
Chicken Licken cries fowl as ad board rules KFC copied its characters
The 'All Star Box' ad centres on a protagonist who enjoys a meal while accompanied by clones of himself, emphasising the box meal's value. The storyline introduces two additional characters who observe the protagonist and then decide to order the same meal for themselves.
Chicken Licken submitted that KFC's advertisement used characters resembling its own without permission.
According to Chicken Licken, these characters are central to its brand image and have been featured in its ads for years. Since KFC and Chicken Licken are direct competitors in the fast-food market, the complainant felt this was a calculated move.
It further claimed KFC's ad wasn't just borrowing ideas; it was outright imitation.
KFC denied that it had copied anything deliberately and described the ad as a parody meant to highlight the appeal of the 'All Star Box.' No names or products were included in the ad, KFC said, and it didn't mention Chicken Licken at all.
A line in the ad used the term 'salty,' which Chicken Licken also took issue with. KFC argued it was slang meaning someone was envious and that it wasn't meant as a jab at Chicken Licken's food.
After reviewing the complaint and the ad, the ARB ruled in favour of Chicken Licken.
It noted undeniable similarities between the characters in KFC's ad and Chicken Licken's.
According to the ARB, KFC undermined its rival's advertising efforts, as both parties are close competitors in the fast-food industry and recycling its original advertising dilutes its marketing value. The ARB said that humour or parody cannot be used as an excuse when it results in copying or exploiting ideas that help identify a competing brand.
In its ruling, the board found KFC to be in breach of the advertising code, which specifically bans mimicry that harms a competitor's advertising value. KFC was told to pull the plug on its 'All Star Box' commercial across all platforms immediately.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
‘Summertide' Is a Human-Scale Beachy Drama
The South African domestic drama 'Summertide,' on AcornTV, rolls in with an 'Everwood' vibe and a beachy setting. Martin (Frank Rautenbach) is a widower and marine biologist who moves back to his hometown in False Bay with his teenage son, Tristan (Jan Combrink), and tween daughter, Lucy (Evangelina Hallock). His family welcomes them with open arms and old resentments. Wouldn't you know it, Martin's childhood sweetheart Rebecca (Monique Rockman), a fancy chef who is also back in town, is glad to see him — though that's complicated somewhat by her romantic relationship with Martin's brother, Gavin (Tyrone Keogh). Martin struggles with guilt over his wife's death (the specifics of which are doled out slowly), and he is determined not to replicate with Tristan the relationship he has with his father (Andre Jacobs). Good luck to him! Tristan gets into some scrapes right away but also strikes up a romance. Lucy becomes obsessed with two local penguins. Gavin resents being perceived as a flaky man child, though he concedes he has earned it. The miracle here is that 'Summertide' is not a murder show or a cop show, at least not in the six episodes made available for review. It is sketched to a human scale, and you can feel the relationships stretch and repair in concert with one another; we see the characters experience different moods, not just different plot points. Everyone here is in a huge moment of transition, either moving or retiring or reassessing or maturing. And each wonders, Why can't you see me as I am, and especially as I am right now? How dare you think you understand me? 'Summertide' has its soapy elements. Longer arcs about the ecological health of the bay, especially as it relates to shady goings-on among local fishermen, unfurl as the season goes on. The show can afford to be relaxed in its pacing because there are 52 episodes in the first season, two of which are already streaming. That is a lot of episodes, and it engenders in the viewer the same feeling the characters share: We're in this together for the long haul.


Forbes
5 hours ago
- Forbes
The Big Lesson From The Sydney Sweeney American Eagle Backlash
The fact that a denim ad is the most controversial moment of the week speaks volumes about the current tensions in society. Unless you've been hiding under a rock, you'll have seen the Sydney Sweeney and American Eagle's 'great jeans' campaign and subsequent backlash. How could a jeans advert warrant such criticism? And what is the bigger lesson brands and agencies can learn from the controversy? The campaign has been dominating headlines, but it's important to understand the wider business context. American Eagle has faced a challenging Q1 with weakening business performance due to tariffs, product misses and steep discounting. The brand has withdrawn its guidance for 2025, citing an adjusted operating loss of $68 million. In recent years, American Eagle has collaborated with the likes of Addison Rae, Coco Gauff and Yara Shahidi to win over Gen-Z and unlock new growth. The Sydney Sweeney was an attempt to further boost cultural relevance with Gen-Z. In an interview with WWD, Chief Marketing Officer Craig Brommers said, 'I think this is potentially one of the biggest gets in American Eagle history'. The campaign with Sydney Sweeney is reportedly the company's most expensive campaign to date. It was a big bet from the brand. However, the 'great jeans' advert has received some serious backlash online. Firstly, for promoting sexual imagery while attempting to raise awareness for a domestic violence charity. Commentators were quick to criticize the campaign for appealing to the male gaze. One comment on Instagram reads: 'If your goal was to sell women's jeans to men, great job'. But the main controversy is related to the campaign messaging. On the surface, the adverts seem innocuous. The campaign tagline uses a double entendre, a form of wordplay that combines "jeans" and "genes." You can imagine the idea being blurted out during a meeting or workshop. But the campaign has been accused and criticized for promoting white supremacy and phrases coded in the language of eugenics. The video features Sweeney saying, 'Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality, and even eye color. My genes are blue.' Concluding with the slogan: 'Sydney Sweeney has great jeans'. One TikTok commentator wrote: 'It's giving 1930s Germany.' The main critique centres on the meaning of having 'great genes'. Does it suggest the existence of less good or inferior genes? Context is important here. Sydney Sweeney is a white woman with blonde hair and blue eyes. Critics have argued that the campaign reinforces and normalizes the notion that certain genetic attributes are more desirable than others. Eugenics was a central pillar of ideology and policy in Nazi Germany. Separately from this campaign, for the first time in decades, we're witnessing eugenicist thinking from fringe to mainstream headlines. Serving as the backdrop to the American Eagle campaign. Some view the campaign as symbolic of a cultural and ideological shift back towards commentators have suggested that the backlash might have been prevented if more diverse voices were included in the creative process. The problem is that diverse voices don't always translate to an equal share of influence. Challenging the consensus requires building a culture that welcomes dissent. Besides, a number of TikTok creators have pointed out that the American Eagle Executive team are all white when almost 40% of the U.S. population identifies as people of color. There also appears to be no representation of Millennials or Gen-Z on the leadership team. The very demographics the brand is hoping to connect with. Others are celebrating the campaign for being 'anti-woke'. A return to normality, where brands and celebrities don't have to be apologetic for existing or being white. Many marketers have argued that people are reading too much into a simple brand advertisement featuring a trending celebrity to sell jeans. The internet and social media have democratized the share of voice. However, more voices create greater levels of scrutiny, resulting in countless critiques and campaign teardowns, oftentimes distant from the original creator's intentions and ambitions. It feels like marketers and brands are stuck in a lose-lose situation. Brands are bound to be criticized by one group or the other. Where such an argument falls short is in the real world. Brands are not just logos; they are vehicles for communicating implicit and explicit meaning. Unlike broadcast media and one-way communication models, it's the audience, not the CMO, who decides how a message is received, remixed and interpreted. Advertising doesn't exist in a vacuum. Campaigns are created, transmitted and translated within the context of culture. Power has shifted from boardrooms to creators. Under such conditions, it's mission-critical to understand the cultural backdrop in which your brand is operating. Marketers need both perspective and foresight on how messages will be received in the context of the wider cultural conversation, rather than as a standalone communication. Advertising is subliminal. Brands appeal to our subconscious emotions, intuitions and sometimes insecurities. The traditional advertising playbook rejects us as we are but embraces us if we buy the brand. Denim brands, like fragrance and luxury care brands, have historically used sexual appeal and aspiration to sell products. However, societal expectations, norms and aspirations have changed since the 20th century. A change yet to be reflected in the marketing and advertising industry. The American Eagle and Sydney Sweeney controversy will eventually blow over, but only to give way to the next consumer backlash. There is a bigger lesson to be learned from the controversy: marketers no longer control the narrative. A brand is no longer what brands tell people, but what people tell brands.


Forbes
6 hours ago
- Forbes
Mzansi Welcomes The World: LIV Golf Set To Make African Debut In South Africa In 2026
LIV Golf is expanding its global footprint once again, this time with a historic first. In March 2026, the LIV Golf League will make its debut on African soil, with Johannesburg's Steyn City set to host the event from 20 to 22 March. This marks a significant moment not only for South Africa but for the entire African continent, as LIV continues to grow its international presence. Known for blending professional golf with entertainment, music, and lifestyle experiences, LIV Golf's arrival signals another bold step for the league's evolving identity and ambition. A Festival of Golf and Culture As with other LIV events, this tournament will be about more than just competition. Organisers have promised a high-energy experience that fuses sport and culture, what they call a 'festival of golf and life.' Fans can expect live music performances, immersive fan zones, and family-friendly access, including free entry for children under 12. Enthusiasm is already high: the first 10,000 tickets sold out within 24 hours, setting a LIV Golf record, and more than 25,000 tickets have already been claimed in advance of the event. The South Africa tournament will form part of LIV's broader 2026 calendar, which includes events in Australia, Singapore, Mexico, and the United Kingdom. A Venue Built for the Moment The 2026 edition will take place at The Club at Steyn City, a championship course designed by Nicklaus Design. Situated in Midrand between Johannesburg and Pretoria, the venue offers a scenic but demanding 7,700-yard, par-72 layout, surrounded by indigenous bushland and home to wildlife including impalas and porcupines. For LIV, the location offers a striking blend of modern luxury and natural African beauty, an ideal setting for a global tournament seeking to deliver both sporting drama and visual spectacle. LIV Golf has signed a multi-year agreement to stage events in South Africa, while Steyn City's deal is for one year, with options to extend. Spotlight on Home Talent South Africa's Stinger GC is expected to be a major drawcard for local fans. The team is captained by 2010 Open Champion Louis Oosthuizen, joined by fellow countrymen Charl Schwartzel, Branden Grace, and Dean Burmester, all of whom have had success on both traditional and LIV circuits. For Stinger GC, the chance to perform on familiar turf could provide a competitive edge and an emotional boost as they compete against LIV's international field. Global Stars on Display The South Africa tournament will feature a lineup of 54 top players from around the world, including major champions such as Brooks Koepka, Jon Rahm, Bryson DeChambeau, Dustin Johnson, Phil Mickelson, and Cameron Smith. The presence of these names reinforces LIV's goal to deliver a premium golf product while appealing to a new, broader generation of fans. Economic and Tourism Upside LIV Golf events have consistently demonstrated their ability to generate substantial economic impact in host cities. In 2025, LIV Golf Adelaide produced a total economic impact of $78.5 million USD, according to an independent study by Vision Insights. Key stats from that event included: South African tourism and hospitality sectors will be watching closely, with expectations that the 2026 event could deliver similar, if not greater, returns, particularly given Johannesburg's position as a regional hub for business and travel. Community-Focused Legacy Beyond entertainment and economic growth, the 2026 LIV Golf event also aims to leave a social legacy. The tournament will support the Steyn City Foundation's feeding schemes, providing resources for community programs long after the final putt drops. This aligns with LIV's growing emphasis on social investment, sustainability, and charitable partnerships as it continues to scale its global presence. A Strategic Step for the Continent South Africa has long been a destination for major international sporting events, from football and rugby to cricket and athletics. The inclusion of LIV Golf on this list marks a milestone not only for the sport in the region but for Africa's place on the global golf map. As the first African stop on the LIV calendar, the 2026 tournament could serve as a springboard for future events across the continent. For LIV Golf, it represents an important test case, one that may influence its future expansion strategy in emerging markets. As March 2026 approaches, the spotlight will turn to Johannesburg, Steyn City, and the players ready to make history. Whether for fans, athletes, or the host nation, LIV Golf South Africa promises to be a landmark moment in a sport that's redefining its global reach.