not ideological agendas. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force are critical in ensuring equitable access to care for preventive services for both infectious and chronic disease management. But despite their immense impact, they operate less in the public eye and elicit fewer protests and phone calls from Americans who benefit from their guidance than did explicit repeal efforts. Given Republicans' repeated failures to undermine the Affordable Care Act through legislative action or litigation, these stealth attempts constitute an effective, though dangerous pathway for Republicans to evade substantial scrutiny when undercutting critical access to affordable medical care for large swaths of the population. Not all Americans will understand why they can no longer access live-saving healthcare, but they will know they are not being made healthy again. Miranda Yaver is a political scientist and an assistant professor of Health Policy and Management at the University of Pittsburgh. Elizabeth Jacobs is an epidemiologist and professor emerita at the University of Arizona, and a founding member of the advocacy group Defend Public Health.
Business Wire
an hour ago
- Business Wire
TailorCare Appoints Kara Rios as Chief Financial Officer
NASHVILLE, Tenn.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- TailorCare, a leading provider of specialty value-based care solutions for musculoskeletal health, announced today the appointment of Kara Rios as its Chief Financial Officer. Rios brings more than 25 years of financial and operational leadership experience in healthcare, technology, and high-growth startup environments. "Kara's leadership in both startup and large-scale healthcare organizations makes her uniquely equipped to guide TailorCare's next stage of growth." - Rachel Winokur, CEO TailorCare As CFO, Rios will oversee all aspects of TailorCare's financial operations, including accounting, budgeting, forecasting, risk management, and capital strategy. She will play a pivotal role in shaping the company's financial vision, optimizing value-based care cost structures, and capital-raising efforts. 'Kara's leadership in both startup and large-scale healthcare organizations makes her uniquely equipped to guide TailorCare's next stage of growth,' said Rachel Winokur, founder and CEO at TailorCare. 'Her strategic clarity and operational rigor will be critical as we expand access to high-quality, value-based care that improves patient pathways to joint, back, and muscle health.' Prior to joining TailorCare, Rios held CFO roles at Firefly Health, Harbor Health, Bright HealthCare, and UnitedHealthcare Community and State. Her leadership has consistently delivered strong results in operations, cost, and team development. She also served as President of UnitedHealth Group's Central Region Medicaid operations, where she led the expansion of service coverage and improved profitability during a period of complex regulatory changes. 'I'm honored to join TailorCare at such a transformational time in the company's growth,' said Rios. 'The commitment to compassionate healthcare and innovation deeply resonates with my values as a leader. I look forward to working alongside Rachel and the team to accelerate our mission and impact.' Rios earned her bachelor's degree in Accounting from the University of St. Thomas and currently resides in Edina, Minnesota. About TailorCare TailorCare is a leading specialty value-based care solution focused on improving patient outcomes for joint, back, and muscle conditions. We take a deeply personal, data-driven approach by carefully assessing patients' symptoms, health history, preferences, and goals. Utilizing predictive data and the latest evidence-based guidelines, we guide patients in choosing and navigating the most effective treatment pathways every step of the way. Learn more at and follow us on LinkedIn at @TailorCare.
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Rural New York's health care crisis deepens amid federal funding battle
ALBANY, N.Y. (NEXSTAR) — Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli released an audit on Aug. 7 detailing health care staffing shortages in 16 rural counties across New York. The report found the state lacking in primary care doctors, pediatricians, OB-GYNs, dentists and mental health professionals. According to DiNapoli's office, they conducted the system-wide analysis following roundtable discussions in the Hudson Valley and Finger Lakes, where health care access represents a major concern. Per the report, which you can read at the bottom of this story, several counties do not have access to a variety of specialty medical providers. On average, the 16 rural counties examined — Allegany, Cattaraugus, Chenango, Delaware, Essex, Franklin, Greene, Hamilton, Herkimer, Lewis, Schuyler, Steuben, Sullivan, Washington, Wyoming, and Yates — had just four primary care physicians for every 10,000 people. That's less than half the statewide ratio of 8.1 and further still below the national average of 8.4. And that disparity gets worse in designated 'primary care health professional shortage areas,' where nearly 173,000 New Yorkers live. In those regions, it's down to just 0.12 physicians per 10,000. The 16 rural counties have just 0.5 pediatricians for every 10,000 people, less than a fifth of the state ratio of 2.8. Chenango, Schuyler, and Yates Counties have no pediatricians at all, per the audit. The ratio of obstetrician-gynecologists is 0.4 per 10,000, translating to about one for every 23,000 people. Hamilton, Herkimer, Schuyler, and Yates Counties have no OB-GYNs. For dentists, these rural counties had 3.6 per 10,000 people, below half of the state's ratio of 8.3. Ten of the 16 counties have dental primary care health professional shortage areas for those eligible for Medicaid, which includes 134,248 people. And according to the comptroller, Hamilton County has no dentists at all. The audit determined a ratio of 6.9 mental health practitioners per 10,000 people in rural New York. The ratio for the entire state, meanwhile, is 16.1. All 16 counties are mental health primary care health professional shortage areas, either for the entire population or specific groups, like the Medicaid-eligible population. That means that almost 41 percent of the population in these counties — over 305,265 New Yorkers — are considered underserved in mental health care. The audit also reported a lack of physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners, positions meant to address doctor shortages in the 1960s. These professionals now deliver as many as 25 percent of health visits in the U.S. The ratio of PAs per 10,000 people in the rural counties is 4.2, less than half of the state ratio, 9.2. NPs are also lower, at 10.5 per 10,000 compared to the state's 16.4. The comptroller audit, which built on a 2023 comptroller report about rural New York, found that many of these areas struggle with population loss, an aging population, and decreases in the labor force. Low population densities and limited public transportation mean that people have to spend to maintain personal vehicles to access health care. The report recommends creating mobile clinics and school-based health centers to increase access to care, alongside expanded transportation and telemedicine programs. It also suggests offering loan forgiveness and stipends to new healthcare professionals in rural areas and creating educational opportunities for nursing staff to advance their degrees and bolster the workforce. And it proposes that four-year SUNY schools offer satellite programs at local community colleges that blend online and in-person coursework. The federal government has a huge impact on rural hospitals. A new federal law — Public Law No. 119-21, or the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) — earmarks $50 billion from 2026 to 2030 for a Rural Hospital Transformation Program, but it's not guaranteed to offer funding to all states. According to the American Hospital Association, the law would reduce federal Medicaid spending on New York's rural hospitals by $1.125 billion over 10 years. And that law also reduces eligibility for Medicaid and the Essential Plan, which is likely to worsen the situation for rural hospitals operating on narrow profit margins. That's because they need Medicaid funding to stay open. The law also enacts new student loan limits of $50,000 annually for professional students and an aggregate limit of $200,000. This would make it harder for proposed loan forgiveness programs to attract any new doctors to rural New York. An April 2025 analysis from the Center for American Progress found that federal funding cuts to Medicaid threaten these hospitals across the country. They determined that close to a third of those in New York would be at immediate risk of closing. The numbers from another April analysis, this from the Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform, were broadly aligned in finding that close to 200 rural hospitals in 34 Medicaid expansion states were already at immediate risk of closing because of financial instability. In New York, they found that over a third of rural hospitals were at risk of immediate closure. They also counted three having closed since 2015, and 62 percent of the state's rural hospitals reported financial losses in 2023-2024, even with Medicaid funding intact. According to the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), rural hospitals survive best in states that increase Medicaid enrollment and eligibility. New York has six rural hospitals in the top 10 percent nationwide for their Medicaid payer mix, and five more have had negative margins for three consecutive years. In the 16 rural counties examined, 27 percent of the population was on Medicaid as of May 2025. That's close to 205,000 people. The Healthcare Association of New York State (HANYS) and the Greater New York Hospital Association (GNYHA) have opposed the OBBB. In letters sent to New York's congressional delegation in May, both organizations warned of the bill's catastrophic impact on the state's healthcare infrastructure. HANYS stated that the bill would cost the Empire State almost $13.5 billion per year. GNYHA also argued that the bill's cuts would be unsustainable for the state and wreck its hospital system. A June analysis from the Fiscal Policy Institute found that hospitals at immediate risk for closure in New York get over 25 percent of their net patient revenue from Medicaid or other government appropriations. They also reported that 94 hospitals in the state would see their annual profits disappear altogether with just a 10 percent cut to Medicaid revenue, because the program already pays less than half of what commercial insurance pays for the same services. According to the Fiscal Policy Institute, two Republican lawmakers who voted for the bill, Reps. Nicholas Langworthy and Elise Stefanik, represent districts with some of the highest numbers of at-risk hospitals. Eight are in Langworthy's, and seven in Stefanik's. In fact, five Republican members of the state's congressional delegation— including Stefanik and Langworthy —even published a letter in June on the topic. While they said they support OBBB's 'intent to prioritize federal benefits for citizens and long-term residents,' they asked to delay the implementation of two sections. They argued that states and healthcare providers avoid 'drastically disruptive consequences' for the healthcare system with a less abrupt transition. Their letter asked for sections 112101 and 112102, modifying tax credit eligibility for certain lawful immigrants, to not take effect until January 2029. The law would force 500,000 immigrant New Yorkers who live here legally onto state-only Medicaid — because New York is constitutionally required to provide coverage—with state and county taxpayers footing the bill. This could cause 'unsustainable spikes in uncompensated costs' for local health services and destabilize the state's Essential Plan, they warned. Take a look at the comptroller's report below: rural-health-shortages Download
