Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce Slow Danced to 'Shake It Off' in Nashville
They also looked seriously loved up on the dance floor at an intimate TEU's friends and family party, where they slow danced to Taylor's 1989 hit, 'Shake It Off.' In the comments section of a fan-captured video on TikTok, Swifties gushed about the pair.
'She loves that fellow over there with the hella good hair fr,' one fan wrote, referencing the track's lyrics and how the 14-time Grammy winner caressed the Kansas City tight end's hair.
Another pointed out how focused they were on each other, writing, 'They are in love love. So [many] people looking, and all they see is each other.' Someone else doubled down on that sentiment as they referenced Calvin Harris's 'This Is What You Came For,' which Taylor co-wrote under the pseudonym Nils Sjöberg: ''Everybody's watching her but she's looking at youUuUuU' 🥹.'
The next day, the power couple had a double date with Taylor's longtime best friend, Abigail Anderson, and her husband, Charles Berard, in Music City. The group attended Tight End University's friends and family concert at Brooklyn Bowl, where artists like Kane Brown and Chase Rice took the stage.
Taylor even closed out the event with a surprise performance of 'Shake It Off' (honestly...huge week for this song). 'We would like to dedicate this to our favorite players who are going to play, and these are the tight ends,' Taylor said as she introduced the song with its lyrics.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
22 minutes ago
- Forbes
Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce And The Career Perks Of The Right Partner
Taylor Swift appeared on Travis Kelce's podcast this week, offering a rare glimpse into the relationship of this career-driven couple. Despite the glamorous lives of the pop icon and NFL superstar, Swift's anecdotes made their relationship seem completely relatable—whether it was baking sourdough bread for Kelce to take to training camp or laughing about overhearing his booming podcast voice from another room in their home. And if you're wondering whether their relationship might pull focus from her music or his football, the research suggests the opposite. The right relationship can boost your career. Here's what the data say about how a supportive relationship can elevate your career, regardless of whether you're selling out stadiums or climbing the corporate ladder. Partnering May Boost Your Career One survey found that a large majority of people feel happier at work when they are in a healthy relationship outside of work, and positive emotions tend to make you more productive. Indeed, Swift mentioned in the podcast that Kelce 'is a vibe booster.' When their relationships are going well, people actually spend more time at work. In addition, partners can be a great source of social support, and research indicates that people turn to their partners for support when they feel pressure at work. Another study found that those in a romantic relationship are more likely to achieve their goals at work. Partners who share resources, align on objectives and champion each other's ambitions can find themselves achieving more, as long as they are not in direct competition with one another or weighed down by different priorities. When Swift joined Kelce on his podcast, New Heights, she expanded her reach into the sports world and extended his reach to her loyal fans. For dual-career couples, there's one characteristic of your partner that's particularly important for your own career: conscientiousness. When your partner is organized, responsible and hardworking, it can impact your paycheck. Researchers found that for every unit increase in your spouse's conscientiousness, you're likely to earn $4000 more per year. Why? You're likely to mirror their diligent habits, and you're more satisfied in your relationship when you can count on your partner. Both Swift and Kelce seem to check this box. As an example of how partnering can lead to career success, researchers examined the women who had served as CEOs for Fortune 500 companies. Only one had never married. However, not all relationships result in a career boost. When conflict seeps into the relationship, it can impact focus and productivity. For example, 94% of finance professionals report struggling to focus at work when they're in conflict with their partner. In addition, competition between partners or clashing priorities can also undermine work productivity. A partner's work stress can impact you as well. If one partner brings home stress, it can spill over to the other partner. This is why Sheryl Sandberg, author of Lean In and former Meta executive, has long emphasized the importance of choosing the right life partner. As she put it, 'I truly believe that the single most important career decision that a woman makes is whether she will have a life partner and who that partner is. I don't know of one woman in a leadership position whose life partner is not fully—and I mean fully—supportive of her career. No exceptions.' Problems Can Arise When Women Earn More Swift became a billionaire in October 2023, and Forbes estimates her net worth at $1.6 billion. Kelce's success is also impressive. But despite an estimated $52 million net worth and a two-year $34.25 million contract extension signed last spring, Swift's earnings still outpace his by a wide margin. Research shows that this income disparity can present challenges for straight couples. One study of marriages between men and women found that as women earned a larger share of the household income, relationship satisfaction dropped, particularly for men. Men who earned less than their female partner reported feeling less masculine and more inadequate, and those feelings were linked to lower relationship quality. Women who outearned their husbands also reported feeling uncomfortable challenging traditional gender roles, though the effect was smaller than it was for men. Others have found a higher risk of relationship dissolution when the woman outearns her husband, and men in this situation have an 11% greater chance of being diagnosed with a mental health problem. Despite their higher earnings, women still typically shoulder more of the housework and caregiving, while men have more leisure time—though Swift and Kelce are likely to be able to afford any household help they need. The Additional Burden Of Public Scrutiny Finally, Swift and Kelce face an additional challenge of being in the public eye, which can add significant pressure to any relationship. One analysis found that celebrities are twice as likely to divorce as the rest of us, likely due to public scrutiny and the blurring of personal and professional boundaries. Swift and Kelce tend to keep their relationship very private, drawing a clear line between their personal and private lives. Swift explains in the podcast, that she never checks her social media, adding 'I'm not an online person at all.' It's a reminder, even for those of us who are not celebrities, of the value in carving out time just for your relationship, free from work obligations and the draw of social media.
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
San Francisco chef speaks out about viral TikTok encounter that ruined his reputation
A San Francisco chef whose restaurant closed down after he was accused of being rude to a TikTok influencer is now speaking out for the first time about the viral controversy. In an interview with the San Francisco Standard, the former co-owner of Kis Cafe, in Hayes Valley, recounted his disastrous meeting with TikTok influencer Karla Marcotte, who posted a video of her 'nightmare SF restaurant experience' on July 23. In her video, Marcotte said that Luke Sung, a James Beard-nominated chef, criticized her follower count and said it was a 'mistake' for the restaurant's host to invite her to the establishment. Sung told The Standard that Marcotte came into his restaurant, sat down and didn't greet him. 'My high expectation for professionalism has failed me again and again — it just brings disappointment,' Sung told The Standard. Sung said he then started looking through her TikTok page and saw an image of 'creamy' spaghetti with 'overcooked' steak on top that Marcotte had cooked herself, causing him to doubt her abilities as a food writer. Sung said that he told Marcotte, 'I think there may have been a mistake. I'm not sure if we have the same audience.' He said he also asked if she had researched him and his cafe and what they were trying to do. According to Sung, Marcotte was offended after he looked through her TikTok page and told her husband, who had just arrived, that they weren't going to eat at the restaurant. Sung said Marcotte told him,'The restaurant world is really small. There will be consequences.' In her TikTok video, Marcotte said that Sung asked her if she had done any research into the restaurant and if she knew 'who we are.' Marcotte responded that she knew it was a wine bar with small bites that didn't have a website yet. According to Marcotte, Sung smirked and said she hasn't done her research on the restaurant. He also asked for her TikTok and started watching her videos. 'After scrolling two times, he says to me that he doesn't think my videos are at the level at which he wants his restaurant to be represented,' she said in the video. 'He goes on to say my audience and my followers are not the kind of people that are going to be at his restaurant.' Kis Cafe closed in July after Marcotte's video went viral on social media, according to the San Francisco Standard. Sung also left as co-owner. It has since reopened under a new name, Bosque, on Aug. 7, under the leadership of Eric Lin, who co-owned Kis Cafe with Sung. Sung posted an apology on Kis Cafe's Instagram account on July 27. 'I am truly sorry for my actions towards you,' he wrote. 'I was condescending, hurtful and intimidating. You did not deserve to be made to feel less than or unimportant, nobody does. Regardless, I thank you for teaching me a valuable lesson in kindness and respect There are no excuses to be made, and I've decided it's time for me to step away from Kis cafe permanently and in all capacities.'
Atlantic
an hour ago
- Atlantic
Is Anyone Actually Mad About Sorority-Rush Dances?
'You know the LIBS are seething over this,' Joe Kinsey, an editor at the sports website OutKick, wrote on X while reposting a video of sorority girls doing a choreographed dance. Many of the girls were wearing red-white-and-blue outfits, though some were dressed as hot dogs. They waved American flags in front of a banner that read We Want You Kappa Delta. 'Credit to these ladies for pumping out patriotism to kick off the 2025 school year,' Kinsley wrote. It wasn't only the display of patriotism that supposedly made liberals seethe. 'The purple hair lesbians have to be furious that SEC sororities ARE BACK,' Kinsey wrote while reposting another sorority-dance video. This one had no clear Americana element aside from the matching trucker hats all of the dancing girls were wearing. Kinsey's two posts were viewed nearly 40 million times. Many other such videos have been shared on X in the past couple of weeks, as sororities have begun recruiting for the new school year. The videos come from TikTok, where sorority dance videos have long been popular. But they've been presented on X with a new gloss: Democrats, liberals, and leftists are enraged by pretty, mostly white young women who are dancing happily. It drives them up the wall when a woman is blond! Do not let a liberal see a woman smiling while wearing a short denim skirt. The only thing that is missing is evidence of seething libs. Search around social media, and you might be surprised how difficult such reactions are to find. In fact, I couldn't find a single one. When I asked Kinsey where he got the idea that people were angry about the sorority-recruitment videos, he didn't point me to any specific examples. He noted that many people replied to his posts saying that they weren't mad about the TikTok dances. But, he said, 'I don't believe that.' By now, this is all familiar. Recall the recent controversy over an American Eagle ad starring Sydney Sweeney, in which the actress hawked denim jeans by making a pun about her genes. A small number of people on social media did get very angry, and posted about how the ad sounded like a eugenics dogwhistle. Their reaction was then amplified by right-wing commentators eager to make the point that the left hates hot women. The fact that the situation involved Sydney Sweeney, a celebrity who had already been evoked in culture-war debates in the past, drove even more attention. It turned into a full-blown news cycle. (I am confident my grandmother heard about this.) In both cases, this burst of bizarre posting is less a story about American politics than it is a story about social media and, specifically, X. Whatever else you may say about Elon Musk's platform, it is the best place to watch a fake drama unfold. Both of the videos that Joe Kinsey shared—of the girls with the flags and the girls with the trucker hats—were originally posted on their respective sororities' TikTok accounts. But the versions he shared had been uploaded to X by what appears to be an account called 'Calico Cut Pants,' which seemingly exists to move short-form videos from one platform to another. The account follows no one and is named after a sketch from the Tim Robinson Netflix show I Think You Should Leave. Other sorority dance videos have been pulled from TikTok and posted by an account called 'Big Chungus,' which also posts almost nothing but videos from other sites, paired with incendiary rhetoric. Accounts like these can bring in money by driving engagement on X, thanks to a revenue-sharing program that debuted after Musk took over the site. Both Big Chungus and Calico Cut Pants have Premium badges, which means they can get paid for generating activity including likes and replies. According to X's Creator Revenue Sharing guidelines, the company maintains some discretion in calculating the true 'impact' of posts. For instance, engagement from other paid accounts is worth more than engagement from an unpaid account. It stands to reason that the best way to make money is to elicit some reaction to your content from the people who enjoy X enough to pay for it. Social media is replete with political outrage, and playing to either a liberal or conservative audience is likely to draw attention. (Certainly, plenty of accounts decrying MAGA values, real and exaggerated, exist.) But X, in particular, is a much more right-coded platform than it was a few years ago, and it makes sense to pander to the home crowd. Consider 'non aesthetic things,' an account that has 4.9 million followers on X, all from posting short-form videos—sometimes relatable, sometimes nostalgic, generally just mind-numbing. Its bio links to an Instagram page that is full of ads for the gambling company Stake. (None of these accounts responded to requests for an interview.) The non aesthetic things account shared a video of sorority girls at Arizona State University who were performing in jean shorts, most of them quite short, and cowboy boots. The X caption makes reference to 'their JEANS'—a subtle nod to the Sydney Sweeney panic. This pairing of footage and wink was a solid bet to produce a big reaction. Given all the attention the Sweeney dustup received, returning to it is logical for engagement farmers. 'BREAKING,' wrote a pro-Trump account called 'Patriot Oasis' that almost exclusively posts short-form videos, 'Sorority at the University of Oklahoma wearing 'Good Genes' is going VIRAL showcasing pure American beauty. Liberals are OUTRAGED online.' The caption suggested that the sorority is participating in some kind of activist response to the villainization of Sydney Sweeney, though there is no reason to believe that. The girls in the video never say anything about politics, Sydney Sweeney, genes, or even jeans. The sorority has been making similar dance videos for years. Nevertheless, the right-wing influencer Charlie Kirk reposted Patriot Oasis to his 5.1 million followers and asked, 'Do you see the difference between conservative and liberal women?' Underneath his post, a Community Note generated by other users pointed out that the video doesn't reveal whether the women are conservative or not. But that hardly mattered. Many others made the same argument in the replies to Kirk's post, driving up engagement. Although the original post has since been deleted, Kirk's repost has more than 3.8 million views. Sorority dances worked well on social media even before they were inserted into a fake culture-war debate, because they are briefly hypnotic due to the weirdness of so many people moving in the same way while wearing such similar outfits. They offer the muted thrill of a flash mob. But plucked from their original context, they offer more. Someone finds them and puts them on X with just a phrase or two of framing and they blow up. People watch the videos of young women dancing and gleefully share them, writing, for example, 'nothing is more triggering to leftists,' and 'at what point do you just give up if you're a lib?' and 'America is BACK and Democrats hate it.' There is no need to point to an actual instance of a leftist or lib or Democrat being triggered. It is easy enough to imagine how triggered they are.
