Colombia ex-president Uribe guilty of bribing official
Judge Sandra Liliana Heredia read her decision to the court over the course of some 10 hours. She found the right-wing politician not guilty of a separate bribery charge.
The ruling, which Uribe's legal team said he will appeal, is the latest decision in a hugely politicised case that has run for about 13 years.
Uribe, 73, and his supporters say the process is a persecution and that he is innocent. His detractors have celebrated it as the deserved downfall for a man who has been repeatedly accused of close relationships with violent right-wing paramilitaries, but never convicted of any crime.
Each charge carries a jail sentence of between six and 12 years. Heredia is expected to sentence Uribe in a later hearing.
"Justice does not kneel before power," Heredia told the court. "It is at the service of the Colombian people."
"We want to say to Colombia that justice has arrived," she said, adding that her full decision is some 1000 pages long.
Uribe and one of his lawyers, Jaime Granados, joined the hearing via video link, while another lawyer, Jaime Lombana, appeared in person.
Granados said the presumption of Uribe's innocence should be maintained and asked for him to remain free during the remainder of the process, a decision Heredia said she will take on Friday.
Even if the conviction is eventually upheld, Uribe may be allowed to serve his sentence on house arrest because of his age.
Uribe, who was president from 2002 to 2010 and oversaw a military offensive against leftist guerrilla groups, was investigated along with several allies over allegations of witness tampering carried out in an attempt to discredit accusations he had ties to paramilitaries.
Judges have twice rejected requests by prosecutors to shelve the case, which stems from Uribe's allegation in 2012 that leftist Senator Ivan Cepeda had orchestrated a plot to tie him to paramilitaries.
The Supreme Court said in 2018 that Cepeda had collected information from former fighters as part of his work and had not paid or pressured former paramilitaries. Instead, the court said it was Uribe and his allies who pressured witnesses.
Uribe's trial triggered sharp criticism from US Secretary of State Marco Rubio ahead of the judge's decision.
"Uribe's only crime has been to tirelessly fight and defend his homeland. The weaponisation of Colombia's judicial branch by radical judges has now set a worrisome precedent," Rubio said on X.
Uribe, who was placed under house arrest for two months in 2020, is head of the powerful Democratic Centre party and was a senator for years both before and after his presidency.
Uribe joins a list of Latin American leaders who have been convicted and sometimes jailed, including Peru's Alberto Fujimori, Brazil's Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, Ecuador's Rafael Correa, Argentina's Cristina Fernandez and Panama's Ricardo Martinelli.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
2 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Rwanda agrees to take deportees from the US
Rwanda has become the third African nation to agree to accept deportees from the United States under the Trump administration's plans to send migrants to countries they have no ties with to get them off American soil. Makolo didn't provide a timeline for any deportees to arrive in Rwanda or say if they would arrive at once or in several batches. She said details were still being worked out. The State Department said the US "works with Rwanda on a range of mutual priorities" but wouldn't comment on details of the deportation deal and what it called diplomatic conversations with other governments. The US sent 13 men it described as dangerous criminals who were in the US illegally to South Sudan and Eswatini in Africa last month and has said it is seeking more agreements with African nations. It said those deportees' home countries refused to take them back. The US has also deported hundreds of Venezuelans and others to Costa Rica, Panama and El Salvador under President Donald Trump's plans to expel people who he says entered the US illegally. In March, using an 18th-century wartime law, the US deported more than 200 Venezuelan immigrants to El Salvador, where they were immediately transferred to a mega-prison known as the Terrorism Confinement Centre, which was built to hold alleged gang members. Human rights groups have documented hundreds of deaths as well as cases of torture inside its walls. Rwanda attracted international attention and some outrage when it struck a deal in 2022 with the UK to accept migrants who had arrived in the UK to seek asylum. The contentious agreement was criticised by rights groups and others as being unethical and unworkable and was ultimately scrapped when Britain's new Labour government took over. Britain's Supreme Court ruled in 2023 that the deal was unlawful because Rwanda was not a safe third country for migrants. Both South Sudan and Eswatini have declined to give details of their agreements with the US Rwanda, a relatively small country of some 15 million people, has long stood out on the continent for its recovery from a genocide that killed over 800,000 people in 1994. Government spokesperson Makolo said the agreement with the US was Rwanda doing its part to help with international migration issues because "our societal values are founded on reintegration and rehabilitation". "Those approved (for resettlement in Rwanda) will be provided with workforce training, healthcare, and accommodation support to jumpstart their lives in Rwanda, giving them the opportunity to contribute to one of the fastest-growing economies in the world over the last decade," she said. There were no details about whether Rwanda had received anything in return for taking the deportees. Gonzaga Muganwa, a Rwandan political analyst, said "appeasing President Trump pays". "This agreement enhances Rwanda's strategic interest of having good relationships with the Trump administration," he said. Rwanda has become the third African nation to agree to accept deportees from the United States under the Trump administration's plans to send migrants to countries they have no ties with to get them off American soil. Makolo didn't provide a timeline for any deportees to arrive in Rwanda or say if they would arrive at once or in several batches. She said details were still being worked out. The State Department said the US "works with Rwanda on a range of mutual priorities" but wouldn't comment on details of the deportation deal and what it called diplomatic conversations with other governments. The US sent 13 men it described as dangerous criminals who were in the US illegally to South Sudan and Eswatini in Africa last month and has said it is seeking more agreements with African nations. It said those deportees' home countries refused to take them back. The US has also deported hundreds of Venezuelans and others to Costa Rica, Panama and El Salvador under President Donald Trump's plans to expel people who he says entered the US illegally. In March, using an 18th-century wartime law, the US deported more than 200 Venezuelan immigrants to El Salvador, where they were immediately transferred to a mega-prison known as the Terrorism Confinement Centre, which was built to hold alleged gang members. Human rights groups have documented hundreds of deaths as well as cases of torture inside its walls. Rwanda attracted international attention and some outrage when it struck a deal in 2022 with the UK to accept migrants who had arrived in the UK to seek asylum. The contentious agreement was criticised by rights groups and others as being unethical and unworkable and was ultimately scrapped when Britain's new Labour government took over. Britain's Supreme Court ruled in 2023 that the deal was unlawful because Rwanda was not a safe third country for migrants. Both South Sudan and Eswatini have declined to give details of their agreements with the US Rwanda, a relatively small country of some 15 million people, has long stood out on the continent for its recovery from a genocide that killed over 800,000 people in 1994. Government spokesperson Makolo said the agreement with the US was Rwanda doing its part to help with international migration issues because "our societal values are founded on reintegration and rehabilitation". "Those approved (for resettlement in Rwanda) will be provided with workforce training, healthcare, and accommodation support to jumpstart their lives in Rwanda, giving them the opportunity to contribute to one of the fastest-growing economies in the world over the last decade," she said. There were no details about whether Rwanda had received anything in return for taking the deportees. Gonzaga Muganwa, a Rwandan political analyst, said "appeasing President Trump pays". "This agreement enhances Rwanda's strategic interest of having good relationships with the Trump administration," he said. Rwanda has become the third African nation to agree to accept deportees from the United States under the Trump administration's plans to send migrants to countries they have no ties with to get them off American soil. Makolo didn't provide a timeline for any deportees to arrive in Rwanda or say if they would arrive at once or in several batches. She said details were still being worked out. The State Department said the US "works with Rwanda on a range of mutual priorities" but wouldn't comment on details of the deportation deal and what it called diplomatic conversations with other governments. The US sent 13 men it described as dangerous criminals who were in the US illegally to South Sudan and Eswatini in Africa last month and has said it is seeking more agreements with African nations. It said those deportees' home countries refused to take them back. The US has also deported hundreds of Venezuelans and others to Costa Rica, Panama and El Salvador under President Donald Trump's plans to expel people who he says entered the US illegally. In March, using an 18th-century wartime law, the US deported more than 200 Venezuelan immigrants to El Salvador, where they were immediately transferred to a mega-prison known as the Terrorism Confinement Centre, which was built to hold alleged gang members. Human rights groups have documented hundreds of deaths as well as cases of torture inside its walls. Rwanda attracted international attention and some outrage when it struck a deal in 2022 with the UK to accept migrants who had arrived in the UK to seek asylum. The contentious agreement was criticised by rights groups and others as being unethical and unworkable and was ultimately scrapped when Britain's new Labour government took over. Britain's Supreme Court ruled in 2023 that the deal was unlawful because Rwanda was not a safe third country for migrants. Both South Sudan and Eswatini have declined to give details of their agreements with the US Rwanda, a relatively small country of some 15 million people, has long stood out on the continent for its recovery from a genocide that killed over 800,000 people in 1994. Government spokesperson Makolo said the agreement with the US was Rwanda doing its part to help with international migration issues because "our societal values are founded on reintegration and rehabilitation". "Those approved (for resettlement in Rwanda) will be provided with workforce training, healthcare, and accommodation support to jumpstart their lives in Rwanda, giving them the opportunity to contribute to one of the fastest-growing economies in the world over the last decade," she said. There were no details about whether Rwanda had received anything in return for taking the deportees. Gonzaga Muganwa, a Rwandan political analyst, said "appeasing President Trump pays". "This agreement enhances Rwanda's strategic interest of having good relationships with the Trump administration," he said. Rwanda has become the third African nation to agree to accept deportees from the United States under the Trump administration's plans to send migrants to countries they have no ties with to get them off American soil. Makolo didn't provide a timeline for any deportees to arrive in Rwanda or say if they would arrive at once or in several batches. She said details were still being worked out. The State Department said the US "works with Rwanda on a range of mutual priorities" but wouldn't comment on details of the deportation deal and what it called diplomatic conversations with other governments. The US sent 13 men it described as dangerous criminals who were in the US illegally to South Sudan and Eswatini in Africa last month and has said it is seeking more agreements with African nations. It said those deportees' home countries refused to take them back. The US has also deported hundreds of Venezuelans and others to Costa Rica, Panama and El Salvador under President Donald Trump's plans to expel people who he says entered the US illegally. In March, using an 18th-century wartime law, the US deported more than 200 Venezuelan immigrants to El Salvador, where they were immediately transferred to a mega-prison known as the Terrorism Confinement Centre, which was built to hold alleged gang members. Human rights groups have documented hundreds of deaths as well as cases of torture inside its walls. Rwanda attracted international attention and some outrage when it struck a deal in 2022 with the UK to accept migrants who had arrived in the UK to seek asylum. The contentious agreement was criticised by rights groups and others as being unethical and unworkable and was ultimately scrapped when Britain's new Labour government took over. Britain's Supreme Court ruled in 2023 that the deal was unlawful because Rwanda was not a safe third country for migrants. Both South Sudan and Eswatini have declined to give details of their agreements with the US Rwanda, a relatively small country of some 15 million people, has long stood out on the continent for its recovery from a genocide that killed over 800,000 people in 1994. Government spokesperson Makolo said the agreement with the US was Rwanda doing its part to help with international migration issues because "our societal values are founded on reintegration and rehabilitation". "Those approved (for resettlement in Rwanda) will be provided with workforce training, healthcare, and accommodation support to jumpstart their lives in Rwanda, giving them the opportunity to contribute to one of the fastest-growing economies in the world over the last decade," she said. There were no details about whether Rwanda had received anything in return for taking the deportees. Gonzaga Muganwa, a Rwandan political analyst, said "appeasing President Trump pays". "This agreement enhances Rwanda's strategic interest of having good relationships with the Trump administration," he said.
Perth Now
5 hours ago
- Perth Now
Outback Wrangler trial finally set to get under way
The long-awaited trial of reality TV star Matt Wright is finally set to begin more than three years after his mate Chris "Willow" Wilson died in an outback chopper crash. Following many delays because of legal argument and scheduling issues, a jury was selected on Tuesday to try Wright on charges of perverting the course of justice following the February 2022 crash in the Northern Territory. Mr Wilson, 34, was hanging from a sling under the chopper on a mission to collect crocodile eggs when the aircraft lost power and plunged to the ground, killing him and critically injuring pilot Sebastian Robinson. Wright, the star of TV show Outback Wrangler, was charged after being accused of tampering with evidence to cover up non-adherence to aircraft maintenance rules. The 45-year-old has pleaded not guilty to three counts of attempting to pervert the course of justice. On Tuesday, more than 100 potential jurors packed the Supreme Court in Darwin, with dozens coming forward to seek to be excused from jury service as Wright watched quietly from the dock. A panel of 12 jurors plus two reserves was selected, comprising eight men and six women. Acting Justice Allan Blow told the court the trial could take from three to five weeks, with a long list of witnesses to be examined. He told jurors the case had received a lot of publicity but it was important they ignore what they had heard or read and rely solely on evidence presented in the courtroom to make their decisions. The charge of attempting to pervert the course of justice carries a maximum 15-year jail term in the NT. An Australian Transport Safety Bureau report into the crash near the King River in Arnhem Land found the chopper's engine stopped mid-flight because of a lack of fuel. Wright rose to fame starring in National Geographic's Outback Wrangler and the Netflix series Wild Croc Territory.
The Advertiser
15 hours ago
- The Advertiser
'No shame': Minns slams convicted rapist's bid to serve as MP from jail
Lawyers for convicted rapist Gareth Ward have filed an injunction to stop his expulsion from parliament, which means he will remain MP for Kiama in the NSW Illawarra region while he awaits his sentencing behind bars. But Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig said the Supreme Court orders issued by Justice Sweeney were "non-binding upon the House" and the government would give the court the opportunity to rectify what he called "a significant constitutional error". Parliament returned on Tuesday and it was expected a notice of motion to expel the disgraced politician would be put forward. However, NSW Premier Chris Minns confirmed Ward's lawyers sought the injunction against Leader of the Lower House Ron Hoenig, with an urgent hearing to occur in the Supreme Court later this week. He warned there was a critical time factor at play, with parliament sitting from Tuesday for just one week before breaking again for five weeks. Mr Minns told 2GB radio on Tuesday morning that "most people would appreciate, it's an unconscionable situation to have someone who's currently sitting in Silverwater ... who is demanding to remain a member of parliament and continue to be paid". "Clearly he's got no shame," Mr Minns said. Mr Hoenig said he had received the orders from the Supreme Court but believed they did not stop the House from moving forward with the expulsion motion. "The orders made by the court yesterday afternoon, we say, have no effect and are not binding upon the House," Mr Hoenig said. "The House has an inherent power to conduct its own business, in accordance with the Constitution, unconstrained by any interference." He said the Crown Solicitors had been instructed to approach Justice Sweeney to "reconsider the orders that she had made to enable the House to conduct its affairs on behalf of the people unconstrained". He noted the case was listed for hearing on Friday, which is the last sitting day of the parliament until September 9. The Crown Solicitors had been instructed to try and get the case heard today rather than waiting until Friday, which may result in the parliament having to be recalled to deal with the expulsion motion. In a press conference, Mr Hoenig was asked whether the government planned to go ahead with the expulsion motion regardless of the court orders. "It is open to the House to conduct its affairs," he said. "We say that the court has no jurisdiction to prevent any member of parliament from moving a motion or any power to have the House conduct its affairs as it is entitled to under the Constitution. "However, we are talking about a separation of powers, we are talking about the Supreme Court of NSW, also a constitutional court, so we will give the court the opportunity to correct what we say is a significant constitutional error." The Minister said the affidavit from Ward's lawyers "asserted that the parliament had no jurisdiction to expel him", which Mr Hoenig said was constitutionally incorrect. Mr Hoenig said, in any debate on the expulsion motion, the parliament was free to consider waiting until Ward had exhausted the appeals process. "It's a matter for Parliament to consider, so it's my role to place the matter before the House for its consideration and for the House to consider it," Mr Hoenig said. "But as you would appreciate, the appeals process will take quite some time. "So if you run the appeals process through the Court of Criminal Appeal and then reserves its judgment, and then there's a special leave for the high court, the people of Kiama, for example, could be represented by somebody in custody right up until the next election." Ward, 44, has been in jail since last week after Judge Kara Shead SC granted a detention application to revoke his bail, after a jury found him guilty of sexual intercourse without consent and three counts of indecent assault. The Kiama MP since 2011 had faced a nine-week trial, which heard he sexually assaulted a 24-year-old man in Potts Point in 2015, and touched and massaged an 18-year-old man in Meroo Meadow in 2013. He met both men through political circles. On the morning parliament returned NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman recommitted to supporting Ward's expulsion and working with the government "to get this done as quickly as possible" "However, Mr Ward's legal team should do whatever it takes to get a clear message to him - immediately resign," Mr Speakman said. "Every day he clings to his seat from a jail cell, taxpayers are footing the bill and the people of Kiama are left voiceless. It's not just wrong, it's offensive. "This is about decency, accountability, and basic respect for the community. Mr Ward should spare the Parliament, spare the courts, and above all, spare the people of NSW any further disgrace. "Step aside." Last week, Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig sent a letter to Ward via his legal team notifying him of the parliament's plans to consider his expulsion. "I am sure you would appreciate that in view of the verdict of the jury convicting you of serious criminal offences that the House needs to consider whether your continued membership of the House requires it to act to protect the high standing of the Parliament so that it may discharge with the confidence of the community the great responsibility that it bears," the letter stated. The letter, seen by the Mercury, noted that Ward was in custody and would be unable to attend parliament when the expulsion motion is being debated. "Accordingly, I invite you to submit to me yourself or anyone on your behalf any statement or material you would want the House to consider prior to making any determination," the letter stated. It gave a deadline for submissions of 9am on August 5. Under the NSW Constitution Act, an MPs seat is declared vacant if they are convicted of a crime punishable by five years or more imprisonment. Ward is facing a maximum penalty of 14 years' jail. However, changes to the law in 2000 state that a conviction is considered to mean "once you have reached the end of the appeals process ... and not had the conviction overturned". Ward confirmed his intention to appeal in a press release issued last Friday. "I am taking advice about next steps, but I can confirm that I have provided instructions to my legal team to prepare an appeal at the earliest opportunity," he said. Parliament also has the power to expel an MP for "unworthy conduct". If the expulsion is passed a byelection will be called for the seat of Kiama. Despite being charged with the offences in 2022, Ward was re-elected to the seat as an independent in 2023. Lawyers for convicted rapist Gareth Ward have filed an injunction to stop his expulsion from parliament, which means he will remain MP for Kiama in the NSW Illawarra region while he awaits his sentencing behind bars. But Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig said the Supreme Court orders issued by Justice Sweeney were "non-binding upon the House" and the government would give the court the opportunity to rectify what he called "a significant constitutional error". Parliament returned on Tuesday and it was expected a notice of motion to expel the disgraced politician would be put forward. However, NSW Premier Chris Minns confirmed Ward's lawyers sought the injunction against Leader of the Lower House Ron Hoenig, with an urgent hearing to occur in the Supreme Court later this week. He warned there was a critical time factor at play, with parliament sitting from Tuesday for just one week before breaking again for five weeks. Mr Minns told 2GB radio on Tuesday morning that "most people would appreciate, it's an unconscionable situation to have someone who's currently sitting in Silverwater ... who is demanding to remain a member of parliament and continue to be paid". "Clearly he's got no shame," Mr Minns said. Mr Hoenig said he had received the orders from the Supreme Court but believed they did not stop the House from moving forward with the expulsion motion. "The orders made by the court yesterday afternoon, we say, have no effect and are not binding upon the House," Mr Hoenig said. "The House has an inherent power to conduct its own business, in accordance with the Constitution, unconstrained by any interference." He said the Crown Solicitors had been instructed to approach Justice Sweeney to "reconsider the orders that she had made to enable the House to conduct its affairs on behalf of the people unconstrained". He noted the case was listed for hearing on Friday, which is the last sitting day of the parliament until September 9. The Crown Solicitors had been instructed to try and get the case heard today rather than waiting until Friday, which may result in the parliament having to be recalled to deal with the expulsion motion. In a press conference, Mr Hoenig was asked whether the government planned to go ahead with the expulsion motion regardless of the court orders. "It is open to the House to conduct its affairs," he said. "We say that the court has no jurisdiction to prevent any member of parliament from moving a motion or any power to have the House conduct its affairs as it is entitled to under the Constitution. "However, we are talking about a separation of powers, we are talking about the Supreme Court of NSW, also a constitutional court, so we will give the court the opportunity to correct what we say is a significant constitutional error." The Minister said the affidavit from Ward's lawyers "asserted that the parliament had no jurisdiction to expel him", which Mr Hoenig said was constitutionally incorrect. Mr Hoenig said, in any debate on the expulsion motion, the parliament was free to consider waiting until Ward had exhausted the appeals process. "It's a matter for Parliament to consider, so it's my role to place the matter before the House for its consideration and for the House to consider it," Mr Hoenig said. "But as you would appreciate, the appeals process will take quite some time. "So if you run the appeals process through the Court of Criminal Appeal and then reserves its judgment, and then there's a special leave for the high court, the people of Kiama, for example, could be represented by somebody in custody right up until the next election." Ward, 44, has been in jail since last week after Judge Kara Shead SC granted a detention application to revoke his bail, after a jury found him guilty of sexual intercourse without consent and three counts of indecent assault. The Kiama MP since 2011 had faced a nine-week trial, which heard he sexually assaulted a 24-year-old man in Potts Point in 2015, and touched and massaged an 18-year-old man in Meroo Meadow in 2013. He met both men through political circles. On the morning parliament returned NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman recommitted to supporting Ward's expulsion and working with the government "to get this done as quickly as possible" "However, Mr Ward's legal team should do whatever it takes to get a clear message to him - immediately resign," Mr Speakman said. "Every day he clings to his seat from a jail cell, taxpayers are footing the bill and the people of Kiama are left voiceless. It's not just wrong, it's offensive. "This is about decency, accountability, and basic respect for the community. Mr Ward should spare the Parliament, spare the courts, and above all, spare the people of NSW any further disgrace. "Step aside." Last week, Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig sent a letter to Ward via his legal team notifying him of the parliament's plans to consider his expulsion. "I am sure you would appreciate that in view of the verdict of the jury convicting you of serious criminal offences that the House needs to consider whether your continued membership of the House requires it to act to protect the high standing of the Parliament so that it may discharge with the confidence of the community the great responsibility that it bears," the letter stated. The letter, seen by the Mercury, noted that Ward was in custody and would be unable to attend parliament when the expulsion motion is being debated. "Accordingly, I invite you to submit to me yourself or anyone on your behalf any statement or material you would want the House to consider prior to making any determination," the letter stated. It gave a deadline for submissions of 9am on August 5. Under the NSW Constitution Act, an MPs seat is declared vacant if they are convicted of a crime punishable by five years or more imprisonment. Ward is facing a maximum penalty of 14 years' jail. However, changes to the law in 2000 state that a conviction is considered to mean "once you have reached the end of the appeals process ... and not had the conviction overturned". Ward confirmed his intention to appeal in a press release issued last Friday. "I am taking advice about next steps, but I can confirm that I have provided instructions to my legal team to prepare an appeal at the earliest opportunity," he said. Parliament also has the power to expel an MP for "unworthy conduct". If the expulsion is passed a byelection will be called for the seat of Kiama. Despite being charged with the offences in 2022, Ward was re-elected to the seat as an independent in 2023. Lawyers for convicted rapist Gareth Ward have filed an injunction to stop his expulsion from parliament, which means he will remain MP for Kiama in the NSW Illawarra region while he awaits his sentencing behind bars. But Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig said the Supreme Court orders issued by Justice Sweeney were "non-binding upon the House" and the government would give the court the opportunity to rectify what he called "a significant constitutional error". Parliament returned on Tuesday and it was expected a notice of motion to expel the disgraced politician would be put forward. However, NSW Premier Chris Minns confirmed Ward's lawyers sought the injunction against Leader of the Lower House Ron Hoenig, with an urgent hearing to occur in the Supreme Court later this week. He warned there was a critical time factor at play, with parliament sitting from Tuesday for just one week before breaking again for five weeks. Mr Minns told 2GB radio on Tuesday morning that "most people would appreciate, it's an unconscionable situation to have someone who's currently sitting in Silverwater ... who is demanding to remain a member of parliament and continue to be paid". "Clearly he's got no shame," Mr Minns said. Mr Hoenig said he had received the orders from the Supreme Court but believed they did not stop the House from moving forward with the expulsion motion. "The orders made by the court yesterday afternoon, we say, have no effect and are not binding upon the House," Mr Hoenig said. "The House has an inherent power to conduct its own business, in accordance with the Constitution, unconstrained by any interference." He said the Crown Solicitors had been instructed to approach Justice Sweeney to "reconsider the orders that she had made to enable the House to conduct its affairs on behalf of the people unconstrained". He noted the case was listed for hearing on Friday, which is the last sitting day of the parliament until September 9. The Crown Solicitors had been instructed to try and get the case heard today rather than waiting until Friday, which may result in the parliament having to be recalled to deal with the expulsion motion. In a press conference, Mr Hoenig was asked whether the government planned to go ahead with the expulsion motion regardless of the court orders. "It is open to the House to conduct its affairs," he said. "We say that the court has no jurisdiction to prevent any member of parliament from moving a motion or any power to have the House conduct its affairs as it is entitled to under the Constitution. "However, we are talking about a separation of powers, we are talking about the Supreme Court of NSW, also a constitutional court, so we will give the court the opportunity to correct what we say is a significant constitutional error." The Minister said the affidavit from Ward's lawyers "asserted that the parliament had no jurisdiction to expel him", which Mr Hoenig said was constitutionally incorrect. Mr Hoenig said, in any debate on the expulsion motion, the parliament was free to consider waiting until Ward had exhausted the appeals process. "It's a matter for Parliament to consider, so it's my role to place the matter before the House for its consideration and for the House to consider it," Mr Hoenig said. "But as you would appreciate, the appeals process will take quite some time. "So if you run the appeals process through the Court of Criminal Appeal and then reserves its judgment, and then there's a special leave for the high court, the people of Kiama, for example, could be represented by somebody in custody right up until the next election." Ward, 44, has been in jail since last week after Judge Kara Shead SC granted a detention application to revoke his bail, after a jury found him guilty of sexual intercourse without consent and three counts of indecent assault. The Kiama MP since 2011 had faced a nine-week trial, which heard he sexually assaulted a 24-year-old man in Potts Point in 2015, and touched and massaged an 18-year-old man in Meroo Meadow in 2013. He met both men through political circles. On the morning parliament returned NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman recommitted to supporting Ward's expulsion and working with the government "to get this done as quickly as possible" "However, Mr Ward's legal team should do whatever it takes to get a clear message to him - immediately resign," Mr Speakman said. "Every day he clings to his seat from a jail cell, taxpayers are footing the bill and the people of Kiama are left voiceless. It's not just wrong, it's offensive. "This is about decency, accountability, and basic respect for the community. Mr Ward should spare the Parliament, spare the courts, and above all, spare the people of NSW any further disgrace. "Step aside." Last week, Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig sent a letter to Ward via his legal team notifying him of the parliament's plans to consider his expulsion. "I am sure you would appreciate that in view of the verdict of the jury convicting you of serious criminal offences that the House needs to consider whether your continued membership of the House requires it to act to protect the high standing of the Parliament so that it may discharge with the confidence of the community the great responsibility that it bears," the letter stated. The letter, seen by the Mercury, noted that Ward was in custody and would be unable to attend parliament when the expulsion motion is being debated. "Accordingly, I invite you to submit to me yourself or anyone on your behalf any statement or material you would want the House to consider prior to making any determination," the letter stated. It gave a deadline for submissions of 9am on August 5. Under the NSW Constitution Act, an MPs seat is declared vacant if they are convicted of a crime punishable by five years or more imprisonment. Ward is facing a maximum penalty of 14 years' jail. However, changes to the law in 2000 state that a conviction is considered to mean "once you have reached the end of the appeals process ... and not had the conviction overturned". Ward confirmed his intention to appeal in a press release issued last Friday. "I am taking advice about next steps, but I can confirm that I have provided instructions to my legal team to prepare an appeal at the earliest opportunity," he said. Parliament also has the power to expel an MP for "unworthy conduct". If the expulsion is passed a byelection will be called for the seat of Kiama. Despite being charged with the offences in 2022, Ward was re-elected to the seat as an independent in 2023. Lawyers for convicted rapist Gareth Ward have filed an injunction to stop his expulsion from parliament, which means he will remain MP for Kiama in the NSW Illawarra region while he awaits his sentencing behind bars. But Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig said the Supreme Court orders issued by Justice Sweeney were "non-binding upon the House" and the government would give the court the opportunity to rectify what he called "a significant constitutional error". Parliament returned on Tuesday and it was expected a notice of motion to expel the disgraced politician would be put forward. However, NSW Premier Chris Minns confirmed Ward's lawyers sought the injunction against Leader of the Lower House Ron Hoenig, with an urgent hearing to occur in the Supreme Court later this week. He warned there was a critical time factor at play, with parliament sitting from Tuesday for just one week before breaking again for five weeks. Mr Minns told 2GB radio on Tuesday morning that "most people would appreciate, it's an unconscionable situation to have someone who's currently sitting in Silverwater ... who is demanding to remain a member of parliament and continue to be paid". "Clearly he's got no shame," Mr Minns said. Mr Hoenig said he had received the orders from the Supreme Court but believed they did not stop the House from moving forward with the expulsion motion. "The orders made by the court yesterday afternoon, we say, have no effect and are not binding upon the House," Mr Hoenig said. "The House has an inherent power to conduct its own business, in accordance with the Constitution, unconstrained by any interference." He said the Crown Solicitors had been instructed to approach Justice Sweeney to "reconsider the orders that she had made to enable the House to conduct its affairs on behalf of the people unconstrained". He noted the case was listed for hearing on Friday, which is the last sitting day of the parliament until September 9. The Crown Solicitors had been instructed to try and get the case heard today rather than waiting until Friday, which may result in the parliament having to be recalled to deal with the expulsion motion. In a press conference, Mr Hoenig was asked whether the government planned to go ahead with the expulsion motion regardless of the court orders. "It is open to the House to conduct its affairs," he said. "We say that the court has no jurisdiction to prevent any member of parliament from moving a motion or any power to have the House conduct its affairs as it is entitled to under the Constitution. "However, we are talking about a separation of powers, we are talking about the Supreme Court of NSW, also a constitutional court, so we will give the court the opportunity to correct what we say is a significant constitutional error." The Minister said the affidavit from Ward's lawyers "asserted that the parliament had no jurisdiction to expel him", which Mr Hoenig said was constitutionally incorrect. Mr Hoenig said, in any debate on the expulsion motion, the parliament was free to consider waiting until Ward had exhausted the appeals process. "It's a matter for Parliament to consider, so it's my role to place the matter before the House for its consideration and for the House to consider it," Mr Hoenig said. "But as you would appreciate, the appeals process will take quite some time. "So if you run the appeals process through the Court of Criminal Appeal and then reserves its judgment, and then there's a special leave for the high court, the people of Kiama, for example, could be represented by somebody in custody right up until the next election." Ward, 44, has been in jail since last week after Judge Kara Shead SC granted a detention application to revoke his bail, after a jury found him guilty of sexual intercourse without consent and three counts of indecent assault. The Kiama MP since 2011 had faced a nine-week trial, which heard he sexually assaulted a 24-year-old man in Potts Point in 2015, and touched and massaged an 18-year-old man in Meroo Meadow in 2013. He met both men through political circles. On the morning parliament returned NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman recommitted to supporting Ward's expulsion and working with the government "to get this done as quickly as possible" "However, Mr Ward's legal team should do whatever it takes to get a clear message to him - immediately resign," Mr Speakman said. "Every day he clings to his seat from a jail cell, taxpayers are footing the bill and the people of Kiama are left voiceless. It's not just wrong, it's offensive. "This is about decency, accountability, and basic respect for the community. Mr Ward should spare the Parliament, spare the courts, and above all, spare the people of NSW any further disgrace. "Step aside." Last week, Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig sent a letter to Ward via his legal team notifying him of the parliament's plans to consider his expulsion. "I am sure you would appreciate that in view of the verdict of the jury convicting you of serious criminal offences that the House needs to consider whether your continued membership of the House requires it to act to protect the high standing of the Parliament so that it may discharge with the confidence of the community the great responsibility that it bears," the letter stated. The letter, seen by the Mercury, noted that Ward was in custody and would be unable to attend parliament when the expulsion motion is being debated. "Accordingly, I invite you to submit to me yourself or anyone on your behalf any statement or material you would want the House to consider prior to making any determination," the letter stated. It gave a deadline for submissions of 9am on August 5. Under the NSW Constitution Act, an MPs seat is declared vacant if they are convicted of a crime punishable by five years or more imprisonment. Ward is facing a maximum penalty of 14 years' jail. However, changes to the law in 2000 state that a conviction is considered to mean "once you have reached the end of the appeals process ... and not had the conviction overturned". Ward confirmed his intention to appeal in a press release issued last Friday. "I am taking advice about next steps, but I can confirm that I have provided instructions to my legal team to prepare an appeal at the earliest opportunity," he said. Parliament also has the power to expel an MP for "unworthy conduct". If the expulsion is passed a byelection will be called for the seat of Kiama. Despite being charged with the offences in 2022, Ward was re-elected to the seat as an independent in 2023.
