N.H. State Police buying AI-powered drone detection system to monitor airspace over mass gatherings
'This system will address emerging security threats, protect critical infrastructure, safeguard public events, and enhance emergency response capabilities,' he wrote.
Get N.H. Morning Report
A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox.
Enter Email
Sign Up
This technology will be new to the New Hampshire State Police, but it comes from a company that has been providing similar services to other states. Dedrone Holdings Inc. — which was
The '
Advertisement
New Hampshire's five-member Executive Council approved the $275,000 purchase on Wednesday, without discussion.
Quinn referred follow-up questions to a department spokesperson, Tyler P. Dumont, who said the money is coming from federal Homeland Security grant funds.
While the use of surveillance and emerging technologies by law enforcement always leads to questions about the protection of civil liberties, Dumont said state personnel will aim to use the Dedrone tool in a way that enhances public safety without infringing on the privacy or legal rights of individuals and drone operators.
'We will implement safeguards to ensure that any usage of AI is supplemented by human review and verification, and in compliance with applicable laws and regulations,' he said.
What's more, the drone detection system is a monitoring tool that won't be used to disable any aircraft deemed a potential threat, he added.
Steven Porter can be reached at
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ramsey says Houston woman has a ‘broken marriage' after she admits her and husband are ‘financially abusive'
It's rare for a caller to leave Dave Ramsey speechless — but that's exactly what happened when Quinn from Houston, Texas, phoned into The Ramsey Show. "Am I the financial abuser in my marriage, or is it actually my husband?" she asked during a recent episode. 'Whoa! Harsh words have been spoken,' Ramsey replied. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Quinn explained that her husband, a software engineer earning $140,000, has been actively applying for roles paying around $165,000. She, meanwhile, earns $50,000 per year, receives inconsistent child support from a previous marriage, and is attending graduate school. Despite being married for two years, the couple keeps their finances entirely separate — at his insistence. He argues that she has more money in her bank account while he's stuck covering most household bills, leaving him with less. Quinn also noted that he recently bought an expensive car, against her advice. Ramsey and co-host George Kamel weighed in on the situation — and didn't hold back. What did Dave Ramsey say? 'There's no abuse here. It's just stupidity,' Kamel said bluntly. Ramsey added that the issue wasn't about bank balances — it was that the couple was acting like roommates instead of a married team. Financial abuse is a serious matter, the hosts clarified — but that wasn't the case here. True financial abuse involves deliberately restricting a partner's access to money or employment. That can include giving one partner an 'allowance,' forbidding them to work, racking up debt in their name, refusing to contribute to shared expenses, or cutting off access to joint accounts. In this case, both partners have income, bank accounts, and financial autonomy — just not unity. What they really had, Ramsey said, was a broken marriage dynamic. 'You are no longer roommates,' he told Quinn. 'You don't have 'your savings' or 'my savings.' We have 'our problems' and 'our opportunities' and 'our savings' and 'our income.'' 'Seperate accounts do not solve problems, they just conceal them,' Kamel added. 'Joint accounts don't solve problems, but it does expose them — and that's a good thing.' The solution? Combine finances, set shared goals, and stop going 'tit for tat' with money, which only breeds resentment. Ramsey also recommends marriage counseling. While this situation was extreme, it highlights a common struggle: many couples lack a shared language around money. Read more: Nervous about the stock market? Gain potential quarterly income through this $1B private real estate fund — even if you're not a millionaire. How to navigate money conversations with your partner Many couples argue about money. According to Fidelity's 2024 Couples and Money study, 45% of couples argue about finances at least occasionally, and 25% say it's their biggest relationship challenge. And it's not just about arguments — frequent financial conflict can increase your risk of divorce, too. Couples that argue about money at least once a week are 30% more likely to divorce. Working through financial tension in a marriage isn't easy, but it is possible. Here are a few strategies to help you get started. Set goals together Have an open and honest conversation about what matters to both of you. Set aside blame and focus on shared priorities. Are you saving for a house? Paying off debt? Shared goals help you unite and tackle challenges — not each other. Consider a joint account Turning "my money" and "your money" into "our money" can help shift the dynamic from competitive to collaborative. It doesn't work for every couple, but it can make managing finances easier. If full integration feels too overwhelming, start with a joint account funded with a percentage of each partner's income, used for savings and household expenses. Acknowledge personality differences One of you might be a spreadsheet-loving saver; the other, a carefree spender. Instead of fighting, use those differences to create balance. The key is mutual respect and shared input — no one should be left in the dark or pushed into decisions they don't support. Don't let salary differences breed resentment Whether one of you earns significantly more or one stays home with the kids, both are contributing. Unpaid labor has real value, and both partners deserve an equal voice in financial decisions. The reality is that marriage and money come with challenges. But creating a shared vision can help both partners feel respected, supported, and heard. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Boston Globe
2 days ago
- Boston Globe
N.H. Republicans threaten to impeach high-ranking Democrat over emails helping partisan law firm
Get N.H. Morning Report A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox. Enter Email Sign Up The Elias Law Group, which represents Democrats and progressive causes, Advertisement Republican State Representative Joseph F. Sweeney of Salem, who serves as deputy majority leader in the New Hampshire House, said the emails show Liot Hill used her office to help a Democratic law firm recruit plaintiffs to challenge the new state law. 'That's not public service; that's political lawfare run out of a taxpayer-funded inbox,' he said in a statement. Advertisement Liot Hill is pushing back, however, saying her responsibilities as an elected official include advocating for the voting rights of her constituents. She said she offered to make some introductions and was 'happy' to disclose those emails publicly, adding that she doesn't have any further plans to make email introductions to anyone connected with the Elias Law Group. 'I will continue to use my official email address to do my job, including constituent services, which is standard practice for elected officials,' she said. 'It is outrageous but not surprising that Republicans are attacking me for doing my job and serving my constituents.' The emails in question — which The Boston Globe obtained via a public records request — were first reported Wednesday by the Liot Hill told the Globe that the support she lent to the Elias Law Group was uncompensated. 'I used the phrase 'working with some folks' in the sense of 'assisting in an effort,' not in the sense of 'receiving compensation,'' she said. 'My offer of assistance was to provide email introductions, which I did.' Liot Hill said she doesn't have an attorney-client relationship with Tina Meng Morrison, the Elias Law Group lawyer who was copied in her email messages. Sweeney, the state representative, said on Thursday that executive councilors can be impeached by the House and tried by the Senate for corruption, malpractice, or maladministration. Liot Hill's conduct clearly implicates the latter two categories, he said. Advertisement If she doesn't resign before the legislative filing period opens in September, then he will file articles of impeachment against her, he said. 'New Hampshire's message is simple: we protect the integrity of our elections, we don't outsource state policy to D.C. operatives, and no official, not even the highest ranking Democrat in state government, is above accountability,' he added. The new law at the center of Liot Hill's emails will require absentee voters to either bring a photo ID to their local election officials to request a ballot in person, or submit a copy of their ID or a notarized signature along with their application. While proponents of the change said it will better protect election integrity, critics said it will cause confusion and Liot Hill is the only Democrat on the Executive Council, which serves as New Hampshire GOP Chairman James MacEachern sent a letter on Thursday asking New Hampshire Attorney General John M. Formella to open an investigation into Liot Hill's conduct. Without citing a particular statute, MacEachern's letter claimed Liot Hill had engaged in 'taxpayer-funded electioneering.' To support that claim, he cited a New Hampshire Journal New Hampshire Democratic Party Chair Raymond Buckley said in a social media post that his GOP counterparts had misused the term 'electioneering,' and he called the New Hampshire Journal a ' Advertisement One provision of state law defines ' Michael S. Garrity, a spokesperson for the DOJ, acknowledged that Formella's office had received MacEachern's letter. 'We will assess the information provided and determine the appropriate course of action based on the facts and applicable law,' he said. Aside from the emails issue, MacEachern's letter also mentioned prior incidents for which Liot Hill has faced scrutiny: She was arrested in 2010 and 2018 for drunken driving (as was 'Granite Staters expect their elected officials to use their positions to serve the people, not to further their political interests,' MacEachern wrote. 'Liot Hill's decision to use her official capacity to communicate on behalf of a political law firm adds to the ethical concerns that have already been generated by her previous scandals.' Steven Porter can be reached at
Boston Globe
3 days ago
- Boston Globe
‘Wake-up call': N.H. ranked last in US in higher education funding, new report shows
Low levels of state funding can drive tuition and fees paid by students and families even higher. And the report warned that 'underinvestment' in higher education could contribute to workforce shortages in the coming years. Get N.H. Morning Report A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox. Enter Email Sign Up Four-year public colleges in New Hampshire have bumped up tuition between 2.5 percent to 4.9 percent, while community colleges have seen a nearly 7 percent increase for the 2025 to 2026 school year, the report found. Advertisement At the University of New Hampshire in Durham, tuition and fees for this school year for an in-state student are $19,682. Including room and board bumps the total up to $34,386 per year. For an out-of-state student, tuition, fees, room and board now total $55,548. 'Our findings should serve as a wake-up call,' said Heller. 'Underfunding our public colleges and universities not only makes it harder for Granite Staters to afford to pursue college degrees, it also risks leaving the state unprepared to meet its workforce needs,' she said. Advertisement The report found that the gap between New Hampshire and other states could widen in coming years, given the last state budget, which allocated 17.6 percent less to the University System than it previously received. New Hampshire ranked last in the nation for the state's contribution to higher education, according to a new report the New Hampshire Fiscal Policy Institute released on Aug. 14, 2025. Courtesy of NHFPI For the University System of New Hampshire, which includes two universities and one college, that amounted to $35 million less compared to the last two-year budget period. After New Hampshire, Vermont's contribution to higher education is the second lowest in the nation, followed by Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Delaware. Illinois is the state that contributed the most to higher education in 2024, at $25,529 per full-time equivalent student. Connecticut ranked fifth highest at about $16,800, and Massachusetts ranked ninth at about $14,400, according to the Here's how the New England states compare in funding per full-time equivalent student: New Hampshire: $4,629 Vermont: $5,300 Rhode Island: $7,800 Maine: $9,500 Massachusetts: $14,400 Connecticut: $16,800 This story appeared in Globe NH | Morning Report, a free newsletter focused on New Hampshire, including great coverage from the Boston Globe and links to interesting articles elsewhere. To receive it via email Monday through Friday, . Amanda Gokee can be reached at
