Intel slumps as potential foundry exit deepens investor gloom
Lip-Bu Tan said on Thursday he would further shrink Intel's workforce, halt work on two plants in Europe and slow another in Ohio, binning his ousted predecessor's strategy that relied on building costly facilities to restore its manufacturing edge.
The plan for such extreme measures follows a surprise second-quarter adjusted loss and a forecast for a bigger-than-expected loss in the third quarter.
The weakening financials pointed to more trouble for Intel after years of mismanagement eroded its PC and datacenter market share and left it with almost no presence in the AI market.
The disclosures 'revive long-unanswered questions on the chances of success for its foundry business and...what the path forward is if Intel does not develop leading edge manufacturing capability,' TD Cowen analyst Joshua Buchalter said.
'It's hard to understate the significance of this potential outcome in the context of the history of the semiconductor industry.'
As part of its new strategy, Intel may reserve the advanced 18A manufacturing process for its products and proceed with its next-generation 14A only if it lands a major external customer commits, Tan told analysts on the post-earnings call.
The move could put US$100 billion in assets at risk and deepen its dependence on rival TSMC, adding strain to margins already running at about half their historical highs.
'Intel Foundry is a big story and currently people are questioning how successful 18A is. A failure in 18A will be a broken story,' said Hendi Susanto, portfolio manager at Gabelli Funds.
Intel was set to lose nearly $8 billion in market value, if current losses hold. Its current valuation of around $100 billion is less than half of Advanced Micro Devices' AMD.O more than $260 billion.
The stock has lagged far behind rivals this year, rising 12.8 per cent compared with AI darling Nvidia's 30 per cent gain and AMD's 34 per cent. Intel trades at a 12-month forward price-to-earnings ratio of 42.55 versus 33.90 for Nvidia and 32.12 for AMD.
Since taking the helm in March, Tan has divested businesses, laid off employees and redirected resources as part of his strategic reset to revive the embattled chipmaker.
'There are no more blank checks,' he wrote in a memo to employees on Thursday.
(Reporting by Rashika Singh and Arsheeya Bajwa in Bengaluru, Samuel Indyk in London; Editing by Amanda Cooper, Vijay Kishore and Arun Koyyur)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
29 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Should You Buy American Express While It's Below $315?
Key Points American Express continues to report solid revenue growth, with younger consumers propelling the business forward. A strong brand and a powerful network effect support American Express' competitive position. The stock doesn't look cheap at the current price. 10 stocks we like better than American Express › American Express (NYSE: AXP) has been around for 175 years, which showcases the durability of its business model. It's not going to turn heads by posting outsized growth like a younger, more tech-driven company will. The credit card and financial services enterprise does have staying power, though. This stock has put up a phenomenal gain in the past five years, producing a total return of 244%. While I don't believe this kind of performance will repeat through the rest of this decade, there's no question that American Express is a high-quality business that deserves a closer look. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » Should you buy the shares as they trade below $315 (as of July 25)? Warren Buffett's stamp of approval The great Warren Buffett has a stringent filter for what Berkshire Hathaway owns in its portfolio. So investors should take notice of the fact that American Express is one of the top holdings for the conglomerate. This means that the company must have some merits. One area worth mentioning is the company's durable performance in these uncertain economic times. Through the first six months of 2025, Amex's revenue increased 8.4% year over year to $34.8 billion. As mentioned, that growth isn't forcing investors to pick their jaws up off the floor. However, I do believe the gains are sustainable. American Express benefits from the general expansion in the overall economy, and from rising spending levels. The company can also "steal" market share from cash- and paper-based transactions -- the rise of digital payments helps Amex. It wouldn't be surprising to see this level of growth continue indefinitely. Recently, Amex has been resonating with younger consumers. Attracting a younger demographic can lead to a lucrative long-term relationship, especially as these customers' financial lives evolve over time, their wealth grows, and they gain more spending power. Leaning on key competitive advantages American Express has built a reputation for being a premium brand in the credit card space. There's a certain level of exclusivity and prestige that comes with being a cardholder. That's supported by high annual fees for its top cards, like the Platinum and the Gold. This naturally brings in more affluent customers who have lower credit risk and the ability to spend more money. The company also charges higher processing fees to merchants than competitors do. Even so, there are 100 million merchant locations that accept Amex payments, as they realize the benefit of having access to such a compelling customer base. In other words, you don't want to lose an Amex cardholder's business. American Express has a unique setup because it also runs the underlying payment infrastructure, connecting merchants with customers. Consequently, there's a network effect in play here. It's a positive feedback look, with more merchants creating more value for cardholders and vice versa. This makes it extremely difficult for American Express to be disrupted or become obsolete. Is the stock cheap or expensive? The past five years have been spectacular for Amex shareholders. But after such a huge gain, investors must assess the current situation with fresh eyes. Is the stock cheap or expensive with the price below $315? The price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is a useful tool to analyze valuation. Right now, Amex's is 21.9, near its highest level in three years. I don't think the valuation presents a bargain opportunity. In fact, shares might be expensive. Amex's management team forecasts mid-teens earnings-per-share growth over the long term. Assuming it's a 15% annualized gain, which seems realistic, the stock will double in five years. That's with the P/E multiple staying constant. But there's a good chance it will contract, a trend that would lower the stock's return. Investors who are still bullish might want to consider a dollar-cost averaging approach. With this strategy, buying shares below $315 would have less of an effect in the long run. Should you invest $1,000 in American Express right now? Before you buy stock in American Express, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and American Express wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 28, 2025
Globe and Mail
29 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
2 Top Dividend Stocks Yielding 5% or More to Buy Right Now for Passive Income
Key Points Realty Income is a high dividend payer with a long track record. Vici Properties is perhaps the safest way to bet on Las Vegas. 10 stocks we like better than Realty Income › Over time, dividends have become a smaller and smaller part of the stock market's total return, with the S&P 500 boasting an average yield of just 1.22% today, compared to 7.44% in 1950. That said, some companies still offer fat, consistently growing payouts, just like the good old days. Let's explore some reasons why Realty Income (NYSE: O) and Vici Properties (NYSE: VICI) could make fantastic long-term picks. Realty Income Corporation Real estate investment trusts (REITs) are a special type of investment that allows retail investors to benefit from the income generated from commercial real estate. But they aren't all the same. Realty Income stands out from the alternatives because of its track record of success, monthly payouts, and unique, risk-minimizing business model. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » Since going public in 1994, Realty Income has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years. The company funds the payout with the cash generated from its portfolio of 15,600 properties spread across North America and Europe. Realty Income's business model is relatively safe because of its use of triple-net leases, which mean the tenant is responsible for building-level operating costs like tax and insurance. It also tends to focus on recession-proof tenants like grocery stores, dollar stores, and auto repair shops, although many flashier clients like casinos and IT data centers have been sprinkled into the mix to help power growth. While macroeconomic threats like high interest rates have caused Realty Income's shares to underperform in recent years, they give investors an opportunity to buy the stock for cheap and lock in a relatively high yield of 5.55% at the time of writing, which is far above the market average. Vici Properties While Realty Income features a long track record and diversification into many different industries, Vici Properties offers more concentrated exposure. The company was formed in 2017 from the spinoff of real estate assets formerly owned by Caesars Entertainment Company during its bankruptcy restructuring. It has since evolved to become a leading entertainment-focused REIT, with 93 properties across North America. While entertainment is a consumer discretionary expenditure that may drop during economic downturns, Vici manages this risk with triple-net leases and high-quality tenants like Caesars and MGM Resorts, which have stable businesses and are deeply tied to their locations. The company has often relied on leaseback sales, which are when it buys an asset (such as a Casino) from a client who needs liquidity or to free up capital for elsewhere, only to rent it back to them, giving Vici access to stable, growing revenue. Vici also offers excellent growth potential as it expands into different asset types, such as golf courses, and potentially redevelops its 33 acres of undeveloped land located near the Las Vegas Strip. With a dividend yield of 5.15%, Vici is an excellent pick for investors who prioritize passive income. But don't overlook its stock price growth potential. Shares have risen around 60% over the last five years, with a 16% rally so far in 2025. The company probably won't stay this cheap for long. Which dividend stock is right for you? Realty Income and Vici Properties are both great picks for investors who prioritize sustainable passive income for the long term. If you could only pick one, the best choice will depend on your investment goals. Realty Income is better for investors who are willing to sacrifice a little growth potential for stability. But while Vici Properties doesn't have as long a track record, it offers more room for capital appreciation. Should you invest $1,000 in Realty Income right now? Before you buy stock in Realty Income, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Realty Income wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 28, 2025
CBC
30 minutes ago
- CBC
Why Trump's deals with the EU, Japan may not be templates for Canada in trade talks
Social Sharing U.S. President Donald Trump's successive announcements of deals setting baseline tariffs on the European Union and Japan are prompting questions about whether they're a road map for Canada to follow in trade talks. Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen described the bones of an agreement on Sunday. It sets across-the-board tariffs of 15 per cent on most European Union exports to the United States, along with a commitment by Europe to invest $600 billion US in the American economy and spend $750 billion on U.S. energy products — although there's plenty of fine print still to come. That makes it broadly comparable to the deal Trump announced last week with Japan: a 15 per cent across-the-board tariff and a Japanese commitment to invest $550 billion in the U.S. Trump was threatening to hit Europe with 30 per cent baseline tariffs and Japan with 25 per cent on Aug. 1, so both trading blocs are selling the deals as wins. Because Canada is facing the threat of 35 per cent tariffs on some goods on the same date, does that mean Canada should be aiming for a similar agreement? Prime Minister Mark Carney certainly isn't saying so. Asked whether any forthcoming deal will be "in the ballpark" of those 15 per cent baseline tariffs, he emphasized the differences between Europe's and Canada's trading relationship with the U.S. "We are in a different position, and that is why these negotiations ... are different," Carney said on Monday, citing Canada's geographical closeness and energy exports to the U.S. "Europe, in that agreement yesterday, made commitments to buy American energy," he said at a news conference in Prince Edward Island. "America needs Canadian energy." WATCH | Canada's trade talks with the U.S. are different from Europe's, Carney says: Carney says Canada is 'in a different position' than EU on trade deal with U.S. 15 hours ago Across-the-board tariffs 'difficult for Canada to accept' There are plenty of reasons why a 15 per cent baseline tariff rate is not something for Canada to aspire to, given that its economy is proportionally far more dependent on the U.S. market than Europe's and Japan's are. Jonathan O'Hara, an international trade lawyer in the Ottawa law office of McMillan LLP, said Canada should set its sights on a better deal than the EU or Japan negotiated since it's already so tightly integrated with the American economy. "On a broad level, having some kind of across-the-board tariffs, I think, would be very difficult for Canada to accept," O'Hara said in a weekend interview with CBC News. WATCH | Here's what's in Trump's tariff deal with the EU: Trump, EU reach trade deal framework 1 day ago Yet it appears that Canada doesn't actually face the prospect of tariffs that are truly across-the-board. That's because it has something that neither the European Union nor Japan have: an actual free-trade deal. Trump's "fentanyl emergency" tariffs, currently set at 25 per cent — which he's threatening to raise to 35 per cent on Friday — hit only those goods that don't comply with the rules of origin in the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). That means the vast bulk of Canada's exports to the U.S. are currently crossing the border tariff-free. Steel and aluminum tariffs a big question That may be why Carney's Liberal government does not feel the same sort of pressure as Europe and Japan to get a deal on Trump's timeline, said Drew Fagan, a professor at the University of Toronto's Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy. "Overall, the average tariff on Canadian goods going into the United States is about as low as any place in the world," he told CBC News. "What's important for us is that the [CUSMA] free-trade agreement continues to hold. Whether it will in the future, of course, is a fundamental question." The biggest exceptions to Canada's mostly tariff-free access to the U.S. are steel and aluminum, hit by Trump's 50 per cent global rate as he tries to prop up that sector at home. In their deals reached with the U.S., neither the EU nor Japan are let off the hook from that tariff. While Canada is surely angling for something better on steel and aluminum — such as the U.K.'s 25 per cent tariff, potentially headed to zero — the European and Japanese agreements suggest that will be tough to achieve. Carlo Dade, director of international policy at the University of Calgary's School of Public Policy, said Canada will likely face a tariff rate comparable to Europe's. "The Americans have decided to readjust the terms of trade," Dade said. "The price of access to the U.S. market is going up globally. It appears everyone is going to have to pay an increased cost." There are plenty of signs to suggest that the prospects are slim for Canada to reach a deal by Trump's deadline of Friday: Carney said the talks are complex, his top trade negotiators are downplaying the importance of the deadline and Trump himself is saying there may not be a deal at all.
