logo
Crisis in the copper chain: innovation, geopolitics and Australia's role

Crisis in the copper chain: innovation, geopolitics and Australia's role

Yahoo07-07-2025
As demand for clean energy tech rises, the global copper market is facing a supply-demand gap that analysts warn could be near impossible to close if production remains at its current levels.
Adding to the market volatility are US president Donald Trump's threatened tariffs, and his executive order to fast-track US exploration and mining of critical minerals, including copper, in international waters.
In the face of supply chain uncertainty, countries are prioritising sovereign access to copper. This means targeting new or previously inaccessible deposits, often deeper and more remote than previously seen, while innovators rush to develop technology that could make lower-grade ore economically viable.
While Australia is by no means the biggest copper producer (ranking eighth globally in 2024), it is home to the world's second largest copper reserves, making it a key player in any long-term production strategy.
With questions over how nations will meet copper demand without triggering further instability, we look at the projects working to keep Australia's supply afloat in an uncertain time.
Currently, copper demand sits at around 25 million tonnes (mt) per year. However, estimates suggest that the market trajectory is pushing towards a demand of 50mt by 2050.
Ollie Brown, an economist at GlobalData, told Mining Technology that this demand, similar to other critical minerals, is primarily driven by electric vehicles, grid renovations and renewable energy initiatives.
Amid growing demand, he says the global copper market is defined by 'lagging supply', while Trump's threatened tariffs from the beginning of this year are 'rattling global prices.'
While Trump has not set a levy against copper specifically, he has made it clear that he wants to cut back on imports and increase domestic production.
In February 2025, he commissioned the US Department of Commerce to investigate potential national security risks of copper imports ─ the first step towards potentially curbing these goods.
While the tariffs and their impacts remain conjecture at this stage, Nicolas Psaroudis, APAC economist at GlobalData, told Mining Technology the threat of restrictions contribute to uncertainty and price volatility.
'Internationally, export restrictions could disrupt global copper supply chains,' he explains. 'A sudden drop in supply could tighten global scrap availability, drive up international prices, and strain smelters already facing concentrate shortages.'
If nothing else, the situation has proven an unwelcome reminder of the fact that global mineral supply chains remain vulnerable to the whims of trade tensions and has added to calls to bolster domestic production.
Lawrence M. Cathles, professor of earth and atmospheric sciences at Cornell University, says Western nations need to be more willing to expand operations to avoid market dependence.
'It's not enough to say copper is important while refusing to do the work,' says Cathles. 'We don't want anybody to control any major commodity, but just not wanting that isn't enough. You've got to have policies and plans in place to avoid undesirable situations – and part of that is mining in our own territory.'
Yet while Australia has no shortage of copper ore, the issue lies in accessing it.
According to Dan Wood, exploration geologist and University of Queensland (UQ) adjunct professor, one of the main challenges is finding copper ore that's viable for development.
'Almost all of the large deposits theoretically available to replace one of the top-ten producing mines that will close in the early-2050s have all failed at least one mining feasibility study,' he says.
These failures are mainly due to low ore grades and remoteness, as well as low copper prices. Even if prices rise enough to make low-grade copper development viable, Wood cautions that oversupply could trigger a feedback loop: more copper brings prices down, undoing the gains.
To make the most of Australia's deposits, Wood says more should be done to access deeper ore bodies. One potential method is caving, when the rock is 'undercut' or drilled beneath the surface and recovered as it falls.
While the practice is not uncommon - for instance, it is used in Sweden for iron ore - little is known about how to safely mine beyond a certain depth, and education and training around the method remains low.
'Caving isn't uncommon, but the scary thing is there are so few people left in the world who really understand it,' Wood states. 'If you go deeper than around 1.4 kilometers, there isn't much data on the rock stressors. Take Rio Tinto's Resolution deposit in Arizona. You have to go down nearly two kilometers before you reach the top of the ore, and the rocks that deep are nearly 100 degrees centigrade.'
Initiatives to train the next generation of caving miners do exist - for instance UQ has partnered with Rio Tinto and the University of Mongolia to scale up caving expertise at Rio's Oyu Tolgoi mine in Mongolia. However, Wood warns the process is a long one.
'We're looking at a 20-year journey to end up with a cohort of properly trained and, most importantly, experienced caving engineers,' he says. 'This skills gap is serious and unless addressed will be a major drag on future copper supply towards 2050.'
Aside from education, technology may provide another route to increasing supply, with innovators looking to make low-grade ores viable development options.
One project, a collaboration between UQ and start-up Banksia Minerals Processing (BMP), is developing a more environmentally friendly means of extracting copper from low-grade resources.
The process relies on hydrometallurgy rather than pyrometallurgy (water rather than heat) to extract copper from the ore; dissolving, purifying and then recovering metals from liquid using electricity.
While the process itself isn't new, having been practiced in the late 1970s in the US, the team had a breakthrough in the purity of the copper produced, making it more viable for commercial deployment.
The method also addresses another issue plaguing copper miners - that of impurities.
Currently, smelters have strict regulations on how many impurities can be processed alongside the copper ore (with arsenic a particularly problematic contaminant).
James Vaughan, head of the university's Hydrometallurgy Research Group, explains the limits are getting increasingly difficult to meet.
'Miners are having to cherry pick ore bodies, and it's a significant limitation on the amount of material that can actually be pulled out of those mines,' he said. 'That's a problem when we need more and more copper."
While the typical smelting method sees arsenic exiting as a gas that can be harmful to both workers and the environment, using a water-based method stores the arsenic in a stable, and disposable, form.
By addressing this challenge, Leigh Staines, managing director of BMP, says the new technology could unlock copper resources previously deemed unfeasible.
'Our hypothesis is that more than half of known copper resources out there are restricted from development due to those smelter intake limitations,' she says. 'By enabling a feasible pathway for processing of those resources, we're then able to unlock the commercial viability of bringing that supply to market.'
The tech can be integrated into modular plants that are anticipated to be far cheaper to construct than traditional smelters ─in the order of hundreds of millions rather than billions ─ and running on an estimated 50% less energy.
As a result, the team say the project could pave the way for an economically viable onshore processing option, and bolster Australia's supply chain independence.
'We see a real opportunity from a sovereign supply perspective – gaining access to not only copper itself but the by-products from copper concentrate,' Staines says. 'In the longer term, if this takes off, I really do think it will become the new norm.'
Yet while innovations such as these show Australia is already on its way to unlocking copper's potential, another persistent concern is that without sufficient funding, even the best tech won't close the gap.
On the global stage, Arthur F. Thurnau, professor of mineral resources at the University of Michigan warns the West is underfunding its mining workforce.
'Governments in Australia, Canada, the EU and the US do not seem to fully appreciate the magnitude of the difference in education and training between these regions and China,' he says. 'Specifically, in the fields of geology and mining, China has more faculty and graduate students within a single university (such as the China University of Geosciences Beijing), than the sum of Australia, Canada, the EU and the US'
Without closing the gap, Thurnau warns that Western nations will be forever trying to catch up to China. '
For Cathles, government attitude is also an issue, though he points more towards a lack of realism in the demand for copper in the path to net zero.
'If the goal is to electrify everything and thereby dramatically increase copper demand - double or even triple it – you can't just suddenly mine more because the mining infrastructure cannot be expanded quickly,' he says.
Instead, he calls for long-term planning: building a skilled workforce and pursuing a more pragmatic clean energy transition that reduces pressure on supply chains.
There may be promising alternatives, he adds, such as battery chemistries that use less copper, pairing renewables with backup systems like gas-powered plants, or a focus on rolling out hybrid rather than fully electric vehicles. While these options may mean it takes longer to reach net zero, Cathles said they lessen the strain on copper production.
'Let's be sensible,' he says. 'We need grounded policies. We shouldn't place sudden, unrealistic demands on sectors that we know can't respond quickly.'
Whether through education, innovation, or a more measured path to net zero, one thing is clear: the world must confront the widening gap between copper demand and supply.
As Cathles and Thurnau both emphasise, the solution won't come from mining alone. It will require strategic investment in human capital, realistic energy policies, and a willingness to adapt. Without these, Western nations, including Australia, risk falling behind - not only in production capacity, but in their ability to lead a sustainable energy transition.
"Crisis in the copper chain: innovation, geopolitics and Australia's role" was originally created and published by Mining Technology, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Obama hits back at Trump ‘treason' accusation over Russia investigation
Obama hits back at Trump ‘treason' accusation over Russia investigation

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Obama hits back at Trump ‘treason' accusation over Russia investigation

Former President Barack Obama hit back Tuesday at President Donald Trump's accusation that his predecessor committed 'treason' related to the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Hours after Trump falsely accused Obama of trying to rig the 2016 election, the ex-president's office said it had no choice but to publicly refute the claim. 'These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction,' Obama's office said in a statement. The 44th commander in chief's office debunked the claim that an intelligence report released last week by Trump Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard somehow amounts to new evidence against Obama or losing 2016 Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton. ADVERTISEMENT The statement noted that neither Obama nor Clinton ever claimed that Russia succeeded in flipping votes from the Democrat to Trump's column in the election that catapulted him to the White House. It pointed to a 2020 bipartisan report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-chairman ex-Sen. Marco Rubio, that instead accused Russia of seeking to influence the election in Trump's favor. 'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes,' Obama's office said. The statement came soon after Trump erupted in a rant against Obama during an Oval Office meeting with Philippines President Ferdinand Marcos. 'They caught President Obama absolutely cold,' Trump said. 'They tried to rig the election and they got caught.' ADVERTISEMENT 'It's time to go after people,' he added. 'Obama's been caught directly…He's guilty. This was treason.' Trump's outburst is seen by critics as an attempt to distract from negative attention regarding his relationship with late sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and unanswered calls to release files related to the notorious pedophile's case. Trump's right-wing MAGA base has been pushing for the administration to publicly bare Department of Justice files on the case even after Attorney General Pam Bondi said she wouldn't release any more information related to the sex-trafficking case. Gabbard's report, released Friday, appears to be the latest effort to change the subject from Epstein. It downplayed the extent of Russian interference in the 2016 election by highlighting Obama administration emails showing officials had concluded before and after the presidential race that Moscow had not hacked state election systems to manipulate votes in Trump's favor. ADVERTISEMENT But Obama's Democratic administration never suggested otherwise, even as it exposed other means by which Russia interfered in the election, including through a massive hack-and-leak operation of Democratic emails by intelligence operatives working with WikiLeaks. _____

US Olympic and Paralympic Committee bans transgender athletes in compliance with Trump order
US Olympic and Paralympic Committee bans transgender athletes in compliance with Trump order

New York Post

time20 minutes ago

  • New York Post

US Olympic and Paralympic Committee bans transgender athletes in compliance with Trump order

The U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee is falling in line with an executive order from President Donald Trump banning transgender women from women's sports. The committee quietly updated its eligibility rules Monday, adding a paragraph to its 27-page 'Athlete Safety Policy' posted to its website that includes language that implies it bars transgender women from competing in women's divisions. Trump signed the 'Keeping Men out of Women's Sports' executive order — also known as Executive Order 14201 — in February. Advertisement The LA2028 official Olympic flag at Los Angeles City Hall on September 23, 2024. Getty Images 'The USOPC will continue to collaborate with various stakeholders with oversight responsibilities, e.g., IOC, IPC, NGBs, to ensure that women have a fair and safe competition environment consistent with Executive Order 14201 and the Ted Stevens Olympic & Amateur Sports Act,' the added language in the document stated. It's not clearly stated how the policy will be enforced, and it is unclear whether any American Olympians will be banned from the upcoming 2028 Summer Olympics taking place in Los Angeles. Advertisement A USOPC spokesperson told the New York Times that the committee had been having 'a series of respectful and constructive conversations with federal officials' following the president's executive order. The committee said it would work with national governing bodies to implement the new policy. 'As a federally chartered organization, we have an obligation to comply with federal expectations,' the USOPC statement read. President Donald Trump reacts after the FIFA Club World Cup 2025 Final match between Chelsea FC and Paris Saint-Germain. FIFA via Getty Images Advertisement No openly transgender woman has won an Olympic medal. The U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee's former policy based its rulings on 'real data and science-based evidence rather than ideology,' and that it would be 'making science-based decisions, sport by sport and discipline by discipline, within both the Olympic and Paralympic movements.' The International Olympic Committee has struggled to address the issue of transgender athletes in sports. USA Fencing updated its policy last week in response to criticism that it had been facing for allowing biological males to compete in the women's category. Part of the requirements to compete in a domestic women's competition include the language, 'Athletes who are of the female sex, provided all other entry criteria have been met.'

The Memo: Trump fuels Epstein furor he wants to escape
The Memo: Trump fuels Epstein furor he wants to escape

The Hill

time20 minutes ago

  • The Hill

The Memo: Trump fuels Epstein furor he wants to escape

President Trump and his allies are desperate to move past the Jeffrey Epstein controversy — but their own words and actions are having the opposite effect. Trump's decision to sue The Wall Street Journal over an Epstein-related story, his administration's choice to bar the Journal from the group of reporters who will cover the president's upcoming trip to Scotland, and Speaker Mike Johnson's (R-La.) eagerness to avoid a House vote on disclosure of Epstein material have all given fresh fuel to the story. The self-defeating aspect of this approach was typified by one social media post among the many that Trump has been issuing. On Tuesday afternoon, the president lamented that the achievements of the first six months of his second term were being underplayed because 'all the Fake News wants to talk about is the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax!' His post, of course, gave the media another reason to keep talking about it. The sense of creeping anxiety emanating from the White House over the Epstein matter is testament to the unusual discord it has caused within the Trump base. Trump's astonishing political comeback, from the nadir of the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021, to winning the White House back last November, was enabled by the fierce loyalty of his 'Make America Great Again' (MAGA) supporters — and by a party that has grown ever-warier of crossing him. The Epstein matter is an unusual exception. Republican elected officials have proven uncommonly willing to break with the president — or at least create some discomfort for him. Even the Speaker has called for greater 'transparency' around Epstein, though he has more recently tried to close a perceived gap between himself and Trump. But Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) called on social media on Tuesday for a vote on disclosing the so-called Epstein files — exactly the thing Johnson has been moving to thwart. Norman said Republicans should 'vote on it before August recess and get it DONE!!' Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) has also called for the material to be released, while Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) — who has been to the fore of the effort — is now in open defiance of Trump. Massie noted in an X post Tuesday that he had introduced 'the only binding congressional legislation' to get the Epstein material released, and 'in return, the attacks on me intensified.' Massie included in his message a screenshot of a Trump social media attack on him, in which the president called him 'the worst Republican Congressman' and 'A real loser!' Massie, in turn, used that attack to try to juice fundraising support from his supporters so he could 'stay in the ring.' The big picture, of course, is that the Speaker's reluctance to hold a vote is giving more ammunition to those who suspect Trump has something to hide. Massie told reporters Tuesday morning that Johnson seemed to want his party colleagues to 'just sort of stick your head in the sand' on the issue. It is a matter of public record that Trump and Epstein, the disgraced financier and sexual predator, were friendly acquaintances for years in the 1990s and early 2000s. Trump called Epstein a 'terrific guy' in a 2002 New York Magazine profile and also noted Epstein's fondness for women 'on the younger side.' It's also known the two later fell out, though the precise reason has never been definitively established. Some reports cite a competitive battle over real estate, others contend Trump cut contact with Epstein after the latter behaved inappropriately at the future president's Mar-a-Lago club. Trump's legal suit against The Wall Street Journal centers on the news organization's claim that a birthday message from Trump was included in an album to mark Epstein's 50th birthday in 2003. Trump insists the story, and alleged letter, are false. In terms of the politics of the overall matter, Trump is reaping what his allies sowed, at least in some regard. People around Trump stoked general suspicion of all the circumstances surrounding Epstein, who died — apparently by suicide — in 2019 while facing sex trafficking charges. The current storm was set off by the contrast between comments made by Attorney General Pam Bondi in February during a Fox News interview — where she said a list of Epstein's clients was 'sitting on my desk right now for review' — and an unsigned memo from the FBI and the Department of Justice earlier this month that contended 'no incriminating 'client list'' could be found. That set off real angst in the Trump base, with a number of MAGA-leaning commentators speaking out. The relatively meager polling that has been done in relation to Epstein underlines the political peril for the president. An Economist/YouGov poll released Tuesday found Americans disapproving of Trump's handling of the Epstein investigation by a huge margin. Fifty-six percent disapproved and just 22 percent approved. Significantly, exactly 1 in 4 Republicans disapproved of the president's actions, and an additional 30 percent declined to express an opinion. Just 45 percent of Republicans approved of how Trump had handled the matter. Those are unusually bad figures for Trump among Republicans. There is nothing very surprising about the overwhelming disapproval of the president's handling of the controversy among Democrats (only 7 percent approved), but it is also telling that independents came out against his actions by a massive 61 percent to 15 percent. For the moment, at least, Trump is stuck, and new developments are coming thick and fast. An announcement Tuesday from Bondi's social media account saying Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche would meet with Ghislaine Maxwell set off its own new round of speculation as to possible ulterior motives. In 2022, Maxwell was sentenced to 20 years for conspiring in Epstein's abuse. Trump has tried to turn the page repeatedly. So far, unusually, it hasn't worked.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store