US is no longer first choice for international students
President Donald Trump's administration has been pressuring US colleges to reduce their dependence on international enrollment while adding new layers of scrutiny for foreign students as part of its crackdown on immigration. The US government has sought to deport foreign students for participating in pro-Palestinian activism, reported Associated Press. In the spring, it abruptly revoked the legal status of thousands of international students, including some whose only brush with law enforcement was a traffic ticket.
After reversing course, the government paused new appointments for student visas while rolling out a process for screening applicants' social media accounts.The US remains the first choice for many international students, but institutions elsewhere are recognizing opportunity in the upheaval, and applicants are considering destinations they might have otherwise overlooked. The impact on US universities — and the nation's economy — may be significant.
New international enrollment in the US could drop by 30% to 40% this fall, according to an analysis of visa and enrollment data by NAFSA, an agency that promotes international education.
That would deprive the US economy of $7 billion in spending, according to the analysis. Many international students pay full price, so their absence would also hurt college budgets, Associated Press reported.
As the second most popular destination for international students, Britain is positioned to benefit.
The country's new Labour government has vowed to cut migration, and officials have imposed time limits on post-study visas allowing graduates to stay and work. But admissions consultants say the United Kingdom is still seen as the most welcoming of the traditional "big four" English-speaking destinations in higher education — the US, UK, Canada and Australia.
After declining last year, the number of international applications for undergraduate study in the UK this fall grew by 2.2%, official figures show. A record number of applications came from China, up 10% compared with the previous year. Applications from the US also reached nearly 8,000 students — an increase of 14% and a 20-year high. Acceptances of international students for graduate programs in the UK grew an estimated 10% from last year, driven by demand for business and management courses in particular, according to data from UniQuest, which works with many British universities on admissions.
Data showing the extent of any impact will not be available until fall, said Mike Henniger, CEO of Illume Student Advisory Services, a consultancy that works with colleges in the US, Canada and Europe. "But the American brand has taken a massive hit, and the UK is the one that is benefiting," he said.
Demand from Chinese students has risen rapidly for universities places in Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia, said Will Kwong, managing director of AAS Education, a consultancy in Hong Kong. Many Western universities have offshore campuses there that are more affordable than going to the US or UK.
"Opting for study in Asia has been a trend since the easing of COVID-19," Kwong said. "But obviously it's been exacerbated by the change of administration in the US."
Some Asian families have told him the US is no longer their clear first choice because of political turbulence and visa difficulties, many are still waiting for US visa interviews and will likely miss the start of the fall term, Kwong said. Chinese college student Alisa, who is studying data science, plans to attend an exchange program this fall at the University of California, Berkeley. She hopes to pursue a master's degree in the US. But she is also looking into other options "just so I could still go to school if the extreme scenario occurs," said Alisa, who spoke on condition of partial anonymity out of fear of being targeted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
21 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Leading global academics denounce UK's Palestine Action ban
Scores of leading global academics have signed an open letter denouncing the British government's ban on direct action group Palestine Action as an "attack on fundamental freedoms". The letter, published in the Guardian on Wednesday, was signed by 52 intellectuals including Judith Butler, Tariq Ali, Angela Davis, Naomi Klein, Rashid Khalidi, Avi Shlaim and Ilan Pappe among others. "As scholars dedicated to questions of justice and ethics, we believe that Yvette Cooper's recent proscription of Palestine Action represents an attack both on the entire pro-Palestine movement and on fundamental freedoms of expression, association, assembly and protest," the letter reads. "We deplore the repressive consequences that this ban has already had, and are especially concerned about the likely impact of Cooper's ban on universities across the UK and beyond." The letter further says: "We therefore applaud the growing campaign of collective defiance that aims to overturn the ban." New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters British officials proscribed Palestine Action under anti-terror laws on 4 July. The move followed an incident in which members broke into RAF Brize Norton and spray-painted two planes they said were 'used for military operations in Gaza and across the Middle East". 'Ending flow of weapons' Since Palestine Action was proscribed as a terrorist organisation, more than 200 people have been arrested - including priests, vicars and former magistrates - after they were deemed by police officers to have expressed support for the group. Supporting the group is now a criminal offence, as is inviting or "recklessly" expressing "support for the group'. Those found guilty of supporting or inviting support for the group can face up to 14 years in prison under the Terrorism Act 2000. The letter praises those campaigning against Palestine Action's proscription, saying: "In alliance with thousands of trade unionists, teachers and students throughout the UK and abroad, we affirm our own solidarity with all those who are campaigning against the proscription. Peer sought to 'influence' Palestine Action case on behalf of US company Read More » "We fully share the aim of ending the flow of weapons from Britain to Israel and the belief that all participants in the pro-Palestine movement should be free to make our own decisions about how best to achieve that goal." Last week a High Court Judge ruled in favour of Palestine Action and granted the direct action group a judicial review to oppose the UK government's ban on the group. The ruling marks a setback for the government, which has faced escalating criticism over its handling of the proscription and concerns that the ban on the group could be used to stifle criticism of Israel and the right to protest. The letter declares: "As the organisers of massive national demonstrations face prosecution, as hundreds of people again risk arrest by joining street protests on 9 August, and as students and teachers prepare for the start of another turbulent academic year, we express our full solidarity with those mobilising on their campuses or in their workplaces and communities to put an immediate stop to the escalating genocide and to end all UK complicity with Israel's crimes."
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
How Netanyahu's plan to occupy Gaza is bringing the Israeli army to its knees
This week, Israeli media reported that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had decided to order the army to fully occupy the Gaza Strip. According to reports, Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir is strongly opposed to such a move and has even threatened to resign. If these reports are true, the importance of this moment is difficult to overstate. Such a head-on clash between the government and the army puts Netanyahu and his government in a position that challenges not only the military but also the will of much of the Israeli public. For a long time, polls indicate that most Israelis support ending the war in exchange for a deal that would see Hamas releasing its remaining captives. In recent weeks, this public demand has grown. A Channel 12 News poll last month shows that 74 percent of Israelis support signing such a deal. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The army warns that the full occupation of Gaza will risk the captives' lives. The government is fully aware of these dangers: Culture Minister Miki Zohar admitted that expanding the war would put the remaining captives in grave danger. If the decision to occupy the entire Gaza Strip is indeed made, it marks a moment when Netanyahu's government abandons what most of the public wants. The government is leading Israel to a move with unknown results and significance for the country, for the army and even for Netanyahu himself. In turn, this uncertainty is fuelling opposition to the war, both by the public and the army. This week's appeal by various former heads of the security forces to end the war, which included people who led the military, Mossad, Shin Bet and the police, indicates the army's grave concerns about fully occupying the Palestinian enclave. The former officials believe that in practice Israel has nothing more to achieve in Gaza, and to some extent attests to the army's position. This is also what most of those demonstrating in the streets against the government think. This view, which sees the continuation of the war as futile, stems from a failure to achieve the government's stated goals of the war. Hamas resistance in Gaza continues, despite the severe damage it has suffered, and Israeli soldiers continue to be killed. Similarly, the military has not been able to secure the release of the hostages as it had promised in March after Israel unilaterally ended the ceasefire. But fear of a pointless war is not the whole story of Israeli opposition to the onslaught. There are two internal and external aspects that can be added to the list of Israeli grievances. More Israelis, including from the political mainstream, are expressing reservations, and sometimes even opposition, to Israel's war crimes in Gaza. It began at the end of 2024, when former defence minister Moshe Yaalon said that Israel was carrying out ethnic cleansing in the northern Gaza Strip. It intensified after Israel collapsed the ceasefire, with former prime minister Ehud Olmert acknowledging that Israelis were committing crimes in Gaza. A demonstrator wearing a mask depicting Benjamin Netanyahu during an anti-government protest in Tel Aviv on 31 July 2025, calling for a stop to the war on Gaza (AFP/Jack Guez) Now they are joined by a growing number of public figures, such as author David Grossman, a beacon on the Israeli left, who last week said that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. More soldiers are speaking about how they are unable to live with what they have done and what they have seen in Gaza. And the images of starving Palestinians have contributed to the growing resistance to Israel's crimes in Gaza, even though the Israeli media is conducting a propaganda campaign that denies the famine and Israel's role in creating it. International image At the same time, the demand to end the war is also linked to the international image of Israel following mounting pressures from its allies and the world. Naftali Bennett, who aspires to be Israel's next prime minister, recently returned from the United States and testified that Israel has become a 'leper state'. According to Bennett, a move to fully occupy the enclave must not be carried out without taking into account international public opinion. Bennett, who does not oppose the killing of Palestinians - morally or politically - understands, like others in Israel, that the country is moving towards global isolation. Such isolation could have fateful economic consequences. Israel's trade agreements with the European Union, which constitute a significant pillar of the Israeli economy, are in jeopardy. Poland, which until recently was considered one of Israel's allies in the EU, came out against its actions in Gaza in a statement made by Prime Minister Donald Tusk. Former Israeli PM Bennett says Israel is seen as a 'leper state' in US Read More » It is not just economic concerns that are troubling Israelis. Just yesterday, a German football team cancelled the signing of an Israeli player in light of his support for the war. The chairman of the Israel Football Association said this week that it has become more difficult to find places in Europe that will agree to host Israeli teams, which have been unable to hold European fixtures domestically since the war began. From here, the road to exit football's flagship European competitions is short. Large numbers of Israelis are beginning to comprehend the cost of Israel's war on Gaza. They are seeing how Israel is perceived in the world today as a pariah state, as a lonely nation. In fact, apart from the Trump administration - and even there, it seems that there are cracks - there is no one in the world who accepts the Israeli story on Gaza anymore. The world's perception of Israel, as Israelis perceive it, has a fundamental impact on the demand to end the war. Often, Israelis' initial response to international criticism is accusations of antisemitism, misunderstanding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict or that the world does not know Palestinians and Arabs. However, when international criticism is so harsh, it can crack even this set of defence mechanisms. According to a Channel 12 News poll, about 56 percent of Israelis fear that in the future they will not be able to travel abroad due to Israel's bad image. Israel will become an isolated island, they fear, which will create a sense of ghetto. In addition, most Israelis, apart from some supporters of Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, see themselves as part of the western world. For Israelis, being outcast from the West is a fatal blow to their very identity. Therefore, the continuation of the war poses a great threat to the Israelis themselves. Affecting capabilities Concerns of international isolation are evident also in the Israeli army. Despite the central role that the United States plays in arming Israel, it is not the only country with which Israel has arms trade relations with. Weapons and parts of aircraft also come from European countries such as Britain, France, Germany and Italy, whose governments have come under severe pressure to end ties with the Israeli military apparatus. Therefore, along with the fear of the International Criminal Court in The Hague, the military is very concerned about the influence of international public opinion on its very capabilities. In conclusion, the Israeli army is concerned about the order to occupy the entire Gaza Strip because of various reasons. The military is very concerned about the influence of international public opinion on its very capabilities The army, which still sees itself as the people's army, is afraid of losing its unifying status in Israeli society. The full occupation of the Gaza Strip with its unknown consequences, the danger to captives and soldiers, the pointlessness of the war and the growing Israeli isolation, could lead to a rift between the people's army and its people, who see such a move as a crime against the hostages or against the Palestinians. The consequences of such a rift could be a failure to report for army reserve duty, which has been suffering from a manpower shortage. If the army makes such a move, it risks becoming a mercenary force that is completely loyal to the settlers, a process that has been going on for some time but could become even more literal. Now the Israeli army finds itself in a decisive moment. On the one hand, the army can listen to the public and end the war, and on the other hand, it can agree to Netanyahu's demand to occupy the entire Gaza Strip and bring about an unprecedented rift between the military and many in the Israeli public. We are now facing a dramatic moment in the war on Gaza.
Khaleej Times
2 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
India's Modi vows no compromise on farmers interests amid Trump's tariff salvo
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi said on Thursday he will not compromise the interests of the country's farmers even if he has to pay a heavy price, in his first comments after U.S. President Donald Trump's salvo of a 50% tariff on Indian goods. "For us, our farmers' welfare is supreme," Modi said at an event in New Delhi. "India will never compromise on the wellbeing of its farmers, dairy (sector) and fishermen. And I know personally I will have to pay a heavy price for it," he said. Trump announced an additional 25% tariff on Indian goods on Wednesday, raising the total duty to 50% — among the highest imposed on any U.S. trading partner. The new tariff, effective August 28, is meant to penalise India for continuing to buy Russian oil, Trump has said. While Modi did not explicitly mention the U.S. or the collapsed trade talks, his comments marked a clear defence of India's position. Trade talks between India and the United States broke down after five rounds of negotiations over disagreement on opening India's vast farm and dairy sectors and stopping Russian oil purchases. India's foreign ministry has called the U.S. decision 'extremely unfortunate' and said it would 'take all necessary steps to protect its national interests.' The U.S. has yet to impose similar tariffs for China, the biggest buyer of Russian oil. Experts say China's dominance in rare earth minerals — critical to high-tech industries — gives it leverage that India currently lacks. "The U.S. tariff hike lacks logic," Dammu Ravi, secretary of economic relations in India's foreign ministry, told reporters. "This is a temporary aberration, a temporary problem that the country will face, but in course of time, we are confident that the world will find solutions." India is already signalling it may seek to rebalance its global partnerships. Modi is preparing for his first visit to China in over seven years, suggesting a potential diplomatic realignment amid growing tensions with Washington. Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said on Wednesday he would initiate a conversation among the BRICS group of developing nations about how to tackle Trump's tariffs. He said he planned to call Modi and China's Xi Jinping. The BRICS group also includes Russia and South Africa. India's Ravi added that "like-minded countries will look for cooperation and economic engagement that will be mutually beneficial to all sides." Mounting domestic pressure Both supporters of Modi and the opposition Congress party have called on him to respond firmly to the U.S. tariffs, urging action "with self-respect and dignity." "India's national interest is supreme. Any nation that arbitrarily penalises India for its time-tested policy of strategic autonomy, rooted in the ideology of non-alignment, does not understand the steel frame India is made of," Congress party president Mallikarjun Kharge said. Indian industry, already struggling with global headwinds, has expressed alarm. Sudhir Sekhri, chairman of the Apparel Export Promotion Council, said: "There is no way the industry can absorb such a steep hike". He demanded fiscal support from the government. Indian billionaire Mukesh Ambani's Reliance Industries in its annual report said continuing geopolitical and tariff-related uncertainties may affect trade flows and demand-supply balance. India's equity market, which has been weakening due to tariff risks and muted earnings growth slipped another 0.5% on Thursday to three-month lows. The reaction was muted as investors bet on the tariffs being negotiated down.
