logo
Interval or end credits? Why Kamal Haasan may have cast aside dream to become CM, at least for now

Interval or end credits? Why Kamal Haasan may have cast aside dream to become CM, at least for now

The Print2 days ago

On 28 May, the ruling DMK, while announcing candidates for the 19 June Rajya Sabha polls, allotted one seat to MNM, setting the stage for Haasan to enter the Upper House.
MNM's influence has since waned, signalling a near end to its role as a competitive political force at the state level. Although the party had not won any seats in Tamil Nadu, it held a minor vote share and carried some weight only because of Haasan's popularity.
Chennai: As Makkal Neethi Maiam (MNM) leader Kamal Haasan prepares to enter the Rajya Sabha with the DMK's support, the veteran actor-politician appears to have quietly shelved his once-ambitious dream of becoming chief minister of Tamil Nadu, a vision he boldly championed when he launched his party in 2018.
With Haasan now being at the centre, political analysts say while it may help the INDIA bloc overall, it would further diminish his own party's clout in Tamil Nadu politics.
'Even for the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, he helped a lot of DMK candidates secure a win through his campaign. Although it did not create a big wave, it did add value to the DMK-led alliance in raking up opposition against the BJP-led Union government and the opposition party,' political analyst Raveendran Duraisamy told ThePrint.
On 30 May, Haasan met Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin at Anna Arivalayam after the DMK allocated a Rajya Sabha seat to the MNM.
Later, Haasan told reporters it was the need of the hour to raise the voice of Tamils at a national level. 'It is not that I have not been speaking for Tamils. My voice has always been for the Tamils and for the first time, it is going to be heard in Parliament.'
Asked about his earlier stand against the ruling DMK, he said it was the need of the hour, adding, 'It is needed for the country, hence I have come here.'
Haasan had launched the Makkal Needhi Maiam in Madurai district on 21 February, 2018. He decided to go for the torch as his party symbol. During his first speech, he emphasised anti-corruption, welfarism and ideologically neutral politics.
In the 2019 Lok Sabha polls, Haasan, without any alliance with any political party, fielded candidates in all 39 parliamentary constituencies in the state. He led the campaign but did not contest from any of the seats. MNM secured a vote share of 3.72 percent.
In the run-up to 2021 assembly elections, Haasan declared he would not be joining hands with either of the two larger Dravidian parties. 'Both DMK and AIADMK are looters. By this, I am not saying I am against the Dravidian ideology,' he had said during a campaign in Dharmapuri in January that year.
MNM instead joined hands with All India Samathuva Makkal Katchi led by actor-turned politician Sarath Kumar and Indhiya Jananayaka Katchi led by T.R. Pachamuthu alias Paarivendhar. Sarath Kumar later merged his party with the BJP.
While MNM contested in 142 seats, its allies contested in 73 seats. This time, Haasan himself contested in Coimbatore South but lost to BJP's Vanathi Srinivasan by a margin of 1,728 votes. MNM secured a vote share of 2.62 percent, but did not win any seats.
For the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, Haasan joined the DMK-led Secular Progressive Alliance.
Although it was initially discussed to allot a seat to MNM from the Congress party's share, sources in MNM said they were keen on contesting on their own symbol rather than contesting on the Congress's symbol.
'The Rajya Sabha seat given now was part of the agreement made between DMK and MNM during the 2024 Lok Sabha election,' an MNM functionary said.
Also Read: How Kamal Haasan's Tamil-Kannada remark touched a nerve, reigniting identity war among southern states
Why Haasan could not garner public support
Cinestars taking the political plunge is not new to Tamil Nadu. Dravidian stalwart, DMK founder and former chief minister C.N.Annadurai, and his successor M. Karunanidhi were both script writers in the Tamil film industry. AIADMK founder M.G.Ramachandran, fondly called MGR, and his successor J. Jayalalithaa too were from Kollywood.
Annadurai founded DMK in 1949, while MGR founded AIADMK in 1972.
Political analysts ThePrint spoke to said those in the Dravidian parties who came from the cine industry were not just actors or writers, but had been associated with political movements for a very long time, unlike Kamal Haasan.
Political analyst Sunilkumar said actors who venture into politics are trying to replicate what MGR did in 1977, by becoming the chief minister of Tamil Nadu.
'What they don't remember is that, even MGR, before starting his own party in 1972, was part of the DMK and part of the Dravidian movement since his early cine days. All the Dravidian leaders have been part of politics much before they ventured into politics,' the assistant professor of political science department at Hindustan University said.
Duraisamy pointed out that not contesting in all 234 assembly constituencies in 2021 was Haasan's first misstep. 'Even by contesting limited seats, he was able to garner between 2-3 percent of votes. Had he contested in all the constituencies, he might have had a better chance for a better negotiation during the 2024 Lok Sabha elections.'
Sunilkumar said Haasan failed to capitalise on his popularity. 'Kamal had a support base who were an urban educated crowd, lacking the understanding of the state's social structure. Kamal, as a leader of a political party, could not politicise them, which costs him now, losing his ambition of becoming chief minister.'
(Edited by Tony Rai)
Also Read: Kamal Haasan set to enter Rajya Sabha with DMK's backing, party also names its own 3 candidates

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Time to ‘retire lame horse'—Rahul Gandhi hints at massive revamp of MP Congress unit
Time to ‘retire lame horse'—Rahul Gandhi hints at massive revamp of MP Congress unit

The Print

time41 minutes ago

  • The Print

Time to ‘retire lame horse'—Rahul Gandhi hints at massive revamp of MP Congress unit

Referring to an earlier address to the Gujarat Congress, Rahul said, 'Earlier I had mentioned two horses, but we all know there is a third kind of horse.' 'But they shouldn't trouble others. Otherwise, they will have to face disciplinary action,' he told party workers in Bhopal's Ravindra Bhawan during a day-long visit to the city to kickstart a campaign to revive the state organisation. Bhopal: Signalling a major overhaul of the beleaguered Madhya Pradesh Congress, senior leader Rahul Gandhi used a metaphor on Wednesday to outline his revival plan. Taking a swipe at the party's old guard, which has dominated the party for decades, he said, 'There are three types of horses: A race horse, a wedding horse and a lame horse. The race horse will be put in the race, the wedding horse in a wedding and the lame one needs to be asked to retire.' Soon after he arrived in Bhopal, the Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha also chaired a meeting of the state's political affairs committee. He was welcomed at the airport by state party president Jitu Patwari, leader of opposition Umang Singhar and senior Congress leader Kamal Nath. Drawing from recent structural changes in the Gujarat Congress, Rahul hinted at a similar exercise in Madhya Pradesh. 'I compared the old list of district presidents with the new names proposed by observers. One list had the names of assistants of senior leaders and the other list had potential. This is something we want to repeat in Madhya Pradesh and take it down from the district level to the village level,' he said. The new district presidents, he explained, will be measured on objective parameters such as the party's increase in vote share in local and parliamentary elections, the local unit's response to the targeting and suppression of Adivasis, backward classes, women and minorities, and whether new workers are being promoted. Rahul said district presidents would play a critical role in the selection of candidates for local bodies, MLAs and and MPs. 'There are some who keep giving controversial statements, some who say things out of frustration, and some others who also work for the BJP. But we have to start making changes somewhere. So we have decided to start from the district and district presidents up to the village level,' he said. He added that the party had enough talent to defeat the BJP, but their hands were tied as their voices were stifled within the party. He assured them that the 'doors of his home, that of Venu Gopal and state president Jitu Patwari would always be open for them'. 'Narendra-Surrender' Rahul also attacked Prime Minister Narendra Modi over Operation Sindoor, India's response to the 22 April terror attack in Pahalgam, and reports of US President Donald Trump's role in the ceasefire between India and Pakistan. 'US President Trump picked up the phone and said, 'What are you doing Modi ji?, Narendra-Surrender'. And swiftly obliging, Narendra Modi ji followed Trump's order,' the Congress leader said. He then drew parallels to the 1971 India-Pakistan when the then-Prime Minister Indira Gandhi stood her ground even as the US deployed the 7th Fleet. 'We all remember 1971 when there was no call but the 7th Fleet was on standby with aircraft carriers, but Indira Gandhi ji said, 'I'll do what needs to be done'.' Rahul also attacked the BJP and RSS, saying they were in the habit of surrendering since the freedom struggle. But people like Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru and Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel were not among those who surrendered; instead, these are the people who fought the superpowers. His attack on Modi drew a sharp reaction from the BJP. BJP state party president V.D. Sharma condemned Gandhi's statement. 'The comments made by Rahul Gandhi show his Italian upbringing. He is playing the role of a Chinese agent and as the spokesperson of Pakistan. Why did Indira Gandhi release the prisoners of war after the 1971 war? Under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's leadership, the terrorists' safe havens are destroyed,' he said. (Edited by Sugita Katyal) Also Read: Revanth asks how many Rafale jets 'shot down' in Op Sindoor. BJP calls him & Rahul 'Pakistan ke Babbar'

We were up against Pak propaganda but armed with satellite images, proof, says Vadodara MP who was part of all-party delegation
We were up against Pak propaganda but armed with satellite images, proof, says Vadodara MP who was part of all-party delegation

Indian Express

time44 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

We were up against Pak propaganda but armed with satellite images, proof, says Vadodara MP who was part of all-party delegation

Vadodara BJP MP Hemang Joshi, who was part of an all-party delegation that travelled to Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Indonesia and Singapore to convey India's position on the April 22 Pahalgam attack and the subsequent Operation Sindoor, on Wednesday said that the delegation was faced with questions related to nuclear power, referendum in Kashmir, besides 'indirect attempts' by Pakistan to derail India's diplomatic mission. Which countries did your delegation travel to and whom did you meet? We first travelled to Japan and, thereafter, to South Korea, Singapore, Indonesia and Malaysia. In South Korea, we were in a bit of a tricky situation as the country was in election mode. We went with a briefing of the Indian Embassy that had indicated imminent change of power. We met the then incumbent government as well as the party that is the incoming government, as per the results declared just a day ago. Since South Korea is a strategic business country, we met business leaders such as Hyundai. Which of these countries were the most receptive to India's message on Operation Sindoor? Japan and South Korea. In South Korea, the shared sentiment is that due to their conflict with North Korea, they also understand the anguish of also had extremely enriching interactions in Singapore and Indonesia. Incidentally, the mastermind of Pahalgam attacks, Saifullah Kasuri of The Resistance Front, which has claimed responsibility, was seen at a victory rally in Pakistan during our visit to one of the countries. He was flanked by a Pakistan Cabinet Minister as well as the speaker of Punjab province. In the rally, he even said that the Pahalgam attack has made the TRF famous… It was another example to drive our point that Pakistan's proxy war against India is terror as it cannot overtake us on development and progress. Even the GDP of Tamil Nadu is more than that of Pakistan. Which was the trickiest part of the tour? In Malaysia, we learnt that Pakistan tried to derail our appointments through indirect influence. We learnt through insiders that Pakistan actively tried to sabotage our meetings with the think tanks in Malaysia and even handed out questionnaires to influencers to pick holes… We learnt that they were playing the card of being a fellow Islamic country. The think tanks in Malaysia…wanted to know who won, whose jets were brought down, and how many air base camps were destroyed in India. The questions were based on narratives spun by Pakistan but because we were armed with proofs, we ruled out the confusion. Later, the Pakistan High Commission in Malaysia also issued a public statement reacting to our visit and claiming that they were victims of terror. Meanwhile, Malaysia officially changed its stand and extended cooperation to India. In Malaysia, we have also given proof of military atrocity in PoK and Balochistan… We said if you need a referendum, it should be in PoK and Balochistan… In Kashmir, since the abrogation of Article 370, tourism has flourished and a democratic system is in place, which even saw a 62% voter turnout in the elections. In South Korea, people condemned terrorism in all forms but the country had been much under the influence of Western narrative thus far, which was a narrative also driven by (defence) commercial interests. How did the delegation arm itself to counter questions from the countries? We were up against the Western narrative and also the constant propaganda of Pakistan. But, we were armed with satellite images as well as previous antecedents where India, despite submitting dossiers and proofs, did not receive any positive response from Pakistan in the form of action against terror. Even when proof was given when Ajmal Kasab was caught alive (after Mumbai 2008 attacks), Pakistan did nothing. There was a lot of propaganda on how much destruction the Pakistani forces had caused to India during the attacks, but we refuted the claims with evidence. Several unilateral narratives of the West were forced to change after we put forth the proofs. That also led Pakistan to dispatch a copy-cat delegation. We also reiterated Prime Minister Narendra Modi's pledge to explain why India has decided to consider all acts of terror as acts of war by Pakistan because it has been using these terror attacks as proxy war. We emphasised that Pakistan should be kept on the grey list of the FATF (Financial Action Task Force). What were the questions of concern raised by the countries? We did not have any specific questions about the terrorists involved in the Pahalgam attack but we did detail the action taken under Operation Sindoor. It is pertinent to note that the Pahalgam terror attack was not just an attack in isolation but it was designed with an evil plan to sow hatred across India and fan wider internal conflict between communities, which is why there was an explicit use of religion in the attack. The concerns about nuclear power possessed by both countries was also addressed… We categorically reiterated that India will not bow down to nuclear blackmail. What was the cultural interaction like during the visit to the countries? We visited the Indian Council for Cultural Relations (ICCR) centres in Korea, Malaysia and Japan. We also interacted with the Indian diaspora and I, particularly, interacted with the Gujarati population that will continue to take forward our message. We had some touching interactions in Indonesia, where we met leaders who are Muslims but their names have Hindu roots, such as Agrasen, due to the influence of Indic civilisation. Members of the Nahdlatul-Ulama, which is the prominent Islamic organisation with lot of influence in ruling party, the way Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) has in India, told us that they are not ashamed of accepting Indic civilisation roots and for them, Hinduism is a culture more than a religion. They even told us they do not subscribe to terror as part of Islam and extended support to India. What was the experience like sharing the limelight with leaders of other parties? We went as a team from India. We did not feel even one bit that we belong to different parties… We went with one message and we all believed in it. Rahul Gandhi has taken a jibe that a phone call from US President Donald Trump made PM Modi surrender… With his demeaning comments, Rahul Gandhi is not only lowering the morale of the Indian Army but also of all Indians. He is attempting to make a place in the hearts of Pakistani militants and the government by making such ridiculous statements… If he indeed intends to contest in the next polls, he must watch his words.

US Congress condemns Pahalgam terror attack, supports India's right to retaliate
US Congress condemns Pahalgam terror attack, supports India's right to retaliate

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

US Congress condemns Pahalgam terror attack, supports India's right to retaliate

At a high-level meeting in Washington with an Indian all-party delegation led by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, members of the Congressional India Caucus emphasized the strategic depth of India-US ties, while backing India's firm stance on cross-border terror.'The Congressmen expressed unequivocal and bipartisan condemnation for the terror attack in Pahalgam. They expressed support for India's right to respond to terrorism in the spirit of zero tolerance against terrorism,' the Indian Embassy said in a post on India Caucus — led by Co-Chairs Rep. Ro Khanna and Rep. Rich McCormick, along with Vice Co-Chairs Rep. Andy Barr and Rep. Marc Veasey met with the Indian delegation for detailed briefings on the threat landscape India faces. The delegation, which included leaders from across India's political spectrum, spotlighted the success of Operation Sindoor, India's recent counter-terror operation, as an inflection point in the country's counterterrorism approach. The mission, they said, is 'defining a new normal' in India's campaign against cross-border all-party delegation also held candid and fruitful exchanges with House Foreign Affairs Committee (HFAC) leadership.'Chair @RepBrianMast, Ranking Member @RepGregoryMeeks, South and Central Asia Subcommittee Chair @RepHuizenga, Ranking Member @RepKamlagerDove, Ranking Member @RepBera and East Asia and Pacific Subcommittee @RepYoungKim greeted the delegation,' the Indian Embassy said in another post on committee leadership condemned the Pahalgam attack unequivocally and said India and USA stand together in their unwavering resolve and fight against terrorism in all its delegation is one of the seven multi-party delegations India had tasked to visit 33 global capitals to reach out to the international community to emphasise Pakistan's links to Shashi Tharoor, the delegation included MPs Sarfaraz Ahmad (JMM), Ganti Harish Madhur Balayogi (TDP), Shashank Mani Tripathi (BJP), Bhubaneswar Kalita (BJP), Milind Deora (Shiv Sena), Tejasvi Surya (BJP), and former Indian Ambassador to the U.S., Taranjit Singh to news agency PTI, delegation member Deora said that the group in the US, as well as those visiting other regions and countries, is telling the world that 'India has had enough.'He said that every country they visited so far 'issued very unequivocal, I would almost say, unconditional, statements in favour of India.''We want to live in peace. We would prefer it if we have a stable neighbour. Nobody wants an unstable lunatic living next to you,' he April 22 attack at Baisaran meadow in Pahalgam, was the deadliest in Kashmir since the 2019 Pulwama strike that left 40 CRPF personnel dead. Following the Pahalgam terror attack in which 26 people lost their lives, the already strained ties between India and Pakistan plunged to a new low. (With inputs from PTI)Tune InMust Watch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store