Mangakino farmer must report to jail after losing animal cruelty appeal
Koberstein appealed his prison sentence in the Court of Appeal in Wellington in March and Justices Rebecca Ellis, Rachel Dunningham and Layne Harvey released their decision dismissing the appeal yesterday.
Koberstein's lawyer, Philip Morgan, KC, appealed on the grounds the prison sentence was excessive given Koberstein was also banned from farming. He asked that a home detention sentence be imposed instead.
Koberstein has been on bail pending the outcome of the appeal.
A jury found Koberstein guilty of 11 charges in March last year. The charges were laid by the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) after a complaint and subsequent search of his farm in July 2019.
He was found to have wilfully ill-treated 33 sheep that had to be destroyed, and failed to ensure proper and sufficient food for 834 pregnant sheep, 86 cattle and 32 heifers.
Other charges related to sheep stuck on their backs with their eyes pecked out by hawks, one with a neck too deformed to eat properly, and another with an injured foot seen walking on its knuckle.
Judge Snell said at sentencing that the offending was serious as it involved hundreds of animals in very poor to extensively poor body condition, suffering over a lengthy time.
Despite numerous warnings and previous convictions for similar offending, Koberstein 'buried his head in the sand'. Judge Snell said Koberstein was 'unrepentant'.
At appeal, Morgan said Judge Snell should have reduced the sentence by 12 months, not four months, for the lifetime farming ban.
Morgan said disqualifying Koberstein from farming effectively meant his life's work was lost.
He also argued Judge Snell's prison starting point was too high, given Koberstein's age and the fact he did not mean to starve the animals.
Crown prosecutor Anna McConachy said Judge Snell's sentence was appropriate and should be upheld.
She said the 17% discount was generous, given the circumstances.
She highlighted Koberstein's lengthy history of MPI interventions before the 2019 offending. She said this history showed Koberstein was farming animals with poor body conditions in 2013, 2016 and 2018.
The appeal decision said the justices agreed with McConachy that the overall approach to sentencing was generous and the end sentence was not manifestly excessive.
'An uplift for the previous involvement of MPI and Mr Koberstein's previous convictions could easily have been warranted. Mr Koberstein's conduct did, on more than one occasion, cause the extended and acute suffering of many animals, leading to their death.'
They said in the decision that Parliament had provided for terms of imprisonment for this type of offending in the Animal Welfare Act and had encouraged courts to treat such offending as criminal.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
28-05-2025
- Scoop
Court Concludes Padded Racing Whips Hurt Horses
On 27 May it was proven in a Tasmanian court that padded whips cause pain and suffering to horses. This is the first court decision, since the introduction of padded whips in 2009, against their use on horses. The Coalition for the Protection of Racehorses are once again calling for an immediate ban of the whip in racing. 'The Magistrates Court in Tasmanian has made the groundbreaking ruling that whipping a horse with a padded whip does indeed cause pain and suffering to the horse,' said General Manager for the Coalition for the Protection of Racehorses, Helle Erhardsen. 'This ruling is significant because it wasn't any old whip in question, it was the specific padded whip which is approved for racing, and which Racing Australia claims do not hurt horses.' The conventional whip was replaced with a padded whip in 2009 because of the massive public concern about the pain it inflicts upon horses to be whipped. Despite studies which, according to the RSPCA, show that the padded whip 'will cause a similar level of pain as occurs with a conventional whip', the racing industry has justified its continued use of the whip by arguing it has not been proven that whipping hurts horses. With this court decision, that argument is no longer valid. The guilty ruling relates to Tasmanian racehorse trainer Liandra Gray, who was recorded on CCTV in July 2022 hitting a racehorse with a padded whip more than 40 times. Under the Animal Welfare Act, the RSPCA charged the trainer with committing an act which 'caused or was likely to cause unreasonable and unjustifiable pain or suffering to an animal.' The defendant Liandra Gray pleaded not guilty. In her defence, she claimed she had used less force with the whip than a jockey would in a race. On May 27, 2025, after considering extensive evidence, including several hearings and expert reports, Magistrate Evan Hughes of Devonport Court found the defendant Liandra Gray guilty: Although the whip was padded, it was proven that it caused the horse to experience 'unreasonable and unjustifiable pain or suffering.' 'The Australian racing industry can no longer hide behind a smokescreen of being unaware of the pain they are allowing jockeys and trainers to inflict upon horses used for racing,' said Ms Erhardsen. 'We now have a legal judgement that whipping a horse with a padded whip is a criminal act of cruelty to animals. In light of this, the Coalition for the Protection of Racehorses once again calls for an immediate ban of whip use across the racing industry.' Currently in Australia jockeys are permitted to strike their horse five times prior to the last 100 metres of a race, and from thereon at their own 'discretion'. 'This court decision could just be the best news of all time for the welfare of racehorses in Australia,' Ms Erhardsen said.
Scoop
27-05-2025
- Scoop
Nelson Courthouse To Reopen To Public After Seismic Upgrade
Ministry of Justice - Latest News [Page 1] 'The health and safety of all users of the courthouse remains a priority. Engineers confirm the building can be reoccupied while further seismic assessment is undertaken,' Mr Loo says. More >> Chief Victims Advisor To Government: Support Available For Victims During Lockdown Friday, 20 August 2021, 6:48 pm | Ministry of Justice New Zealand's Chief Victims Advisor to Government, Dr Kim McGregor, wants victims and survivors of family violence and sexual violence to know that the Police and social services are there to help them even through this period of lockdown. 'My ... More >> Tackling Sexual Violence: National Strategy Design, Execution Will Be Key Thursday, 8 July 2021, 11:50 am | Ministry of Justice Leading family violence and sexual violence sector leaders say the work underway to develop a National Strategy and Action Plans must be well designed and executed because there is an unlikely to be a better chance to get it right. 'This national ... More >> Scott Watson's Convictions To Be Referred To Court Of Appeal Friday, 26 June 2020, 4:35 pm | Ministry of Justice The Governor-General has referred Scott Watson's convictions for murder back to the Court of Appeal, Justice Minister Andrew Little announced today. Mr Watson was convicted in 1999 of the murders of Ben Smart and Olivia Hope. His appeal to the ... More >> Revised Practice Notes And Protocols To Be Published For COVID-19 Alert Level 2 Friday, 8 May 2020, 5:07 pm | Ministry of Justice In the event the Government announces an immediate or phased step-down to Alert Level 2 on Monday, the Courts will publish revised practice notes and protocols explaining what effect, if any, this will have on the way each jurisdiction will operate. These ... More >> Statement From The Chief District Court Judge Friday, 24 April 2020, 2:17 pm | Ministry of Justice All divisions of the District Court, including Family Court and Youth Court, are preparing to resume as much work as possible when New Zealand's pandemic response moves to COVID-19 Alert Level 3. More >> Operation Of The Courts Under COVID-19 Alert Level 3 Thursday, 23 April 2020, 4:52 pm | Ministry of Justice The Prime Minister has now announced the country will move to alert level 3[1] from Tuesday 28 April. In light of this, the Chief Justice Helen Winkelmann has announced the following changes to the way New Zealand's courts will be operating: The courts ... More >> Public Access To Courts Tightened For Safety Reasons Thursday, 26 March 2020, 10:31 pm | Ministry of Justice To preserve public safety and give effect to the COVID-19 Alert Level 4, District Courts and the High Court are excluding from courthouses members of the public whose attendance is not required for the business of the court that day. This takes effect ... More >> Family Justice Reforms Monday, 5 November 2018, 11:38 am | Ministry of Justice There are just five days left to make submissions on the Family Justice Services Review says Panel Chair, Rosslyn Noonan. More >> Criminal Justice Advisory Group to visit Northland Thursday, 1 November 2018, 5:23 pm | Ministry of Justice The Government's Safe and Effective Justice Programme Advisory Group – Te Uepū Hāpai i te Ora – will visit Northland on November 5 and 6 as part of its nationwide consultation to gather information on the criminal justice system. This is the fourth ... More >> Criminal Justice Advisory Group to visit Bay of Plenty Thursday, 1 November 2018, 4:44 pm | Ministry of Justice The Government's Safe and Effective Justice Advisory Group – Te Uepū Hāpai i te Ora – will visit the Bay of Plenty on November 5 and 6 as part of its nationwide consultation to gather information on the criminal justice system. More >> Major crime survey reaches milestone Thursday, 25 October 2018, 1:39 pm | Ministry of Justice The Ministry of Justice's new crime survey – The New Zealand Crime and Victims Survey' (NZCVS) – which started in March, has reached its target this month of interviewing 8,000 New Zealanders over the age of 15 about their experience of crime. More >> Criminal Justice Advisory Group to visit South Auckland Friday, 12 October 2018, 12:17 pm | Ministry of Justice The Government's Safe and Effective Justice Programme Advisory Group – Te Uepū Hāpai i te Ora – will visit South Auckland on October 15 and 16 as part of its nationwide consultation to gather information on the criminal justice system. More >> Waitangi Tribunal finds serious Treaty breaches Monday, 10 September 2018, 3:42 pm | Ministry of Justice The Crown's significant breaches of the Treaty of Waitangi caused serious damage to the mana and autonomy of the iwi and hapū of Te Rohe Pōtae (the King Country), the Waitangi Tribunal has found. More >> Submissions on 2014 Family Justice Reforms Now Open Wednesday, 5 September 2018, 8:55 am | Ministry of Justice The Independent Panel considering the 2014 family justice reforms wants to hear from people who have used the Family Court and related services. More >> Considering the Family Justice System Wednesday, 29 August 2018, 2:55 pm | Ministry of Justice The Independent Panel evaluating the 2014 reforms to the family justice system will be launching a public submissions process from 5 September 2018. More >> Extra support will improve Coronial Post-mortem Services Monday, 20 August 2018, 4:30 pm | Ministry of Justice The Ministry of Justice has agreed new contracts for post-mortem services across New Zealand. More >> District Court responds to high incidence of disabilities Thursday, 16 August 2018, 12:34 pm | Ministry of Justice The District Court is to consider adopting a different approach to young adult offenders to take account of the high incidence of neurodisabilities among those appearing in court. More >>
NZ Herald
23-05-2025
- NZ Herald
Mangakino farmer must report to jail after losing animal cruelty appeal
Koberstein appealed his prison sentence in the Court of Appeal in Wellington in March and Justices Rebecca Ellis, Rachel Dunningham and Layne Harvey released their decision dismissing the appeal yesterday. Koberstein's lawyer, Philip Morgan, KC, appealed on the grounds the prison sentence was excessive given Koberstein was also banned from farming. He asked that a home detention sentence be imposed instead. Koberstein has been on bail pending the outcome of the appeal. A jury found Koberstein guilty of 11 charges in March last year. The charges were laid by the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) after a complaint and subsequent search of his farm in July 2019. He was found to have wilfully ill-treated 33 sheep that had to be destroyed, and failed to ensure proper and sufficient food for 834 pregnant sheep, 86 cattle and 32 heifers. Other charges related to sheep stuck on their backs with their eyes pecked out by hawks, one with a neck too deformed to eat properly, and another with an injured foot seen walking on its knuckle. Judge Snell said at sentencing that the offending was serious as it involved hundreds of animals in very poor to extensively poor body condition, suffering over a lengthy time. Despite numerous warnings and previous convictions for similar offending, Koberstein 'buried his head in the sand'. Judge Snell said Koberstein was 'unrepentant'. At appeal, Morgan said Judge Snell should have reduced the sentence by 12 months, not four months, for the lifetime farming ban. Morgan said disqualifying Koberstein from farming effectively meant his life's work was lost. He also argued Judge Snell's prison starting point was too high, given Koberstein's age and the fact he did not mean to starve the animals. Crown prosecutor Anna McConachy said Judge Snell's sentence was appropriate and should be upheld. She said the 17% discount was generous, given the circumstances. She highlighted Koberstein's lengthy history of MPI interventions before the 2019 offending. She said this history showed Koberstein was farming animals with poor body conditions in 2013, 2016 and 2018. The appeal decision said the justices agreed with McConachy that the overall approach to sentencing was generous and the end sentence was not manifestly excessive. 'An uplift for the previous involvement of MPI and Mr Koberstein's previous convictions could easily have been warranted. Mr Koberstein's conduct did, on more than one occasion, cause the extended and acute suffering of many animals, leading to their death.' They said in the decision that Parliament had provided for terms of imprisonment for this type of offending in the Animal Welfare Act and had encouraged courts to treat such offending as criminal.
