N.H. State Police buying AI-powered drone detection system to monitor airspace over mass gatherings
Advertisement
'This system will address emerging security threats, protect critical infrastructure, safeguard public events, and enhance emergency response capabilities,' he wrote.
Get N.H. Morning Report
A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox.
Enter Email
Sign Up
This technology will be new to the New Hampshire State Police, but it comes from a company that has been providing similar services to other states. Dedrone Holdings Inc. — which was
The '
Advertisement
New Hampshire's five-member Executive Council approved the $275,000 purchase on Wednesday, without discussion.
Quinn referred follow-up questions to a department spokesperson, Tyler P. Dumont, who said the money is coming from federal Homeland Security grant funds.
While the use of surveillance and emerging technologies by law enforcement always leads to questions about the protection of civil liberties, Dumont said state personnel will aim to use the Dedrone tool in a way that enhances public safety without infringing on the privacy or legal rights of individuals and drone operators.
'We will implement safeguards to ensure that any usage of AI is supplemented by human review and verification, and in compliance with applicable laws and regulations,' he said.
What's more, the drone detection system is a monitoring tool that won't be used to disable any aircraft deemed a potential threat, he added.
Steven Porter can be reached at
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
13 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Consultant behind AI-generated robocalls mimicking Biden goes on trial in New Hampshire
Get N.H. Morning Report A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox. Enter Email Sign Up 'It's important that you save your vote for the November election,' voters were told. 'Your votes make a difference in November, not this Tuesday.' Advertisement Kramer, who owns a firm specializing in get-out-the-vote projects, has said he wasn't trying to influence the election but rather wanted to 'Maybe I'm a villain today, but I think in the end we get a better country and better democracy because of what I've done, deliberately,' Kramer told The Associated Press in February 2024. Advertisement Ahead of the trial, prosecutors sought to prevent Kramer from arguing that the primary was a meaningless straw poll because it wasn't sanctioned by the Democratic National Committee. At Biden's request, The state argued such evidence was irrelevant and could confuse jurors, but Judge Elizabeth Leonard denied the motion in March, saying the DNC's actions and Kramer's understanding of them were relevant to his motive and intent. She did grant the prosecution's request that the court accept as fact that the state held its presidential primary election as defined by law on Jan. 23, 2024. Jurors will be informed of that conclusion but won't be required to accept it. Defense says the only attack came from the DNC In his opening statement, defense attorney Thomas Reid said the robocall was Kramer's 'opinion and commentary' on the DNC's initial decision to block the state's delegates to the convention. 'That, ladies and gentlemen, was a brazen attack on your primary,' he said, referring to the DNC's actions. 'And it wasn't done by Steve Kramer.' 'He didn't see it as a real election, because it wasn't,' Reid said. Kramer faces Advertisement Kramer's attorney argued that his client didn't impersonate a candidate because the message didn't include Biden's name, and Biden wasn't a declared candidate in the primary. He also said the robocall message didn't tell anyone not to vote, a point quickly contradicted by the first half dozen witnesses for the prosecution. 'How else would one take it?' said Theodore Bosen, a retired lawyer from Berlin who received the call. 'That was horrific to my sensibilities that anybody would be trying to influence the vote in any election,' he said. On cross-examination, O'Donnell, the prosecutor, told jurors that Kramer tried to minimize his connection to the calls, including using his father's online banking account to pay the magician and fabricating the name of a 'client' when emailing a company involved in sending the calls. And he didn't contact authorities until the magician publicly identified him and authorities had begun tracing the calls to him, O'Donnell said. 'He knew it was wrong and was trying to get away with it,' O'Donnell said. Trial begins as the national landscape on AI is shifting Kramer The agency was developing AI-related rules when Donald Trump won the presidency, but has since shown signs of a possible shift toward loosening regulations. And though many states have enacted legislation regulating AI deepfakes in political campaigns, House Republicans in Congress recently added a clause to their signature tax bill that would ban states and localities from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade. Advertisement
Boston Globe
a day ago
- Boston Globe
After ‘tough choices' on spending, N.H. Senate approves budget with notable cuts
'This budget makes tough choices with limited resources and doesn't ask to increase the tax burden on New Hampshire families,' Carson said, noting that senators had responded to constituent concerns by restoring Medicaid reimbursement rates and including resources for mental health services and people with developmental disabilities. Get N.H. Morning Report A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox. Enter Email Sign Up Democrats contended, however, that Republican leaders had set the stage for a tight budget cycle Advertisement Senator Rebecca Perkins Kwoka, the Democratic minority leader, said her GOP colleagues shouldn't be celebrated for responding to a problem they caused. 'The arsonists don't get credit for putting out the fire,' she said. 'That fire burns until we create a system that works for everyone.' Democrats offered a series of unsuccessful floor amendments on Thursday to highlight budget provisions they oppose, including the budget's plan to charge premiums for certain Medicaid beneficiaries who earn more than the federal poverty threshold — a proposal Democrats argued is effectively 'an income tax' on vulnerable people, though Republicans disputed that characterization. Advertisement 'This is not an income tax,' Republican Senator Regina M. Birdsell said three times, as she made the case that charging Medicaid premiums can help to prepare beneficiaries to transition to other health insurance plans. The budget's planned expansion of New Hampshire's voucher-like While the EFA program currently allows families that earn up to 350 percent of the federal poverty level to take their child's state share of K-12 education funding and spend it on private school tuition or certain other educational expenses, the budget would remove that income-based eligibility cap altogether. That would allow families who are already enrolled in private schools to begin receiving EFA money. Megan Tuttle, president of National Education Association in New Hampshire, said the Senate approved an 'unjust' budget that would 'deepen the inequities in our school funding system.' Republicans pushed back against criticisms of the EFA program, saying the school-choice tool has been a lifeline for some students and should be expanded to give all families flexibility in where and how their children learn. Riffing on the argument his Democratic counterparts had made with regard to Medicaid premiums, Republican Senator James P. Gray said he wonders whether denying someone access to the EFA program based on their income might also be construed as income tax. Advertisement While the chamber's Republican supermajority approved the budget legislation without a single Democratic vote, the GOP caucus wasn't lockstep. Republican Senator Keith Murphy voted against both pieces of legislation that comprise the state budget, saying he has concerns about the basis for some of the higher revenue projections that enabled the Senate to undo many cuts made by the House. 'Revenue estimates should be based on real numbers, Republican Senator Victoria L. Sullivan voted in favor of House Bill 1 but against House Bill 2, saying she also has concerns about the revenue projections and disagrees with the way the budget plan would address a shortfall in the retirement system for certain public employees, including police and firefighters. Sullivan said there was an alternative proposal that she could live with, but she worried the proposal that made it into the budget would be too big of a burden on property taxpayers. 'We just The next step is for the House and Senate to reconcile the differences between their two versions of the budget, which likely will entail forming a committee of conference. The deadline for action on the committee of conference report would be June 26, with the new budget taking effect July 1. Steven Porter can be reached at
Boston Globe
a day ago
- Boston Globe
N.H. Senate approves ban on gender-affirming care for minors
Opponents of Get N.H. Morning Report A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox. Enter Email Sign Up Proponents said it is important to protect children from treatments that they believe carry significant risks and consequences. They argue that children are not developmentally ready to make potentially life-altering decisions. Advertisement 'It's dangerous, it's reckless, and it's gross,' Senator Kevin Avard, a Nashua Republican, said of gender-affirming care, when speaking in support of the bill. 'Leave the kids alone and let them develop,' he said. 'If they're 18 or older, then do whatever you want. You're an adult.' Gender-affirming hormone treatment has undergone tremendous scrutiny, clinical research, and peer review to become an approved medical treatment, according to the New Hampshire Medical Society. Advertisement The 'This bill would force health care professionals to ignore best practices, to disregard what they know is medically sound, and to watch young people suffer, knowing they have the tools to help them but they are barred from using them,' said Senator Debra Altschiller, a Stratham Democrat. 'That's not medicine, that's political interference.' Some New Hampshire families with transgender children have been following this legislation closely, with at least a handful of them The Senate also approved another measure limiting other gender-affirming surgeries for minors. The bill explicitly bans physicians from performing 'transgender chest surgery' on people who are under 18, with exceptions for medical conditions such as cancer. The bill would also update the chapter of New Hampshire law adopted last year prohibiting genital gender reassignment surgery on minors. It would extend the ban to other types of gender-affirming surgeries for minors, such as facial feminization or masculinization surgery and removing reproductive organs. Advertisement It would also lift the prohibition on providers from making referrals for such surgeries, so they would be allowed to refer patients to another state where such care is allowed. Violating the ban would be classified as unprofessional conduct that could lead to discipline from a licensing entity or disciplinary review board. Amanda Gokee can be reached at
