Umberto Ferrara, Jannik Sinner's trainer during doping case, says he warned of clostebol risks
Umberto Ferrara, who is now working with Sinner's compatriot, Matteo Berrettini, said that he has been using Trofodermin — an over-the-counter spray which is readily available in Italy and which contains the anabolic steroid clostebol — 'for years,' in order to manage a chronic condition. He brought it to last year's Indian Wells tournament in California for that reason and advised Sinner's physio, Giacomo Naldi, of the risks of using it on his person.
Advertisement
'I very clearly communicated to Naldi both the nature of the product, and the fact that it must not come into contact with Jannik for any reason,' Ferrara said in an interview with Gazzetta dello Sport.
The Athletic contacted Naldi for comment via text message.
Sinner, who will not return to tennis until May, fired Ferrara and Naldi last summer, three days after it was announced that an independent tribunal convened by tennis integrity authorities had found that Sinner bore 'no fault or negligence' for his two positive tests. Later, the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) appealed that decision but did not dispute that Sinner had not intentionally doped. WADA's and Sinner's legal teams reached a case resolution agreement for a three-month ban in February.
'I'm not feeling that confident to continue with them,' Sinner said of the pair during a news conference ahead of last year's U.S. Open, which he won. He also won the Australian Open in January, his second title there and his third Grand Slam overall.
Sinner twice tested positive for clostebol, once in-competition at Indian Wells on March 10, and once out of competition just over a week later. He was provisionally suspended from tennis after both positive tests but successfully appealed those suspensions after explaining that they were the result of contamination from Naldi's sports massages. Sinner was therefore allowed to play without his positive tests becoming public, per the tennis anti-doping regulations set out by the International Tennis Integrity Agency (ITIA).
Ferrara added to Gazzetta that the incident had led to him suffering 'grave damage' to his professional and personal reputation. Explaining how Naldi ended up using the spray on Sinner, Ferrara said: 'I suggested that he use it because he had a cut on his finger that wasn't healing and was affecting his work. I only allowed it to be used in my personal bathroom.
'Naldi did not deny being told about it, but he said he did not remember.'
Upon news of Sinner's positive test, Ferrara said his reaction was one of 'disbelief and astonishment.' He added: 'In a few hours, we reconstructed the steps that led to Jannik's contamination and I provided proof of purchase for the spray from a pharmacy in Bologna.'
Ferrara also criticized people who, he said, 'chose to attack my character by reporting the facts and circumstances superficially, deliberately ignoring the substance of the independent tribunal's decision.'
Sinner has been suspended from tennis since February 9. He will return at the Italian Open in Rome in early May.
(Top photo of Giacomo Naldi, Jannik Sinner and Umberto Ferrara with the Australian Open trophy: Andy Cheung / Getty Images)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Introducing The Athletic's new player-style pizza charts
Even those with a moderate interest in data will have seen that player pizza charts are a staple visualisation in the world of football analytics. These graphics can be a valuable starting point in breaking down a player's stylistic profile with a single glance, with this style of visualisation being a key theme at The Athletic over the years, from smarterscout pizza charts to team playstyle wheels. Advertisement This summer, we have had a refresh. Allow us to present our player pizza charts 2.0 — all right, maybe the title could be catchier, but the visual is exciting. Here, we use Opta data (via FBref) to create some new metrics broken down into defence, possession, progression and attack across Europe's top five leagues — the Premier League (England), Bundesliga (Germany), La Liga (Spain), Ligue 1 (France), and Serie A (Italy). However, rather than the same metrics for every player across every position, we now have bespoke graphics with metrics that are most relevant to the respective position. First, how do you read these player graphics? Much like other pizza charts in The Athletic's suite, each player is given a 'percentile' rating between zero and 99 for each metric. Put simply, the higher the number, the more frequently — or efficiently — the player performs this action compared with their positional peers. Instead of inundating you with endless 'per 90' numbers, we prefer to strip things back and present the percentile numbers, alloing you to assess a player's stylistic profile easily and quickly. You may also notice that we have rebranded a few established metrics to ensure we are speaking 'football language' throughout and not drowning you in any technical terms. So let's walk you through what we have, alongside some examples… Front-foot defending — this looks at how often a player goes hunting for defensive actions, measured as tackles attempted, challenges attempted, fouls committed, interceptions plus blocked passes per 90 minutes. To account for the opportunity to perform such actions, this metric is adjusted for a team's possession. Tackle success — this looks at the percentage of tackles won as a share of all tackles attempted, challenges attempted and fouls committed. Back-foot defending — this looks at more reactive defensive actions, measured as blocked shots and clearances per 90 minutes. Again, this metric is adjusted for a team's possession. Loose ball recoveries — this shows how often a player retrieves the ball when neither side has it. A good proxy for a player's inclination to hoover up potential danger or anticipate where the ball is going to land to restart their team's possession. Advertisement Aerial volume — simply a player's aerial duels contested per 90 to indicate their propensity to compete in the air. Aerial success — you will have guessed this one. The percentage of aerial duels won as a share of total aerial duels contested. An easy example to run through is Liverpool captain Virgil van Dijk. As illustrated below using last season's stats, the centre-back regularly competes for headers (Aerial volume, 79 out of 99) and is one of the best in Europe in winning those battles (Aerial success, 94 out of 99). Regularly Liverpool's defensive safety net, Van Dijk's back-foot defending ranks highly (91 out of 99). Somewhat surprisingly, he does not always come out with the ball when he makes a challenge (Tackle success, 31 out of 99), often committing low-risk fouls that still manage to kill the opposition's attack. As a bonus defensive metric, we have also included the following for full-backs: One-v-one defending — this looks at the percentage of dribblers tackled as a share of total dribblers challenged. A frequent task for any full-back and a good proxy for their defensive solidity. Having finally been given a run of games in a Tottenham Hotspur shirt, full-back Djed Spence showed himself to be near-immovable in a one-v-one situation, with the strength and athleticism to swat most wingers to one side when they dared to cross his path. Link-up play — the percentage of short or medium-distance passes as a share of total passes made. Often teases out the technicians whose job it is to keep the play ticking over in a metronomic fashion. Ball retention — the percentage of passes completed as a share of total passes attempted. It might not be the sharpest of tools, but it shows a player's inclination (or tactical instruction) to look after possession. Launched passes — the percentage of long-distance passes as a share of total passes made. While purely stylistic, you will often — but not always — find that players operating for direct teams rate highly for this metric. Surely the best example for this season is Paris Saint-Germain's quadruple-winning midfielder Vitinha. With an ability to evade pressure, he looks after the ball like his life depends on it (Ball retention, 98 out of 99), predominantly keeping those passes short (Link-up play, 98 out of 99) but not shy to ping a cross-field ball when the situation allows it (Launched passes, 67 out of 99). Creative threat — this is a combination of a player's expected assists (xA) and actual assists per 90 minutes, with an 80 per cent to 20 per cent weighting towards xA to provide a more accurate view of a player's creative process rather than restricting it to the outcome. Cross volume — the number of crosses made per 100 touches in the attacking third. Dribble volume — the number of dribbles attempted per 100 touches. This accounts for a player's opportunity to perform this action, rather than purely highlighting those operating for dominant teams. Pass progression — the number of progressive passes as a share of total passes made. This shows a player's inclination to make a progressive pass when given equal opportunity. Carry progression — the number of progressive carries as a share of total carries made. This shows a player's inclination to make a progressive carry when given equal opportunity. Advertisement Progressive receptions — the volume of progressive passes received as a share of total passes received. This is often a good proxy for a player who likes to stay high and wide or ghost between opposition lines to find a pocket of space. An obvious yet interesting example is the mercurial talent of Florian Wirtz, Liverpool's new playmaker. His creative numbers at Bayer Leverkusen were easily among the best in Europe (Creative threat, 96 out of 99), but the data shows he is more than just an output monster. A low 'Pass progression' rating (37 out of 99) is likely due to his sheer involvement in Leverkusen's play last season (Link-up play, 99 out of 99) — showing his all-round game to get on the ball. Often receiving in advanced areas (Progressive receptions, 72 out of 99), Wirtz is brave in asking for the ball with bodies around him — desperate to play the killer pass and not simply pull wide to deliver a hopeful ball (Cross volume, 37 out of 99). Goal threat — this is a combination of a player's expected goals (xG) and actual goals per 90 minutes, with a 70 per cent to 30 per cent weighting towards xG to provide a more accurate view of a player's ability to generate chances. Shot frequency — the number of non-penalty shots per 100 touches. This can tease out those who only have eyes for goal from those who contribute more widely to their team's attack. Box threat — the number of touches in the penalty area as a share of total touches in the attacking two-thirds of the pitch. This often separates the roaming false 9s from those who stay between the width of the six-yard box. Shot quality — the average quality of a given chance, denoted by xG per shot. This is often a good measure of a player's ability to get into good areas to score and can have good predictive value for future performance. A good example is one of Europe's most coveted strikers, Alexander Isak. With attacking output that is in the elite category (Goal threat, 89 out of 99), it is interesting that the 25-year-old is not all about shooting volume (Shot frequency, 70 out of 99) — most likely because he is drifting into spaces to offer a creative threat and not just stay between the width of the posts (Box threat, 80 out of 99). Could he improve the quality of those efforts? Possibly (Shot quality, 80 out of 99), but being such a well-rounded striker means that he cannot always help to create a chance and be on the end of it at the same time. Keep an eye out for more of these visualisations on The Athletic, across the transfer window this summer and into the 2025-26 campaign. And if you have any thoughts, feel free to post them in the comments section below. Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Naomi Osaka's comeback rolls on as she reaches first WTA 1000 final since 2022
Naomi Osaka is rolling once more. Twenty months into her comeback from maternity leave, Osaka is back where she wants to be, playing in the finals of a big-time tournament, riding those big, booming balls off the ground to win after win. Wednesday night at the Canadian Open in Montreal, Osaka, the four-time Grand Slam champion who hasn't won a tournament since the Australian Open in 2021, had her way with Clara Tauson of Denmark early and outslugged her late to win 6-2, 7-6(7) to make her first final of a tour event since January in New Zealand. Advertisement The only wobbles from Osaka came in the second set, when she was on the cusp of a 6-2, 5-2 lead that would have felt nearly insurmountable given how cleanly she'd been striking the ball all evening. But after a couple of errors on game points, Osaka's first serve grew shaky and Tauson was able to smack her way back into the match. A game later, Tauson had knotted the set, and then on they went to the tiebreak. That's where good fortune set in for Osaka. She was a point from elimination early in this tournament. She was a point from being forced into a third set in the semifinal Wednesday night against Tauson. But Tauson cut two serves too close, missing the lines by inches, or even less, and double-faulting to allow Osaka back into the match. Osaka smacked a forehand return to earn a second match point, and Tauson whacked a second serve return into the net, giving Osaka the win. The victory sets up an enticing final, with Osaka, one of the biggest stars in the sport, facing Victoria Mboko, the 18-year-old Canadian who appears destined for big things, maybe as soon as Thursday. Mboko charged back from a set down and saved a match point on her way to toppling Elena Rybakina in three sets and a deciding tiebreak in front of a wild Quebecois crowd in Montreal waving 'Allez Vicky' signs. It's Mboko's first Tour-level final of her young career. She was fighting her way through Challengers during the first months of the year. It's Osaka's first WTA 1000 level final since 2022, when she lost to Iga Świątek in Miami. Osaka's roll has once more proven the age-old cliche in tennis, that salvation might always be just one tournament and one good week away. She'd lost six of eight matches heading into the Canadian Open, six of her last eight defeats had come in three sets, with the decider either going 6-4 or 7-6 against her. One of the exceptions was a straight-sets defeat to Emma Raducanu in Washington, D.C., which precipitated her split with coach Patrick Mouratoglou, who had taken the place of Wim Fissette last fall. Advertisement In interviews and news conferences, both Osaka and Mouratoglou had given the impression that communication was at times complicated. Osaka found it difficult to share her feelings, he said; Mouratoglou might feel he was wasting his time with her, having coached someone on the level of Serena Williams, Osaka said. Świątek's former coach, Tomasz Wiktorowski, has joined Osaka for a trial period in Canada, and so far, the new coach bounce is bouncing. Wiktorowski specializes in simplifying the game. Osaka has played simple tennis in Montreal all week. And now she's in the finals of a big-time tournament — just where she wanted to be. Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Coco Gauff, New Balance reveal new US Open collection
The post Coco Gauff, New Balance reveal new US Open collection appeared first on ClutchPoints. Fresh off of a huge Canadian Open win, tennis phenom Coco Gauff is debuting a new U.S. Open Collection with New Balance. The sportswear giant's new line, revealed on Friday, features three Gauff-inspired tennis shoes that celebrate her recent triumphs and her journey to the top of the sport. The collection includes the Coco CG2 'Urgent Red and Monarch Burgundy,' as well as two colorways of the versatile Coco Delray: 'Bisque and Urgent Red' and 'Bisque and Monarch Burgundy.' The centerpiece of the collection is the newest colorway of Gauff's second signature tennis shoe, the Coco CG2. Releasing on August 15th with a price tag of $160, the 'Urgent Red and Monarch Burgundy' design is a direct and powerful nod to the burgundy outfit and shoes Gauff wore during her first Grand Slam win at the US Open in 2023. That momentous victory saw her stage a thrilling comeback against Aryna Sabalenka in the final, securing her maiden major title on home soil in New York. The win came on the 50th anniversary of equal prize money at the US Open, a significant milestone that etched Gauff's place in history. Alongside her high-performance signature shoe, the collection also features the more casual Coco Delray. Described as a versatile shoe comfortable for leisure activities as well as the court, the Delray offers a stylish and accessible option for fans. With new colorways also releasing on August 15th for $110, it broadens the appeal of the collection to a wider audience, from dedicated tennis players to fashion-conscious supporters. The timing of this announcement is no coincidence. It comes as Gauff is riding a wave of momentum after her thrilling come-from-behind victory in the Canadian Open on Thursday afternoon. The top-seeded American showcased her signature fighting spirit, battling back from a set down to defeat Russian tennis star Veronika Kudermetova 4-6, 7-5, 6-2. Related: Coco Gauff stumbles to another Canadian Open win in Montreal Related: Genie Bouchard officially ends career in hometown Montreal
